EPTYou mean you didn't get your disruptor fix in the the PvP series? And there were some macro games...just more sort of one side-sided stomps.
[IEM] Taipei - Day 2 - Page 41
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
FrkFrJss
Canada1205 Posts
You mean you didn't get your disruptor fix in the the PvP series? And there were some macro games...just more sort of one side-sided stomps. | ||
|
Arvendilin
Germany1878 Posts
On February 02 2016 17:02 pure.Wasted wrote: what a shitfest. And here I was, in my naivete, hoping for some cool Disruptor micro and some back and forth macro games. You were one game away herO. ONE GAME! Disruptor micro in PvT? You almost never build them other than against mech (sometimes) or in the suepr super lategame, Bio shits on diruptors | ||
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On February 02 2016 17:04 Cricketer12 wrote: With the way ByuN plays legacy, either he kills sOs early or loses, the game wont last long enough for disruptors The first game lasted long enough, but why build disruptors when you can build carriers and tempests? | ||
|
Cricketer12
United States13980 Posts
On February 02 2016 17:05 Arvendilin wrote: Disruptor micro in PvT? You almost never build them other than against mech (sometimes) or in the suepr super lategame, Bio shits on diruptors No no no, you get pheonix high temp to kill medi, then disruptor kills bio  | ||
|
Cricketer12
United States13980 Posts
On February 02 2016 17:05 ZigguratOfUr wrote: The first game lasted long enough, but why build disruptors when you can build carriers and tempests? Well, exactly | ||
|
pure.Wasted
Canada4701 Posts
On February 02 2016 17:05 Arvendilin wrote: Disruptor micro in PvT? You almost never build them other than against mech (sometimes) or in the suepr super lategame, Bio shits on diruptors And here I was, in my naivete, hoping that the entire point of introducing the Disruptor was to force Protoss to micro really really fucking hard to take engagements over Terran. | ||
|
EatingBomber
1017 Posts
On February 02 2016 17:03 Vindicare605 wrote: LOL more strategic? At least half of the game's strategy comes down to blind luck. Stop deluding yourself. Strategy in Hearthstone is making calculated guesses and risks, deciding what is most efficient with the hand you are played, while considering what your opponent has from his prior plays. SC2? Win an engagement, takes whole army across the map and wipes them out. 1a is so complex! Don't scout a cheese/proxy? Lose on the spot. But please, continue living in a world where SC2 is 'strategic'. | ||
|
Boucot
France15997 Posts
On February 02 2016 17:03 sAsImre wrote: Byun was aware something was going on but sOs played that perfectly by going for a 1 immo timing. Either you're lucky and your army is in the right spot or you die. But better calling me than actually playing some starcraft right. It was a joke :x | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
On February 02 2016 17:07 EatingBomber wrote: Stop deluding yourself. Strategy in Hearthstone is making calculated guesses and risks, deciding what is most efficient with the hand you are played, while considering what your opponent has from his prior plays. SC2? Win an engagement, takes whole army across the map and wipes them out. 1a is so complex! Don't scout a cheese/proxy? Lose on the spot. But please, continue living in a world where SC2 is 'strategic'. Hahaha, bold move to diss Starcraft like that on a Starcraft fan site of all places | ||
|
swissman777
1106 Posts
Not with that attitude + Show Spoiler + sorry | ||
|
Noonius
Estonia17413 Posts
| ||
|
Roadog
Canada1670 Posts
On February 02 2016 17:04 Cricketer12 wrote: Just realized no sOs in PL today... fuck my FPL... I was hoping to maybe buy low on him later, but rip no trading | ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16082 Posts
On February 02 2016 17:07 EatingBomber wrote: Stop deluding yourself. Strategy in Hearthstone is making calculated guesses and risks, deciding what is most efficient with the hand you are played, while considering what your opponent has from his prior plays. SC2? Win an engagement, takes whole army across the map and wipes them out. 1a is so complex! Don't scout a cheese/proxy? Lose on the spot. But please, continue living in a world where SC2 is 'strategic'. You actually just argued against yourself without even realizing it. | ||
|
EatingBomber
1017 Posts
On February 02 2016 17:03 Vindicare605 wrote: LOL more strategic? At least half of the game's strategy comes down to blind luck. | ||
|
Diabolique
Czech Republic5118 Posts
| ||
|
Diabolique
Czech Republic5118 Posts
On February 02 2016 17:10 Roadog wrote: I was hoping to maybe buy low on him later, but rip no trading Exactly that was my plan ... he does not start well usually ... but what makes him a beast is a participation at a foreign tournament and winning it - then he performs great in Korea as well. | ||
|
nanaoei
3358 Posts
would you make disruptors against an open engagement versus mostly cracklings? ofc not. how about against mostly stimmed bio? it's possible, with enough numbers, enough buffer, and the right situation taking place in the game, but it's still widely cost inefficient when all it takes is a lull in dps to maneuver. | ||
|
Wrath
3174 Posts
On February 02 2016 17:10 Noonius wrote: the patch changed NOTHING Protoss win games -> bad patch! | ||
|
Diabolique
Czech Republic5118 Posts
sOs is not a protoss! | ||
|
Noonius
Estonia17413 Posts
| ||
| ||
