EPTFINALLY! - The 2013 NHL Season - Page 63
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
a-game
Canada5214 Posts
| ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27174 Posts
SJ played great, but I actually thought game 4 was their worst. Before game 4 I thought they were legit for the next round, but since they will probably play the Hawks, they will have a tough time. | ||
|
Slardar
Canada7596 Posts
| ||
|
Manifesto7
Osaka27174 Posts
| ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
On May 08 2013 21:03 Slardar wrote: SJ VS Hawks will be the Cup decider. #GetHYPE #COMPENDIUMNHLSTANLEYDOTACUP2013 I doubt that. I don't think the Sharks will win the Cup. Sorry and I agree Mani. Many Vancouver fans come across to me as being narcissistic. ~_~ Like I said before, Tomas should have started game 1. | ||
|
Thallis
United States314 Posts
On May 08 2013 21:03 Slardar wrote: SJ VS Hawks will be the Cup decider. #GetHYPE #COMPENDIUMNHLSTANLEYDOTACUP2013 None of the western teams have looked as impressive as the Blues or the Kings. I wouldn't say anything is the cup decider yet. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On May 08 2013 22:02 Thallis wrote: None of the western teams have looked as impressive as the Blues or the Kings. I wouldn't say anything is the cup decider yet. I really hope that the Sharks don't have to play the Blues. That is one team that has the Sharks' number. The Sharks' most likely second round opponent will be Chicago. That's not a matchup that I would expect the Sharks to win, even though the Sharks are very clearly playing their best hockey right now. | ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
| ||
|
monx
Canada1400 Posts
| ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17708 Posts
no need to even watch the games themselves. CBC does it again with another great HNIC opening montage... so many great Maple Leafs in this video.. why they put Tucker in it at least twice is beyond me. | ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32157 Posts
On May 08 2013 10:38 xDaunt wrote: The Pens aren't going anywhere with this kind of consistently horrific defensive and goaltending play. it's... it's almost as if a wise and handsome forum user with 21,000 posts (and flaccid!) foresaw MAF playing like dogshit again! good to see jimmy dismissing anything that doesnt jive with his anti stats viewpoint again! ![[image loading]](http://i.somethingawful.com/forumsystem/emoticons/emot-downsbravo.gif) On May 08 2013 13:18 Skinnyboy wrote: First is seats second is surprise from before the game  + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/oK4ODvG.jpg) + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/JMkftB3.jpg) dope seats. how much that set you back?? i am happy the isles are looking good again. a first round win will do so much for that franchise, and breathe life back into the isles rivalries with all of their atlantic buddies. On May 08 2013 14:16 Sub40APM wrote: I always thought hockey needs to introduce a challenge flag from the NFL. You can only use it once, and if you are wrong on video review you get a penalty against you but at least you can review key decisions like this one. Eh. I guess it couldn't hurt, but there are really so few instances where it would be necessary. You shouldn't be able to challenge penalties like in the NFL. Goals are automatically reviewed. What else is there really? | ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32157 Posts
On May 09 2013 00:29 StarStruck wrote: Hawk I think anyone with hockey sense would have figured Tomas should have been their go to guy from the start. Well that's not very nice to say about Jimmy J Raynor!!! look at this wonderful netminding by Noted Stanley Cup Winning Goalie http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/marc-andre-fleury-sit-penguins-game-5-isles-030245888.html | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32157 Posts
and yeah as bad as he has played, the d hasnt been helping maf much. that's another thing that shouldnt have been much of a surprise. their big add to that shitty defense was a broken and old douglass murray | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17708 Posts
On May 09 2013 00:40 QuanticHawk wrote: Well that's not very nice to say about Jimmy J Raynor!!! look at this wonderful netminding by Noted Stanley Cup Winning Goalie http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/marc-andre-fleury-sit-penguins-game-5-isles-030245888.html which is why .907 describes nothing about the guy. along with most goalies and their "career averages" i am not "anti stats". when it comes to certain athletic activities .. stats are a solid way to sum up someone's abilities. and in other activities.. not so much. baseball stats, in the right hands, can tell you much more about a player than hockey stats for a goalie. so my "anti stats" viewpoint as you have labelled it is relative to other sports and even other hockey positions where stats can provide some insight. On May 09 2013 00:07 StarStruck wrote: You know how it is Jim. If you show passion and make any decent contribution no matter the role you get a shrine in Toronto. ;/ ironically that goal by Roenicke was caused by Tucker being 60 feet out of position because he took that long run at Kapenen that they showed later in the video. Tucker was just plain bad. I wonder if Corson is going to sue the internet trolls that started the rumours that he fucked AlMo's wife  | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On May 09 2013 01:30 QuanticHawk wrote: and yeah as bad as he has played, the d hasnt been helping maf much. that's another thing that shouldnt have been much of a surprise. their big add to that shitty defense was a broken and old douglass murray Has Murray been one of the defensemen who has been victimized so far in the playoffs? Sharks fans were happy when we dumped Murray. He's a great, physical player, but he's just gotten so slow recently. Our defense actually got better as a result of getting rid of him (the team got a lot better in general at the trade deadline when we dumped our slower players and added Torres). Hell, Scott Hannan of all people has played exceptionally well so far for the Sharks and made everyone forget about Murray. | ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
On May 08 2013 21:01 Manifesto7 wrote: Didn't lose the series because of that call, but damn that is a bad way to go. I don't get all the AV hate though. He is a great coach. Gillis gets the blame for getting nothing for Hodgson, fucking around with the goalies, and continuing to bring in guys that peaked 7 years ago... Roy... Pahlsson... SJ played great, but I actually thought game 4 was their worst. Before game 4 I thought they were legit for the next round, but since they will probably play the Hawks, they will have a tough time. as to AV, I think there are a couple points against him in this playoffs. In game 2, when they were defending a one goal lead he had the Sedin twins defending essentially a power play -- and they never do that. The Sharks scored as the Sedins proved incapable of covering anyone. Then in Game 3, when Schneider is clearly still sick/injured and when Luongo is playing strong, he puts in Schenider who promptly has a metldown in the 3rd period. AV is a good coach but in key moments he has bizare moves. Finally, the Canucks played an undisciplined series and some of the D men, Bieksa, Edler, were just garbage and that is also o nteh coach. As to the Pens, if anyone thinks Vokoun is going to carry them, good luck. MAF is a terrible goalie but the D is letting he Islanders to just walk in on him. | ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
On May 09 2013 01:30 JimmyJRaynor wrote: which is why .907 describes nothing about the guy. along with most goalies and their "career averages" i am not "anti stats". when it comes to certain athletic activities .. stats are a solid way to sum up someone's abilities. and in other activities.. not so much. baseball stats, in the right hands, can tell you much more about a player than hockey stats for a goalie. so my "anti stats" viewpoint as you have labelled it is relative to other sports and even other hockey positions where stats can provide some insight. ironically that goal by Roenicke was caused by Tucker being 60 feet out of position because he took that long run at Kapenen that they showed later in the video. Tucker was just plain bad. I wonder if Corson is going to sue the internet trolls that started the rumours that he fucked AlMo's wife Oh we know damn well that their roster isn't safe from prosecution. Take Malkin's zero effort to get back in the play when he causes a turnover and heads right off the ice. Still, that doesn't change the fact MAF has let in way too many soft goals in this series because he wasn't square to the puck and he's been flopping around this way and that. | ||
| ||
