[GSL 2019] Super Tournament 1 - Championship Sunday - Page 5
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
FrostedMiniWheats
United States30730 Posts
| ||
Anc13nt
1557 Posts
| ||
Fango
United Kingdom8987 Posts
On April 21 2019 17:55 blooblooblahblah wrote: Overall, Byun is probably the best but it still bugs me that he could never split marines ByuN was the best solely with reapers. The fact he struggled to control big armies even in his prime should take him straight out of the micro GOAT discussion imo. | ||
Durnuu
13320 Posts
![]() | ||
stilt
France2749 Posts
On April 21 2019 17:57 Ej_ wrote: Not insanely hard to have good micro if you don't do anything else... Yes sure, it's pretty easy to replicate his micro and wc3 is an easy game. | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland25503 Posts
On April 21 2019 18:02 stilt wrote: Yes sure, it's pretty easy to replicate his micro and wc3 is an easy game. No it isn’t though | ||
Ej_
47656 Posts
On April 21 2019 18:02 stilt wrote: Yes sure, it's pretty easy to replicate his micro and wc3 is an easy game. What I'm saying is that you will obviously be better at 1 aspect of the game if you disregard others, which is especially evident in a game like Starcraft 2 where economy management is very important and plays a large role in winning the games. However, you can disregard that and give me another passive-aggressiave hyperbole that refers to Happy's skills in a completely different game, be my guest. | ||
Fango
United Kingdom8987 Posts
| ||
Charoisaur
Germany15967 Posts
On April 21 2019 17:45 FrostedMiniWheats wrote: I don't agree with Artosis at all. People have not caught up to prime PartinG in micro. Mfer was lethal with blink stalkers Personally I think herO at his peak had better micro than PartinG | ||
stilt
France2749 Posts
On April 21 2019 18:05 Ej_ wrote: What I'm saying is that you will obviously be better at 1 aspect of the game if you disregard others, which is especially evident in a game like Starcraft 2 where economy management is very important and plays a large role in winning the games. However, you can disregard that and give me another passive-aggressiave hyperbole that refers to Happy's skills in a completely different game, be my guest. Don't really know how you can said he particulary disregarded the macro management aspect, proof for this would be hard to bring imo, especially when the few wc3 players who spoke about it all said they were progressing/focusing on macro. As for happy's macro management, he scew up some times by getting supply blocked but the "forgot to build vcs" is a ridiculous statement, actually I would say his macro was fine as a lot of protoss were QQing about his mass orbital style in late game. Anyway, you don't get top GM while forgetting such fundamental asects of the game. Happy was super predictable and was relying on his overall mechanics to win, this approach works better on wc3 than sc2 tho. | ||
Fango
United Kingdom8987 Posts
On April 21 2019 18:11 Charoisaur wrote: Personally I think herO at his peak had better micro than PartinG Nah PartinG edges out herO I think. He was smarter in terms of how to use units optimally and knowing when to go in/out. | ||
FrostedMiniWheats
United States30730 Posts
| ||
Elentos
55551 Posts
On April 21 2019 18:14 stilt wrote: Don't really know how you can said he particulary disregarded the macro management aspect, proof for this would be hard to bring imo, Watch any given Happy game in SC2 and look at the rate at which he produces workers. God awful compared to other Terrans with worse micro. This is not some myth. | ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
| ||
Die4Ever
United States17676 Posts
| ||
Penev
28481 Posts
classicuu | ||
sudete
Singapore3054 Posts
| ||
Kopernikus
Germany27 Posts
| ||
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
| ||
TerranOwnsAll
359 Posts
| ||
| ||