EPTNFL 2014 Season - Page 145
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
cheese sandwich
Russian Federation194 Posts
| ||
|
cheese sandwich
Russian Federation194 Posts
| ||
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
| ||
|
cheese sandwich
Russian Federation194 Posts
On October 06 2014 13:16 Darkhorse wrote: Nice to see the Pats bounce back, and it does seem early to have no more undefeated teams. Yeah other than Oakland I think the gap between all teams is closer than ever before. Any team can take a game from each other. | ||
|
cheese sandwich
Russian Federation194 Posts
| ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
On October 06 2014 13:19 cheese sandwich wrote: Yeah other than Oakland I think the gap between all teams is closer than ever before. Any team can take a game from each other. I think that's a bit strong. The Seahawks lost in anomalous conditions to San Diego, who I think most believe to be pretty good, and Denver lost at Seattle which is a nightmare. I would agree that the middle seems quite muddled with the mess in New Orleans and questions in New England, but there seems to be wheat separated from chaff. | ||
|
cheese sandwich
Russian Federation194 Posts
On October 06 2014 13:27 AgentW wrote: I think that's a bit strong. The Seahawks lost in anomalous conditions to San Diego, who I think most believe to be pretty good, and Denver lost at Seattle which is a nightmare. I would agree that the middle seems quite muddled with the mess in New Orleans and questions in New England, but there seems to be wheat separated from chaff. Two teams up top but Denver looks vulnerable late. Other than the Arizona game where they needed to take out their players to win. Anyway, other than in Seattle, Denver threw pretty big leads against Indy and KC. | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On October 06 2014 13:02 cheese sandwich wrote: Just wait, when Manning is gone they will be the new Vikings. Literally throwing away money just to win a super bowl with Peyton these past few years. Throwing away money to win a Super Bowl? Does not compute. Isn't that what the goal of your money is? Most teams can't be the 2013 Seahawks, 2011-13 49ers, or 01-04 Pats where you amass talent because you were mediocre so long and then stumble into a quarterback who is being paid 2% of what he is worth. | ||
|
DannyJ
United States5110 Posts
| ||
|
cheese sandwich
Russian Federation194 Posts
| ||
|
cheese sandwich
Russian Federation194 Posts
| ||
|
cheese sandwich
Russian Federation194 Posts
On October 06 2014 13:38 cLutZ wrote: Throwing away money to win a Super Bowl? Does not compute. Isn't that what the goal of your money is? Most teams can't be the 2013 Seahawks, 2011-13 49ers, or 01-04 Pats where you amass talent because you were mediocre so long and then stumble into a quarterback who is being paid 2% of what he is worth. Yeah mismanaging a team to buy players who get overpaid and hope players who were on losing teams like Cleveland and Dallas to make a difference. Obviously the goal is to spend or build a team for a super bowl but to build that team solely on the middle aged players who are 1 year from passing their prime or past it is just wasting your cap. Who will be the leader when Manning leaves? This team will go back to the Jake Plummer days after Manning is done. Even if they do win this year, congrats, look at Tampa since they won their ONE super bowl or after Denver won theirs in late 90's. | ||
|
cheese sandwich
Russian Federation194 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On October 06 2014 14:51 cheese sandwich wrote: As a fan I would rather my team have a complete roster that competes every year for a decade and even wins it a couple of times than be a fan of one that sucks from 2000-2012 and make a few playoff wins past the wildcard round when they stumble upon a QB on his last run. Well, there is really no evidence for your ideal "complete roster for a decade" plan. The only teams that compete that long, now, in the salary cap era, are ones who find young qbs who can carry rosters to the playoffs over and over again. This is often why good QBs win early in their career because being a good Quarterback makes the rest of your team worse, over time. | ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
On October 06 2014 14:51 cheese sandwich wrote: As a fan I would rather my team have a complete roster that competes every year for a decade and even wins it a couple of times than be a fan of one that sucks from 2000-2012 and make a few playoff wins past the wildcard round when they stumble upon a QB on his last run. I think everyone would love to have a team that competes every year and even wins a couple of times. How about a team that wins once (say this year) versus one that's always competing for a playoff spot (but doesn't always make the playoffs or advance)? | ||
GTR
51593 Posts
if rex still has the job by the end of the season i'll (insert something that i won't do here) | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On October 06 2014 19:42 GTR wrote: http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/jets/jets-bench-geno-smith-michael-vick-better-blowout-loss-chargers-article-1.1964297 if rex still has the job by the end of the season i'll (insert something that i won't do here) I wouldn't be surprised if he takes the fall, but I suspect that the Jets would just be shooting themselves in the foot by firing him. | ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
On October 06 2014 05:40 tonight wrote: Detroit kickers just like Detroit bullpen. Cannot catch a break. and another one cut... | ||
|
GrapeApe
1053 Posts
| ||
|
ZasZ.
United States2911 Posts
On October 06 2014 14:51 cheese sandwich wrote: As a fan I would rather my team have a complete roster that competes every year for a decade and even wins it a couple of times than be a fan of one that sucks from 2000-2012 and make a few playoff wins past the wildcard round when they stumble upon a QB on his last run. Man you are salty after that game yesterday. Without Peyton Manning, the Broncos would still be a borderline wildcard team, but is it really surprising that bringing in one of the best of all time would have a dramatic positive effect on the team's chances? I feel like you're complaining just for the sake of complaining. If he had come in for one year before retiring, maybe you would have a point. | ||
| ||
