But that's why the top half get prizes, (Does anyone read the OP?) So even if you only get top %50 you break even, from there win again and you made some money, etc, etc, etc.
Yeah, but if I think that I am worse than 50% of the player, I won't sign up. I read the OP. The problem is, there is no luck factor. If I play SnG's, I will win occasionally, even if I am worse than 50% of the players.
Also If i were to divide it up into leagues, I would have to check everyones profile, it would be closed to lower players who wished to support this work or just try their hand in a tourney, on top of which with a tiered prize system (price wise) if I get to many lower tiered players joining and only one or two higher priced buy ins, if the higher priced buy in wins (which he is more likely too) I could very easily go broke from the prize pool being too small to allow his first place finish. And in chess they do have open tournaments all the time. I was actually thinking of later on doing more tournaments that are more money and only open to the top 200 or a semis or greater finish in one of my opens, thus drawing them away from the opens allowing more players to have a reasonable chance at winning. However to establish myself I need to host a few opens first.
Could be done automatically? Site like sc2ranks.com get the data from bnet, this is doable. But for sure, if it's not coded, it's a lot of work for you, so it's maybe something for the future...
Also I really love the swiss tournament structure, and I can't figure out why it isn't used more often.
Agreed 