|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 05 2015 19:15 opisska wrote:I was watching the fungals all the time with disbelieve - how is it possible that so many landed so perfectly? I believe TY is just playing a little too slow today.
I don't think he was slow he was all over the map and clawing his way back.
Fungals are hard to dodge and he was being pushed on with ultras and lings.
plus Dark is awesome
|
To the geezer who voted "Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do": I hope you're trolling or it's the other option
|
On February 05 2015 19:17 Penev wrote: To the geezer who voted "Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do": I hope you're trolling or it's the other option Maybe a missclick Or a SKT hater
|
A really good game but i think that zerg lack the ability to harras due to PF:s while terran can harras with drops all the time. That impedes multitasking for zerg also.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 05 2015 19:17 NaboliC wrote: A really good game but i think that zerg lack the ability to harras due to PF:s while terran can harras with drops all the time. That impedes multitasking for zerg also.
mutas
|
Who's arranging this event?
|
On February 05 2015 19:17 NaboliC wrote: A really good game but i think that zerg lack the ability to harras due to PF:s while terran can harras with drops all the time. That impedes multitasking for zerg also.
banelings runby or mass muta. Hard to do when you're going for a full t3 army tho.
|
United Kingdom31935 Posts
On February 05 2015 19:18 cheekymonkey wrote: Who's arranging this event? Spottv
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 05 2015 19:17 NaboliC wrote: A really good game but i think that zerg lack the ability to harras due to PF:s while terran can harras with drops all the time. That impedes multitasking for zerg also.
the reason it was harder for dark to harass was because he chose a very immobile army whereas TY had the most mobile army in the game
|
United Kingdom31935 Posts
On February 05 2015 19:18 sAsImre wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2015 19:17 NaboliC wrote: A really good game but i think that zerg lack the ability to harras due to PF:s while terran can harras with drops all the time. That impedes multitasking for zerg also. banelings runby or mass muta. Hard to do when you're going for a full t3 army tho. Cracklings aint bad as well
|
On February 05 2015 19:18 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2015 19:17 NaboliC wrote: A really good game but i think that zerg lack the ability to harras due to PF:s while terran can harras with drops all the time. That impedes multitasking for zerg also. mutas I mean in lategame like in this game. You don't build mutas at that point since they are useless.
|
United Kingdom31935 Posts
|
On February 05 2015 19:18 GumBa wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2015 19:18 sAsImre wrote:On February 05 2015 19:17 NaboliC wrote: A really good game but i think that zerg lack the ability to harras due to PF:s while terran can harras with drops all the time. That impedes multitasking for zerg also. banelings runby or mass muta. Hard to do when you're going for a full t3 army tho. Cracklings aint bad as well 4 ultras also very good to bust an isolated PF
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 05 2015 19:19 NaboliC wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2015 19:18 KelsierSC wrote:On February 05 2015 19:17 NaboliC wrote: A really good game but i think that zerg lack the ability to harras due to PF:s while terran can harras with drops all the time. That impedes multitasking for zerg also. mutas I mean in lategame like in this game. You don't build mutas at that point since they are useless.
well yeh but if you choose a lategame immobile army you can't also have an awesome harass army.
|
On February 05 2015 19:19 NaboliC wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2015 19:18 KelsierSC wrote:On February 05 2015 19:17 NaboliC wrote: A really good game but i think that zerg lack the ability to harras due to PF:s while terran can harras with drops all the time. That impedes multitasking for zerg also. mutas I mean in lategame like in this game. You don't build mutas at that point since they are useless.
you can play with mass muta 3/3 without any problem in lategame ZvT.
|
United Kingdom31935 Posts
On February 05 2015 19:19 TheDwf wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2015 19:18 GumBa wrote:On February 05 2015 19:18 sAsImre wrote:On February 05 2015 19:17 NaboliC wrote: A really good game but i think that zerg lack the ability to harras due to PF:s while terran can harras with drops all the time. That impedes multitasking for zerg also. banelings runby or mass muta. Hard to do when you're going for a full t3 army tho. Cracklings aint bad as well 4 ultras also very good to bust an isolated PF Yeah, lategame ZvT both can harass really well imo
|
On February 05 2015 19:19 NaboliC wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2015 19:18 KelsierSC wrote:On February 05 2015 19:17 NaboliC wrote: A really good game but i think that zerg lack the ability to harras due to PF:s while terran can harras with drops all the time. That impedes multitasking for zerg also. mutas I mean in lategame like in this game. You don't build mutas at that point since they are useless. That was Dark's choice, you can perfectly play lategame with 20+ mutas
|
your Country52797 Posts
2:00 Dark opens 13 pool. TY opening with a barracks followed by a later gas. Dark expanding. TY getting a marine.
3:00 Zerglings moving across the map. Reactor goes on the barracks. TY expanding. Zerglings move across the map and find two marines. TY pulls lots of SCVs but holds the zerglings with only one worker loss.
4:00 Factory for TY. Dark sneaks back into the natural and kills the SCV building the OC again. TY has four marines now.
5:00 Starport for TY. Dark building drones. TY looking for overlords with a barracks and marines. TY starting hellion production.
|
|
United Kingdom31935 Posts
Dark believes in a thing called roach
|
|
|
|