EPTI think it's also very important to point out that these changes would not affect the lower leagues, as anything micro intensive really just doesn't exist down there (and if it's tried it's at the expense of macro).
Carrier Micro - Page 2
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS |
|
Weird
United States832 Posts
I think it's also very important to point out that these changes would not affect the lower leagues, as anything micro intensive really just doesn't exist down there (and if it's tried it's at the expense of macro). | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
| ||
|
NuclearJudas
6546 Posts
| ||
KadaverBB
Germany25657 Posts
There is simply no reason to not do this in Hots beta and test it out  | ||
|
Toyman69
Canada100 Posts
| ||
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
Corruptor vs Goliath. The corruptor is a fellow air unit, so the primary benefit of the move away carrier micro is lost, being able to abuse cliffs and terrain to attack the Goliath's without being hit back by outranging them, whereas Corruptors ignore this and can carry on moving. So even if the opportunity was there (no doubt it would help) corruptors would just be able to keep chasing, unlike Goliaths. This isn't even talking about the problem of infestors  | ||
|
AxiR
Germany944 Posts
On September 17 2012 05:39 StorrZerg wrote: Tempest wasn't around in wol though so thats a poor excuess. Tempest might not be needed if the carrier gets its old feel back, and im ok with that. I actually agree with you... the carrier is a much cooler unit but blizzard might not want to scratch the tempest.. Then again they did actually remove the warhound recently so there might be hope! | ||
|
frederik
Denmark29 Posts
| ||
|
Nightsz
Canada398 Posts
blizzard needs to watch this | ||
ZeromuS
Canada13402 Posts
| ||
|
ConstantineL
United States14 Posts
| ||
|
Rustug
1488 Posts
| ||
|
sc2pal
Poland624 Posts
| ||
|
HazMat
United States17077 Posts
| ||
|
LuckyFool
United States9015 Posts
| ||
|
ZooG
Sweden618 Posts
| ||
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
Here are the ones I can recall: 1. Target switching in leash zone 2. Able to self select / target interceptors 3. Continuous deployment of interceptors while moving Also, the movement pattern of the interceptors seem quite different between BW and SC2, which would affect the "death rate" and "dps rate" of interceptors I imagine. | ||
|
Ariuz
Germany39 Posts
thanks to tyler, good video! | ||
|
Aphasie
Norway474 Posts
| ||
|
acrimoneyius
United States983 Posts
| ||
| ||
