EPTSet 2
P11 GuemChi<Ohana> P5 Wooki
[SPL] Air Force ACE vs. KT Rolster - Page 52
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Juliette
United States6003 Posts
Set 2 P11 GuemChi<Ohana> P5 Wooki | ||
|
N.geNuity
United States5112 Posts
On May 22 2012 16:58 MrCon wrote: July said he'll go to military soon, wouldn't he be able to join Ace ? probably not. licenses are valid for like a year. just like idra doesn't have a license. | ||
ZeromuS
Canada13401 Posts
| ||
|
Sawamura
Malaysia7602 Posts
On May 22 2012 16:59 radadaundandan wrote: Since when such games are part of this game section? Since sc2/bw hybrid started on the 20th. | ||
|
zaii
Guam2611 Posts
| ||
|
ladyumbra
Canada1699 Posts
| ||
|
PhoenixDark
United States286 Posts
On May 22 2012 16:54 Kommander wrote: Hey, I'm just happy that certain "elitists" were proven wrong when they said that BW pros were immediately going to crush in SC2. I mean seriously, it's going to take them several months or so. It's pretty funny in fact. The initialy argument was that SC2 was "so easy" that BW pros would naturally dominate it immediately. Then the argument morphed to claiming the game was so cheesy/timing based there could be no stability at the top(nevermind three players basically dominating the game for its first two years). They're going to get good eventually considering how much they practice. But none of them are going to be better than DRG, MVP, etc by the end of the year | ||
|
Caihead
Canada8550 Posts
| ||
|
las91
United States5080 Posts
| ||
|
Juliette
United States6003 Posts
On May 22 2012 16:59 Juliette wrote: ACE vs KT Set 2 P11 GuemChi <Ohana> P5 Wooki Wookie puts his gate on 10, GuemChi waits until 13 | ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
On May 22 2012 16:59 N.geNuity wrote: probably not. licenses are valid for like a year. just like idra doesn't have a license. Oh k, thanks. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
zaii
Guam2611 Posts
EDIT: TY | ||
|
Ruscour
5233 Posts
| ||
|
xxpack09
United States2160 Posts
On May 22 2012 16:59 roymarthyup wrote: he made the faster gates for faster units to have more units slightly faster at the terran base slightly faster so if the terran went CC first, it would be an auto win if he made gates later, the units would arrive at the terran base slightly later same as when a zerg 4pools to get units to the terran base ASAP so if the terran goes CC first they auto win when it fails, it fails. it says that the user of the all-in build sucks because he went for a highly inefficient build that sacrifices a ton of econ to get attacking units ASAP to the enemy in hope that they get a free win cuz the enemy was playing greedy 13gate vs 15gate does not get you dragoons out faster, the fact that you're missing those 2 probes means you can't build goons immediately (since you have to get range). But nice try. | ||
|
Severian
Australia2052 Posts
| ||
|
SupLilSon
Malaysia4123 Posts
On May 22 2012 16:55 ZeromuS wrote: It also doesn't help terran is in the most stale and difficult situation in sc2 atm. With the queen buff no one knows whats going on in TvZ atm :/ IDK. In my noob opinion, I just feel like these Terrans are always trying to use the wrong build in the wrong situation. Terran is super versatile early/mid and that's where Terran is dangerous, the ability to employ so many different strategies. But it requires amazing game sense and knowledge to know when to use each one and when to recognize that it's not going to work and you need to switch gears. We've seen Terrans go all out marines vs collosus, Iris had tons of baracks with techlabs but was making marines, it just seems like their experience isn't there yet. | ||
|
ZeromuS
Canada13401 Posts
11gate 3 gate pressure, hits 30 seconds before standard fast warpgate and can often do damage, Good on 2 player maps popularized by Oz about a year ago now first instance on Crossfire (the sc2 version of peaks of beakdu) | ||
|
Dante08
Singapore4139 Posts
On May 22 2012 16:53 roymarthyup wrote: normally the zerg just GG's if the 4pool doesnt grant him a BO win lizzy decided he could either attack with a 100% chance of failing and maybe a miracle would happen or lizzy could pull back and play at a 100% extreme disadvantage in the macro game. same as a 4pool pulling back and trying to play normal after failing to win with the initial attack It's still a very playable position. Yes he would have been at a disadvantage but it's not as bad as a failed 4 pool. Guess he didn't favour a macro game | ||
|
hagrin
United States278 Posts
PS - It's kind of catchy though TT. PPS - I think a drunk Fruitdealer might be able to win these games. | ||
| ||
