[TSL] Ro32 Day2 - Page 318
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Upset about the results? Want to vent your rage? Use this instead | ||
lowercase
Canada1047 Posts
| ||
Khalleb
Canada1909 Posts
| ||
eFonSG
United States255 Posts
On March 21 2011 06:32 Laids wrote: Terran 2 raxes to victory = " Amazing play " Zerg baneling busts= "OMG SUCH A ONE TRICK PONY" Okay guys. This could not be more wrong. In fact its the EXACT opposite on Teamliquid. There is such a strong Zerg bias its crazy. Everyone is calling this series exciting and all that, but in reality it was just a zerg using two 2 base timing pushes against a greedy Terran. Boring and unexciting, there was no difference between these type of games and the one MC just played in the GSL finals yet those were considered dull games? | ||
Warrice
United States565 Posts
On March 21 2011 06:40 DiaBoLuS wrote: funny thing is - julyzerg plays like that: "wow, what an incredible innovative strategy so unexpected blabla" morrow does it vs jinro: "such a noob he can only banelingbust", obv not knowing that morrow is a macro-oriented player after all^^ so true, sad, but very true. t.t | ||
LostDevil
Fiji283 Posts
| ||
TheSwamp
United States1497 Posts
| ||
gnutz
Germany666 Posts
On March 21 2011 06:40 MYM.ClouD wrote: Baneling bust off 2 bases is absolutely retarded and overpowered against any FE build who doesn't include fast hellions or fast siege tanks (which is a shit build anyway except for holding and punishing baneling bust). It turns the early game into a coinflip. People calling Morrow "hyper aggressive" or thinking he played well are wrong because anyone, even a silver league player, can pull it off. This just shows how this game is too much about chances and all in and not as skill centered as WC3 and SCBW. I'm very disappointed at SC2. WHY should it be Coinflip if the Zerg can do it in RESPONSE to an FE ? I don't understand. | ||
Laneir
United States1160 Posts
![]() | ||
PredY
Czech Republic1731 Posts
completely agree. morrow really played and executed those busts well. i thought jinro would adapt better though.. | ||
Jungosi
Germany186 Posts
On March 21 2011 06:42 KhAlleB wrote: as day9 said the better player try to get the game during the longest time, while the worse try to end it asap However the better player should be aware of that. | ||
hugman
Sweden4644 Posts
| ||
theteam
United States515 Posts
| ||
s4life
Peru1519 Posts
On March 21 2011 06:40 Milvus wrote: Hmm the only player who once managed to kill MC in tournament is out ![]() Only another protoss could beat MC at this point... and it so happens MC's PvP is prolly the best.. so there. | ||
Benjef
United Kingdom6921 Posts
On March 21 2011 06:40 TheBanana wrote: Did I just read someone say MorroW can't macro? Whaaaat? This has to be the first time some of you watched him play. IMO he has the sickest macro in Europe hands down. This. I don't think I've seen him baneling bust before. | ||
4Servy
Netherlands1542 Posts
On March 21 2011 06:40 MYM.ClouD wrote: Baneling bust off 2 bases is absolutely retarded and overpowered against any FE build who doesn't include fast hellions or fast siege tanks (which is a shit build anyway except for holding and punishing baneling bust). It turns the early game into a coinflip. People calling Morrow "hyper aggressive" or thinking he played well are wrong because anyone, even a silver league player, can pull it off. This just shows how this game is too much about chances and all in and not as skill centered as WC3 and SCBW. I'm very disappointed at SC2. gogo cloud get them told! | ||
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
Thats the reason the 4 gate worked - it was brilliant play and simply outsmarted by HasuObs - not a simple build order win. I disagree Carlo. Obviously its insanely strong since its a strategy that deals damage no matter what, but on the first hand its something that is scoutable and on the other hand it was JinrO's fault. He went command center first without any attempt on scanning what MorroW does nor did he build 1 or even 2 bunkers which you can easily do without being behind. He even used the barracks in front to upgrade stim - which he could change and use a barracks in the back to upgrade stimpack. Rushing to medivacs is far inferior even though it gives you drop ability than rushing to hellions or tanks. MorroW did simply abuse the lack of scouting and went for an aggressive build which can lead to a quick win or loss - but in a tournament like TSL you also have to cut corners. In game 2 he was behind due to the bunkerrush and didn't even allin banelingbust - he tried to kind of equal the game out but pulled back when he saw it won't work. So I totally understand that you are saying its a super strong strategy, but its by no means a coinflip because you can actually scout it without being behind. | ||
Crissaegrim
2947 Posts
On March 21 2011 06:42 KhAlleB wrote: as day9 said the better player try to get the game during the longest time, while the worse try to end it asap Dont see much wisdom in that quote. The better player takes the opportunity to win when it presents itself to said player. MorroW saw a chance and went for it. Sheesh. Think about it. | ||
ArYeS
Slovenia268 Posts
| ||
Grettin
42381 Posts
On March 21 2011 06:42 LostDevil wrote: To Jinro fanboys: Don't hate the player, hate the game. Gotta agree as a jinro fanboi!. :-) good games overall. | ||
aTnClouD
Italy2428 Posts
On March 21 2011 06:42 gnutz wrote: WHY should it be Coinflip if the Zerg can do it in RESPONSE to an FE ? I don't understand. Because FE is the only thing you can do right now against zerg. 1 base openings except 2 rax into cc simply don't work anymore because of the bigger maps and zerg players getting better at managing larva. | ||
| ||