Kaspersky New Year's StarCraft II Invitational - Page 50
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Selias
16 Posts
| ||
Ipp
United States456 Posts
| ||
obsidia
122 Posts
| ||
majordoh
25 Posts
On December 30 2010 01:34 Liquid`Ret wrote: he went for 6 gate before he saw anything you silly silly guy, hence why i took aLL drones off gas and never made a damn mutalisk lol but honestly i gave up the game when i saw his probe ret nice to respons so fast here really impressed of your macro skills, game 1 couldve gone either way if u werent trapped in 20 forcefields ![]() btw, what u think of mc's style, especially the cannons in game 1 and 3, lots of ppl whine about it on tl | ||
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
On December 30 2010 01:40 obsidia wrote: thought you might have a timing window with the mutalisks during his gateway push in g2 when he was zealot heavy, just abit unfortunate he kept the pressure up so well. Also slightly unnerving to see how close the worker count was to say you were on 3 base macroing like a beast while he Fe'd.... Well he took all workers off gas to try and get enough lings/sunks to survive. So when MC got zealot count he didn't have any gas to actually get muta out. Not much of a window ![]() | ||
GG.Lonely
Russian Federation27 Posts
http://hotfile.com/dl/92834324/2d08a10/KasperskySemifinals.zip.html | ||
Lann555
Netherlands5173 Posts
On December 30 2010 01:39 Liquid`Ret wrote: yes, but you dont play this game at high level, close pos metal i cant win with roaches vs MC so i took the huge gamble with spire and +1 lings hoping for a robotics, as soon as it wasnt a robotics i knew i lost, this game isnt clear and cut as you think, theres a lot of mind games involved as well when you lose 80% of your zvps on ladder that doesnt help with confidence either If you don't mind me asking: What happens if you do go Roach in that situation? You die to Immortal/Forcefield or somethign? | ||
Manimal_pro
Romania991 Posts
there's no lag for the HD stream on ragequit TV actually works great | ||
-Archangel-
Croatia7457 Posts
On December 30 2010 01:39 Liquid`Ret wrote: yes, but you dont play this game at high level, close pos metal i cant win with roaches vs MC so i took the huge gamble with spire and +1 lings hoping for a robotics, as soon as it wasnt a robotics i knew i lost, this game isnt clear and cut as you think, theres a lot of mind games involved as well when you lose 80% of your zvps on ladder that doesnt help with confidence either Why didn't you try to build hydra den as soon as he started attacking? You could have had a lot of hydras for his last push. You were killed by FF, hydras could have helped with this (even with no range upgrade). | ||
![]()
Liquid`Ret
Netherlands4511 Posts
| ||
SagaSan
France64 Posts
| ||
Faze.
Canada285 Posts
On December 30 2010 01:40 majordoh wrote: btw, what u think of mc's style, especially the cannons in game 1 and 3, lots of ppl whine about it on tl I'm trying to think about who would watch tournament and go like "OMG AWESOME YES!" when a cannon rush happens, but all my mind can do right now is puke until it drowns in its own vomit. | ||
Influ
Germany780 Posts
On December 30 2010 01:39 Liquid`Ret wrote: yes, but you dont play this game at high level, close pos metal i cant win with roaches vs MC so i took the huge gamble with spire and +1 lings hoping for a robotics, as soon as it wasnt a robotics i knew i lost, this game isnt clear and cut as you think, theres a lot of mind games involved as well when you lose 80% of your zvps on ladder that doesnt help with confidence either it looked like you put down the spire in the exact moment when you scouted 4 gates in his main which confused me like hell | ||
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
On December 30 2010 01:42 -Archangel- wrote: Why didn't you try to build hydra den as soon as he started attacking? You could have had a lot of hydras for his last push. You were killed by FF, hydras could have helped with this (even with not range upgrade). Again, he took all off gas just to survive till that point. If he had drones on gas and hydra den going he would have never stopped that first push anyway. You can't just look at a game and go "maybe should have done this" because the whole game would be changed and you would never know what MC would do. Just saying "if he got x unit for last push would have been fine" yet ignoring what would happen before that is straight bad. | ||
Uncultured
United States1340 Posts
| ||
TiBe
Mexico200 Posts
On December 30 2010 01:40 majordoh wrote: btw, what u think of mc's style, especially the cannons in game 1 and 3, lots of ppl whine about it on tl Do you really need Ret to talk about that? Just check the last PTR (aka pylon block "disabled").. About the 3rd game, I think that what killed Ret is the hatch first in close positions.. | ||
Thezzphai
Germany1145 Posts
On December 30 2010 01:38 village_idiot wrote: How can it be all-in if it isn't risky? That's exactly the point. SC2 needs less risky all-ins. Wait... | ||
gnutz
Germany666 Posts
On December 30 2010 01:39 Liquid`Ret wrote: yes, but you dont play this game at high level, close pos metal i cant win with roaches vs MC so i took the huge gamble with spire and +1 lings hoping for a robotics, as soon as it wasnt a robotics i knew i lost, this game isnt clear and cut as you think, theres a lot of mind games involved as well when you lose 80% of your zvps on ladder that doesnt help with confidence either okay that makes things more clear ... i know the mind games. i'm not THAT newbie. At least they patch the cannon-wall-in, but i clearly cannot see a zerg ever (only if they get highly overpowered) winning a tournament anymore with this mappool. | ||
Sain
Lebanon25 Posts
| ||
arew
Lithuania1861 Posts
On December 30 2010 01:35 Faze. wrote: Every single map in the SC2 pool are too small, no exception. Yeah, make it bigger and go play every single game for 20minutes, rofl. Some maps are to small, yes, but saying that about every single map just makes me laugh. The problem is not really about the maps. | ||
| ||