EPT
[Q&A] Official NASL Thread - Page 71
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
Before you post, read the title of this thread slowly and out loud. | ||
|
oursblanc
Canada1450 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
SaturnAttack
United States125 Posts
| ||
|
Shanlan
United States41 Posts
Also to clarify, the invite format is only for the first season, and subsequent seasons will have a different qualification scheme? | ||
|
bennyaus
Australia1833 Posts
| ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
On March 04 2011 14:48 Shanlan wrote: Q: Will you be releasing at some point a list of the judges of the player applications and the criteria players are selected by? Also to clarify, the invite format is only for the first season, and subsequent seasons will have a different qualification scheme? I've already said what criteria we will be judging players by. | ||
|
DND_Enkil
Sweden598 Posts
Q: Will you be releasing the the time when the games are actually played beforehand so betting sites can close betting at that point? | ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
| ||
NonY
8748 Posts
Why is it when a replay gets leaked, both players in the replay get penalized? Why not just penalize the player whose copy was leaked? | ||
|
Klive5ive
United Kingdom6056 Posts
On March 05 2011 01:27 Liquid`Tyler wrote: Why don't you cast from replays? It would allow you to schedule matches 24/7 since the only person that needs to be present is a referee. Flexible scheduling is really important for an international competition. You are already not broadcasting live and you can arrange for the commentators to be seeing the replay for the first time when they commentate it. Whatever your reason is, keep in mind that it has to be so important that you're willing to lose the participation of some of the best players in the world for it. Why is it when a replay gets leaked, both players in the replay get penalized? Why not just penalize the player whose copy was leaked? Aren't the replays identical? | ||
|
NonY
8748 Posts
:o No I think it's safe to assume that the loser will leave the game first... so the winner's replay is a split second longer if the winner immediately goes to score screen when given the option or it's a lot longer if the winner returns to game and then leaves later. The loser's replay ends simultaneously with the loser leaving. I'm pretty sure latency guarantees that extra split second on the winner's replay and when Europeans/Asians win games, theirs should be even more obvious. But even when I win games on NA server, it's obvious enough. | ||
|
Kleinmuuhg
Vanuatu4091 Posts
However, wouldn't it be unfair to some people to make them pay for VODs, because the live show ,which is free to watch, is basically like a VOD only shown at a specific time.People who have to work at that time will have to pay to watch the VODs, so they have basically the same service only that they are forced to pay. Yes, they can watch VODs multiple times, but who does that, and yes it is in HQ, but being forced to buy premium, because your work schedule doesn't allow you to watch it live is a real inconvenience to me. Now I see you try to fix this problem by having a re-stream for europeans, but that still may suck for some. Whats your position on this topic? Oh and to Tyler's question: I could imagine that if you cast it off of replays that some people would complain about the casters faking enthusiasm or that the feeling of the casters that this is happening right when they cast it is missing. This wouldnt really make sense to me though. Maybe they want to have a regular schedule and are afraid that if the players chose their date to play that there could be misunderstandings and they end up not having replays so they'd rather schedule it right away. Either way I think that the TSL always have been good examples of how replay casting can work, so I don't really care as I am not a player myself. | ||
|
NonY
8748 Posts
edit: unless someone is bi-winning, then they're winning here and they're winning there, and they'll probably pull ahead. | ||
|
Chriamon
United States886 Posts
On March 05 2011 02:31 Liquid`Tyler wrote: Are you going to conduct drug tests at the finals to make sure no competitors are on Sheen? If everyone is WINNING, I don't think the finals will ever end. edit: unless someone is bi-winning, then they're winning here and they're winning there, and they'll probably pull ahead. This sounds like an inside joke, anyone care to explain? | ||
|
Liquoid
United Kingdom275 Posts
On March 05 2011 02:42 Chriamon wrote: This sounds like an inside joke, anyone care to explain? Google Charlie Sheen's interview/Twitter shenanigans. It's hard to explain, you'll be better off witnessing it 1st person. | ||
|
dtz
5834 Posts
| ||
|
Lonyo
United Kingdom3884 Posts
| ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
| ||
|
Turgid
United States1623 Posts
| ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
| ||
| ||
