On June 18 2012 08:32 Anonymous_Coward wrote:
It's not Dreamhack's fault that Taeja couldn't win his group.
It's not Dreamhack's fault that Taeja couldn't win his group.
Would've been TaeJa vs Ret in that case. Teamkill was inevitable.
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
June 17 2012 23:39 GMT
#5841
On June 18 2012 08:32 Anonymous_Coward wrote: It's not Dreamhack's fault that Taeja couldn't win his group. Would've been TaeJa vs Ret in that case. Teamkill was inevitable. | ||
|
TheDougler
Canada8306 Posts
June 17 2012 23:39 GMT
#5842
On June 18 2012 08:34 m0ck wrote: Show nested quote + On June 18 2012 08:32 TheDougler wrote: On June 18 2012 08:25 disinfect wrote: On June 18 2012 08:23 Crushinator wrote: Ouch, Huk out despite going 2-1. That has to hurt, and is a very unfortunate thing about this system ![]() It's a great system. It always sucks to lose. It's not a great system it takes a lot of strategy out of each series. In a GSL group, due to winner's and loser's matches, you can play way more mind games. Do you go for two standard games or do you cheese? If you're up 1-0 in your BO3 you can do a risky build to try to close it out easily. In the dreamhack system you HAVE to try to 2-0 every match, 2-1 is (as we see right here) not an option. So people will do the build they feel most comfortable with. Remember Nestea's spine crawler rush that worked in GSL a few months ago? Or the failed one he tried earlier this week? Neither of those would EVER happen in this tournament because it's just not worth the risk of being eliminated. You're making zero sense Could you explain to me what you don't understand? In this system, you can't afford to metagame your opponent. Your strategy will be the same regardless of your position in the series. In GSL, and (I believe, though could be wrong, MLG where it's heads up, then map score) this is not the case. Therefore there is less strategy in the dreamhack system, therefore it is inferior. Why do you disagree? | ||
|
TheSilverfox
Sweden1928 Posts
June 17 2012 23:39 GMT
#5843
On June 18 2012 08:36 flowSthead wrote: I don't get this bracket. Why is it Group A vs Group B and Group E vs Group F, but Group C vs Group H and Group D vs Group G. For half of the bracket they used groups next to each other and for half of the bracket they didn't. That makes no sense. They draw the Ro16 randomly. | ||
|
7331
Israel8 Posts
June 17 2012 23:39 GMT
#5844
User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
RaiKageRyu
Canada4773 Posts
June 17 2012 23:39 GMT
#5845
On June 18 2012 08:34 m0ck wrote: Show nested quote + On June 18 2012 08:32 TheDougler wrote: On June 18 2012 08:25 disinfect wrote: On June 18 2012 08:23 Crushinator wrote: Ouch, Huk out despite going 2-1. That has to hurt, and is a very unfortunate thing about this system ![]() It's a great system. It always sucks to lose. It's not a great system it takes a lot of strategy out of each series. In a GSL group, due to winner's and loser's matches, you can play way more mind games. Do you go for two standard games or do you cheese? If you're up 1-0 in your BO3 you can do a risky build to try to close it out easily. In the dreamhack system you HAVE to try to 2-0 every match, 2-1 is (as we see right here) not an option. So people will do the build they feel most comfortable with. Remember Nestea's spine crawler rush that worked in GSL a few months ago? Or the failed one he tried earlier this week? Neither of those would EVER happen in this tournament because it's just not worth the risk of being eliminated. You're making zero sense He's making perfect sense. He's just saying you can throw in a random build here and there in dual elim group system. | ||
|
Irave
United States9965 Posts
June 17 2012 23:39 GMT
#5846
| ||
|
niteReloaded
Croatia5282 Posts
June 17 2012 23:39 GMT
#5847
Naniwa - similar thing. Two PvZs in a row........ Those are my two favourites usually, but now I'll have to root for Mana and Sase my secondary picks. | ||
|
Battousai13
United States638 Posts
June 17 2012 23:39 GMT
#5848
| ||
|
Derrida
2885 Posts
June 17 2012 23:39 GMT
#5849
On June 18 2012 08:36 flowSthead wrote: I don't get this bracket. Why is it Group A vs Group B and Group E vs Group F, but Group C vs Group H and Group D vs Group G. For half of the bracket they used groups next to each other and for half of the bracket they didn't. That makes no sense. I was thinking the exact same thing... maybe they randomly drew the groups to be matched with each other? (trying to keep a positive view of things here). | ||
|
Awesomeness
Germany1361 Posts
June 17 2012 23:40 GMT
#5850
On June 18 2012 08:38 Gotuso wrote: Show nested quote + On June 18 2012 08:30 aruken wrote: to people whining about this 'system' : suck it up it is called goal average. Only alternative is the gsl one in which basicly every group is a little double elimination bracket with winner of both winner and loser brackets advancing. But it is not fairer in any way. Suck it up. Actually the GSL system is way better because it completly removes these kinds of situations. In the GSL groups it's always 100% clear who is going to advance and who is out. As a player you're also never reliant on another competitor, where as in these kind of groups that can happen. For instance, in this case sLivko got to play his last match vs an opponent who was already out, instead of facing Stephano who was also playing for a place in the top 16. But you can only play one game at a time with the GSL-System. (Except for the first 2 games obviously.) That would take way too long at an event like this... | ||
|
Sp00ly
United Kingdom1546 Posts
June 17 2012 23:40 GMT
#5851
On June 18 2012 08:36 Anonymous_Coward wrote: Show nested quote + On June 18 2012 08:34 OzVelas wrote: hero keen taeja nerchio stephano are in the same bracket, what a joke Only two of those you mention managed to win their group. What do you want Dreamhack to do, intervene and set up the bracket based upon what they think will be better, and ignore the group stage? If they didn't want to be on the "stacked" side of the bracket, they should have won their group. Well if they had filled in the bracket in a different order it could be way more balanced whilst keeping the winner vs 2nd place set up. As it stands I'm going to call a HerO-Sase final. | ||
|
Kazeshini
Germany166 Posts
June 17 2012 23:40 GMT
#5852
| ||
|
TheBanana
Norway2183 Posts
June 17 2012 23:40 GMT
#5853
On June 18 2012 08:33 Ammanas wrote: I still don't understand why aren't all the tournaments with group stages using GSL format groups, rather than round robin. In that format it can never happen that player only loses once and is eliminated... Because the GSL-group system is unfair. Example. Player A is God and beats everyone. Player B is horrible and loses to everyone. Player C and Player D are exactly the same. C and D goes 1-1 (2-1, 1-2) against each other. The guy drawing player B advances and never faces player A. | ||
|
Chenz
Sweden1197 Posts
June 17 2012 23:40 GMT
#5854
On June 18 2012 08:38 Inhumane wrote: Show nested quote + On June 18 2012 08:38 Anonymous_Coward wrote: On June 18 2012 08:36 Skyline026 wrote: Dreamhack trying to have atleast one of the quantic swedes make it to the finals. These brackets are bullshit. The bracket was decided in advance, winner of group x, plays runner up of group y, and so on. Stop with your bullshit conspiracy theories, people. Why is it A vs. B and E vs. F but not C vs. D and G vs. H? I'm 90% sure it's being drawn randomly, one 1st place from a group vs one 2nd place. That's what they always done at earlier events, and what they did for each of the different group stages. | ||
|
polyphonyEX
United States2539 Posts
June 17 2012 23:40 GMT
#5855
stephano > keen Nerchio > Bratok Hero> Taeja Cytoplsm > Mana Naniwa> Slivka dimaga> Protosser Sase > ret Harstem > Fraer Stephano > Nerchio Hero> Cytoplasm Naniwa> dimaga sase> frae stephano > Hero Sase > Naniwa Sase > Stephano | ||
|
m0ck
4194 Posts
June 17 2012 23:41 GMT
#5856
On June 18 2012 08:38 Anonymous_Coward wrote: Show nested quote + On June 18 2012 08:36 Skyline026 wrote: Dreamhack trying to have atleast one of the quantic swedes make it to the finals. These brackets are bullshit. The bracket was decided in advance, winner of group x, plays runner up of group y, and so on. Stop with your bullshit conspiracy theories, people. Is that so? Was the information public? | ||
|
Domus
510 Posts
June 17 2012 23:41 GMT
#5857
![]() | ||
|
flowSthead
1065 Posts
June 17 2012 23:41 GMT
#5858
On June 18 2012 08:37 Awesomeness wrote: Show nested quote + On June 18 2012 08:36 flowSthead wrote: I don't get this bracket. Why is it Group A vs Group B and Group E vs Group F, but Group C vs Group H and Group D vs Group G. For half of the bracket they used groups next to each other and for half of the bracket they didn't. That makes no sense. It's a random draw, which actually is the fairest way to do it. But it is only partly random draw. It's random draw for groups, not for players. That means that people do not have to face the same person they played previously in their group. It's.... bizarre. | ||
|
amazingoopah
United States1925 Posts
June 17 2012 23:41 GMT
#5859
Sase vs Hero finals please. | ||
|
Rhaegar_tar
France847 Posts
June 17 2012 23:41 GMT
#5860
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 mouzHeroMarine StarCraft: Brood WarUpATreeSC ProTech135 BRAT_OK JuggernautJason85 SKillous FoxeR Railgan Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games Grubby4546 Beastyqt1005 FrodaN867 B2W.Neo481 allub287 Fuzer QueenE139 ArmadaUGS136 Livibee75 Liquid`Ken19 OptimusSC25 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH94 StarCraft: Brood War• Reevou • Kozan • AfreecaTV YouTube • sooper7s • intothetv • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel League of Legends Other Games |
|
PiGosaur Monday
The PondCast
OSC
Clem vs Cure
ByuN vs TBD
TBD vs Solar
MaxPax vs TBD
Krystianer vs TBD
ShoWTimE vs TBD
Big Brain Bouts
Serral vs TBD
BSL 21
BSL 21
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
WardiTV Invitational
|
|
|