|
On April 24 2011 02:18 The KY wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2011 02:16 pureability wrote: kas is up 40supply with no battles or anything. crazy macro It's insane! I don't even know how he's doing it, but he's just ahead without doing anything, not only ahead but so far ahead that he looks unassailable.
Grubby macro seems way worse, he had 2 colossus and a low gateway count at 16:00 o.-
|
kas did that without building a single tank as well. he's improved so much lately
|
Kas is going to win this tourney IMO
|
Too bad that MC is probably watching this and will be very prepared for Kas's style.
|
kas is so amazingly good, i cant believe it.
|
(A hypothetical) Kas vs MC might be closer than most people will think.
|
I told u, Grubby has no chances. Cant wait for Kas vs MC finals.
|
actually is it possible that grubby forgot about his 4 stalker between the 2 bases when he tried to snipe the retreating dropship?
there was always this small blue dot in that area that never vanished O_O
|
On April 24 2011 02:09 udgnim wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2011 02:03 jellyjello wrote:On April 24 2011 01:46 OgsStump wrote:On April 24 2011 01:34 .Enigma. wrote: It hurts to know that MorroW could've won the first two games by just changing up his composition a little, it hurts to see a Zerg staying on roach/hydra tech for too long. :< Do you mean change composition and stay on the same tech or tech up to infestors or hive. If you are talking about changing tech i both agree and disagree with you. I'm a protoss player and I agree with you in game 1 he had an opportunity to change his tech because of his big lead but I'm not sure he had the same window in game 2. It seems to me like a lot of people don't realize how much you have to commit to change your composition into a higher tech. I mean you hear state of the game people say that people need to add infestors to the composition to be successful but fail to really address the impact that changing your tech has on your army size/economy (besides idra of course lol). It's not like you can have the exact same army and have infestors. Changing tech for zerg does involve some sacrifice. You're likely giving up the instant remax possiblity if you change to infestors or hive tech. Meaning if you can't take down the protoss ball in the first big engagement, you likely won't have enough units in the next engagement. I think in order to change tech without risking huge vulnerabilities to timing attacks you need to have a significant lead on your opponent like he had during game 1. Idk correct me if I'm wrong. Morrow couldn't have held off that initially 2 collosus timing attack if he was simultaneously trying to tech up to hive or infestors. Watch the Nestea game today at GSL, that could be the solution that the zergs have been looking for. Personally, I can't understand why zerglings and mutas aren't being utilized more effectively. Mutalisk, especially, is one of the best units for zergs with its overall jack-of-all trade capability. MC had an army comprised of sentries, stalkers, zealots, immortals, and colossus. He also used a warp prism in game one. If you think that a zerg can counter this army with simply roaches + hydra + corruptors, then I don't know what to tell you really... Nestea didn't even play a Protoss yesterday...
I was referring to his games vs Jinro
|
|
|
So will we watch MC vs Thorzain or MC vs Kas/Grubby? Choices choices choices!!!
|
Stream's been fine for the few hours I've been watching, but it just became really laggy and choppy. Anyone else having this or is it just me?
|
On April 24 2011 02:20 TheBB wrote: (A hypothetical) Kas vs MC might be closer than most people will think.
I'm sure it will be close if Kas can handle his nerves. But hoping grubby can make a comeback first
|
On April 24 2011 02:19 Mailing wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2011 02:18 The KY wrote:On April 24 2011 02:16 pureability wrote: kas is up 40supply with no battles or anything. crazy macro It's insane! I don't even know how he's doing it, but he's just ahead without doing anything, not only ahead but so far ahead that he looks unassailable. Grubby macro seems way worse, he had 2 colossus and a low gateway count at 16:00 o.-
In fairness Kas did kill a gateway, and I don't think Grubby was sitting on any resources or anything. His macro could no doubt have been better, but not too much better.
|
Grubby at the 6, Kas at the 3 on Terminus.
|
On April 24 2011 02:21 Benjef wrote: So will we watch MC vs Thorzain or MC vs Kas/Grubby? Choices choices choices!!!
Both.
|
On April 24 2011 02:19 Aus.Force wrote: kas did that without building a single tank as well. he's improved so much lately
What do you mean? The only people who didn't know he was the best player in Europe in the last few months were those SotG hosts.
|
On April 24 2011 02:20 Dante08 wrote: Although Morrow lost, was anyone impressed with his macro? Especially in game 2 I felt he macroed so well, just that the strategy he chose was wrong.
Well he used to play bw so it isn't too surprising. Since switching to Zerg morrow has always had awesome micro and macro but poor strategies
|
Kas is pretty sick, would be a nice final vs MC, assuming he makes it.
|
Grubby spawns Blue Toss 6oClock Kas spawns Red Terran 3oClock
|
|
|
|
|
|