EPTOn May 05 2011 19:49 FarbrorAbavna wrote:
finally anypro showing why he is where he is.
finally anypro showing why he is where he is.
Showing why NesTeas strategy isn't the holy grail that zergs have not discovered yet according to this thread*
GSL Code S RO8 Day 2 - Page 62
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Mailing
United States3087 Posts
Showing why NesTeas strategy isn't the holy grail that zergs have not discovered yet according to this thread* | ||
|
Jehct
New Zealand9115 Posts
On May 05 2011 19:47 najreteip wrote: I agree, no way that was all-in, just a perfect timing push An all-in that's going to work is still an all-in -_- | ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
|
Kavas
Australia3421 Posts
| ||
|
branflakes14
2082 Posts
| ||
|
Sajiki
Germany522 Posts
you guys are not better than any dumb thread in the battle.net forums. seriously. | ||
|
Moonwrath
United States9568 Posts
| ||
|
dartoo
India2889 Posts
| ||
|
Fyzar
Netherlands8010 Posts
He sees hydras but continues with his double stargate play and makes so many phoenixes that he can lift everything! | ||
|
Maliris
Northern Ireland2557 Posts
| ||
|
CodeskyE
United States777 Posts
| ||
|
Yaotzin
South Africa4280 Posts
On May 05 2011 19:43 Jehct wrote: You have absolutely no way to hold the 2-3 colossus push that should be impending on your third from that position in the game. If that build doesn't do serious damage you're behind - the definition of an all-in. No, that's the definition of a failed attack. Any attack that fails will leave you behind, duh! An allin is where you have no reasonable prospect of winning the game if it fails to deal heavy damage. Not just being behind. | ||
|
cheesemaster
Canada1975 Posts
On May 05 2011 19:46 hugman wrote: Yeah, ofc it wasn't cheese So many people here don't have any idea what they're talking about, but it's definitely a push that's meant to end the game. The expansion is a backup plan, but he still needs to do a lot of damage because you cut a lot of econ to make that many Hydras on 2-base. I dont understand how all all in have become this term to describe any kind of creative early play or play with any risks involved. Protoss and terrans do it all the time its about time zergs started doing it. This balance talk between zergs and the rest of the sc2 community has really started to get out of hand though, it distracts me fromm the games, i need to close teamliquid so i can enjoy these quality games. looks like this game is in it for the long term, sick pheonix play by anypro, pheonix are awesome if you can pick up enough hydras. | ||
|
anatem
Romania1369 Posts
| ||
|
SundeR.
Australia112 Posts
On May 05 2011 19:49 Jehct wrote: You have to explain statements like that to avoid looking foolish. It's a timing attack. The Protoss could not chase him. At any point Nestea can cut drones, expand, make a round of drones and put up a spire. Realising that your opponent is being super-greedy and choosing to do a timing attack does not make it an all-in. What if protoss did a two base 3-gate aggression and Nestea took an early third? What if Protoss lost that army? Is that an all-in? | ||
|
najreteip
Belgium4158 Posts
On May 05 2011 19:50 Jehct wrote: An all-in that's going to work is still an all-in -_- Not when you expand while doing it | ||
|
OopsOopsBaby
Singapore3425 Posts
| ||
|
BuzZoo
Australia1468 Posts
| ||
|
diLLa
Netherlands247 Posts
On May 05 2011 19:50 Jehct wrote: An all-in that's going to work is still an all-in -_- Not if you have the information you need that can do GARANTEED damage. even if you lose your army, you done the damage needed to balance off your own loss. Stop being ignorant man | ||
|
eluv
United States1251 Posts
| ||
| ||
