just make sure the other team gets him huehue
The Shikyo Memorial for QQ Therapy - Page 459
Forum Index > The Shopkeeper′s Inn |
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
just make sure the other team gets him huehue | ||
OmegaKnetus
Germany431 Posts
On July 21 2013 03:43 BlasiuS wrote: Fucking Udyr every single game. In the past few days, for at least 75% of my games that have an Udyr in it, the team with Udyr loses. He's not a "fit into every comp" champ, but this skin is bringing out all the baddies. Udyr's actually a solo queue beast, but all those baddies playing tiger dorans blade start, because they saw one game with that just keep failing. Whatever I like free lp XD | ||
obesechicken13
United States10467 Posts
| ||
FSKi
United States901 Posts
| ||
Shotcoder
United States2316 Posts
On July 21 2013 05:46 OmegaKnetus wrote: Udyr's actually a solo queue beast, but all those baddies playing tiger dorans blade start, because they saw one game with that just keep failing. Whatever I like free lp XD I like banning him and watching 2-3 people in my queue rage at me. | ||
Craton
United States17233 Posts
Yep, still nothing in ranked but crying butthurt 12 year olds. | ||
zer0das
United States8519 Posts
| ||
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
obesechicken13
United States10467 Posts
You can't even tell the difference in bot games. | ||
Swords
6038 Posts
Of course later I'll probably love him because he'll be on the other team and feed me free double kills when he ganks. | ||
Simberto
Germany11331 Posts
On July 21 2013 23:39 obesechicken13 wrote: Riot's fisher price modems are acting up again. At least I didn't get in game. And they blame it on Comcast when this doesn't affect any other games or browsing :/ You can't even tell the difference in bot games. Well, my ISP once randomly blacklisted riot and blizzard game servers, or something along those lines. Everything else worked, but i could play neither LoL nor any Blizzard game. It affected nothing else, and it only happened for people with vodafone internet, but apparently for all of those. So it could really be true. Still, i have come to the conclusion that companies always lie just to make you shut up if something does not work, so it might as well be riot (well, actually that was another thing with my ISP, maybe other companies are different and actually tell you what is wrong instead of random BS. I should really switch, but i am just so lazy while it is working, plus i haven't heard of any ISP which is not a steaming pile of shit.) | ||
sylverfyre
United States8298 Posts
On July 21 2013 23:39 obesechicken13 wrote: Riot's fisher price modems are acting up again. At least I didn't get in game. And they blame it on Comcast when this doesn't affect any other games or browsing :/ You can't even tell the difference in bot games. Have you done a tracert? It's got to do with Comcast's shitty routing that's creating a bottleneck in the route to Riot's servers. If you haven't actually investigated your tracert, don't call anyone out for claiming that the problem isn't what they claim it is. | ||
upperbound
United States2300 Posts
| ||
Simberto
Germany11331 Posts
On July 22 2013 05:59 upperbound wrote: This stupid fucking league system leaves me with gold V idiots in my game every time that have lost so many games in a row that they just troll 100% of the time. Oh, our Cait is 11/1/3? Let me go afk because we didn't force baron with 0 ward coverage. In theory, it should even out, but I have played 700 fucking ranked games and still I get twice as many people willing to afk on my team as on the other one. If it's not that, it's my league client that crashes 10 times a week, costing me probably about 4-5 wins, and Riot's shit interactions with Verizon and Comcast (the only 2 internet providers in my area), causing me insane lag every so often. I'm trying to just make myself better, but when I go legendary every lane phase as ad and then external factors cause me to still lose unloseable games under regular conditions, I don't know what to do anymore. If your connection is that bad, play a different game. That is the best for everyone, both for you, and for all the people you play with which have to deal with your disconnects/lags. | ||
zer0das
United States8519 Posts
| ||
TheLink
Australia2725 Posts
| ||
SnK-Arcbound
United States4423 Posts
On July 22 2013 10:24 TheLink wrote: There has to be a point at which I start winning right? Like I don't mind where I end up, if I'm a bronze 5 player then I'm a bronze 5 player but I'm just getting destroyed every game no matter what. I just want to hit a bottom point where I'm finally evening out, not this constant plummeting. You shouldn't play ranked if you don't have a lot of runes/champions. There are other reason for why you would just keep losing. You might also be playing a role you aren't particularly good at. | ||
Simberto
Germany11331 Posts
On July 22 2013 10:30 SnK-Arcbound wrote: You shouldn't play ranked if you don't have a lot of runes/champions. There are other reason for why you would just keep losing. You might also be playing a role you aren't particularly good at. Disagree. You just need ~2 not commonly banned champs for each role. You can usually skip one role completely as long as it is not support. So 8 champions would be completely fine for ranked, and you need 16 to queue. A deep champion pool is not really necessary, and might even be detrimental when compared to focussing on actually learning a smaller pool of champions. Runes, you should have ~3 pages and you can play every role, anything more is usually very specific. AD/AD/Armor/MR AP/Mpen/Armor/MR GP10/Mpen/Armor/MR. So you don't need a lot of stuff to be able to play ranked at all, most of that you should be able to afford very shortly after you reach 30. | ||
TheLink
Australia2725 Posts
![]() | ||
Simberto
Germany11331 Posts
| ||
| ||