EPTLegalming fuck'd up last game :<
[GSL] Code A Ro32 Day 1 - Page 81
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Please talk about the games in this thread. If you feel the desire to rage about something, bottle it up inside you and lash out elsewhere. Thanks! | ||
|
zYwi3c
Poland1811 Posts
Legalming fuck'd up last game :< | ||
|
happyness
United States2400 Posts
| ||
|
Mauldo
United States750 Posts
| ||
|
Weavel
Finland9223 Posts
 | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
Losira is either a genius or a fool for such insane baneling play. On one hand, Stalkers are quite hardy against banelings. On the other hand, banelings do quite a bit of damage. Banelings are so rarely used against Protoss, so it's understandable that a Protoss of LegalMind's caliber can be quite confused against them. However, it seems that storms absolutely wreck baneling clumps. | ||
|
Vorenius
Denmark1979 Posts
On February 21 2011 18:56 densha wrote: "The banelings are busting me heart!" She's A-OK in my book. Actually, Tasteless made that joke... | ||
|
Talack
Canada2742 Posts
| ||
|
SBelmont
United States122 Posts
| ||
|
Cel.erity
United States4890 Posts
On February 21 2011 18:56 tbrown47 wrote: BLOW UP ON ME YOU COWARDS as he looks back to his probe wife and children A zealot would never marry a probe. Bronze-level roleplay.  | ||
|
Dommk
Australia4865 Posts
On February 21 2011 18:57 andrewwiggin wrote: I don't understand how the tosses army was so small. The zerg was on 2 base only, right? (He had macro hatches, but that still makes it 2 base). And toss had his 3rd. wtf 3 Base. Toss teched to templar with double forge as well. Stalkers cost more than Hydras, replenishing them whilst getting Templar isn't easy, especially with Templars putting 45second cooldowns on your warpgates | ||
|
Dfgj
Singapore5922 Posts
On February 21 2011 18:57 andrewwiggin wrote: I don't understand how the tosses army was so small. The zerg was on 2 base only, right? (He had macro hatches, but that still makes it 2 base). And toss had his 3rd. wtf A lot of investment into hts, I'd guess. Don't know why he didn't have very many storms, though. | ||
|
Mentalizor
Denmark1596 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Yeah, I be trolling! Last 4-5 pages are basicly saying this. But it's better than bashing Kelly | ||
|
TheCrow
Norway296 Posts
On February 21 2011 18:57 andrewwiggin wrote: I don't understand how the tosses army was so small. The zerg was on 2 base only, right? (He had macro hatches, but that still makes it 2 base). And toss had his 3rd. wtf Zerg was three base with macrohatch. | ||
|
JonnyCosMo
United States57 Posts
User was banned for this post. | ||
|
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
On February 21 2011 18:57 Juliette wrote: No one else impressed at the FFs and then the blinkback to avoid the carpet bomb? those banelings were amazing though Was until he stood under them so they worked... | ||
|
BrahCJ
Australia659 Posts
On February 21 2011 18:57 L3g3nd_ wrote: oh wow. fuck that was good. revolutionising ZvP I don't know if you can go THAT far! It was only possible due to greedy econ... I still don't trust Blings against Stalkers as a stable build. | ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
LegalMind, micro much? Baneling drops to take down the HTs and Sentries is a good idea - it's viable. But a good Protoss player should've been able to do something other than stand there while a baneling ball RUNS INTO YOUR BLINK STALKERS. Also, make colossi against this composition, not HTs. | ||
|
curreh
Australia265 Posts
On February 21 2011 18:56 57 Corvette wrote: OBJECTION! Banelings don't counter blink stalkers! OBJECTION! IMLosira and his overlords clearly contradict this statement :D | ||
|
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
On February 21 2011 18:57 andrewwiggin wrote: I don't understand how the tosses army was so small. The zerg was on 2 base only, right? (He had macro hatches, but that still makes it 2 base). And toss had his 3rd. wtf the Zerg had the 3rd too | ||
|
mastergriggy
United States1312 Posts
| ||
| ||
