|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On May 09 2012 22:34 sc2holar wrote:
Can someone explain to me how the new U&D format works, will Nestea and Polt have a chance at advancing straight to Code S despite losing in code A? or will they be fighting to stay in code A and not fall to the so called code B qualifiers?
they still can get code s
|
On May 09 2012 22:34 sc2holar wrote:
Can someone explain to me how the new U&D format works, will Nestea and Polt have a chance at advancing straight to Code S despite losing in code A? or will they be fighting to stay in code A and not fall to the so called code B qualifiers?
The only way to fall out of the GSL and forced to re-qualify is if you lose in the Code A Ro48.
|
On May 09 2012 22:36 opterown wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2012 22:34 sc2holar wrote:
Can someone explain to me how the new U&D format works, will Nestea and Polt have a chance at advancing straight to Code S despite losing in code A? or will they be fighting to stay in code A and not fall to the so called code B qualifiers? they still can get code s
but they should still be at some kind of disadvantage going into the U&D, right? i mean since they LOST in the round 32. Otherwise it would make the code A games completley pointless...
a player who goes to the round of 8 in code A should have some kind of advantage in the U&D compared to someone who fell 2-0 in R32, right?
|
United Kingdom38255 Posts
On May 09 2012 22:39 sc2holar wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2012 22:36 opterown wrote:On May 09 2012 22:34 sc2holar wrote:
Can someone explain to me how the new U&D format works, will Nestea and Polt have a chance at advancing straight to Code S despite losing in code A? or will they be fighting to stay in code A and not fall to the so called code B qualifiers? they still can get code s but they should still be at some kind of disadvantage going into the U&D, right? i mean since they LOST in the round 32. Otherwise it would make the code A games completley pointless...
Round 1 of Code A :: Advancement = R2, Elimination = out of the GSL
Round 2 of Code A :: Advancement = R3, Elimination = Up & Down matches
Round 3 of Code A :: Advancement = Code S, Elimination = Up & Down matches
|
On May 09 2012 22:42 Asha` wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2012 22:39 sc2holar wrote:On May 09 2012 22:36 opterown wrote:On May 09 2012 22:34 sc2holar wrote:
Can someone explain to me how the new U&D format works, will Nestea and Polt have a chance at advancing straight to Code S despite losing in code A? or will they be fighting to stay in code A and not fall to the so called code B qualifiers? they still can get code s but they should still be at some kind of disadvantage going into the U&D, right? i mean since they LOST in the round 32. Otherwise it would make the code A games completley pointless... Round 1 of Code A :: Advancement = R2, Elimination = out of the GSL Round 2 of Code A :: Advancement = R3, Elimination = Up & Down matches Round 3 of Code A :: Advancement = Code S, Elimination = Up & Down matches
So losing in Round 2 of Code A has literary no consequenses when it comes to your chance of advancing to code S?
sounds like a pretty stupid format to me....
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On May 09 2012 22:44 sc2holar wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2012 22:42 Asha` wrote:On May 09 2012 22:39 sc2holar wrote:On May 09 2012 22:36 opterown wrote:On May 09 2012 22:34 sc2holar wrote:
Can someone explain to me how the new U&D format works, will Nestea and Polt have a chance at advancing straight to Code S despite losing in code A? or will they be fighting to stay in code A and not fall to the so called code B qualifiers? they still can get code s but they should still be at some kind of disadvantage going into the U&D, right? i mean since they LOST in the round 32. Otherwise it would make the code A games completley pointless... Round 1 of Code A :: Advancement = R2, Elimination = out of the GSL Round 2 of Code A :: Advancement = R3, Elimination = Up & Down matches Round 3 of Code A :: Advancement = Code S, Elimination = Up & Down matches So losing in Round 2 of Code A has literary no consequenses when it comes to your chance of advancing to code S? sounds like a pretty stupid format to me....
well, you lose the opportunity to get to code S directly I guess
|
So losing in R2 pretty much means that you can relax and wait for the U&D instead of having to spend a week of practice for your next opponant in R3? unless i have missed something, that sounds like a pretty retarded format.
|
On May 09 2012 22:34 neoghaleon55 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2012 22:16 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Puzzle lost...
Ryung lost...
Polt lost...
Nestea lost...
My heart is breaking a little more each day. I used to follow Nestea-ology...but I lost faith... I converted to DRG-ism Now I'm quite happy 
Haha I'm definitely a fan of DRG as well. It's just hard to see Nestea fall.
|
On May 09 2012 22:44 sc2holar wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2012 22:42 Asha` wrote:On May 09 2012 22:39 sc2holar wrote:On May 09 2012 22:36 opterown wrote:On May 09 2012 22:34 sc2holar wrote:
Can someone explain to me how the new U&D format works, will Nestea and Polt have a chance at advancing straight to Code S despite losing in code A? or will they be fighting to stay in code A and not fall to the so called code B qualifiers? they still can get code s but they should still be at some kind of disadvantage going into the U&D, right? i mean since they LOST in the round 32. Otherwise it would make the code A games completley pointless... Round 1 of Code A :: Advancement = R2, Elimination = out of the GSL Round 2 of Code A :: Advancement = R3, Elimination = Up & Down matches Round 3 of Code A :: Advancement = Code S, Elimination = Up & Down matches So losing in Round 2 of Code A has literary no consequenses when it comes to your chance of advancing to code S? sounds like a pretty stupid format to me....
Up and Down matches are a lot more risky and tiring.
There's also a bunch of luck factored into it if people in your group gets the same score as you...then winners are decided based on direct win and such...
Point is, you rather be in Code A rounds than in Up and Down.
|
On May 09 2012 22:48 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2012 22:34 neoghaleon55 wrote:On May 09 2012 22:16 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Puzzle lost...
Ryung lost...
Polt lost...
Nestea lost...
My heart is breaking a little more each day. I used to follow Nestea-ology...but I lost faith... I converted to DRG-ism Now I'm quite happy Haha I'm definitely a fan of DRG as well. It's just hard to see Nestea fall.
Calling yourself a fan...tsk.
I don't see your drawing yet in my Zergling for DRG project!
:D
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On May 09 2012 22:48 sc2holar wrote:
So losing in R2 pretty much means that you can relax and wait for the U&D instead of having to spend a week of practice for your next opponant in R3? unless i have missed something, that sounds like a pretty retarded format.
but they miss out on the opportunity of having that match in the first place - the winner of R2 can also just as easily relax and chill and throw his R3 match and prep for the up and downs too.
the up and downs are also arguably much harder than just one best-of-three against another player.
|
On May 09 2012 22:50 opterown wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2012 22:48 sc2holar wrote:
So losing in R2 pretty much means that you can relax and wait for the U&D instead of having to spend a week of practice for your next opponant in R3? unless i have missed something, that sounds like a pretty retarded format. but they miss out on the opportunity of having that match in the first place - the winner of R2 can also just as easily relax and chill and throw his R3 match and prep for the up and downs too. the up and downs are also arguably much harder than just one best-of-three against another player.
I get your point. But i still dont think you should be able to advance to Code S if you lose 0-2 in R2 code A.
If you lose in Code A r32, you should be demoted to Code A r48. The format is too forgiving.
|
On May 09 2012 22:50 neoghaleon55 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2012 22:48 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On May 09 2012 22:34 neoghaleon55 wrote:On May 09 2012 22:16 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Puzzle lost...
Ryung lost...
Polt lost...
Nestea lost...
My heart is breaking a little more each day. I used to follow Nestea-ology...but I lost faith... I converted to DRG-ism Now I'm quite happy Haha I'm definitely a fan of DRG as well. It's just hard to see Nestea fall. Calling yourself a fan...tsk. I don't see your drawing yet in my Zergling for DRG project! :D
I can't draw worth a shit... so I re-create them with the man himself:
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/KC8uz.jpg)
 Don't doubt my fanboyism
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
well, i guess the main problem is that R2 losers are treated the same as R3 losers. but there's not much you can do about that if you want the current up/down format
|
On May 09 2012 23:02 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2012 22:50 neoghaleon55 wrote:On May 09 2012 22:48 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On May 09 2012 22:34 neoghaleon55 wrote:On May 09 2012 22:16 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Puzzle lost...
Ryung lost...
Polt lost...
Nestea lost...
My heart is breaking a little more each day. I used to follow Nestea-ology...but I lost faith... I converted to DRG-ism Now I'm quite happy Haha I'm definitely a fan of DRG as well. It's just hard to see Nestea fall. Calling yourself a fan...tsk. I don't see your drawing yet in my Zergling for DRG project! :D I can't draw worth a shit... so I re-create them with the man himself: + Show Spoiler + Don't doubt my fanboyism
Draw it you bum!!
Draw stick figures if you have to!
Gah but I am super jello at your picture.
I will get one myself!
you just watch!
comon Anaheim!!
|
Haha I knew Keen would beat Nestea with ease
7/8 last night 7/8 the night before. Pretty good! :D
|
gwhahahahahah KEEN PREVAILS. nextup MMA.
|
On May 09 2012 22:48 sc2holar wrote:
So losing in R2 pretty much means that you can relax and wait for the U&D instead of having to spend a week of practice for your next opponant in R3? unless i have missed something, that sounds like a pretty retarded format.
Train for a whole week and NOT need to go through the up and downs to get into code S, which are pretty violent format wise/
|
On May 09 2012 22:39 sc2holar wrote:
but they should still be at some kind of disadvantage going into the U&D, right? i mean since they LOST in the round 32. Otherwise it would make the code A games completley pointless...
a player who goes to the round of 8 in code A should have some kind of advantage in the U&D compared to someone who fell 2-0 in R32, right?
Going into U&D is the disadvantage.
|
On May 09 2012 23:28 Douillos wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2012 22:48 sc2holar wrote:
So losing in R2 pretty much means that you can relax and wait for the U&D instead of having to spend a week of practice for your next opponant in R3? unless i have missed something, that sounds like a pretty retarded format. Train for a whole week and NOT need to go through the up and downs to get into code S, which are pretty violent format wise/
Yet R3 losers are treated the same as R2 losers in the Up and Downs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
