• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 17:48
CET 23:48
KST 07:48
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !10Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Micro Lags When Playing SC2? When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win
Tourneys
$100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1 RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Anyone remember me from 2000s Bnet EAST server? soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB QuarterFinals - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1168 users

[D][Q] Should Corruptors slow down enemy air?

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS
Post a Reply
Normal
Existor
Profile Joined July 2010
Russian Federation4295 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-13 11:25:21
December 13 2012 11:16 GMT
#1
[image loading]

Add slow effect for Corruptor's ability, so with 20% more damage it also will slow down enemy air unit by 20-50% (numbers can be tweaked). so corruptors will be able to slow some enemy air units and fight with them, like they should be.

The reason is because phoenixes now can kite Corruptors with 7 range, and mutalisks just can fly away and regenerate. Corruptors with their speed can't do much damage. Also it will be a soft counter against new Medivacs. Plus it will work better against kiting Tempests.

Make them able to slow down one enemy target (1 corruptor slows one enemy unit for short time). And/or separate these abilities, so slow effect will work only on air units, but will not work against ground targets.

Please, support this idea. Now corruptor is really boring unit. If it will ruing ZvT with slow vikings, just buff Thor's High-Impact payload against armored targets.

So in result what is the suggestion:
- Corruption now slow downs one enemy air unit from 20% to 50% (number can be tweaked)
- Slow effect works only against air units
- Corruptors will be able to slow down enemy Medivac / Phoenix / Mutalisk / Oracle / kiting Tempests / speed Prizm
- ZvZ will be more interesting instead Mutalisk-vs-Mutalisks wars. Now you will make Corruptors as real counter to mutalisks. Currently Corruptors don't work against Mutalisks, because buffed speed for Mutas and their regeneration

tl:dr: Corruption ability must slow down enemy air unit for 20%-50% (numbers can be tweaked) for short time, maybe same as damage buff lasts. Make them viable counter against quick targets.

Suppport this thread if you like this idea
http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/6160656057
blackbrrd
Profile Joined September 2010
Norway477 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-13 11:45:38
December 13 2012 11:44 GMT
#2
Corruptors are meant to be good against massive targets, or for zoning faster units. Which still works, so I don't quite see the problem.

Slowing - like concussion shells - is one of the most boring abilities in the game and I don't want another such ability.
Existor
Profile Joined July 2010
Russian Federation4295 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-13 11:51:50
December 13 2012 11:49 GMT
#3
On December 13 2012 20:44 blackbrrd wrote:
Corruptors are meant to be good against massive targets, or for zoning faster units. Which still works, so I don't quite see the problem.

Slowing - like concussion shells - is one of the most boring abilities in the game and I don't want another such ability.

They can't reach Phoenixes and Mutalisks, both units are very fast in HotS and phoenixes also able to kite corruptors

Slowing - like concussion shells - is one of the most boring abilities in the game and I don't want another such ability.

So you still prefer muta-vs-muta wars in ZvZ? Isn't it boring? With slow effect of corruption per target, corruptors will be able to slow some mutalisks and fight with them normally. Right now they can do some shots, then muta regenerates health and attacks somewhere in other place, like nothing happend and like zerg didn't built corruptors. They're worse as counter to mutalisks/phoenixes now. Plus it will buff a bit zerg air.
Mahanaim
Profile Joined December 2012
Korea (South)1002 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-13 12:14:56
December 13 2012 12:02 GMT
#4
Abilities that slow down the mobility of other units are always dangerous to design. I'm not saying that time warp and concussive shells are necessarily bad, but if you can slow down enemy units then you can make sure that you kill almost every enemy unit in engagements (if you have an army lead at the time) because the enemy can't outrun you. With concussive shells in WoL already sufficiently demonstrating the danger of games becoming extremely onesided simply because a group of army was got caught off guard by a group of mauraders, maybe we should consider a little more about adding more mobility-decreasing skills (since we already have plenty of them: time warp, concussive shells, fungal growth, force fields: in a way), not to mention the corruptor is still one of the stronger anti-air units in the game. However, I do agree that the corruptor can be slightly tweaked to be a more interesting unit to both watch and use.
Celebrating Starcraft since... a long time ago.
KaiserKieran
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States615 Posts
December 13 2012 12:10 GMT
#5
anti-micro abilities are not fun to watch. Different angle to look at the corrupter would help.
Decendos
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany1341 Posts
December 13 2012 12:14 GMT
#6
i would rather sse phoenix range and mutaspeed reverted so corruptor are fine vs phoenix again.

but agree corruptor needs to be changed. they need something that helps vs ground like phoenix and viking have. nothing too strong but right now they are 100% dead supply after air units of opponent are dead (and no: you dont just morph them into BLs because you dont always have greater spire and min/gas to do that). QXC mentioned some very nice idea like the corruptor suiciding himself on a ground unit and doing X amount of damage or sth. like that would be nice.
Fragile51
Profile Joined October 2011
Netherlands15767 Posts
December 13 2012 12:23 GMT
#7
How about instead of slowing down the target it increases the corruptors speed? No anti-micro mumbo jumbo and in essence does the same thing. Only bad thing is that corruptors can't have a catchy name like turbovacs or ferrarilords :p
Pursuit_
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States1330 Posts
December 13 2012 12:24 GMT
#8
Yeah, not a good idea. Currently Terran still can't win late game TvZ when kiting Corruptors with Vikings, and as many people have mentioned above there are simply better ways to make alternative options to mutas in ZvZ. I feel like we need to give Zerg some time to develop counters; 6+ Queen / Spore does incredibly well vs Mutas in low-medium numbers in my experience, and they still have fungal if the other player over commits (burrow infestors into 0 range sneak attack fungal?).

On December 13 2012 20:49 Existor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2012 20:44 blackbrrd wrote:
Corruptors are meant to be good against massive targets, or for zoning faster units. Which still works, so I don't quite see the problem.

Slowing - like concussion shells - is one of the most boring abilities in the game and I don't want another such ability.

They can't reach Phoenixes and Mutalisks, both units are very fast in HotS and phoenixes also able to kite corruptors


That's not what zoning means, zoning means staying by a high priority target (i.e. brood lords, mineral line) so that the opponent's faster units (i.e. mutalisks, pheonix) can't engage them, rendering their mobility worthless. And I agree, abilities like Concussive Shell are simply boring unless the opponent has a way to counter-act the effects.
In Somnis Veritas
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
December 13 2012 12:25 GMT
#9
I'd love to have something on them that affects(=corruputs) units. But probably not a slow, though it makes sense. But slow is kind of reserved for the marauder. And the Infestor already does something similar for zerg through fungal.
ETisME
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
12624 Posts
December 13 2012 12:26 GMT
#10
i think zerg does need a stronger late game anti air unit.
it's really hard to kill sky terran when corruptors are sniped by vikings and their attacks get blocked by pdds
其疾如风,其徐如林,侵掠如火,不动如山,难知如阴,动如雷震。
Existor
Profile Joined July 2010
Russian Federation4295 Posts
December 13 2012 12:32 GMT
#11
On December 13 2012 21:26 ETisME wrote:
i think zerg does need a stronger late game anti air unit.
it's really hard to kill sky terran when corruptors are sniped by vikings and their attacks get blocked by pdds

For compensation Thor's HIP can be buffed against corruptors.

anti-micro abilities are not fun to watch. Different angle to look at the corrupter would help.

Are ZvZ muta wars fun to watch without scourges?

I'm not saying that time warp and concussive shells are necessarily bad, but if you can slow down enemy units then you can make sure that you kill almost every enemy unit in engagements (if you have an army lead at the time) because the enemy can't outrun you.

For compensation Corruption ability range can be lowered by 1-2, so it will be harder to target mutalisks that are flying away quickly. Corruptors vs Mutas will be like spiders, if you get too close, then it's a trap to you.

How about instead of slowing down the target it increases the corruptors speed?

Man, we already have a lot speed-buff things in the game. What about more interesting mechanics? Like lower range corruption.

I feel like we need to give Zerg some time to develop counters; 6+ Queen / Spore does incredibly well vs Mutas

Not works normally, mutalisks now can regenerate quickly and fly away. Even with new projectile fungal, mutalisks are more ultimate solution now, like ultralisks. To counter them, you can't do other units, just make mutas/ultras too.
rEalGuapo
Profile Joined January 2011
Germany832 Posts
December 13 2012 12:33 GMT
#12
On December 13 2012 21:26 ETisME wrote:
i think zerg does need a stronger late game anti air unit.
it's really hard to kill sky terran when corruptors are sniped by vikings and their attacks get blocked by pdds


I think Terran really need a stronger late game anti air unit.
it's really hard to kill Broodlords when vikings are sniped by corruptors/Infested Terrans and they get held in place by fg
blackbrrd
Profile Joined September 2010
Norway477 Posts
December 13 2012 12:38 GMT
#13
On December 13 2012 21:33 rEalGuapo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2012 21:26 ETisME wrote:
i think zerg does need a stronger late game anti air unit.
it's really hard to kill sky terran when corruptors are sniped by vikings and their attacks get blocked by pdds


I think Terran really need a stronger late game anti air unit.
it's really hard to kill Broodlords when vikings are sniped by corruptors/Infested Terrans and they get held in place by fg

Fungal and infested terrans got nerfed - which is the right approach. Terran air is plenty strong with the Vikings.
ETisME
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
12624 Posts
December 13 2012 12:45 GMT
#14
On December 13 2012 21:33 rEalGuapo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2012 21:26 ETisME wrote:
i think zerg does need a stronger late game anti air unit.
it's really hard to kill sky terran when corruptors are sniped by vikings and their attacks get blocked by pdds


I think Terran really need a stronger late game anti air unit.
it's really hard to kill Broodlords when vikings are sniped by corruptors/Infested Terrans and they get held in place by fg

you are talking in pre patch fungal and egg hp.
once you get enough BCs, infested terrans die extremely quickly to BCs and the vikings constantly can snipe off corruptors when pdds are helping out.
3-3 BCs are BEAST
其疾如风,其徐如林,侵掠如火,不动如山,难知如阴,动如雷震。
Stratos_speAr
Profile Joined May 2009
United States6959 Posts
December 13 2012 12:49 GMT
#15
On December 13 2012 20:49 Existor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2012 20:44 blackbrrd wrote:
Corruptors are meant to be good against massive targets, or for zoning faster units. Which still works, so I don't quite see the problem.

Slowing - like concussion shells - is one of the most boring abilities in the game and I don't want another such ability.

They can't reach Phoenixes and Mutalisks, both units are very fast in HotS and phoenixes also able to kite corruptors

Show nested quote +
Slowing - like concussion shells - is one of the most boring abilities in the game and I don't want another such ability.

So you still prefer muta-vs-muta wars in ZvZ? Isn't it boring? With slow effect of corruption per target, corruptors will be able to slow some mutalisks and fight with them normally. Right now they can do some shots, then muta regenerates health and attacks somewhere in other place, like nothing happend and like zerg didn't built corruptors. They're worse as counter to mutalisks/phoenixes now. Plus it will buff a bit zerg air.


No. Muta vs. Muta can be very exciting (see BW). Furthermore, Corruptors aren't meant to be good against everything; they can currently take on pretty much every air unit in the game, so a slow would just buff them even more. Along those lines, Corruptors are boring. We don't want to see more of them because there's nothing to them (no interesting abilities or micro to speak of). Finally, you don't just buff Corruptors because they can't deal with certain air, you buff Corruptors because Zerg has a hard time dealing with air, and as of yet, this doesn't seem like a problem. Even if Zerg develops AA problems, you can always buff other units; no need to buff the Corruptor with this ability. Slowing mechanics should be kept to rare cases because they discourage or eliminate micro, and micro capability 1) increases the skill ceiling dramatically and 2) makes the game far more enjoyable to watch and play.
A sound mind in a sound body, is a short, but full description of a happy state in this World: he that has these two, has little more to wish for; and he that wants either of them, will be little the better for anything else.
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
December 13 2012 12:51 GMT
#16
On December 13 2012 21:45 ETisME wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2012 21:33 rEalGuapo wrote:
On December 13 2012 21:26 ETisME wrote:
i think zerg does need a stronger late game anti air unit.
it's really hard to kill sky terran when corruptors are sniped by vikings and their attacks get blocked by pdds


I think Terran really need a stronger late game anti air unit.
it's really hard to kill Broodlords when vikings are sniped by corruptors/Infested Terrans and they get held in place by fg

you are talking in pre patch fungal and egg hp.
once you get enough BCs, infested terrans die extremely quickly to BCs and the vikings constantly can snipe off corruptors when pdds are helping out.
3-3 BCs are BEAST


Not to mention the few HotS changes to help with BLs: shared upgrade, HunterBroodlordSeekerMissile, Thor Hip mode
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
December 13 2012 12:53 GMT
#17
On December 13 2012 21:49 Stratos_speAr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2012 20:49 Existor wrote:
On December 13 2012 20:44 blackbrrd wrote:
Corruptors are meant to be good against massive targets, or for zoning faster units. Which still works, so I don't quite see the problem.

Slowing - like concussion shells - is one of the most boring abilities in the game and I don't want another such ability.

They can't reach Phoenixes and Mutalisks, both units are very fast in HotS and phoenixes also able to kite corruptors

Slowing - like concussion shells - is one of the most boring abilities in the game and I don't want another such ability.

So you still prefer muta-vs-muta wars in ZvZ? Isn't it boring? With slow effect of corruption per target, corruptors will be able to slow some mutalisks and fight with them normally. Right now they can do some shots, then muta regenerates health and attacks somewhere in other place, like nothing happend and like zerg didn't built corruptors. They're worse as counter to mutalisks/phoenixes now. Plus it will buff a bit zerg air.


No. Muta vs. Muta can be very exciting (see BW). Furthermore, Corruptors aren't meant to be good against everything; they can currently take on pretty much every air unit in the game, so a slow would just buff them even more. Along those lines, Corruptors are boring. We don't want to see more of them because there's nothing to them (no interesting abilities or micro to speak of). Finally, you don't just buff Corruptors because they can't deal with certain air, you buff Corruptors because Zerg has a hard time dealing with air, and as of yet, this doesn't seem like a problem. Even if Zerg develops AA problems, you can always buff other units; no need to buff the Corruptor with this ability. Slowing mechanics should be kept to rare cases because they discourage or eliminate micro, and micro capability 1) increases the skill ceiling dramatically and 2) makes the game far more enjoyable to watch and play.


Sry, but Muta vs Muta is crap in both games.
Existor
Profile Joined July 2010
Russian Federation4295 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-13 12:57:20
December 13 2012 12:54 GMT
#18
No. Muta vs. Muta can be very exciting (see BW). Furthermore, Corruptors aren't meant to be good against everything; they can currently take on pretty much every air unit in the game, so a slow would just buff them even more. Along those lines, Corruptors are boring. We don't want to see more of them because there's nothing to them (no interesting abilities or micro to speak of). Finally, you don't just buff Corruptors because they can't deal with certain air, you buff Corruptors because Zerg has a hard time dealing with air, and as of yet, this doesn't seem like a problem. Even if Zerg develops AA problems, you can always buff other units; no need to buff the Corruptor with this ability. Slowing mechanics should be kept to rare cases because they discourage or eliminate micro, and micro capability 1) increases the skill ceiling dramatically and 2) makes the game far more enjoyable to watch and play.

So you want to say, that muta-vs-muta wars more interesting to watch than "Oh, mutalisks was slowed down by corruptors! Mutalisks are in trap now, but some mutas were able to fly away" instead "Who have more mutas right now? Hmm, lets look who wins here"

Everything can be balanced. Like corruption will slow down only by 20%, so it means mutalisks will be still able to fly away from corruptors, just a bit slower -> a bit easier to fight against mutas and fungal them. Or it can slow by 50%, but corruptor's speed will be nerfed to 2.75 (a bit)

New compisition can be in ZvZ - fungal+corruptors, that will nicely counter heavy Muta play. And it will require skill with fungaling mutalisks AND corrupting every mutalisk with each corruptor.
archonOOid
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
1983 Posts
December 13 2012 12:57 GMT
#19
What about an melee ability that could be activated when the corruptor is within 400 range from an enemy target. It doubles the corruptors damage but the corruptor is permanently stuck on the enemy target until it's dead. Corruptor can't use the melee ability simultaneously and the ability would have to be on cooldown.
I'm Quotable (IQ)
SpecKROELLchen
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany151 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-13 13:03:21
December 13 2012 13:01 GMT
#20
If the corruptor gets ANY new ability. Its damage, the fucking amor, the hp has to be reduced or something else has to be nerfed. They kill carriers and BC like they were flies with corruption and you can transform them into one of the strongest units ingame
Existor
Profile Joined July 2010
Russian Federation4295 Posts
December 13 2012 13:09 GMT
#21
On December 13 2012 22:01 SpecKROELLchen wrote:
If the corruptor gets ANY new ability. Its damage, the fucking amor, the hp has to be reduced or something else has to be nerfed. They kill carriers and BC like they were flies with corruption and you can transform them into one of the strongest units ingame

Of course. Just make them so they will really counter what they're supposed to counter
Umpteen
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United Kingdom1570 Posts
December 13 2012 13:20 GMT
#22
I remember an idea from ages ago: replace Corruption with the Overseer's Contaminate, and make it work (possibly for less time) on static defence. Now corruptors are useful for harrassment, useful for assisting Mutas vs spores, turrets and cannons, (and ling runbys vs cannons), useful for breaking spine walls...and it doesn't make them any stronger as anti-air.
The existence of a food chain is inescapable if we evolved unsupervised, and inexcusable otherwise.
Grendel
Profile Joined November 2010
Belgium126 Posts
December 13 2012 14:22 GMT
#23
Not sure if I'd want a slow effect. That would just be the same as Concussive shells.

Wouldn't something like the Devourer in BW be more interesting? An attack speed debuff of attacked units. Or something similar, something that allows at least a bit of micro.
MateShade
Profile Joined July 2011
Australia736 Posts
December 13 2012 14:43 GMT
#24
Absolutely no. The last thing the corruptor needs is a buff. You have abduct.. How the fuck can you micro colossus against this? One of the worst ideas I have heard. Please no
rpgalon
Profile Joined April 2011
Brazil1069 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-13 15:01:03
December 13 2012 14:48 GMT
#25
On December 13 2012 22:09 Existor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2012 22:01 SpecKROELLchen wrote:
If the corruptor gets ANY new ability. Its damage, the fucking amor, the hp has to be reduced or something else has to be nerfed. They kill carriers and BC like they were flies with corruption and you can transform them into one of the strongest units ingame

Of course. Just make them so they will really counter what they're supposed to counter

they already counter.
badog
Fig
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1324 Posts
December 13 2012 15:05 GMT
#26
Corruptors are good at what they do. You could switch their current ability for another that is more interesting, but definitely not a passive slow. Zergs already have the viper and infestor to pull and stop units.
Can't elope with my cantaloupe
Morphs
Profile Joined July 2010
Netherlands645 Posts
December 13 2012 15:19 GMT
#27
Corruptors are the most boring unit that Blizzard ever made. Remember the original Corruptor, actually corrupting units to make them fight for you? That idea was awesome. It's a horrible unit after changing it to a normal unit in WoL Alpha. Remember WoL Beta? After giving the corruptor a normal attack they were trying really hard to find a good spot for its abilities. But the beta wasn't long enough to thoroughly adress the Corruptor and we ended up with a unit that can only attack air and has nothing else.

It's completely a reactionary unit vs Colossus, which makes it a flawed design. For the rest it's only built for Brood Lords and reactionary vs the Vikings that counter the broodlords. At the very least, the corruptor should have some potential to harrass or threat the enemy by itself. I've been an advocate of giving it some form of contamination (instead of the overseer).
tar
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany991 Posts
December 13 2012 15:30 GMT
#28
So far every ability that reduced mobility of the opponent's units got heavily criticized and we shouldn't try to add more of those to the game!
whoever I pick for my anti team turns gosu
EsportsJohn
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4883 Posts
December 13 2012 15:38 GMT
#29
It would make sense for the fastest AtA in the game to be able to slow down air, right?

....-_-'
StrategyAllyssa Grey <3<3
Existor
Profile Joined July 2010
Russian Federation4295 Posts
December 13 2012 15:53 GMT
#30
It would make sense for the fastest AtA in the game to be able to slow down air, right?

Phoenixes are faster
fighter2_40
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States420 Posts
December 14 2012 21:11 GMT
#31
No. In fact corruptors should not exist as a unit. Lets not dress something up that sucks. Just completely redesign it.
Omnidroid
Profile Joined November 2011
New Zealand214 Posts
December 14 2012 21:31 GMT
#32
On December 15 2012 06:11 fighter2_40 wrote:
No. In fact corruptors should not exist as a unit. Lets not dress something up that sucks. Just completely redesign it.

I agree, I hope Blizzard could rework the corrupter like they did with the Void-Ray or Thor. Right now corrupters are a boring unit.
RinconH
Profile Joined April 2010
United States512 Posts
December 14 2012 21:35 GMT
#33
It needs some kind of rework but not slow.

IMO vikings and corrupters are some of the biggest problems with the game currently.

They require almost no positioning or strategy. Just a simple A-Move counter unit. At least A-Move units on the ground have to take terrain into account.

Corrupter, of the two, is def. the worst. Viking is a bit more fragile and has the ground attack which at least gives it a little interest.

I just think back to BW and how awesome scourges were and weep.

PVJ
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
Hungary5221 Posts
December 14 2012 21:42 GMT
#34
They should consider making corruptors fun first, and also play around with the mutation-tree a bit because now mutas are dead-end, while corruptors are boring.
The heart's eternal vow
Crawdad
Profile Joined September 2012
614 Posts
December 14 2012 21:45 GMT
#35
Wow, this solution is even more boring than Corruption.
Ramiz1989
Profile Joined July 2012
12124 Posts
December 14 2012 21:45 GMT
#36
On December 13 2012 22:20 Umpteen wrote:
I remember an idea from ages ago: replace Corruption with the Overseer's Contaminate, and make it work (possibly for less time) on static defence. Now corruptors are useful for harrassment, useful for assisting Mutas vs spores, turrets and cannons, (and ling runbys vs cannons), useful for breaking spine walls...and it doesn't make them any stronger as anti-air.

But Vipers already can do that with Blinding Cloud. We will probably see a lot more Vipers with Mutas harassment in the future.
"I've been to hell and back, and back to hell…and back. This time, I've brought Hell back with me."
unteqair
Profile Joined November 2011
United States308 Posts
December 14 2012 21:48 GMT
#37
I always thought it would be cool to make them a fast, extremely high damage, extremely low health air melee unit that used its tentacles for fisticuffs, able to attack up to a few targets at a time. My ideas usually suck though.
Crawdad
Profile Joined September 2012
614 Posts
December 14 2012 21:52 GMT
#38
On December 13 2012 22:20 Umpteen wrote:
I remember an idea from ages ago: replace Corruption with the Overseer's Contaminate, and make it work (possibly for less time) on static defence. Now corruptors are useful for harrassment, useful for assisting Mutas vs spores, turrets and cannons, (and ling runbys vs cannons), useful for breaking spine walls...and it doesn't make them any stronger as anti-air.


Uh, that was their OLD ability, it was moved to the Overseer.

It would have been better in its previous form, but now the Viper has it covered.
ch4ppi
Profile Joined July 2010
Germany802 Posts
December 14 2012 21:53 GMT
#39
On December 13 2012 21:54 Existor wrote:
Show nested quote +
No. Muta vs. Muta can be very exciting (see BW). Furthermore, Corruptors aren't meant to be good against everything; they can currently take on pretty much every air unit in the game, so a slow would just buff them even more. Along those lines, Corruptors are boring. We don't want to see more of them because there's nothing to them (no interesting abilities or micro to speak of). Finally, you don't just buff Corruptors because they can't deal with certain air, you buff Corruptors because Zerg has a hard time dealing with air, and as of yet, this doesn't seem like a problem. Even if Zerg develops AA problems, you can always buff other units; no need to buff the Corruptor with this ability. Slowing mechanics should be kept to rare cases because they discourage or eliminate micro, and micro capability 1) increases the skill ceiling dramatically and 2) makes the game far more enjoyable to watch and play.

So you want to say, that muta-vs-muta wars more interesting to watch than "Oh, mutalisks was slowed down by corruptors! Mutalisks are in trap now, but some mutas were able to fly away" instead "Who have more mutas right now? Hmm, lets look who wins here"

Everything can be balanced. Like corruption will slow down only by 20%, so it means mutalisks will be still able to fly away from corruptors, just a bit slower -> a bit easier to fight against mutas and fungal them. Or it can slow by 50%, but corruptor's speed will be nerfed to 2.75 (a bit)

New compisition can be in ZvZ - fungal+corruptors, that will nicely counter heavy Muta play. And it will require skill with fungaling mutalisks AND corrupting every mutalisk with each corruptor.



Yeah nice composition... and what do you do if you want to do anything?
Right, corrupters dont do anything. They need to be less one-dimensional. A slow effect is the lazy way make them better. I am always thinking about a possibility to attack an enemy in close combat with an air unit, that doesnt explode... just a loose thought..
PieTaster
Profile Joined September 2011
52 Posts
December 14 2012 22:21 GMT
#40
I don't see the reason for this when fungal is at our disposal as well.
The brofestors are after you next.
Tuczniak
Profile Joined September 2010
1561 Posts
December 14 2012 22:33 GMT
#41
It's good idea. Probably not the best, but still better than corruptor as it is.
iKill
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Denmark861 Posts
December 14 2012 22:34 GMT
#42
On December 13 2012 21:23 Fragile51 wrote:
How about instead of slowing down the target it increases the corruptors speed? No anti-micro mumbo jumbo and in essence does the same thing. Only bad thing is that corruptors can't have a catchy name like turbovacs or ferrarilords :p


Corvettors
thepuppyassassin: "My god... the deathball's grown wings!"
mdoubles
Profile Joined September 2012
Canada17 Posts
December 14 2012 22:47 GMT
#43
Does anyone else read posts like this and wonder if we're playing the same game they are? As if corrupters need a ****ing slow ability! What are you thinking? Am I the only one who has corrupters already destroy every flying unit \i have in my army handily? Thank the lord the OP isnt a blizzard game designer
Deleted User 261926
Profile Joined April 2012
960 Posts
December 14 2012 22:48 GMT
#44
something different and a bit stronger is certainly needed to replace the anti air power the infestor used to give coupled with this unit.
ledarsi
Profile Joined September 2010
United States475 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-14 23:29:19
December 14 2012 22:58 GMT
#45
If any unit deserves concussive shell, it is the corruptor. Air units generally have perfect, uncontestable mobility around the map, and anti-micro abilities like forcefield or a concussive slow create positional relations between air units, where otherwise there would be none, as the air plane is flat and totally featureless.

Corruption is a boring ability that doesn't really fit with SC2, much like Frenzy did not fit. This idea is much better, but someone may come up with something still better.

Immobilizing air units with Fungal wasn't necessarily a bad thing in and of itself. The problem was the splash, the damage, and the immobilization together allowed unlimited stacking and chaining. Giving the Corruptor a single target root that works on air units only, and making fungal not root air units might be a logical design, to go one more than giving the Corruptor a concussive-like slow. A single target effect like this is also much stronger against big units that are few in number, which is the Corruptor's intended job. The trick would be making this ability interesting and not create another fungal-micro-killing-fiasco.
"First decide who you would be, then do what you must do."
rpgalon
Profile Joined April 2011
Brazil1069 Posts
December 14 2012 23:05 GMT
#46
sorry, but you don't give slow to units that are really good in straight up fights...
badog
HeavenResign
Profile Joined April 2011
United States702 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-14 23:20:30
December 14 2012 23:20 GMT
#47
I am not sure if a slow is the right addition to the corrupter, but it surely needs a re-design to make it more of an interesting unit that encourages skilled control. It has even less incentive for good control than units like the colossus, roaches, etc which typically get the brunt of a-move criticism.
ArvickHero
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
10387 Posts
December 14 2012 23:28 GMT
#48
muta vs muta in BW was only interesting because Scourges added in a really cool micro dynamic.

Think corruptors would be pretty unique/interesting if they could latch onto other enemy air (w/ their tentacles and all), and either attack or have a special ability like that. But then maybe ppl would say it's too much like Scourge lol
Writerptrk
ledarsi
Profile Joined September 2010
United States475 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-14 23:31:00
December 14 2012 23:30 GMT
#49
AvrickHero, corruptors do indeed have perfectly good tentacles that are not presently doing anything productive. I nominate the Corruptor to receive a tentacle grab which immobilizes a single target. Other details up for debate. Perhaps it also applies its Corruption damage increase against the target.
"First decide who you would be, then do what you must do."
LexKaiba
Profile Joined May 2011
Ireland23 Posts
December 14 2012 23:41 GMT
#50
dont like slows, but would like something!
Zerg!!!!!!
neptunusfisk
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
2286 Posts
December 15 2012 02:01 GMT
#51
I hate corruptors and everything associated with it. Use your scourge, morph mutalisks to guardians and be done with it.
maru G5L pls
MarcusRife
Profile Joined March 2011
343 Posts
December 15 2012 02:25 GMT
#52
How about have corruption do single target corrosive damage over time instead of the +20% damage.
K_osss
Profile Joined June 2010
United States113 Posts
December 15 2012 02:44 GMT
#53
I think blizzard can make hydras a pretty strong addition to the zerg arsenal. They're headed in the right direction with the buffs. Personally I'd prefer more hydra play vs muta than corruptor.
kcdc
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2311 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-15 02:56:54
December 15 2012 02:54 GMT
#54
If Protoss has researched the phoenix range upgrade and is committing 100% of their APM to kite your corruptors at exactly 7 range, dealing all of 6 damage per shot against a 200 HP target, props to them. They deserve to get a free corruptor kill. Just attack anywhere else while he's doing that and score a free base kill while they micro their ass off to kill one corruptor.
Zato-1
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Chile4253 Posts
December 15 2012 03:05 GMT
#55
[D][Q] Should Corruptors slow down enemy air?

No. The Corruptor is already a good air-to-air unit, especially when coupled with Infestors; it doesn't need the help.

If Infestors / Fungal Growth did not exist, then Corruptors would probably need buffing to let them hold their own vs. Vikings, but as things stand, Zerg anti-air is very strong once Corruptors + Infestors are out.
Go here http://vina.biobiochile.cl/ and input the Konami Code (up up down down left right left right B A)
Howl41
Profile Joined September 2012
United States65 Posts
December 15 2012 04:42 GMT
#56
So you want Corruptors to have a slow so that your infestors can then waddle over and fungal those units to death? lol no thanks
<3 Bomer/Flash/Innovation/MMA/MVP/Demuslim/Forgg/Gumiho/Lucifron/SeleCT
Piousflea
Profile Joined February 2010
United States259 Posts
December 15 2012 06:51 GMT
#57
My idea for Corruptors is this:
1) Nerf Corruptor's HP to 120.
2) Nerf Corruptor's attack to 12 damage (18 vs. Massive) but increase range to 7.
3) Attacks inflict "Parasitic Corruption" debuff for 5 seconds: Unit takes damage equal to 50% of any damage dealt. Reflected damage ignores Armor.

The HP/damage nerf and the Iron Maiden debuff should cancel themselves out, leaving the Corruptor not much stronger or weaker than it is now. For example, a Viking shooting at a Corruptor should result in both units dying at the same time:
Both the Vike and Ruptor will shoot 6 times before they die;
Corruptor takes 24*6 = 144 damage and dies;
Viking takes 12*6 = 72 direct damage, and 120/2 = 60 reflected damage (the first salvo is fired before the reflect debuff), total = 132 damage so it dies

------
Why is a damage reflect debuff awesome?

1) It makes the rest of the Zerg force much more effective. Right now, a mixed Corr/Muta force sucks because enemy units can kill off the Mutas while ignoring the Corruptor's low DPS. However, having a 50% Iron Maiden debuff means that they actually damage themselves by killing the Mutas first, whereas they could get rid of the debuff by killing Corruptors first.

2) It forces the enemy player to make a decision. Do they kill the Corruptors first or go for the Mutas? Right now there is no decision because Mutas are shorter ranged and more fragile and the Corruptors don't really do much damage. With a relatively fragile but deadly (due to debuffs) Corruptor force, you might actually want to focus down Corruptors before the Mutas.

3) It makes ground-to-air more effective vs Corruptors. Corruptors are easier to shoot down with Stalkers and Turrets, and as a bonus, if you're relying upon GtA to kill them, your air units can stop shooting and stop taking Iron Maiden damage.
Seek, behold, and reveal the truth
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 13h 12m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft387
IndyStarCraft 176
JuggernautJason112
elazer 39
StarCraft: Brood War
EffOrt 109
910 48
Dota 2
febbydoto19
League of Legends
C9.Mang0164
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox391
Other Games
Grubby3990
FrodaN1939
tarik_tv1580
B2W.Neo706
shahzam299
mouzStarbuck229
RotterdaM211
Liquid`Hasu172
XaKoH 104
Maynarde77
Mew2King55
ViBE16
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV59
StarCraft 2
angryscii 33
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• RyuSc2 55
• Reevou 14
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• mYiSmile125
• Michael_bg 4
• XenOsky 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21615
Other Games
• imaqtpie1824
• Shiphtur532
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
13h 12m
Gerald vs YoungYakov
Spirit vs MaNa
SHIN vs Percival
Creator vs Scarlett
Replay Cast
1d 10h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 13h
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Krystianer vs TBD
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs TBD
ByuN vs Nicoract
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-12-22
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.