| Forum Index > Sports |
|
Larkin
United Kingdom7161 Posts
On October 05 2014 22:47 DarkLordOlli wrote: They're two entirely different offenses that you cannot compare. Cahill committed a regular foul, Chambers committed a tactical one. The solution is to send off Gibbs | ||
|
Mensol
14536 Posts
Tension between Mou and Wenger earlier. | ||
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
| ||
|
ZeroChrome
Canada1001 Posts
On October 05 2014 22:48 DarkLordOlli wrote: Alright, let's leave it at that. Different meaning of "regular". Regular meaning regular and then regular meaning career threatening ok i get it | ||
|
bObaZ
Portugal864 Posts
On October 05 2014 22:51 DarkLordOlli wrote: Yeah... that's nowhere near intentional. Nowhere near intentional?? Are you just trolling? You can't even say that he went for the ball but the ball wasn't there anymore. The ball was there but he opted to tackle alexis instead! It's a clear red as it gets... | ||
|
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
On October 05 2014 22:53 bObaZ wrote: Nowhere near intentional?? Are you just trolling? You can't even say that he went for the ball but the ball wasn't there anymore. The ball was there but he opted to tackle alexis instead! It's a clear red as it gets... LOL, he missed the ball. That's all there is to it. The game isn't played in replay speed and anyone who's played football will tell you the same. It ended up being a dreadful challenge, but that is not a red card. | ||
|
Larkin
United Kingdom7161 Posts
On October 05 2014 22:49 NuclearJudas wrote: Fucking damn it, Kosc... Why do you make so many stupid tackles like that? Can't fault Hazard for going down there, as it's just invited. And I'm of the opinion now that Cahill should have been sent off. Look at the tackle. https://mtc.cdn.vine.co/r/videos/AB507097C21130542002627575808_212ad566fd9.5.1.7195489688785602737.mp4?versionId=N5oV3t52tHtl2xNFWDL3DPVgHe.FnXcK The ball's right there, but he studs Alexis instead. I love Cahill, but that's a disgraceful tackle. Hmm I think it doesn't look like there's intent to do harm - it looks like an accident. And since it's only one footed, I think a red is harsh there. | ||
|
bObaZ
Portugal864 Posts
On October 05 2014 22:54 DarkLordOlli wrote: LOL, he missed the ball. That's all there is to it. The game isn't played in replay speed and anyone who's played football will tell you the same. Anyone that played football knows that he went straight for the player and didn't even try to get the ball... But i guess we'll agree to disagree  | ||
|
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
On October 05 2014 22:54 bObaZ wrote: Anyone that played football knows that he went straight for the player and didn't even try to get the ball... Alright, let's leave it at that. Stop arguing. | ||
|
malcram
2752 Posts
| ||
|
city42
1656 Posts
| ||
|
NuclearJudas
6546 Posts
On October 05 2014 22:54 Larkin wrote: Hmm I think it doesn't look like there's intent to do harm - it looks like an accident. And since it's only one footed, I think a red is harsh there. Saying we should judge everything on intent is just straight up wrong. Obviously Cahill doesn't want to hurt Alexis. But it's a straightened leg with all of Cahill's weight (so 80-90 kg?) behind it. Alexis' ankle would have quite possibly snapped under that. It's a clear red. That said, I can see that being hard for the ref to adjudge and why it's been given a yellow. | ||
|
Larkin
United Kingdom7161 Posts
| ||
|
bObaZ
Portugal864 Posts
![[image loading]](http://a.pomf.se/jhwrij.gif) | ||
|
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
| ||
|
Larkin
United Kingdom7161 Posts
On October 05 2014 22:58 NuclearJudas wrote: Saying we should judge everything on intent is just straight up wrong. Obviously Cahill doesn't want to hurt Alexis. But it's a straightened leg with all of Cahill's weight (so 80-90 kg?) behind it. Alexis' ankle would have quite possibly snapped under that. It's a clear red. That said, I can see that being hard for the ref to adjudge and why it's been given a yellow. I didn't say we SHOULD judge everything on intent. But maliciousness is a factor - it's in the rules - for determining whether something is a red card or not. It isn't a clear red because it very obviously looks like a mistimed tackle, missing the ball, rather than a deliberate attempt to do Alexis in. What Cahill meant only he knows - but to the referee, in a split second decision, it doesn't look malicious enough to warrant a red card. | ||
|
NuclearJudas
6546 Posts
| ||
|
zeo
Serbia6343 Posts
edit: yeah age wouldn't make a difference if wenger had formal training but idk, he is taller but jose could just poke him in the eye. | ||
|
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
| ||
|
Larkin
United Kingdom7161 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
Afreeca Starleague
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
BSL Open Qualifier
Sparkling Tuna Cup
IPSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
