EPT[DreamHack] Valencia Day 2 - Page 58
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
| ||
|
Leviance
Germany4079 Posts
| ||
|
Day9notdead
Russian Federation501 Posts
| ||
|
andaylin
United States10830 Posts
On September 23 2012 20:55 xrapture wrote: Which is why I don't mech on ladder. My mechanics won't improve as fast using a style where anything other than a move is optional. once zergs refigure out how to tech switch between muta and roach against mech it will suck again. | ||
|
hoLyNtt
United States170 Posts
| ||
|
pieisamazing
United States1234 Posts
if you're uber gosu then sure you can defend with minimal static d, but just make the investment and you'll save yourself money, larvae, and a huge headache seriously, just build two spores per base. when you're floating that many minerals, you can afford to put some down. same with spines | ||
|
pallad
Poland1958 Posts
On September 23 2012 20:54 fayte253 wrote: lol patch zergs are so bad Targa played very good for long time , so stfu if you dont know players and watch only stephano | ||
|
yoigen
Germany369 Posts
On September 23 2012 20:55 xrapture wrote: Which is why I don't mech on ladder. My mechanics won't improve as fast using a style where anything other than a move is optional. That is bullshit. Playing mech takes way more than 1a lol. | ||
|
Benjamin99
4176 Posts
| ||
|
JacobShock
Denmark2485 Posts
On September 23 2012 20:57 pieisamazing wrote: i dont understand the reluctance to plant two spores per base or extra spines if you're uber gosu then sure you can defend with minimal static d, but just make the investment and you'll save yourself money, larvae, and a huge headache seriously, just build two spores per base. when you're floating that many minerals, you can afford to put some down. same with spines agreed. | ||
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
On September 23 2012 20:56 andaylin wrote: once zergs refigure out how to tech switch between muta and roach against mech it will suck again. Zergs don't actually die to mech anyway, they die to hellion banshee in massive numbers. Biomech will make up to 8 hellions and 2 banshee max. Mech just produce them all game long and zerg think you defend both of these with the same amount. -_- Mech is just the final a-move army so you don't lose because misscontroling a bio army in the same spot might lose you the game. | ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
| ||
|
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
On September 23 2012 20:57 yoigen wrote: That is bullshit. Playing mech takes way more than 1a lol. well it's less micro-demanding than marine/tank or pure bio at least | ||
|
RageCommodore
Germany912 Posts
| ||
|
ibo422
Belgium2844 Posts
| ||
|
ThePlayer33
Australia2378 Posts
 | ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12041 Posts
well it's less micro-demanding than marine/tank or pure bio at least Yeah, but unlike bio, if you make one mistake with mech you lose the game. I play mech in all matchups, it's awesome against zerg, but bad against protoss. :p | ||
|
xrapture
United States1644 Posts
On September 23 2012 20:57 yoigen wrote: That is bullshit. Playing mech takes way more than 1a lol. I know, but when you have a bunch of thor/tank/banshee/vikingand you have a lead as mech you can just a move. With biomech you can lose your entire army at any point in the game, regardless of your lead- ala more mechanically demanding. | ||
|
AgentChaos
United Kingdom4569 Posts
| ||
|
DaCruise
Denmark2457 Posts
| ||
| ||
