EPT[GSL 2020] Code S - RO24 - Group B - Page 4
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Elentos
55586 Posts
| ||
Teoita
Italy12247 Posts
On September 02 2020 19:41 Durnuu wrote: True. But maps are so big and the economy so huge that i'm pretty sure Zerg could make banelings work even without forcefield killers. Losing 10 banes out of 70 to bait all the protoss forcefields oughta work  As proven by hydra/ling/baneling being a thing Also, RIP Zest. Really underwhelming games today  | ||
|
seemsgood
5527 Posts
On September 02 2020 19:34 Teoita wrote: Yea those were a big deal for sure, but bane drops were never kind to mineral lines. edit: I went through the VOD, Creator cancelled Warpgate, started a Twilight Council when he had ~150 gas, and then started Warpgate again. Total screwup on his end, it wasn't intended. bane drop was much much better than bane ling runby and nydus tho ;o i d trade it for those shits | ||
|
Elentos
55586 Posts
| ||
|
sneakyfox
8217 Posts
| ||
|
Penev
28535 Posts
| ||
|
SharkStarcraft
Austria2271 Posts
pvz is done for | ||
|
Elentos
55586 Posts
On September 02 2020 19:47 SharkStarcraft wrote: how could creator have held that ling flood?? killing the core just seems so stupidly op i cant even pvz is done for We have already established through Harstem that Creator started warp gate late/initially cancelled it and could have had it for the flood. | ||
|
Elentos
55586 Posts
| ||
|
seemsgood
5527 Posts
On September 02 2020 19:41 Durnuu wrote: True. But maps are so big and the economy so huge that i'm pretty sure Zerg could make banelings work even without forcefield killers. Losing 10 banes out of 70 to bait all the protoss forcefields oughta work my problem with zerg is this race is so ferret'd out right now back then ling bane muta was only good against bio and roach hydra was for mech but now zerg players can do wtf'ever they want its like a wok...it just works... | ||
|
Teoita
Italy12247 Posts
On September 02 2020 19:53 seemsgood wrote: its like a wok...it just works... Reading this about Zerg hurts | ||
|
Elentos
55586 Posts
 | ||
|
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12131 Posts
| ||
|
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
|
sneakyfox
8217 Posts
On September 02 2020 19:56 deacon.frost wrote: Why not build a wall and cancel/build something with a drone in the middle? Like, why not do that against these adepts builds? Zerg evo chambers should be able to raise/lower like depots | ||
|
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12131 Posts
| ||
|
seemsgood
5527 Posts
On September 02 2020 19:56 deacon.frost wrote: Why not build a wall and cancel/build something with a drone in the middle? Like, why not do that against these adepts builds? wait until you see dark brutally dismembering zest...again :[ | ||
|
IndyO
392 Posts
cant lose probes at your 4th to baneling runbys if you dont have probes there | ||
|
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12131 Posts
On September 02 2020 19:59 seemsgood wrote: wait until you see dark brutally dismemmber zest...again :[ Well I was just wondering if there's a reason to do it in a more complex way than the ezpz way. (IMO) | ||
|
lolfail9001
Russian Federation40190 Posts
On September 02 2020 19:41 Durnuu wrote: True. But maps are so big and the economy so huge that i'm pretty sure Zerg could make banelings work even without forcefield killers. Losing 10 banes out of 70 to bait all the protoss forcefields oughta work We would just do things Rogue did in 2015 without ravagers. | ||
| ||
