EPTStarcraft 2 to get 3D support in patch - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
FC.Strike
United States621 Posts
| ||
|
Alou
United States3748 Posts
| ||
|
vyyye
Sweden3917 Posts
On July 04 2010 03:45 Zzoram wrote: The most interesting thing about this information is that Blizzard is committed to graphics updates to the game over time. They must really want this game to last as long as Broodwar did. With the whole episodic release thing they're definitely pushing for a long lasting game, I hope they aren't bullshitting when they talk about graphical updates. | ||
|
deth2munkies
United States4051 Posts
It is good to hear that they will be supporting graphical updates on top of all the balance/content updates too. I wish a bunch of older games had done that, Brood War included. | ||
|
Ecto
Denmark54 Posts
| ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
 | ||
|
OPSavioR
Sweden1465 Posts
| ||
|
ghosthunter
United States414 Posts
But I digress, because that's just logical. I'm not sure how I feel about the "3D" revolution". I'll have to see what it looks like (At Blizzcon, probably) before I'll know whether I like it or not. Oh, and thanks for the info about forcing AA, that's actually useful to me. | ||
|
NuKedUFirst
Canada3139 Posts
On July 04 2010 03:41 spinesheath wrote: I think my nVidia driver on my desktop PC already has SC2 listed as 3D compatible. I'm not sure what the process is to get a game into that list, but if Blizz had anything to do with that then the 3D support probably was planned a long time ago. Imo 3D hardware/technology is not yet suited for heavy usage, but the more games/movies start using it, the more likely it is for improvements to be made. SC2 definitely will help boost the development for the platform PC. nVidia is Blizzards partner I agree with you, 3D makes my head hurt  | ||
|
m.Zee
United States11 Posts
| ||
|
johngalt90
United States357 Posts
just picture all the koreans spectating a match with 3D glasses on... and i didnt think it could get any goofier lol! | ||
|
peawok
United States71 Posts
| ||
|
Easy772
374 Posts
On July 04 2010 03:25 m00n wrote: I'm hoping for 2D graphic support Same lol.. Just so I can play on my work PC. . Wonder if they would notice if I installed a graphics card | ||
|
Polar_Nada
United States1548 Posts
| ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
| ||
|
Leeoku
1617 Posts
| ||
|
0neder
United States3733 Posts
| ||
|
LaLuSh
Sweden2358 Posts
"Priorities". | ||
|
Ndugu
United States1078 Posts
3D requires a 120 hz monitor, btw? I'll be in the market for a new monitor soon and have a 470 GTX, so might as well grab a 3D-capable monitor if I can. Some guys, such as Team Fortress 2, I can't picture looking anything but great in 3D-- and some say it helps your depth perception. | ||
|
Radiomouse
Netherlands209 Posts
On July 04 2010 04:07 ghosthunter wrote: Because the people who work on graphics are clearly the same ones who work on Bnet infastructure. But I digress, because that's just logical. I'm not sure how I feel about the "3D" revolution". I'll have to see what it looks like (At Blizzcon, probably) before I'll know whether I like it or not. Oh, and thanks for the info about forcing AA, that's actually useful to me. Because the money they spend on the extra graphic people to make this happen couldn't be spent on people working on usefull/basic functionality of bnet2.0 It would be very suprising to hear that blizzard doesn't have a budget for this game and that all these "extra" features that they're releasing isn't being payed out of said budget. | ||
| ||
