EPTRed Bull Battle Grounds: Washington - Page 24
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Scrubwave
Poland1786 Posts
| ||
|
Captain Peabody
United States3135 Posts
| ||
|
Clonester
Germany2808 Posts
On September 20 2015 05:29 Wintex wrote: The game is better if it's released a bit broken because a lot of playtesters in the real game and in an actually good environment will make balance easier to fix. Open Beta? But hey, why open betas, when you just can sell open betas for 39.99 and call them "gold version" | ||
|
Solar424
United States4001 Posts
On September 20 2015 05:29 Wintex wrote: The game is better if it's released a bit broken because a lot of playtesters in the real game and in an actually good environment will make balance easier to fix. You don't need a big playerbase to see that adepts are broken units | ||
|
Poopfeast 024
Gambia437 Posts
On September 20 2015 05:30 Captain Peabody wrote: I agree the complaining about Adepts is a bit much. It's Beta, and MC and Huk are utilizing a new unit really karking well against opponents without that much experience. It's natural they'd do well. It doesn't necessarily mean adepts are OP, let alone crazy OP. It's just part of what it means to have a Beta tournament. it is an unit with absurd stats/cost. learning to play against something that has ridiculous stats for its price worked out really well in hots beta right? | ||
|
Wintex
Norway16848 Posts
why not just release the game. people can play the campaign etc. it's not like proplay will be truly ready before wcs season 1 | ||
|
Magnifico
1958 Posts
On September 20 2015 05:30 Captain Peabody wrote: I agree the complaining about Adepts is a bit much. It's Beta, and MC and Huk are utilizing a new unit really karking well against opponents without that much experience. It's natural they'd do well. It doesn't necessarily mean adepts are OP, let alone crazy OP. It's just part of what it means to have a Beta tournament. Exactly. Adepts are probably OP in some way, but they are not making Huk/MC "auto" win any game. | ||
|
Wintex
Norway16848 Posts
On September 20 2015 05:31 Solar424 wrote: You don't need a big playerbase to see that adepts are broken units You don't need a big playerbase to see that it's a beta where they are testing design more than creating a fully functional game. The more something is broken, the more it will be a focus and then you get more data. Good god, dude. | ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
| ||
|
TheWinks
United States572 Posts
On September 20 2015 05:30 Captain Peabody wrote: I agree the complaining about Adepts is a bit much. It's Beta, and MC and Huk are utilizing a new unit really karking well against opponents without that much experience. It's natural they'd do well. It doesn't necessarily mean adepts are OP, let alone crazy OP. It's just part of what it means to have a Beta tournament. Nah, it's like pre-nerf mass ravager. It's not just that the unit is too strong, the resulting games are uninteresting. | ||
|
CheddarToss
534 Posts
On September 20 2015 05:30 Captain Peabody wrote: I agree the complaining about Adepts is a bit much. It's Beta, and MC and Huk are utilizing a new unit really karking well against opponents without that much experience. It's natural they'd do well. It doesn't necessarily mean adepts are OP, let alone crazy OP. It's just part of what it means to have a Beta tournament. Yes, that's exactly how I see it. I've been watching Huk's and MC's streams and Adept/WP harass doesn't do nearly as well on ladder as it did against Bomber/MMA and Violet/the other guy. I have a feeling that Terrans in this tournament weren't practicing LotV as much as Huk/MC have. | ||
|
Scrubwave
Poland1786 Posts
| ||
|
Noonius
Estonia17413 Posts
I think I have covered all the key areas for this series | ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
| ||
|
Clonester
Germany2808 Posts
On September 20 2015 05:33 jalstar wrote: Everything people are saying in defense of adepts was said in defense of reapers in WoL and hellbats in HotS. It was wrong then and it's wrong now. It is more like warhounds in hots. You did not need a large player base to see that they where totaly out of any form of balance. | ||
|
Solar424
United States4001 Posts
On September 20 2015 05:33 Wintex wrote: You don't need a big playerbase to see that it's a beta where they are testing design more than creating a fully functional game. The more something is broken, the more it will be a focus and then you get more data. Good god, dude. So things can just be broken because its a Beta? | ||
|
Scrubwave
Poland1786 Posts
| ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
| ||
|
Aeromi
France14461 Posts
On September 20 2015 05:37 Solar424 wrote: So things can just be broken because its a Beta? Yes. | ||
|
Poopfeast 024
Gambia437 Posts
ok wasn't aware of this rule yet. powerful reasoning | ||
| ||
