• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:45
CEST 19:45
KST 02:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.161Rollback Netcode in Brood War845.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 202622Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.16 StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon 5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 2026 ESL Pro Tour for SC2 discontinued [Old] StarCraft 3 Reportedly in Development
Tourneys
$3,500 WardiTV Not-Summer Championship Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BSL23 Confirmations Starts on New BSL Portal ASL FINALS HYPE VIDEO 2X ASL22 General Discussion Sagi.gg Launcher Released
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues ASL 22 Finals [ASL22] Semifinal A [ASL22] Semifinal B
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Dawn of War IV Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Link Between Gaming and …
TrAiDoS
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 12903 users

Widow Mine Nerfs, Lets do it right! - Page 6

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 All
Hattori_Hanzo
Profile Joined October 2010
Singapore1229 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-14 10:50:30
October 14 2012 10:49 GMT
#101
On October 14 2012 19:44 GARcher wrote:
8 Siege Tanks + insufficient number of marines = unsupported siege line. Plus 16 marauders and enough hellions to buffer damage is much more supply wise and resource wise compared to the Siege Tank composition.

16 marauders = 1200 minerals and 400 gas
Planetary = 550 min and 150 gas
Bunker = 100 min

Duh 16 marauders are going to kill these things. Might as well say 4 Roaches would kill 1 Zergling extremely efficiently.

And if you do scout that the opponent is Marauder heavy you'd get more Marines since Marauders have absolutely horrible DPS against non armoured units.



You seem to have missed out some numbers. Your bias is showing.


16 marauders and 4 medivacs = 2000 minerals and 800 gas
8 Siege tanks = 1200 minerals and 1000 gas
Planetary = 550 min and 150 gas
Bunker = 100 min
Cauterize the area
GARcher
Profile Joined October 2012
Canada294 Posts
October 14 2012 10:55 GMT
#102
On October 14 2012 19:49 Hattori_Hanzo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 14 2012 19:44 GARcher wrote:
8 Siege Tanks + insufficient number of marines = unsupported siege line. Plus 16 marauders and enough hellions to buffer damage is much more supply wise and resource wise compared to the Siege Tank composition.

16 marauders = 1200 minerals and 400 gas
Planetary = 550 min and 150 gas
Bunker = 100 min

Duh 16 marauders are going to kill these things. Might as well say 4 Roaches would kill 1 Zergling extremely efficiently.

And if you do scout that the opponent is Marauder heavy you'd get more Marines since Marauders have absolutely horrible DPS against non armoured units.



You seem to have missed out some numbers. Your bias is showing.


16 marauders and 4 medivacs = 2000 minerals and 800 gas
8 Siege tanks = 1200 minerals and 1000 gas
Planetary = 550 min and 150 gas
Bunker = 100 min


16 Marauders + 4 medivac = 40 supply not counting your Hellions

8 Siege Tanks = 24 supply
Needs 16 marines to be even in supply without counting the Hellions.
16 marines isn't an inadequate number of marines.

Who do you think will win?

Keep wanking. Your lack of gameplay experience is showing.
ZvZ is like a shitty apartment: Roaches and Fungal Growth everywhere.
Hattori_Hanzo
Profile Joined October 2010
Singapore1229 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-14 11:19:31
October 14 2012 11:00 GMT
#103
On October 14 2012 19:55 GARcher wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 14 2012 19:49 Hattori_Hanzo wrote:
On October 14 2012 19:44 GARcher wrote:
8 Siege Tanks + insufficient number of marines = unsupported siege line. Plus 16 marauders and enough hellions to buffer damage is much more supply wise and resource wise compared to the Siege Tank composition.

16 marauders = 1200 minerals and 400 gas
Planetary = 550 min and 150 gas
Bunker = 100 min

Duh 16 marauders are going to kill these things. Might as well say 4 Roaches would kill 1 Zergling extremely efficiently.

And if you do scout that the opponent is Marauder heavy you'd get more Marines since Marauders have absolutely horrible DPS against non armoured units.



You seem to have missed out some numbers. Your bias is showing.


16 marauders and 4 medivacs = 2000 minerals and 800 gas
8 Siege tanks = 1200 minerals and 1000 gas
Planetary = 550 min and 150 gas
Bunker = 100 min


16 Marauders + 4 medivac = 40 supply not counting your Hellions

8 Siege Tanks = 24 supply
Needs 16 marines to be even in supply without counting the Hellions.
16 marines isn't an inadequate number of marines.

Who do you think will win?

Keep wanking. Your lack of gameplay experience is showing.



The ratios for marines in marine/tank/medivac comp to effectively beat a marauder/hellion/medivac is all least between four to six marines every 1 tank, that works out 32 marines at least. Assuming the marines focus on the marauders, that leaves the hellions to "line'em up" straight up and cut that number by half within the blue flame first salvo.
Cauterize the area
DaveVAH
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
Canada162 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-14 11:10:47
October 14 2012 11:07 GMT
#104
Mech is already becoming non-viable in TvP on streams, Morrow would ban most of you if you made theses suggestions on his stream (specially anything about toss being weak). Mine is fine specially after this patch. if anything it is weak late game because alot of things outrages it.

Decreasing its range will kill the unit's viability even in early game, removing the anti air would mean it would be garbage compared to spider mines (that did 125 splash damage and were FREE) and would never be built if they costed supply & resources. I think Blizzard knows some folks are over reaching when they mentioned "lower level protoss players are complaining about gateway units".


Alot of zerg and protoss's think they can abuse terrans now that they got the warhound removed and both races are far more populated than terran so they can gang down opinions. This must not happen otherwise blizzard can have a 2 race system for all I care (WCS asia already has zero terrans).
blade55555
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States17423 Posts
October 16 2012 08:20 GMT
#105
On October 14 2012 20:07 DaveVAH wrote:
Mech is already becoming non-viable in TvP on streams, Morrow would ban most of you if you made theses suggestions on his stream (specially anything about toss being weak). Mine is fine specially after this patch. if anything it is weak late game because alot of things outrages it.

Decreasing its range will kill the unit's viability even in early game, removing the anti air would mean it would be garbage compared to spider mines (that did 125 splash damage and were FREE) and would never be built if they costed supply & resources. I think Blizzard knows some folks are over reaching when they mentioned "lower level protoss players are complaining about gateway units".


Alot of zerg and protoss's think they can abuse terrans now that they got the warhound removed and both races are far more populated than terran so they can gang down opinions. This must not happen otherwise blizzard can have a 2 race system for all I care (WCS asia already has zero terrans).


Sorry mine needs some sort of early game nerf (idc if it gets a late game buff to compensate). In tvz at least right now terran gets complete map control until lair tech. Aka zerg can't do any aggression vs terran before the 9 minute mark (unless you are going like 4 minute lair lol). Widow rocket is incredibly powerful and if spread around the map at all zerg can't move out. You can run zerglings around to try and get them to fire (assuming terran doesn't have hellions nearby to stop that) but you won't know where any mines are nor can you counter it unless it's at your base thanks to the spore not needing evo.

They either need to make it so they can't come out so early or something as right now again terran gets complete map control, can take a third and have it established before zerg because we need detection to even be out on the map now.

Of course if blizzard allows overseers earlier or gives overlords detection then i'm all for that to, either way something needs to be done so that zerg can at least push out or if they want to, be aggressive before lair tech. As it is now zerg can't be aggressive due to widow rockets atm. You may think that's fine but it's dumb that terran can secure a third much easier and earlier then zerg without having to worry about a push to punish it ^^.
When I think of something else, something will go here
yanot
Profile Joined March 2010
France130 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-16 09:21:57
October 16 2012 09:21 GMT
#106
On October 16 2012 17:20 blade55555 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 14 2012 20:07 DaveVAH wrote:
Mech is already becoming non-viable in TvP on streams, Morrow would ban most of you if you made theses suggestions on his stream (specially anything about toss being weak). Mine is fine specially after this patch. if anything it is weak late game because alot of things outrages it.

Decreasing its range will kill the unit's viability even in early game, removing the anti air would mean it would be garbage compared to spider mines (that did 125 splash damage and were FREE) and would never be built if they costed supply & resources. I think Blizzard knows some folks are over reaching when they mentioned "lower level protoss players are complaining about gateway units".


Alot of zerg and protoss's think they can abuse terrans now that they got the warhound removed and both races are far more populated than terran so they can gang down opinions. This must not happen otherwise blizzard can have a 2 race system for all I care (WCS asia already has zero terrans).


Sorry mine needs some sort of early game nerf (idc if it gets a late game buff to compensate). In tvz at least right now terran gets complete map control until lair tech. Aka zerg can't do any aggression vs terran before the 9 minute mark (unless you are going like 4 minute lair lol). Widow rocket is incredibly powerful and if spread around the map at all zerg can't move out. You can run zerglings around to try and get them to fire (assuming terran doesn't have hellions nearby to stop that) but you won't know where any mines are nor can you counter it unless it's at your base thanks to the spore not needing evo.

They either need to make it so they can't come out so early or something as right now again terran gets complete map control, can take a third and have it established before zerg because we need detection to even be out on the map now.

Of course if blizzard allows overseers earlier or gives overlords detection then i'm all for that to, either way something needs to be done so that zerg can at least push out or if they want to, be aggressive before lair tech. As it is now zerg can't be aggressive due to widow rockets atm. You may think that's fine but it's dumb that terran can secure a third much easier and earlier then zerg without having to worry about a push to punish it ^^.




lol@ this post, a zerg whining about how terrans have lived the last patch in WoL.... Zerg can secure a third much easier and faster than terran due to queens / spines / spores / units, and now that terran can do THE SAME THING as zerg, it's now unfair?

As already said, the mine is strong but NOT OP because there are work arounds to counter it... if you want to harras with air, just send ONE mutalisk to scout, sacrifice it, then send your mutalisk ball and harras...

Decendos
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany1341 Posts
October 16 2012 09:53 GMT
#107
On October 16 2012 18:21 yanot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 16 2012 17:20 blade55555 wrote:
On October 14 2012 20:07 DaveVAH wrote:
Mech is already becoming non-viable in TvP on streams, Morrow would ban most of you if you made theses suggestions on his stream (specially anything about toss being weak). Mine is fine specially after this patch. if anything it is weak late game because alot of things outrages it.

Decreasing its range will kill the unit's viability even in early game, removing the anti air would mean it would be garbage compared to spider mines (that did 125 splash damage and were FREE) and would never be built if they costed supply & resources. I think Blizzard knows some folks are over reaching when they mentioned "lower level protoss players are complaining about gateway units".


Alot of zerg and protoss's think they can abuse terrans now that they got the warhound removed and both races are far more populated than terran so they can gang down opinions. This must not happen otherwise blizzard can have a 2 race system for all I care (WCS asia already has zero terrans).


Sorry mine needs some sort of early game nerf (idc if it gets a late game buff to compensate). In tvz at least right now terran gets complete map control until lair tech. Aka zerg can't do any aggression vs terran before the 9 minute mark (unless you are going like 4 minute lair lol). Widow rocket is incredibly powerful and if spread around the map at all zerg can't move out. You can run zerglings around to try and get them to fire (assuming terran doesn't have hellions nearby to stop that) but you won't know where any mines are nor can you counter it unless it's at your base thanks to the spore not needing evo.

They either need to make it so they can't come out so early or something as right now again terran gets complete map control, can take a third and have it established before zerg because we need detection to even be out on the map now.

Of course if blizzard allows overseers earlier or gives overlords detection then i'm all for that to, either way something needs to be done so that zerg can at least push out or if they want to, be aggressive before lair tech. As it is now zerg can't be aggressive due to widow rockets atm. You may think that's fine but it's dumb that terran can secure a third much easier and earlier then zerg without having to worry about a push to punish it ^^.




lol@ this post, a zerg whining about how terrans have lived the last patch in WoL.... Zerg can secure a third much easier and faster than terran due to queens / spines / spores / units, and now that terran can do THE SAME THING as zerg, it's now unfair?

As already said, the mine is strong but NOT OP because there are work arounds to counter it... if you want to harras with air, just send ONE mutalisk to scout, sacrifice it, then send your mutalisk ball and harras...



zerg needs to be one base or "half a base" up to be EVEN. if terran has 3rd before zerg, zerg is way behind.

and yes the mine is super OP right now because its early, cheap, single and AoE damage, shoots air and cloaked units and outranges every early game zerg unit. blizzard needs to give them a defined role and they hopefully choose that role to be a ground space control unit.

and no you cant send in one muta since the turret + mine combination doesnt care about 1 muta. the mine shouldnt counter cloak and air harrass since it should take skill to prevent that harrass and not a no-apm-unit thats good vs everything and available way too early and way too cheap for what it does.

- the mine needs to come a little later (so they dont have to make detection available super early and nerf DTs/banshees etc.)

- the mine needs to have longer burrow time (so you cant just runby defenses of opponent and burrow in his face and cant drop mines in mineral lines)

- the mine shouldnt hit air/cloak units (so it takes skill to counter harrass and not burrow 3 mines and be safe vs everything)

if the mine gets too bad after these changes just increase their splash radius and splash damage so they are better at controlling space which is their purpose.
Don.681
Profile Joined September 2010
Philippines189 Posts
October 16 2012 10:16 GMT
#108
As a Protoss player, at my level of play (Bronze HOTS, Gold WOL) I don't think it needs a nerf. I can deal with them better than MMM Balls at the moment.

When I see them, I just start hunting around with hallucinated probes then kill some with 3 stalkers and an obs. I know that my opponent is probably turtling/macroing, or better yet, has made too much of them --If i'm gonna loose, its gonna be because I did not scout a well placed one instead of being rolled by MMM or a good drop which I have to say is more exciting.

Now, if ever there ever comes some Mass Widow Mine + Ravens + Viking build... then I would complain.
yanot
Profile Joined March 2010
France130 Posts
October 16 2012 10:23 GMT
#109
On October 16 2012 18:53 Decendos wrote:

zerg needs to be one base or "half a base" up to be EVEN. if terran has 3rd before zerg, zerg is way behind.

and yes the mine is super OP right now because its early, cheap, single and AoE damage, shoots air and cloaked units and outranges every early game zerg unit. blizzard needs to give them a defined role and they hopefully choose that role to be a ground space control unit.

and no you cant send in one muta since the turret + mine combination doesnt care about 1 muta. the mine shouldnt counter cloak and air harrass since it should take skill to prevent that harrass and not a no-apm-unit thats good vs everything and available way too early and way too cheap for what it does.

- the mine needs to come a little later (so they dont have to make detection available super early and nerf DTs/banshees etc.)

- the mine needs to have longer burrow time (so you cant just runby defenses of opponent and burrow in his face and cant drop mines in mineral lines)

- the mine shouldnt hit air/cloak units (so it takes skill to counter harrass and not burrow 3 mines and be safe vs everything)

if the mine gets too bad after these changes just increase their splash radius and splash damage so they are better at controlling space which is their purpose.



If terran has 3rd "before" (and why should it be "before", more like at the same time btw) .... you take a fourth and are ahead again?

You think zerg will be harrassed a lot if a terran put 2 supply mines AND turrets at each base?

and why can't you sacrifice a muta to get the mine ? If he has mines & turrets, he has too much defense so you just back. You can sacrifice an over and scout too, and you can even use overlords to get mines. There are work arounds, just let enough time to players to find them all before crying OP OP
Decendos
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany1341 Posts
October 16 2012 10:30 GMT
#110
On October 16 2012 19:23 yanot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 16 2012 18:53 Decendos wrote:

zerg needs to be one base or "half a base" up to be EVEN. if terran has 3rd before zerg, zerg is way behind.

and yes the mine is super OP right now because its early, cheap, single and AoE damage, shoots air and cloaked units and outranges every early game zerg unit. blizzard needs to give them a defined role and they hopefully choose that role to be a ground space control unit.

and no you cant send in one muta since the turret + mine combination doesnt care about 1 muta. the mine shouldnt counter cloak and air harrass since it should take skill to prevent that harrass and not a no-apm-unit thats good vs everything and available way too early and way too cheap for what it does.

- the mine needs to come a little later (so they dont have to make detection available super early and nerf DTs/banshees etc.)

- the mine needs to have longer burrow time (so you cant just runby defenses of opponent and burrow in his face and cant drop mines in mineral lines)

- the mine shouldnt hit air/cloak units (so it takes skill to counter harrass and not burrow 3 mines and be safe vs everything)

if the mine gets too bad after these changes just increase their splash radius and splash damage so they are better at controlling space which is their purpose.



If terran has 3rd "before" (and why should it be "before", more like at the same time btw) .... you take a fourth and are ahead again?

You think zerg will be harrassed a lot if a terran put 2 supply mines AND turrets at each base?

and why can't you sacrifice a muta to get the mine ? If he has mines & turrets, he has too much defense so you just back. You can sacrifice an over and scout too, and you can even use overlords to get mines. There are work arounds, just let enough time to players to find them all before crying OP OP


1 rax FE into 2x gas into factory into mines + 3rd CC has the 3rd A LOT earlier then the zerg player.

and no you cant get arund 1 turret and 1 mine in the mineral line with mutas. in WoL the T player needs units to defend once the zerg gets more than 15 or so mutas, in HOTS they just have 6 supply (= 1 min in each mineral line) or 75 gas to counter 1500 gas without no skill, no apm, not even a risk since they are so cheap and otherwise usable in case zerg dont commit to mutas.

i know why you like mines: its because there is no need for skill: no scouting needed before going mines, no apm needed to use them, no risk if you build them, antiair, anticloak and antiground so preventing all harrassment --> even less skill needed since you dont need map awareness, less multitasking etc.

an antieverything mine like it is right now takes A LOT of skill from playing terran and we want more skill in the game not less. its the same with entombed. every bronce player can entombed like a pro player which is superbad game design and will also be changed hopefully.
rpgalon
Profile Joined April 2011
Brazil1069 Posts
October 16 2012 11:54 GMT
#111
I don't mind they buffing the mine damage, or anything else, but the air attack has to go away... My banshee build no longer works in TvT, and probably many other builds from Z/P too...
badog
osiris17
Profile Blog Joined September 2012
United States165 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-16 14:50:27
October 16 2012 14:48 GMT
#112
On October 12 2012 03:51 Ljas wrote:
Alternatively, let's not bombard the devs with balance issues and let them make the general design of the units work first.

The devs approach balance so conservatively and step by step, but there's no need. The best solutions can be figured out in a discussion like this.
Be extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponent's fate. - sun tzu
Qikz
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United Kingdom12064 Posts
October 16 2012 15:28 GMT
#113
On October 16 2012 23:48 osiris17 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 12 2012 03:51 Ljas wrote:
Alternatively, let's not bombard the devs with balance issues and let them make the general design of the units work first.

The devs approach balance so conservatively and step by step, but there's no need. The best solutions can be figured out in a discussion like this.


Wellk that's not entirely true. There's too much whining from everywhere for a discussion like this to work.
FanTaSy's #1 Fan | STPL Caster/Organiser | SKT BEST KT | https://twitch.tv/stpl
terranghost
Profile Joined May 2010
United States980 Posts
October 16 2012 16:25 GMT
#114
I don't like the idea of earlier detection just because of the widow mine because it affects other things too like reducing the effects banshee and dt tech. I would much rather see scouting made easier to compensate this was already basically done with the free hallucination and I would just like to see a zerg version of it.

They said they wanted to experiment with an earlier widow mine so now it does not have the armory requirement.

There are many changes that could be done that would be faster than armory but still delay early widow mines that are used agressively.

I like the health going down but I think the range is fine the primary purpose of the mine being added in the first place is to help tvp mech and from the streams I watch a range decrease would hurt that even more. I would say that increasing the burrowtime would make more sense.
"It is amazing that people who think we cannot afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, and medication somehow think that we can afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, medication and a government bureaucracy to administer it." - Thomas Sowell
PsykoMantis
Profile Joined June 2010
United States203 Posts
October 16 2012 16:36 GMT
#115
I think the mine is fine just the way it is, as a P player it requires me to be more cautious about moving around the map, even though I have a mothership core and I have to be more careful with my observers. There is a whole new dimension to the game the current widow mine adds and its probably far too early to nerf it without adequate testing.
jadeo
Profile Joined September 2012
Sweden18 Posts
October 16 2012 19:00 GMT
#116
just give the mine a delay fire.
Phoenix2003
Profile Joined August 2012
126 Posts
October 16 2012 19:11 GMT
#117
Reduction in hp and remove it's AA.
It can't/musn't remain in it's current form.
BoggieMan
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
520 Posts
October 16 2012 19:23 GMT
#118
remove it from the game
tvt is a huge joke
archon256
Profile Joined August 2010
United States363 Posts
October 16 2012 22:15 GMT
#119
On October 16 2012 18:21 yanot wrote:
lol@ this post, a zerg whining about how terrans have lived the last patch in WoL.... Zerg can secure a third much easier and faster than terran due to queens / spines / spores / units, and now that terran can do THE SAME THING as zerg, it's now unfair?

I don't think the game is balanced around all the races being able to do exactly the same thing, because of the inherent asymmetry of their design. (That's just a comment in general, I haven't played against the WM to talk about how it affects the game).

On October 16 2012 18:21 yanot wrote:
As already said, the mine is strong but NOT OP because there are work arounds to counter it... if you want to harras with air, just send ONE mutalisk to scout, sacrifice it, then send your mutalisk ball and harras...

Question: What happens when there's two WMs next to each other and you fly a Muta into their range? Do they both fire?
"The troupe is ready, the stage is set. I come to dance, the dance of death"
Prev 1 4 5 6 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 6h 15m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech178
UpATreeSC 45
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 26759
actioN 339
firebathero 152
Zeus 87
Trap 50
Mong 47
Light 36
sSak 33
Rock 22
PianO 22
[ Show more ]
Sexy 22
scan(afreeca) 15
HiyA 13
Sharp 10
zelot 10
Sacsri 7
ajuk12(nOOB) 6
Djem5 3
Dewaltoss 0
Dota 2
420jenkins366
League of Legends
Grubby2128
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps1398
fl0m1360
ceh9467
x6flipin303
Heroes of the Storm
MindelVK10
Other Games
FrodaN820
Beastyqt692
KnowMe127
RotterdaM124
QueenE81
Organizations
Other Games
WardiTV372
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 66
• niya90s 1
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 31
• Michael_bg 11
• FirePhoenix10
• blackmanpl 6
• ChaeLyn 5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1958
League of Legends
• Nemesis2581
Other Games
• Shiphtur863
• imaqtpie608
• WagamamaTV425
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
6h 15m
Kung Fu Cup
17h 15m
The PondCast
1d 16h
Online Event
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL Open Qualifier
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
IPSL
4 days
[ Show More ]
BSL Open Qualifier
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-12
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
HCC Season 3
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.