EPTSorry but I have to be biased in this game! This JSL guy took away a huge part of what GSL3 could have meant for me.
[GSL] S3 Ro32 Day 2 - Page 137
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Firereaver
India1701 Posts
Sorry but I have to be biased in this game! This JSL guy took away a huge part of what GSL3 could have meant for me. | ||
|
Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo
Germany2959 Posts
It's not that hard to make forcefield usage seem beautiful -.- | ||
|
smileyyy
Germany1816 Posts
| ||
|
HwangjaeTerran
Finland5967 Posts
He had more stuff alright... but that's pretty much all there was to that game. | ||
|
Mr_Kzimir
France268 Posts
| ||
|
Dfgj
Singapore5922 Posts
I think he had a chance to reduce the colossus count with his drops at several times - better to remake marauders than overinvest in vikings. | ||
|
keV.
United States3214 Posts
On November 29 2010 21:38 Klive5ive wrote: Good to see even great players like JSLZenith lose to Colossus timings on LT; it isn't just me xD If you get T6 vs P3 it's even worse. On the flip side, it's nice to see colossus timings actually work on LT =P | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
|
mizU
United States12125 Posts
| ||
|
Woony
Germany6657 Posts
On November 29 2010 21:38 Klive5ive wrote: Good to see even great players like JSLZenith lose to Colossus timings on LT; it isn't just me xD If you get T6 vs P3 it's even worse. Well JSL had way too many vikings and not enough MM and he even had a drop in HongUns main so he had even less units. | ||
|
konaman
Australia283 Posts
On November 29 2010 21:38 HwangjaeTerran wrote: This I don't understand, protoss plays impressively when just makes a few colossi and runs to Terrans natural? He had more stuff alright... but that's pretty much all there was to that game. Pretty poor interpretation of the game, Terran procrastinated a bit early and Hongun got ahead. | ||
|
MDew
United States256 Posts
On November 29 2010 21:38 HwangjaeTerran wrote: This I don't understand, protoss plays impressively when just makes a few colossi and runs to Terrans natural? He had more stuff alright... but that's pretty much all there was to that game. Terran over-made vikings vs only 3 colossi, had too little bio to fight the stalkers. | ||
|
nufcrulz
Singapore934 Posts
On November 29 2010 21:36 Kreb wrote: Terran was just smart. I mean honestly, if you were T and went up against Ret in a game for a lot of money, would you go into mass expand move and try to beat him in a macro game? Though so. Personally I would like to see the game changed to lessen the amount of viable 1base plays from T, but there is no way that can be done without making it possible for T to keep up with Z late game. As the game is currently, going beyond 2base against Z as T just seems incredibly risky, and often staying 1base over expanding to 2base seems like the better option too. Dont hate the player, hate the game. think the only way to do this is to make the maps bigger.. Current BW maps are so large that they almost always encourage a macro game... also it'll obviously change the metagame.. so blizz, when deciding balance changes, do take into consideration the map pool... | ||
|
Node
United States2159 Posts
On November 29 2010 21:33 FarbrorAbavna wrote: They got rid of the map veto system because the same 4 or 5 maps(cant remember the exact count) kept showing up and GOM didnt like that and they were right it was growing stale. Introducing maps is up to blizz and they are also heavy sponsors for this tournament so GOM can only do so much regarding that(unless I've misunderstood it completely  ).There are plenty of other Blizzard maps, though. :/ I'd love to see more games on maps like Crossfire, Junkyard, and Worldship, all of which I would take over Steppes any day of the week. | ||
|
Mr_Kzimir
France268 Posts
| ||
|
Mascherano
Argentina1726 Posts
C'mon Hongun you are one of 3 Toss who can get to the Ro8! | ||
|
Meatnose
United States141 Posts
| ||
|
Packeteer
United States105 Posts
| ||
|
_vladimir_
Serbia530 Posts
On November 29 2010 21:34 Mr_Kzimir wrote: I don't think these TvP will reach the level of dreamhack final matches ROFL Clueless people are clueless... Anyhow about Spire in 3rd game. Actualy if he managed to take a breath, gather some resources, that spire would win him game..it could kill that viking, it could kill medivac, and would help lings dpsing marauders and hellions..But constant presure, didnt give him a chance  User was warned for this post | ||
palookieblue
Australia326 Posts
On November 29 2010 21:35 Talin wrote: Because it's true? People were talking about it the moment maps were revealed, and they would still be talking about it if Ret won. I disagree that Ret was outplayed. In fact he deserves credit for being so close to defending the push in the last game, despite the mistakes he made (player under pressure will almost certainly make more mistakes than the aggressive player anyway). From what I've seen in all 3 games, Ret is the better all-round player IMO. On balanced maps, Ret would probably win 7 series out of 10 against this guy. The thing that irks me is that silly things like this just fuel the talk of Korean superiority. I thought Ret defended amazing in the last game, so many times I thought he was dead lost but kept going. This doesn't mean he was the better player. All 3 games just confirmed what is the current viewpoint (not saying that I agree) on TvZ. If you let a zerg macro up and have map control (ala game 1), you're disadvantaging yourself. Likewise, if Zerg is too greedy eco-wise on smaller maps, they are vulnerable to aggression (games 2, 3). Again, I can respect your opinion that Ret is better, but the fact that he lost doesn't help your cause compared to if he won. | ||
| ||
