|
On July 05 2011 09:16 Starfox wrote:
Why on earth, of all the console fps don't we get competitive GoldenEye64? :<
goldeneye = bestgame ever
|
On July 05 2011 09:18 BasedSwag wrote:Show nested quote +On July 05 2011 09:16 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:15 Maliris wrote:On July 05 2011 09:08 Slakter wrote:On July 05 2011 09:06 Kevan wrote:On July 05 2011 09:05 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:01 Juliette wrote:On July 05 2011 09:00 bkrow wrote:I don't know if i should say this out loud; but Reach is actually really entertaining.. I think i am going to go have a shower  should have seen halo 3 :3 Honestly should have seen Halo2 which might have been most entertainign shooter i have ever seen. Should have seen Halo:CE, best console shooter ever Which doesnt really mean a lot ^^ I would not have a problem at all with Halo if it wasnt that they play it on an inferior format for competative gaming... indeed, console fps is a joke I understand saying a PC is the only way to play an RTS but you cant give me a good reason why an FPS has to be played on PC. (actually when Halo 1 was on PC it was terrible) The reason is that mouse+keyboard controls have no skill ceiling on how well you can aim, whereas there is a limit to how fast you can turn on a 360 controller, lol.
The "limit" is actually so high that no one dares try to turn the sensitivity to 10 save for a couple pros who rarely ever get it down well enough to use it competitively.
|
On July 05 2011 09:16 BasedSwag wrote:Show nested quote +On July 05 2011 09:08 Speny wrote:On July 05 2011 09:06 Kevan wrote:On July 05 2011 09:05 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:01 Juliette wrote:On July 05 2011 09:00 bkrow wrote:I don't know if i should say this out loud; but Reach is actually really entertaining.. I think i am going to go have a shower should have seen halo 3 :3 Honestly should have seen Halo2 which might have been most entertainign shooter i have ever seen. Should have seen Halo:CE, best console shooter ever Thank you! I would argue your second point as well. But back in the day, MLG had some crazy game types. If I remember correctly, 4v4 CTF on bloodgulch haha Slasher: Thanks for the Quake. Never played it much or got into it but I am enjoying it. It seems like the games I've seen haven't been to close; is this common in Quake? Ie on person gets an advantage and it creates a bit of a snowball? It may be the case with map control and power-ups. Just a question, like I said I'm a total Quake newbie. Some games are close, some are not. It depends on a lot of things, some players just have much better understanding of certain maps than others for example. I would say toxjq and avek are not too close to each other in duel skill-level at the moment either, toxjq doesn't practice duel much I assume. There are a lot of factors to consider in Quake.
Cool thanks just wondering on some general game play of Quake. Looking forward to the next match!
|
On July 05 2011 09:19 th3_great wrote:Show nested quote +On July 05 2011 09:17 Odal wrote:
Aim assist makes my mouse hand want to explode. All those years of practicing my aim in counter strike =( they remove auto-aim for HALO MLG gametype
its sad that not many people seem to understand this.
|
On July 05 2011 09:16 Adreme wrote:Show nested quote +On July 05 2011 09:15 Maliris wrote:On July 05 2011 09:08 Slakter wrote:On July 05 2011 09:06 Kevan wrote:On July 05 2011 09:05 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:01 Juliette wrote:On July 05 2011 09:00 bkrow wrote:I don't know if i should say this out loud; but Reach is actually really entertaining.. I think i am going to go have a shower should have seen halo 3 :3 Honestly should have seen Halo2 which might have been most entertainign shooter i have ever seen. Should have seen Halo:CE, best console shooter ever Which doesnt really mean a lot ^^ I would not have a problem at all with Halo if it wasnt that they play it on an inferior format for competative gaming... indeed, console fps is a joke I understand saying a PC is the only way to play an RTS but you cant give me a good reason why an FPS has to be played on PC. (actually when Halo 1 was on PC it was terrible)
its because the gamepad not allows as precise aim control as the mouse + keyboard combo, so it makes the game less indepth. RTS could be played with gamepads aswell youd just see much inferior games at the results of it. fps as a genre had to be squeezed through the console platform for business reasons, and its obv a just much viable option to dumb down the gaming experience than selling an extra interface just for the genre itself
|
On July 04 2011 16:59 GP wrote:Well, Day said he was originally from the [9] clan, as unlikely as that sounds, maybe they're still around?
No, he copied the name from them, he never was part of it.
|
On July 05 2011 09:16 Adreme wrote:Show nested quote +On July 05 2011 09:15 Maliris wrote:On July 05 2011 09:08 Slakter wrote:On July 05 2011 09:06 Kevan wrote:On July 05 2011 09:05 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:01 Juliette wrote:On July 05 2011 09:00 bkrow wrote:I don't know if i should say this out loud; but Reach is actually really entertaining.. I think i am going to go have a shower should have seen halo 3 :3 Honestly should have seen Halo2 which might have been most entertainign shooter i have ever seen. Should have seen Halo:CE, best console shooter ever Which doesnt really mean a lot ^^ I would not have a problem at all with Halo if it wasnt that they play it on an inferior format for competative gaming... indeed, console fps is a joke I understand saying a PC is the only way to play an RTS but you cant give me a good reason why an FPS has to be played on PC. (actually when Halo 1 was on PC it was terrible)
Better precision. Which is pretty much everything in FPS.
|
On July 05 2011 09:19 Scrandom wrote:Show nested quote +On July 05 2011 09:18 BasedSwag wrote:On July 05 2011 09:16 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:15 Maliris wrote:On July 05 2011 09:08 Slakter wrote:On July 05 2011 09:06 Kevan wrote:On July 05 2011 09:05 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:01 Juliette wrote:On July 05 2011 09:00 bkrow wrote:I don't know if i should say this out loud; but Reach is actually really entertaining.. I think i am going to go have a shower should have seen halo 3 :3 Honestly should have seen Halo2 which might have been most entertainign shooter i have ever seen. Should have seen Halo:CE, best console shooter ever Which doesnt really mean a lot ^^ I would not have a problem at all with Halo if it wasnt that they play it on an inferior format for competative gaming... indeed, console fps is a joke I understand saying a PC is the only way to play an RTS but you cant give me a good reason why an FPS has to be played on PC. (actually when Halo 1 was on PC it was terrible) The reason is that mouse+keyboard controls have no skill ceiling on how well you can aim, whereas there is a limit to how fast you can turn on a 360 controller, lol. Don't start with this PC elitist crap, If I took a top PC cs or quake gamer and made them play against pros on a console game they wouldnt get destroyed and exact same if I took a console pro and made them play on a PC.
Actually I think if you put someone like avek/toxqj/cypher by himself vs an entire team of Halo pros working together, he would win. I would bet thousands of dollars on this. (In Quake not Halo)
|
On July 05 2011 09:20 A Wet Shamwow wrote:Show nested quote +On July 05 2011 09:19 th3_great wrote:On July 05 2011 09:17 Odal wrote:
Aim assist makes my mouse hand want to explode. All those years of practicing my aim in counter strike =( they remove auto-aim for HALO MLG gametype its sad that not many people seem to understand this.
there are also all the other changes to make it more competitive, but removing auto-aim is the most important one.
|
is that a 6gv2 in the background? if so Jp has the same mouse + keyboard set up as me
|
On July 05 2011 09:21 lolsixtynine wrote:Show nested quote +On July 04 2011 16:59 GP wrote:On July 04 2011 16:56 Xeris wrote:
Is that [9] just a coincidence ? Well, Day said he was originally from the [9] clan, as unlikely as that sounds, maybe they're still around? No, he copied the name from them, he never was part of it.
Actually, the "[9]" was connected with team rS.
The amount of players on the team capped at 9.
|
mhm.. quake live. I can respect that.
|
On July 05 2011 09:21 Slakter wrote:Show nested quote +On July 05 2011 09:16 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:15 Maliris wrote:On July 05 2011 09:08 Slakter wrote:On July 05 2011 09:06 Kevan wrote:On July 05 2011 09:05 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:01 Juliette wrote:On July 05 2011 09:00 bkrow wrote:I don't know if i should say this out loud; but Reach is actually really entertaining.. I think i am going to go have a shower should have seen halo 3 :3 Honestly should have seen Halo2 which might have been most entertainign shooter i have ever seen. Should have seen Halo:CE, best console shooter ever Which doesnt really mean a lot ^^ I would not have a problem at all with Halo if it wasnt that they play it on an inferior format for competative gaming... indeed, console fps is a joke I understand saying a PC is the only way to play an RTS but you cant give me a good reason why an FPS has to be played on PC. (actually when Halo 1 was on PC it was terrible) Better precision. Which is pretty much everything in FPS.
Seems like its easier precision not better precision which doenst strike me as better or worse just different.
|
Yay! Quake, much more fun to watch than halo/cod
|
On July 05 2011 09:21 BasedSwag wrote:Show nested quote +On July 05 2011 09:19 Scrandom wrote:On July 05 2011 09:18 BasedSwag wrote:On July 05 2011 09:16 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:15 Maliris wrote:On July 05 2011 09:08 Slakter wrote:On July 05 2011 09:06 Kevan wrote:On July 05 2011 09:05 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:01 Juliette wrote:On July 05 2011 09:00 bkrow wrote:I don't know if i should say this out loud; but Reach is actually really entertaining.. I think i am going to go have a shower should have seen halo 3 :3 Honestly should have seen Halo2 which might have been most entertainign shooter i have ever seen. Should have seen Halo:CE, best console shooter ever Which doesnt really mean a lot ^^ I would not have a problem at all with Halo if it wasnt that they play it on an inferior format for competative gaming... indeed, console fps is a joke I understand saying a PC is the only way to play an RTS but you cant give me a good reason why an FPS has to be played on PC. (actually when Halo 1 was on PC it was terrible) The reason is that mouse+keyboard controls have no skill ceiling on how well you can aim, whereas there is a limit to how fast you can turn on a 360 controller, lol. Don't start with this PC elitist crap, If I took a top PC cs or quake gamer and made them play against pros on a console game they wouldnt get destroyed and exact same if I took a console pro and made them play on a PC. Actually I think if you put someone like avek/toxqj/cypher by himself vs an entire team of Halo pros working together, he would win. I would bet thousands of dollars on this. (In Quake not Halo)
Ok, you're one of those people who absolutely refuse to believe anything other then the "PC master race", no point arguing with you at all.
wow sweet ninja edit with the (in quake not halo) . You didn't even read my comment correctly. I said that Console pros will beat the best pc pros on in a console game and vice versa. Please read what I wrote
|
On July 05 2011 09:23 Adreme wrote:Show nested quote +On July 05 2011 09:21 Slakter wrote:On July 05 2011 09:16 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:15 Maliris wrote:On July 05 2011 09:08 Slakter wrote:On July 05 2011 09:06 Kevan wrote:On July 05 2011 09:05 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:01 Juliette wrote:On July 05 2011 09:00 bkrow wrote:I don't know if i should say this out loud; but Reach is actually really entertaining.. I think i am going to go have a shower should have seen halo 3 :3 Honestly should have seen Halo2 which might have been most entertainign shooter i have ever seen. Should have seen Halo:CE, best console shooter ever Which doesnt really mean a lot ^^ I would not have a problem at all with Halo if it wasnt that they play it on an inferior format for competative gaming... indeed, console fps is a joke I understand saying a PC is the only way to play an RTS but you cant give me a good reason why an FPS has to be played on PC. (actually when Halo 1 was on PC it was terrible) Better precision. Which is pretty much everything in FPS. Seems like its easier precision not better precision which doenst strike me as better or worse just different.
It creates slower and less exciting gameplay and it also limits the players a lot?
|
On July 05 2011 09:23 Scrandom wrote:Show nested quote +On July 05 2011 09:21 BasedSwag wrote:On July 05 2011 09:19 Scrandom wrote:On July 05 2011 09:18 BasedSwag wrote:On July 05 2011 09:16 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:15 Maliris wrote:On July 05 2011 09:08 Slakter wrote:On July 05 2011 09:06 Kevan wrote:On July 05 2011 09:05 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:01 Juliette wrote:
[quote]
should have seen halo 3
:3 Honestly should have seen Halo2 which might have been most entertainign shooter i have ever seen. Should have seen Halo:CE, best console shooter ever Which doesnt really mean a lot ^^ I would not have a problem at all with Halo if it wasnt that they play it on an inferior format for competative gaming... indeed, console fps is a joke I understand saying a PC is the only way to play an RTS but you cant give me a good reason why an FPS has to be played on PC. (actually when Halo 1 was on PC it was terrible) The reason is that mouse+keyboard controls have no skill ceiling on how well you can aim, whereas there is a limit to how fast you can turn on a 360 controller, lol. Don't start with this PC elitist crap, If I took a top PC cs or quake gamer and made them play against pros on a console game they wouldnt get destroyed and exact same if I took a console pro and made them play on a PC. Actually I think if you put someone like avek/toxqj/cypher by himself vs an entire team of Halo pros working together, he would win. I would bet thousands of dollars on this. (In Quake not Halo) Ok, you're one of those people who absolutely refuse to believe anything other then the "PC master race", no point arguing with you at all.
I don't believe that being good at Halo or mastering gamepad controls takes no skill, it's just that the skills are not transferable at all to PC FPS and especially Quake. I would be willing to make the exact same bet for the best Call of Duty PC players.
"I said that Console pros will beat the best pc pros on in a console game and vice versa. Please read what I wrote"
No, you said that if a Halo pro played vs a PC pro on PC, they "wouldn't get destroyed". Which is not true.
|
Does MLG have Quake in their circuit?
|
Liking the <3 to QL.I hope this somehow puts some new light in the QL community... If only MLG could pick it up for the circuit
|
On July 05 2011 09:23 Scrandom wrote:Show nested quote +On July 05 2011 09:21 BasedSwag wrote:On July 05 2011 09:19 Scrandom wrote:On July 05 2011 09:18 BasedSwag wrote:On July 05 2011 09:16 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:15 Maliris wrote:On July 05 2011 09:08 Slakter wrote:On July 05 2011 09:06 Kevan wrote:On July 05 2011 09:05 Adreme wrote:On July 05 2011 09:01 Juliette wrote:
[quote]
should have seen halo 3
:3 Honestly should have seen Halo2 which might have been most entertainign shooter i have ever seen. Should have seen Halo:CE, best console shooter ever Which doesnt really mean a lot ^^ I would not have a problem at all with Halo if it wasnt that they play it on an inferior format for competative gaming... indeed, console fps is a joke I understand saying a PC is the only way to play an RTS but you cant give me a good reason why an FPS has to be played on PC. (actually when Halo 1 was on PC it was terrible) The reason is that mouse+keyboard controls have no skill ceiling on how well you can aim, whereas there is a limit to how fast you can turn on a 360 controller, lol. Don't start with this PC elitist crap, If I took a top PC cs or quake gamer and made them play against pros on a console game they wouldnt get destroyed and exact same if I took a console pro and made them play on a PC. Actually I think if you put someone like avek/toxqj/cypher by himself vs an entire team of Halo pros working together, he would win. I would bet thousands of dollars on this. (In Quake not Halo) Ok, you're one of those people who absolutely refuse to believe anything other then the "PC master race", no point arguing with you at all. wow sweet ninja edit with the (in quake not halo) . You didn't even read my comment correctly. I said that Console pros will beat the best pc pros on in a console game and vice versa. Please read what I wrote
I definitely agree with this. Why can't we just love eSports in general without all this console/pc flaming? To each their own.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
