• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 15:19
CET 21:19
KST 05:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced6[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win3RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge2
StarCraft 2
General
BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge
Tourneys
Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle [Alpha Pro Series] Nice vs Cure RSL Revival: Season 3 $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death
Brood War
General
Which season is the best in ASL? A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BW General Discussion soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group B - Sun 21:00 CET [BSL21] GosuLeague T1 Ro16 - Tue & Thu 22:00 CET
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? Current Meta PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread The Perfect Game Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Artificial Intelligence Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Esports Earnings: Bigger Pri…
TrAiDoS
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2794 users

[D] Zerg creep: Killing the Zerg spirit? - Page 7

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 17 Next All
silencesc
Profile Joined July 2010
United States464 Posts
August 17 2010 17:23 GMT
#121
On August 17 2010 15:59 ahwala wrote:
Yes. Zerg is broken in so many ways that it's impossible to fix, well at least until HotS, which is my last hope for SC2.


This isn't constructive, please think about your posts before you have a knee-jerk "Zerg is UP" reaction.
Real Men Proxy Gate | TEAM LIQUID HWITINGGGG!! PROUD MEMBER OF UC DAVIS CSL TEAM | "If you don't give a shit about what gum you eat, buy Stride" - Liquid`Tyler on SotG 4/19/2011
DTown
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States428 Posts
August 17 2010 17:25 GMT
#122
Anyway, if marauders are T1.5, roaches are 1.5 too -_-

Without a doubt. To get roaches you need Spawning Pool --> Roach Warren, which costs more and takes longer than Barracks --> Tech Lab. So If anything, Marauders are T1.25 while roaches are T1.5. Yes, I understand thats not a perfect picture, but you get the idea.
Uhh Negative
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1090 Posts
August 17 2010 17:26 GMT
#123
On August 17 2010 16:03 HelterSkelter wrote:
I think a good solution would be to reverse creep. Instead of having Zerg move faster on creep, make enemies move slower. That way the advantage to spreading it is still great, but there isn't really a punishment if you don't.

Wow that sounds really awesome. Not sure how it would actually work out but it sounds like a good solution. It would have to be a very slight slow though because otherwise no one would ever cross the creep and just mass air or something like that.
Azile
Profile Joined March 2010
United States339 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-17 17:27:41
August 17 2010 17:27 GMT
#124
If you're going a ground force you need to spread creep; just like if you're going with bio you need to invest in stim.


Brb sniping off your stim with a scan forcing you to re-research it.
Logo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States7542 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-17 17:28:16
August 17 2010 17:27 GMT
#125
On August 18 2010 01:09 Kronologic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 18 2010 01:00 Logo wrote:
On August 18 2010 00:46 Kronologic wrote:
On August 18 2010 00:40 Logo wrote:
On August 18 2010 00:34 iNty.sCream wrote:
lol its simply not an advantage because you have to spread it over the entire map. its not like pressing the stim key or press the blink key to teleport 50 stalkers 235 yards away in 1 second.. why there is so much ignorance


flavor of the race much?

Stim isn't free (to use or to research).
Blink isn't free (it's potentially the most expensive as it demands a citadel to be built) and it's not clear what the resulting move speed of stalkers constantly using blink are. plus it only affects one unit, two if charge is also gotten.


Yes but your missing the point. Zerg is supposed to be the most mobile race. That should be on and off creep.

The speed advantage gained by spreading creep should be a Reward for investing the APM. Not a punishment for not doing it.

I guess there is no analogies that I can make for the other races that really compares tbh.


Options? Rewards? Luxury? Punishment?

This is Starcraft, the game where people have to use every little thing at their disposal to maximize their chance to win. The game where building a spawning pool at 215 minerals instead of exactly at 200 is horrendously bad. The game where people will invest dozens and dozens of clicks just to have a marginally better chance at sniping an overlord with a marine.

There is no luxury or optional things. You're either doing something that increases your chances of winning, or your doing something that's decreasing it.

If you're going a ground force you need to spread creep; just like if you're going with bio you need to invest in stim.

So your 2 keyboard clicks early game + 1 extra click in battle is equal to the 4 clicks every 30 seconds Zerg have to make just to keep pace?

Your right, everything you can do to get an advantage should be done. But Thats exactly the point Spreading creep should give an advantage... Not just allow you to stay on a even keel. The majority (if not all) of Zerg units should be faster off creep than their terran and Toss counterparts.
Thats the supposed strength of the Zerg Army its mobility. Without creep there is no mobility.


That's just so ridiculous. If Zerg on creep = massive advantage auto-win then the game would be so insanely favored to zerg with their ability to play a defensive reactionary style. Look at the current situation. It's entirely possible to have the majority of fights occur on creep if you're willing to move out to defend the edges of your creep.

If the current mechanic of spreading creep is too APM intensive, then fine, but that's not what's being argued. There are much easier ways to attend to that issue. For example tumors could have 30s cooldown but a larger and faster rate of spreading creep. Still it's really not that intensive to get the creep to spread at a reasonable rate and if you want to make the argument that zerg is overloaded with APM requirements you'll need a more comprehensive analysis. It's true that there's a problem with say spawn larva needing attention IMMEDIATELY, but that doesn't apply to the tumors. You don't need to spread the tumors immediately every cooldown unless you're using a leading overlord to reach max range every 15s as the trade-off of putting a tumor immediately at 15s and waiting until the creep spreads more then placing it is relatively even.

I've never once found it difficult to get my creep spreading except possibly connecting the main - natural as early as I want it to be connected. The only time the creep spreading doesn't work out is when I can't defend the edge of my creep.

I find it really funny that it seems like everyone assumes I'm a Terran player lol.
Logo
ocius
Profile Joined August 2010
United States3 Posts
August 17 2010 17:39 GMT
#126
As an ~800 Diamond Zerg player, I'd just like to say that the only time I feel the creep mechanic is a significant problem is in situations of Hydras vs High Templar, off creep. If your army consists of a significant amount of Hydras and the Protoss player has a few HTs, you literally cannot engage them off creep as micro'ing against storm with off-creep Hydra speed is a ridiculous endeavor.

Other than that, I don't mind it so much. Roach speed early can be a bit irritating, but if you're going heavy roaches the speed upgrade is pretty much the first thing you'll pick up at Lair.
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
August 17 2010 17:42 GMT
#127
Two good ideas in this thread though. The one were creep tumors gain a hp-boost after a certain amount of time, and just tweaking the on-speed bonus to be ~20% instead of 30%. Then you wouldn't have the strange case were you're very weak off creep, but creep is also easy to get rid off.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
Blobert
Profile Joined August 2010
2 Posts
August 17 2010 17:53 GMT
#128
That's just so ridiculous. If Zerg on creep = massive advantage auto-win then the game would be so insanely favored to zerg with their ability to play a defensive reactionary style. Look at the current situation. It's entirely possible to have the majority of fights occur on creep if you're willing to move out to defend the edges of your creep.


Well the problem with that is maybe the opponent's force is too powerful for the zerg player's to handle at that point, so the only thing the zerg can do is allow it to happen and just continue building up forces at his own base to counter the other player when the other player reaches his base. And then by the time the zerg player has enough forces to face his opponent the opponent will have already cleared the place of creep.

Personally, I dont think that the speed boost is the best thing the creep should do. The zerg's advantage is having the speed to outmaneuver his opponents. But the problem is this outmaneuvering is now dictated by where creep is and the speed at which creep expands. Therefore, at the end there isnt much outmaneuvering at all because, as previous posters mentioned, it is quite easy for the opponent to destroy creep tumors and by extension creep.

As for the idea that creep could punish the opponent by decreasing their speed. The problem with that is most protoss and terran units already have a longer range than zerg units and dont necessarily need to hurry into position to attack, whereas zerg having less range is more important for them to have the speed to get within range. Also, the fact that a smart player would simply have a detector with his force to destroy any creep tumors when he moves into a creep-ed area would negate this.

Instead, creep should probably just increase the health regen of zerg units. That way, zerg units wont be restricted by the creep as to where they should engage because of decreased speed. Creep spreading would still occur because the zerg would want to have more areas of the map that would 'heal' his units. And then the problem of the opponent whittling away the edges of the creep wont be so detrimental to the zerg because the areas closer to the bases will still have creep to allow for faster regen and they retain their speed to engage the enemy even when they're not on creep.

If creep changed from speed to regen though, the speed upgrades for zerg should give them more or less the current on creep speed to compensate for their current slowness off creep since this change would mean they wont be moving any faster on creep.
Siffer
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
United States467 Posts
August 17 2010 18:04 GMT
#129
The problem I have with creep spread is not the APM/Mechanic sink. I am perfectly fine with having to devote an extra 15apm into spreading creep tumors/overpoop.

The problem I have with creep spread, is that it is too easy to get rid of for the other races. First off, in early-mid game, you don't have a creep spread. Reapers/Hellions/2gates completely restrict your ability to spread creep until you stabilize. At most, you get to connect your two bases with tumors. This in itself is a defensive act. You gain absolutely no advantage, connecting the two bases is only to put yourself even and have a chance vs relentless early game pressure.

Once you get to tier 2, spreading creep becomes a bit easier. You can get an extra queen and use overlords to leap frog your creep tumors. However, at this point, I find myself committing more towards defending my creep tumors more than anything else. By the time you get to the middle of the map, protoss will have an obs and terran will have the ability to scan since they will most likely have two orbitals.

Now that late game arrives, it is damn near impossible to spread creep via tumors anywhere near your opponent. Most of the time, I find myself creating an abundance of overlords to counteract this. I typically will send in 4-5 overlords with every attack with creep-poop turned on so that it is more difficult to kite units like hydras and ultralisks. Basically every attack, I am committing 500 extra minerals just to utilize the supposed "zerg mobility" without running into supply issues.

The other issue is that zerg has two separate macro mechanics(larva and creep spread) they must use while protoss(chrono) and terran(Mule/Scan counts as one imo) have one. When you combine the two, you literally have very little time to actually maneuver your army around the map. You spend more time clicking around the mini-map than selecting actual units. I am a 150-200apm player.

I can not tell you how many games I have lost because a protoss just balls their army of stalker, collosus, and zealot with a obs leading so that the collosus can safely snipe tumors. While ultraling is good vs this unit comp, once creep is gone, it is extremely easy for a protoss to kite the ultras, which are the main damage dealers.

The more aggressive your enemy is, the harder it is to spread creep. Sometimes it leads to a slow death contain because you literally can't out maneuver your opponent, which is supposed to be zergs strength.

How do you fix it? Some ideas:

-Give creep tumors HP buff and maybe a huge armor buff? Maybe make it comparable to an egg/larva?

-Make the spread of a tumor larger so that units like the collosus can't attack tumors from a safe range

-Make creep speed less of a bonus. Up base speed of all zerg units to give them a bit more mobility off creep. It is literally impossible to retreat hydras off creep.

-Make tumors invulnerable to range/splash dmg.

For what its worth. I am a 600 diamond zerg player. I find that I lose the majority of my games because I feel I have no mobility advantage against terran/protoss. I almost always out macro my opponents, but this means nothing if I can be easily kited in/near their base where creep doesn't exist. There have been several instances where I have thought "If I had creep, I would have won this battle." Creep shouldn't have that large of an impact on fights.
tacrats
Profile Joined July 2010
476 Posts
August 17 2010 18:21 GMT
#130
I find the creep mechanic to be fun and all, and i like the idea of spreading creep, however it is a task that takes time to build up, whereas it takes all but no time for the other guy to destroy. I can be very good about spreading creep but once a push comes a good player is just going to kill all the tumors on the way to my base.

Not only that, it more or less forces passive play. When most of my units are slow as hell off creep of course im not going to take them off just to poke around. Sure creep is mainly defensive, which i can accept, but when my units are handicapped off creep its not very enjoyable.

I like the suggestions of lowering creep bonus speed and increasing base speed to a more reasonable level. Creep should also offer passive regen bonuses.

Logo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States7542 Posts
August 17 2010 18:30 GMT
#131
On August 18 2010 03:04 Siffer wrote:
How do you fix it? Some ideas:

-Give creep tumors HP buff and maybe a huge armor buff? Maybe make it comparable to an egg/larva?

-Make the spread of a tumor larger so that units like the collosus can't attack tumors from a safe range

-Make creep speed less of a bonus. Up base speed of all zerg units to give them a bit more mobility off creep. It is literally impossible to retreat hydras off creep.

-Make tumors invulnerable to range/splash dmg.

For what its worth. I am a 600 diamond zerg player. I find that I lose the majority of my games because I feel I have no mobility advantage against terran/protoss. I almost always out macro my opponents, but this means nothing if I can be easily kited in/near their base where creep doesn't exist. There have been several instances where I have thought "If I had creep, I would have won this battle." Creep shouldn't have that large of an impact on fights.


See I think #1, #2, and #4 are much better solutions than #3 if there is a problem. The problem, if there is one, isn't with needing creep, it's with your ability to spread it around and defend it.

Another type of solution would be say if spawn larva was only 20 energy. Then every 3.33 minutes a properly controlled queen would have enough spare energy to spawn a tumor. It doesn't sound like much, but it would help to reduce the investment needed in getting creep spread about (it'd also open up a little room to use transfusion).

One of the problems with the queen is that unlike protoss/terran you can't save the energy for an emergency, then if that situation doesn't occur use it for the economic/production boost.
Logo
JHancho
Profile Joined May 2010
United States166 Posts
August 17 2010 18:33 GMT
#132
On August 18 2010 01:17 ghermination wrote:
"Until" lair tech? You realize that that's about 5 minutes into the game against a competent zerg right?

The only two t1 units that you ever have to worry about when playing against a zerg are Lings and Roaches. Roaches have a ridiculous amount of HP and armor and there are no t1 units that can be made by the other races to destroy them (terran has to go to t1.5 to get marauders, toss has to go to t2 to get immortals or void rays)

Do you know how strong a good roach rush can be if for some reason you don't scout it? Even if you do, it requires that you immediately commit all of your resources to defense, and against an unprepared player will win fairly often.

If roaches moved faster off of creep, that rush would become nearly unstoppable. They would hit before your third gateway unit finishes, as normally this rush hits right after, and long before an immortal or void ray could finish.

Ling obviously have a speed upgrade, and there's no reason to argue about that because everyone can agree speed is almost a necessary upgrade for them.

If we made hydras faster off of creep, they would easily be able to kite a toss army or even a terran one before introduction of siege tanks into the mix (Seriously, have you ever tried to fight micro'd hydras on the creep in a midgame PvZ push? it's crazy! They can easily kite all your zealots and only lose 1 or 2 hydras unless you've pushed them right into the nat, and can also easily sniper stalkers and immortals.)

Basically i could go on and on through a list of why this would damage the MU's much more than it would help, but i think this should be example enough. With lings and fast unit production Zerg already can gain map control very easily. Regardless of what is said about Terran imbalance a Zerg can still maintain map control in that matchup too with intelligent infestor use, and I think infestors are extremely important to that MU and that when zergs start to use them more there will be much fewer shoulder-crying fests of "Terran imba!"


Please go on.

First off, Roaches are Tier 1.5. They have their own building that costs 150 minerals. Heard of it? It's called the Roach Warren. It takes about 55 seconds to morph in, which is 30 less seconds than it takes to get a Tech Lab on your 'rax, leaving you ample time to get out a Marauder, and start one of the best and most powerful upgrades in the game, the Concussive Shell. By the time the first wave hits (6-7 Roaches, depending on inject and warren timing), you should have at the very least 3 Marauders (more if you have additional raxes, or a factory on the way), at least one marine, and many SCVs to repair the wall that Zerg can't get through anyway.

As far as Protoss goes, they better be getting Stalkers at some point in their game, and most assuredly should have it before a one base roach build hits (unless they are doing a forge FE, which they should be punished for). They have many options when it comes to denying roaches. They have Stalkers that deal 14 damage a shot and can kite the Roaches, they have a Sentry that can Force Field the ramp, allowing both the Stalkers and Sentries behind the Force Field free reign to dismember Roaches risk free for 15 seconds. In the time that the Roaches come across the map (except steppes), you have at least 1 production cycle of additional units to deal with it.

Fun fact: If you don't scout your opponent, anything can be hard to stop.
Commit to defense, huh? Reactored Hellions need a lot of attention, otherwise your mineral line gets decimated. Even if you scout them, you're SOL because your Spine Crawlers won't finish in time. If you don't have lots of Speedlings or a fair amount of Roaches out, you might be in serious trouble.

What if a Toss player 2gates you? GL stopping 5 Zealots without Roaches or Spines).

How many Zerg players you know tech up to tier 2.5 (remember, pool, lair, hydra den, combines for a whopping 185 seconds straight (plus gas and all that jazz) before Terrans get out a factory? With continuous production it'll take 150 seconds (if you build the tech lab on the rax and swap, then it'll be 125)

Spawning a wave of hydras (assume, laughably, that you can afford 6 after den) takes 33 seconds. A tank takes 50. Siege mode, which again, will allow you to sit behind your wall, takes 80 seconds. Hydras won't make it over there in the 30 second window that you have before siege tech comes. Even if they do, just repair the wall and wait it out. Hydras are prohibitively expensive, and if the Zerg player is on 2 bases, the push may be stronger, but it will be delayed significantly, allowing multiple tanks to pulverize the Zerg offensive.

Ever heard of Charge or Force Field for those 'mid-game' pushes?

I'd love to hear the rest of your dissertation, and agree that Infestor usage can help a Zerg player, but I'm not certain that it's as dramatic as you seem to think. What can the Infestor do? NP for 2 seconds before getting shelled by a Tank? Force the Zerg player to have 10 of them to get all of the high ticket mech units at once? Fungal? (how many Fungals will it take to kill a Thor?) Infested Terrans? Only if you have, and can get away with, using the burrow-cast to break siege lines with the spawning ITs, which is a waste of gas once the inevitable scan hits.

And do you truly believe that a Terran cares about Infestors when going mech? Sensor Towers, Missile Turrets, and blanket coverage with Tanks allow the terran to sit worry free in his base until he hits 125+ food and is ready to annihilate your 200 food Zerg army.
Take it easy. And if it is easy, it must be cheese
tacrats
Profile Joined July 2010
476 Posts
August 17 2010 18:43 GMT
#133
On August 18 2010 03:33 JHancho wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 18 2010 01:17 ghermination wrote:
"Until" lair tech? You realize that that's about 5 minutes into the game against a competent zerg right?

The only two t1 units that you ever have to worry about when playing against a zerg are Lings and Roaches. Roaches have a ridiculous amount of HP and armor and there are no t1 units that can be made by the other races to destroy them (terran has to go to t1.5 to get marauders, toss has to go to t2 to get immortals or void rays)

Do you know how strong a good roach rush can be if for some reason you don't scout it? Even if you do, it requires that you immediately commit all of your resources to defense, and against an unprepared player will win fairly often.

If roaches moved faster off of creep, that rush would become nearly unstoppable. They would hit before your third gateway unit finishes, as normally this rush hits right after, and long before an immortal or void ray could finish.

Ling obviously have a speed upgrade, and there's no reason to argue about that because everyone can agree speed is almost a necessary upgrade for them.

If we made hydras faster off of creep, they would easily be able to kite a toss army or even a terran one before introduction of siege tanks into the mix (Seriously, have you ever tried to fight micro'd hydras on the creep in a midgame PvZ push? it's crazy! They can easily kite all your zealots and only lose 1 or 2 hydras unless you've pushed them right into the nat, and can also easily sniper stalkers and immortals.)

Basically i could go on and on through a list of why this would damage the MU's much more than it would help, but i think this should be example enough. With lings and fast unit production Zerg already can gain map control very easily. Regardless of what is said about Terran imbalance a Zerg can still maintain map control in that matchup too with intelligent infestor use, and I think infestors are extremely important to that MU and that when zergs start to use them more there will be much fewer shoulder-crying fests of "Terran imba!"


Please go on.

First off, Roaches are Tier 1.5. They have their own building that costs 150 minerals. Heard of it? It's called the Roach Warren. It takes about 55 seconds to morph in, which is 30 less seconds than it takes to get a Tech Lab on your 'rax, leaving you ample time to get out a Marauder, and start one of the best and most powerful upgrades in the game, the Concussive Shell. By the time the first wave hits (6-7 Roaches, depending on inject and warren timing), you should have at the very least 3 Marauders (more if you have additional raxes, or a factory on the way), at least one marine, and many SCVs to repair the wall that Zerg can't get through anyway.

As far as Protoss goes, they better be getting Stalkers at some point in their game, and most assuredly should have it before a one base roach build hits (unless they are doing a forge FE, which they should be punished for). They have many options when it comes to denying roaches. They have Stalkers that deal 14 damage a shot and can kite the Roaches, they have a Sentry that can Force Field the ramp, allowing both the Stalkers and Sentries behind the Force Field free reign to dismember Roaches risk free for 15 seconds. In the time that the Roaches come across the map (except steppes), you have at least 1 production cycle of additional units to deal with it.

Fun fact: If you don't scout your opponent, anything can be hard to stop.
Commit to defense, huh? Reactored Hellions need a lot of attention, otherwise your mineral line gets decimated. Even if you scout them, you're SOL because your Spine Crawlers won't finish in time. If you don't have lots of Speedlings or a fair amount of Roaches out, you might be in serious trouble.

What if a Toss player 2gates you? GL stopping 5 Zealots without Roaches or Spines).

How many Zerg players you know tech up to tier 2.5 (remember, pool, lair, hydra den, combines for a whopping 185 seconds straight (plus gas and all that jazz) before Terrans get out a factory? With continuous production it'll take 150 seconds (if you build the tech lab on the rax and swap, then it'll be 125)

Spawning a wave of hydras (assume, laughably, that you can afford 6 after den) takes 33 seconds. A tank takes 50. Siege mode, which again, will allow you to sit behind your wall, takes 80 seconds. Hydras won't make it over there in the 30 second window that you have before siege tech comes. Even if they do, just repair the wall and wait it out. Hydras are prohibitively expensive, and if the Zerg player is on 2 bases, the push may be stronger, but it will be delayed significantly, allowing multiple tanks to pulverize the Zerg offensive.

Ever heard of Charge or Force Field for those 'mid-game' pushes?

I'd love to hear the rest of your dissertation, and agree that Infestor usage can help a Zerg player, but I'm not certain that it's as dramatic as you seem to think. What can the Infestor do? NP for 2 seconds before getting shelled by a Tank? Force the Zerg player to have 10 of them to get all of the high ticket mech units at once? Fungal? (how many Fungals will it take to kill a Thor?) Infested Terrans? Only if you have, and can get away with, using the burrow-cast to break siege lines with the spawning ITs, which is a waste of gas once the inevitable scan hits.

And do you truly believe that a Terran cares about Infestors when going mech? Sensor Towers, Missile Turrets, and blanket coverage with Tanks allow the terran to sit worry free in his base until he hits 125+ food and is ready to annihilate your 200 food Zerg army.


Nice post. Agreed.
GreatFall
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States1061 Posts
August 17 2010 18:49 GMT
#134
I agree with everything but what can we do.. I've actually been experimenting with a new strategy. It will either be glorious or hilarious. Either way it will be epic. If it works it will change the very way we think about zerg play and it will usher in a new generation of symbiotic zerg warfare. I'll keep you all posted.
Inventor of the 'Burning Tide' technique to quickly getting Outmatched Crusher achivement :D
Tickmint
Profile Joined May 2010
United States12 Posts
August 17 2010 19:46 GMT
#135
I like the idea of spreading creep, but I wish it provided a small hp regen bonus, some type of slower movement for the other races. The biggest change to creep, is I wish tumors were invincible once they are rooted. Creep is too easily killed off for the amount of effort it takes to spread. Almost every decent player kills any tumors as they move towards your base. It takes far less time to kill it off, than it does to lay.
Krunkle
Melancholia
Profile Joined March 2010
United States717 Posts
August 18 2010 00:07 GMT
#136
On August 18 2010 01:13 Knee_of_Justice wrote:

Also, if banelings left creep on the ground after they died, how awesome would that be? Even in death they would have a purpose.

First, awesome name. Second, even more awesome idea, that would be such a cool change.
epik640x
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1134 Posts
August 18 2010 00:11 GMT
#137
I agree about the creep. I think it was Blizzard's intention to give Zerg a boost on the creep aka an advantage.

What they did though, accidentally, was give Zerg a huge disadvantage off the creep. And Terran and Protoss players, saying "spread creep, then", have no idea how difficult and frustrating it can be. And in the end, it's useless anyway since any protoss/terran ball will be carrying an observers or raven.

Also, it's not easy to spread creep into where the opponent is already waiting and when you go on the offensive it's just not possible to always have creep down.
blacktoss
Profile Joined August 2010
United States121 Posts
August 18 2010 00:36 GMT
#138
A big problem is that creep spreading doesn't give you a threat, it is actually very passive. Its most effective use is to connect your expos so that you can actually defend. Using creep to create an offensive threat is impossible. It doesn't work. It doesn't make sense to try.

So while Terran and Protoss have so many ways to create threats, Zerg is preoccupied with a mechanic that they must constantly manage to create a passive equalizer. It's not even an advantage on defense! And it creates virtually no threat offensively.
socjones
Profile Joined August 2010
3 Posts
August 18 2010 00:44 GMT
#139
This is a totally soft comment and not meant to be taken seriously but I feel like on the race design and macros, it's like, the Zerg need their macros to just be up to par. If you're not spreading creep or hitting spawn larvae on the dime you have a negative handicap. Where, the Terran and Protoss macros actually make them over par-- do this faster-- free money.
Dental Floss
Profile Joined September 2009
United States1015 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-18 00:56:41
August 18 2010 00:55 GMT
#140
On August 18 2010 09:44 socjones wrote:
This is a totally soft comment and not meant to be taken seriously but I feel like on the race design and macros, it's like, the Zerg need their macros to just be up to par. If you're not spreading creep or hitting spawn larvae on the dime you have a negative handicap. Where, the Terran and Protoss macros actually make them over par-- do this faster-- free money.


Regardless of actual balance I think Zerg is probably the least forgiving of players making mistakes. I think thats the most frustrating part of it. Even if everything is perfectly balanced playing Zerg is a high-wire act. Even ZvZ where a single baneling can determine the game.
Kim Tae Gyun.... never forget Perfectman RIP
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 17 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PiG Daily
20:15
Best Games of SC
Clem vs Solar
Solar vs herO
herO vs ByuN
Reynor vs Nicoract
Clem vs herO
Solar vs MaxPax
LiquipediaDiscussion
Replay Cast
19:10
RSL Winner's Finals
Maru vs herO
SteadfastSC105
Liquipedia
LAN Event
18:00
LANified! 37: Groundswell
Discussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 655
White-Ra 188
IndyStarCraft 162
UpATreeSC 108
SteadfastSC 105
JuggernautJason34
PiGStarcraft4
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 3738
Rain 2229
Hyun 154
Dewaltoss 119
IntoTheRainbow 9
NaDa 8
Dota 2
capcasts63
League of Legends
rGuardiaN75
Counter-Strike
byalli3979
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang064
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu283
Other Games
Grubby3327
FrodaN3219
fl0m941
Beastyqt735
DeMusliM302
Lowko294
XaKoH 259
crisheroes253
RotterdaM220
Sick170
Hui .143
ArmadaUGS124
taco 123
Mew2King58
Livibee46
Trikslyr38
nookyyy 33
ZombieGrub9
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream119
Other Games
BasetradeTV94
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HeavenSC 20
• davetesta4
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 25
• FirePhoenix17
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
Dota 2
• Ler67
League of Legends
• TFBlade1325
• HappyZerGling109
Other Games
• imaqtpie1085
• Shiphtur368
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
2h 41m
Replay Cast
12h 41m
WardiTV Korean Royale
15h 41m
OSC
20h 41m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 13h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 15h
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
StarCraft2.fi
2 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
StarCraft2.fi
3 days
PiGosaur Monday
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
StarCraft2.fi
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

SOOP Univ League 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
Slon Tour Season 2
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.