|
Australia1757 Posts
On May 29 2010 12:56 deL wrote: Anyone up for spreading the word to try and convince all aussies to buy a USA client, and get communities and sites to only run events via the US server?
Signed
|
signed.
this among problems like no friend add (right now can't even add by ID search or manual input), and private chat channels.
|
/signed a million times over
|
On May 29 2010 05:43 Kennigit wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2010 05:42 Salv wrote: Is there a way to communicate this to Blizzard besides just posting? By causing a shit storm. how big of a shitstorm does it have to be to beat out all the profits millions of semi casuals will bring in?
|
/signed
cross-realm play and chat channels need to be in the game by RELEASE. If the game does not have those features, DO NOT RELEASE IT UNTIL IT DOES. Also, there needs to be an identifier system so you can add people without email address. (Chat channels would fix this).
|
|
Isn't Bnet2.0 supposed to be good? I don't get why they would have "lag" problems
|
On May 29 2010 13:09 Sfydjklm wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2010 05:43 Kennigit wrote:On May 29 2010 05:42 Salv wrote: Is there a way to communicate this to Blizzard besides just posting? By causing a shit storm. how big of a shitstorm does it have to be to beat out all the profits millions of semi casuals will bring in?
The kind of shitstorm that results in a 1 star amazon rating and articles all over the internet about how SC2 isn't ready for release.
I suggest if you have anyone who writes for a gaming site/blog/whatever tell them about this. You could easily write an interesting article about the decline of gaming being a result of companies selling out, and then compare that statement with blizzard, a company once known for waiting until games were absolutely amazing before releasing them.
It really seems like blizzard is dropping the ball on this one, and the only way they will react is a public shitstorm that overflows the SC community and starts affecting the opinions of people who are not die hard SC fans.
|
I always thought of Valve and Blizzard as the best developers...
Where did you go so wrong, Blizzard...?
/signed
|
On May 29 2010 13:36 san-tokie wrote: I always thought of Valve and Blizzard as the best developers...
Where did you go so wrong, Blizzard...?
/signed Yeah I remember there was a poll awhile back about best game developers, and TL tried so hard to win the internet for Blizzard. Man what a waste of time now that I think about it.
|
United States47024 Posts
On May 29 2010 12:56 deL wrote: Anyone up for spreading the word to try and convince all aussies to buy a USA client, and get communities and sites to only run events via the US server? Wow, this is actually a good idea.
|
On May 29 2010 13:14 Wr3k wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2010 13:09 Sfydjklm wrote:On May 29 2010 05:43 Kennigit wrote:On May 29 2010 05:42 Salv wrote: Is there a way to communicate this to Blizzard besides just posting? By causing a shit storm. how big of a shitstorm does it have to be to beat out all the profits millions of semi casuals will bring in? The kind of shitstorm that results in a 1 star amazon rating and articles all over the internet about how SC2 isn't ready for release. I suggest if you have anyone who writes for a gaming site/blog/whatever tell them about this. You could easily write an interesting article about the decline of gaming being a result of companies selling out, and then compare that statement with blizzard, a company once known for waiting until games were absolutely amazing before releasing them. It really seems like blizzard is dropping the ball on this one, and the only way they will react is a public shitstorm that overflows the SC community and starts affecting the opinions of people who are not die hard SC fans.
Not really, this "shit storm" your referring to only really happens when a lot of people are involved, I grant you a hard core can have an exaggerated effect but we are notably not talking about say Ubisoft cutting off single player games or even Valve's first release of Steam (not only did it take hours to install of DVD but really got in the way).
We're not even talking about cross-realm here, that's just miss-leading, we're talking about cross-region. The closest equivalent to realms is divisions, now that would be shit storm: can't play with your friends, can't meet new people from your community and join them in again. That would effect the standard and even Blizzards warped 'Wii style' "casual" player.
What we're talking about here are hardcore players and the success of tournaments that they feed into. Arguing its something else I feel just makes your argument too easy to counter because your simply wrong. Even players who complain they won't be able to play Koreans like they did on iCCup seem to be disingenuous, such a random and infrequent occurrence surely won't and can't stop them from buying a game they're obviously invested in, neigh, love.
All I'm saying is please don't forget you* are an minority, the respected people here are part of the worlds best, their needs are obviously different and the mere fact that people want to emulate that doesn't mean Blizz should throw the baby out of the pram, just listen then do what they think is right.
( * I'm here because I respect the skill and time taken by the players, and pop into some single player from time to time)
|
On May 29 2010 13:38 Slow Motion wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2010 13:36 san-tokie wrote: I always thought of Valve and Blizzard as the best developers...
Where did you go so wrong, Blizzard...?
/signed Yeah I remember there was a poll awhile back about best game developers, and TL tried so hard to win the internet for Blizzard. Man what a waste of time now that I think about it.
Its not Blizzard now, its activision blizzard.
|
On May 29 2010 13:39 TheYango wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2010 12:56 deL wrote: Anyone up for spreading the word to try and convince all aussies to buy a USA client, and get communities and sites to only run events via the US server? Wow, this is actually a good idea.
No, it's not a good idea but a terrible one, because if some of the Aussies decide that the lag is too much and want to go back to the server they are closest to, they can't. Also that doesn't solve the problem for other international players and for US/Euro players planning on playing in Asian tournaments. The best possible option is still to provide a choice everytime a player logs in.
|
On May 29 2010 13:47 ithree wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2010 13:14 Wr3k wrote:On May 29 2010 13:09 Sfydjklm wrote:On May 29 2010 05:43 Kennigit wrote:On May 29 2010 05:42 Salv wrote: Is there a way to communicate this to Blizzard besides just posting? By causing a shit storm. how big of a shitstorm does it have to be to beat out all the profits millions of semi casuals will bring in? The kind of shitstorm that results in a 1 star amazon rating and articles all over the internet about how SC2 isn't ready for release. I suggest if you have anyone who writes for a gaming site/blog/whatever tell them about this. You could easily write an interesting article about the decline of gaming being a result of companies selling out, and then compare that statement with blizzard, a company once known for waiting until games were absolutely amazing before releasing them. It really seems like blizzard is dropping the ball on this one, and the only way they will react is a public shitstorm that overflows the SC community and starts affecting the opinions of people who are not die hard SC fans. Not really, this "shit storm" your referring to only really happens when a lot of people are involved, I grant you a hard core can have an exaggerated effect but we are notably not talking about say Ubisoft cutting off single player games or even Valve's first release of Steam (not only did it take hours to install of DVD but really got in the way). We're not even talking about cross-realm here, that's just miss-leading, we're talking about cross-region. The closest equivalent to realms is divisions, now that would be shit storm: can't play with your friends, can't meet new people from your community and join them in again. That would effect the standard and even Blizzards warped 'Wii style' "casual" player. What we're talking about here are hardcore players and the success of tournaments that they feed into. Arguing its something else I feel just makes your argument too easy to counter because your simply wrong. Even players who complain they won't be able to play Koreans like they did on iCCup seem to be disingenuous, such a random and infrequent occurrence surely won't and can't stop them from buying a game they're obviously invested in, neigh, love. All I'm saying is please don't forget you* are an minority, the respected people here are part of the worlds best, their needs are obviously different and the mere fact that people want to emulate that doesn't mean Blizz should throw the baby out of the pram, just listen then do what they think is right. ( * I'm here because I respect the skill and time taken by the players, and pop into some single player from time to time)
I respectfully disagree. TL is a huge community. If your wondering what kind of pull we have than look no further than the macro mechanics. Weve changed the course of this game (for the better) before and we can do it again.
Poll: Would you give SC2 a one star amazon rating to protest BNET?Yes (6508) 83% No (1331) 17% 7839 total votes Your vote: Would you give SC2 a one star amazon rating to protest BNET? (Vote): Yes (Vote): No
Keep in mind it doesnt just have to be amazon. We could compile a list of every single major site ranking that allowed users to vote. Metacritic, ign we could hit everything...
It could be biblical.
|
|
They dont have to make the severs connected to make me happy. If they just let us choice are server like they did for BW I be fine with it. There no fucking way I'm paying for 3 copys to play on asia, US, and europe.
|
ya i dont understand how bnet 2.0 could delay starcraft beta by so long and then come out with NONE of the features that were included in bnet 1.0. the interface reminds me of fucking AOL ffs. why in the hell does it make a shits difference if my opponant is in germany, korea or a block away.
/signed
|
|
i would even be fine if they sent you a free client if you had already purchased the game i guess.... lol sounds pretty epically stupid though.
|
|
|
|