|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On May 21 2013 11:42 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2013 11:41 usethis2 wrote: I thought there was a spore patch? Is it in effect as of now? Yes. These two just didn't get the memo xD. Snute did though
I think you can still go mutas. Just adjust it so you get a +1 attack on lings so banelings still 1 hit lings.
|
Nestea fighting!!!!!!!!!!
|
Camera watching Sen pack his things is a bit much. ![](/mirror/smilies/frown.gif)
MLG, use some common sense.
|
Slasher is tweeting the wrong results
Fuck Slasher
|
On May 21 2013 11:40 veKtory wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2013 11:40 vult wrote:On May 21 2013 11:39 Crowley. wrote: Come on Sen, those were two of the biggest throws I've ever seen... I really wouldnt those games throws... haha. Running back home with all his Mutas when he could've forced a base trade was basically throwing the game.
nestea had 3-4 spores at his natural, so it was a hard decision for sen to make...
|
On May 21 2013 11:40 PhoenixVoid wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2013 11:39 ETisME wrote: Nestea makes perfect decisions and timings when he was behind. Reminds me of the past NesTea, who didn't have the best mechanics, but compensated with some of the most intelligent, well thought out and deliberate moves. Yup he was near invincible at the time. That's when everyone was just executing their builds and Nestea's scouting and game-reads seemed almost maphack-like during that period.
|
On May 21 2013 11:37 Bagration wrote:Because of the way the mutas damage works. 9, then 3, then 1. More armor reduces a lot more damage 10,4,2 with 1 armor vs 9,3,1 with 2 armor would be the same right?
I always thought the above was right, but I just looked it up and saw that the damage scales different with an upgrade. It becomes 10, 3.3, 1.1
My mistake.
|
On May 21 2013 11:44 Dodgin wrote: Slasher is tweeting the wrong results
Fuck Slasher
Hah, that's wierd.
|
On May 21 2013 11:37 Bagration wrote:Because of the way the mutas damage works. 9, then 3, then 1. More armor reduces a lot more damage
This. The bounce attack loses 2/3 strength wiith each bounce, and that includes the upgrades. +2 armor reduces every bounce by 2. So, the armor scales better than the attack.
It's easy to see when you actually spell out how much damage each attack does:
0/2 attacking 1/1: 9/3/1 against 1 armor = 8/2/0.5 damage, or 10.5 total damage done. (Attacks do a minimum of 0.5 damage.)
1/1 attacking 0/2: 10/3.333/1.111 against 2 armor = 8/1.333./0.5 damage, or 9.833 total damage done.
|
On May 21 2013 11:45 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2013 11:37 Bagration wrote:On May 21 2013 11:35 Koshi wrote: Why is 1/1 worse than 0/2? Because of the way the mutas damage works. 9, then 3, then 1. More armor reduces a lot more damage 10,4,2 with 1 armor vs 9,3,1 with 2 armor would be the same right? I always thought the above was right, but I just looked it up and saw that the damage scales different with an upgrade. It becomes 10, 3.3, 1.1 My mistake.
you don't get +1/+1/+1 from the upgrades. it's +1/+0.33/0.11
but how does the game even handle decimals? playing in the unit tester it still looks like it goes to 10/4/2 with +1 attack, then 11/4/2 with +2 attack and 12/4/2 with +3 attack.
or does the game track the decimals in the hitpoints.
|
|
I think I'm happy with every matchup except Swarmhost Z v. P. So, I hope we don't see that. But, I don't get the feeling Nestea is that kind of player.
|
There's no reason this should take 5-6 hours.
|
What is the song they play during the break that goes blah blah "higher and higher."
|
Alicia looks 5 feet tall relative to everyone else.
|
France7248 Posts
anyone know who is the translator?
|
On May 21 2013 11:52 Yhamm wrote: anyone know who is the translator? Hwanni.
|
Rod Breslau @Slasher NesTea has officially been eliminated from #WCS by Sen. Sen now won win away from two non-Koreans advancing. Go home Slasher, you're drunk.
|
And a good laugh was had by all about void rays.
|
France7248 Posts
On May 21 2013 11:52 PhoenixVoid wrote:Hwanni. thank you
|
|
|
|