EPTGSL soundproof issue - Interview Censorship - Page 8
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
sjschmidt93
United States2518 Posts
| ||
|
Genome852
United States979 Posts
It would be an issue if they censored it and did nothing to resolve the issue, but they've made a public statement saying that they have already fixed the 'problem' if there even was one. | ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38256 Posts
| ||
|
applejuice
307 Posts
On January 23 2011 03:44 Ludwigvan wrote: I think I remeber that there is a door and a curtain. You can see it in one of the jinro (not the idra game) or boxer games where they go to their opponent after the match. I might be wrong, but I dont want to search for it all day.  I'm not so sure- I'm watched a LOT of the matches, and I've never seen anyone open a door. | ||
|
sqrt
1210 Posts
On January 23 2011 06:13 applejuice wrote: I'm not so sure- I'm watched a LOT of the matches, and I've never seen anyone open a door. The camera never goes behind the booth, where the door is. The door is covered by curtains | ||
|
applejuice
307 Posts
On January 23 2011 06:15 sqrt wrote: The camera never goes behind the booth, where the door is. The door is covered by curtains don't care if there's 10 doors. There's either no door, or it's made of bubble wrap. Otherwise, they surely would have mentioned the door here: "Players felt uncomfortable about soundproofing earset and headset, and pointed out sound curtain is too big. So we have used only headset without an earset and eased sound curtain. Behind of Jinro's booth, there is a speaker. All these circumstances made the issue today. " The curtain and headsets are clearly what they are relying on to reduce the sound, even if there is a door. | ||
|
Keitzer
United States2509 Posts
that's retarded... god damnit GOM... realize your errors and fix them, don't cover them up! EDIT: I know they made a statement, but don't cover it up,,,, | ||
|
Spacemanspiff
United States116 Posts
| ||
|
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
| ||
|
briandawkins
United States19 Posts
| ||
|
Redmark
Canada2129 Posts
I acknowledge that the culture there may be different, that doesn't mean I cannot apply my own judgment of what constitutes ethical behavior when deciding how to spend my own money. And even so, I'm buying the English service aren't I? If one wanted to give some sort of multicultural excuse for what I think is bad behavior, then if I'm watching an English stream they should know enough about Western culture to know how upset many of their foreign viewers would be. Thanks for the reply though He's not saying that it's fine because it's Korea or whatever, he's saying that it's not such a big deal even if it's stupid. We're not trying to convince you to forgive GOM for this, we're trying to say that this is not deal, not because covering stuff up is okay but because this isn't really a coverup. Obviously you may not agree, but I think people are taking the wrong conclusions out of some posts. | ||
|
insaneMicro
Germany761 Posts
| ||
|
Ludwigvan
Germany2371 Posts
On January 23 2011 07:05 briandawkins wrote: I hope they go back and edit all the comments about pre-1.2 balance. I wouldn't want any future watchers to get confused. It could hurt eSports! "we are really sorry about the balance issues, and are aware of it. Every single blizzard member got a smack on the bottom. The feeling of this will never expire." However, blizzard is not gomtv. | ||
|
Krehlmar
Sweden1149 Posts
Bad played GomTV. I still love you but still... | ||
|
Spacemanspiff
United States116 Posts
| ||
|
Herculix
United States946 Posts
apparently the streisand effect applies here, but perhaps they weren't aware of such a thing. i do think if they truly wanted to tone down the awareness of the issue, they should've just let it be. i don't think it's the best way to handle it, but i don't think they are being suspicious or shady by doing this and that many people in this thread are overly critical | ||
|
Healingproof
Sweden81 Posts
| ||
|
Spacemanspiff
United States116 Posts
On January 23 2011 08:14 Herculix wrote: they were probably just trying to remove it for crowd control purposes. what does it matter whether they document their mistake for everyone to see? what matters to me is that they admit they made a mistake and they fix it, which they did. The problem was that they admitted it, and then removed something that gave context to what they admitted and the match. One can make an argument that its exaggerated now, but that doesn't mean their logic was flawed. | ||
|
Arryn
Germany95 Posts
| ||
|
briandawkins
United States19 Posts
| ||
| ||
