EPT[SPL] Samsung vs MVP Round 3 2015 - Page 10
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Olli
Austria24417 Posts
| ||
|
GumBa
United Kingdom31935 Posts
| ||
|
KingofdaHipHop
United States25602 Posts
| ||
|
FrostedMiniWheats
United States30730 Posts
| ||
|
RaFox17
Finland4581 Posts
| ||
|
showstealer1829
Australia3123 Posts
On May 18 2015 19:34 FFW_Rude wrote: There's a Top 5 zerg list ? LOL at Dear's face. He was like : "Oh fuck you man" Life Life Life Life ByuL | ||
Inflicted
Australia18228 Posts
His vT results recently has been atrocious | ||
|
Rollora
2450 Posts
On May 18 2015 19:19 Elentos wrote: The real question is - if this works for Reality, will this find its way into the meta? <.< The answer is no: I have seen several mech+ghost vs Toss games, and many wins with it. The reason it worked was mostly because it surprised the opponent. If the opponent knows you are going mech or there is a high possibility, he maneuvres the way around you. Meaning, he abuses the fact that his army is way more mobile. Also mech takes very long to be strong (requires high numbers) as ground force- so you "just" need to go for an early push (sounds easier then it is ofc) or allin, to kill the mech player. Maxed out mech usually also doesn't have too well of anti-air. And if you got Thors and the Opponent has HTs, feedback hits pretty hard. But: its actually a good composition IF you ever make it to the maxed out mech + Ghosts. So its basically not a very viable option. Its not bad, but its hard to execute and there are many ways to kill the mech player before he gets the composition he wants. We will see it from time to time again (as we did already, every couple of months), and if you watch some players that ONLY play mech (or are known for likely going mech), you see you can have success with it. But most players will feel more comfortable with a faster/ more mobile army. If LOTV Tanks (pickup by medivac) stay that way, mech could be more viable, since one of the biggest problems is the time between unsieging, moving, sieging and shooting (if you get attacked somewhere you don't have your army, as we have seen Reality losing his PF) | ||
|
Roadog
Canada1670 Posts
| ||
|
Olli
Austria24417 Posts
| ||
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
Well that''s... quite accurate actually :p | ||
|
showstealer1829
Australia3123 Posts
On May 18 2015 19:35 GumBa wrote: I don't get the point of GG girls Neither do I. It's like EsportsTV's answer to a question no one asked | ||
|
imre
France9263 Posts
On May 18 2015 19:36 Rollora wrote: The answer is no: I have seen several mech+ghost vs Toss games, and many wins with it. The reason it worked was mostly because it surprised the opponent. If the opponent knows you are going mech or there is a high possibility, he maneuvres the way around you. Meaning, he abuses the fact that his army is way more mobile. Also mech takes very long to be strong (requires high numbers) as ground force- so you "just" need to go for an early push (sounds easier then it is ofc) or allin, to kill the mech player. Maxed out mech usually also doesn't have too well of anti-air. And if you got Thors and the Opponent has HTs, feedback hits pretty hard. But: its actually a good composition IF you ever make it to the maxed out mech + Ghosts. So its basically not a very viable option. Its not bad, but its hard to execute and there are many ways to kill the mech player before he gets the composition he wants. We will see it from time to time again (as we did already, every couple of months), and if you watch some players that ONLY play mech (or are known for likely going mech), you see you can have success with it. But most players will feel more comfortable with a faster/ more mobile army. If LOTV Tanks (pickup by medivac) stay that way, mech could be more viable, since one of the biggest problems is the time between unsieging, moving, sieging and shooting (if you get attacked somewhere you don't have your army, as we have seen Reality losing his PF) main example was Bbyong in the play off last year. Won twice with it, got destroyed by Rain the 3rd time he tried it and it wasn't even close. Rain just built stargate and carriers iirc. | ||
|
GumBa
United Kingdom31935 Posts
| ||
|
dazed25
3566 Posts
| ||
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
On May 18 2015 19:37 sAsImre wrote: main example was Bbyong in the play off last year. Won twice with it, got destroyed by Rain the 3rd time he tried it and it wasn't even close. Rain just built stargate and carriers iirc. Stats did it as well against Suno in GSL too. | ||
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
On May 18 2015 19:38 GumBa wrote: For some reason my internet craps out on sundays and mondays a lot. I don't get it. Even youtube ? EDIT : oh... youtube and germany is bad i forgot | ||
|
Elentos
55551 Posts
| ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On May 18 2015 19:33 Big J wrote: Well, Solar losing to his Nemesis on the worst map and Yongwha losing *this is an obvious bait to hear everyone's top5-zerg lists. Well the Solar one was a gamble, but Yongwha should have won that imo :D I am always interested in top 5 lists though  | ||
|
mCon.Hephaistas
Netherlands891 Posts
| ||
| ||
