• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 08:53
CET 14:53
KST 22:53
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13
Community News
[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation13Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA8StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!45$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship7
StarCraft 2
General
Zerg is losing its identity in StarCraft 2 [TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ What happened to TvZ on Retro? SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] RO32 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
PvZ map balance Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers How to stay on top of macro?
Other Games
General Games
Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Gospel – a Pulp No…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2236 users

[D]8/8 proxy reaper rax tvt (and build intro) - Page 6

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 All
Benz0
Profile Joined July 2012
Germany48 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-26 19:43:00
March 26 2013 19:42 GMT
#101
On March 25 2013 02:16 TheDwf wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I don't understand all the fuss over this. Unless I missed something 8-8-8 is awful, whether he goes OC or not… It loses to any continuous production from the first Barracks as long as you take some appropriate measures.

Two days ago, BratOK did this build (using the OC and delayed 1X second rax variant) against me with like five seconds distance between his proxy Barracks and my mineral line, and I had no trouble defending despite being braindead and not even really recognizing it with my scouting SCV. The procedure is simple: retain your first Marine, build a Bunker as a shelter near the Barracks so Marines cannot be picked off by Reapers as they move out of the Barracks, all Marines together at one of the possible edges to have a chance to welcome Reapers as they make the jump, Factory as soon as possible (I went gas 15 so it was even late), one Mine or Hellions, gg.

If we examine the most all-in version i. e. 8-8-8-8 completely skipping OC, we have the first Reaper being complete at ~3'15 (next ones at 4'00, 4'45, 5'30, etc.) and the second Barracks ending at ~3'30 (with Reapers moving out at 4'15, 5'00, 5'45, etc.). Let us immediately remember that 8-8-8 has a grand total of 4 SCVs mining minerals, i. e. 180 minerals per minut assuming those SCVs are on close patches, which means you have as much economy even if you have only your MULE mining. You can thus pull SCVs liberally to protect your first Marines and/or Reapers and still be convincingly ahead…

At the beginning of the attack, the 8-8-8 has only a ~20 seconds window (give or take a few seconds depending on the distance of the proxy) in which he has the advantage, i. e. one Reaper vs one Marine. This means you simply have to hide/protect this first Marine until the second one joins the party (at 3'35), after which you have 2 Marines vs 1 Reaper. Then the second Reaper comes at 4'00, by which time your third Marine is out, which means you still prevail at 3:2 with basic micro (and just like in the 2:1 situation, you still have the option to use 2-3 SCVs as a buffer). If your opponent went OC and a delayed second rax, his rush is effectively stopped because the production of the extra Barracks will come too late (complete at like ~4'45) to do anything; when the third Reaper is there at 4'45, you're on the verge of having your fifth Marine, and fending him off with 5:3 or even 4:3 with some SCVs to shield is not difficult. At any rate, if you went gas 13 your Factory is complete at ~4'25, which means his rush is completely dead shortly after 5'05 because there might be a Mine anywhere on the field for a trap (Hellions are also a possibility).

Now for the 8-8-8-8… The Reaper count increases faster, but it's still not enough to break a well-executed defence. Instead of having one Reaper at 3'15, two at 4'00, three at 4'45 and five at 5'30, the 8-8-8-8 variant (which, let us not forget it, is completely all-in) has three at 4'15, four at 4'45 and five at 5'00. Thus a build having continuous Marine production will have 4 Marines vs 3 Reapers at 4'25. In the open Reapers can win this fight, but the defender still has up to 15 SCVs ready to give their life to shield those Marines and stall long enough to get a Mine or a Hellion. The windows of vulnerability can be seen as below:

[image loading]

In blue, the timing of the first 4 Reapers from his first rax.
In purple, I underlined the advantage 8-8-8-8 has over 8-8-8-1X in terms of Reaper count.
In yellow (8-8-8-1X) and red (8-8-8-8), the windows of vulnerability a continuous Marine defence has if Marines face Reapers alone in the open (which, as you understand, should therefore not happen, i. e. you have to use either SCVs or a Bunker to shield and retain those Marines). Just play cautiously with your Marines during those few moments and you'll be fine.

For Reapers openings (either rax 11 gas 11 or rax 12 gas 12), you should have no trouble whatsoever. Just watch Mvp vs YoDa, Akilon Wastes, IEM, without the wrong sortie from Mvp and you see how he can easily defend while remaining miles ahead. Against 8-8-8-8 you probably want a second rax as soon as possible while still heading for Factory. Your opponent will be ahead in the Reaper count, but you have SCVs anyway.

If you opened gasless, you probably get one Bunker near your Barracks and +1-2 rax as soon as possible depending on the variation he uses.

Blunders to avoid:
- Don't lose your first Marine to avoid the snowball effect.
- No production cut on your Barracks! Naturally you don't get any Reactor on it.

TLDR; Marine and/or Reaper retention using SCVs and a Bunker somewhere to avoid the pitfall of losing too much in the few windows of vulnerability (see picture), Factory as soon as possible for Hellions or a Mine and you're golden.


Thx 4 your post. Valuable information!
I played against 8/8/8 recently and could hold it with ease and then won the game easily.
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
March 26 2013 23:23 GMT
#102
On March 27 2013 01:14 Iron_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 25 2013 02:16 TheDwf wrote:
I don't understand all the fuss over this. Unless I missed something 8-8-8 is awful, whether he goes OC or not… It loses to any continuous production from the first Barracks as long as you take some appropriate measures.

Two days ago, BratOK did this build (using the OC and delayed 1X second rax variant) against me with like five seconds distance between his proxy Barracks and my mineral line, and I had no trouble defending despite being braindead and not even really recognizing it with my scouting SCV. The procedure is simple: retain your first Marine, build a Bunker as a shelter near the Barracks so Marines cannot be picked off by Reapers as they move out of the Barracks, all Marines together at one of the possible edges to have a chance to welcome Reapers as they make the jump, Factory as soon as possible (I went gas 15 so it was even late), one Mine or Hellions, gg.

If we examine the most all-in version i. e. 8-8-8-8 completely skipping OC, we have the first Reaper being complete at ~3'15 (next ones at 4'00, 4'45, 5'30, etc.) and the second Barracks ending at ~3'30 (with Reapers moving out at 4'15, 5'00, 5'45, etc.). Let us immediately remember that 8-8-8 has a grand total of 4 SCVs mining minerals, i. e. 180 minerals per minut assuming those SCVs are on close patches, which means you have as much economy even if you have only your MULE mining. You can thus pull SCVs liberally to protect your first Marines and/or Reapers and still be convincingly ahead…

At the beginning of the attack, the 8-8-8 has only a ~20 seconds window (give or take a few seconds depending on the distance of the proxy) in which he has the advantage, i. e. one Reaper vs one Marine. This means you simply have to hide/protect this first Marine until the second one joins the party (at 3'35), after which you have 2 Marines vs 1 Reaper. Then the second Reaper comes at 4'00, by which time your third Marine is out, which means you still prevail at 3:2 with basic micro (and just like in the 2:1 situation, you still have the option to use 2-3 SCVs as a buffer). If your opponent went OC and a delayed second rax, his rush is effectively stopped because the production of the extra Barracks will come too late (complete at like ~4'45) to do anything; when the third Reaper is there at 4'45, you're on the verge of having your fifth Marine, and fending him off with 5:3 or even 4:3 with some SCVs to shield is not difficult. At any rate, if you went gas 13 your Factory is complete at ~4'25, which means his rush is completely dead shortly after 5'05 because there might be a Mine anywhere on the field for a trap (Hellions are also a possibility).

Now for the 8-8-8-8… The Reaper count increases faster, but it's still not enough to break a well-executed defence. Instead of having one Reaper at 3'15, two at 4'00, three at 4'45 and five at 5'30, the 8-8-8-8 variant (which, let us not forget it, is completely all-in) has three at 4'15, four at 4'45 and five at 5'00. Thus a build having continuous Marine production will have 4 Marines vs 3 Reapers at 4'25. In the open Reapers can win this fight, but the defender still has up to 15 SCVs ready to give their life to shield those Marines and stall long enough to get a Mine or a Hellion. The windows of vulnerability can be seen as below:

[image loading]

In blue, the timing of the first 4 Reapers from his first rax.
In purple, I underlined the advantage 8-8-8-8 has over 8-8-8-1X in terms of Reaper count.
In yellow (8-8-8-1X) and red (8-8-8-8), the windows of vulnerability a continuous Marine defence has if Marines face Reapers alone in the open (which, as you understand, should therefore not happen, i. e. you have to use either SCVs or a Bunker to shield and retain those Marines). Just play cautiously with your Marines during those few moments and you'll be fine.

For Reapers openings (either rax 11 gas 11 or rax 12 gas 12), you should have no trouble whatsoever. Just watch Mvp vs YoDa, Akilon Wastes, IEM, without the wrong sortie from Mvp and you see how he can easily defend while remaining miles ahead. Against 8-8-8-8 you probably want a second rax as soon as possible while still heading for Factory. Your opponent will be ahead in the Reaper count, but you have SCVs anyway.

If you opened gasless, you probably get one Bunker near your Barracks and +1-2 rax as soon as possible depending on the variation he uses.

Blunders to avoid:
- Don't lose your first Marine to avoid the snowball effect.
- No production cut on your Barracks! Naturally you don't get any Reactor on it.

TLDR; Marine and/or Reaper retention using SCVs and a Bunker somewhere to avoid the pitfall of losing too much in the few windows of vulnerability (see picture), Factory as soon as possible for Hellions or a Mine and you're golden.


Great post. I have hardly seen any Terran's on ladder so I have not had much experience yet. What is your usual scout timing to look for these kinds of shenanigans? I had been thinking to scout with my first reaper to save minerals, but this may put me in a bind vs this strat.

13 scout. Even when opening Reaper you're more or less forced to scout around your base with a SCV before starting your first or at least your second Reaper, else you run into troubles against proxy Marauders.
Kalfos
Profile Joined March 2013
Dominican Republic34 Posts
March 27 2013 02:05 GMT
#103
Very useful information
ThePianoDentist
Profile Joined July 2011
United Kingdom698 Posts
March 27 2013 07:52 GMT
#104
I initially in this thread said that I assumed this strat would lead to reaper nerfs. Then I played it myself a few times and realised how easily it can be stopped.

do you guys think when playing against this rush its worth proxying your factory as he has nothing at home to defend?
Brood War Protoss, SC2 Terran/Protoss
Zeweig
Profile Joined July 2011
Sweden189 Posts
March 27 2013 09:07 GMT
#105
On March 27 2013 16:52 ThePianoDentist wrote:
I initially in this thread said that I assumed this strat would lead to reaper nerfs. Then I played it myself a few times and realised how easily it can be stopped.

do you guys think when playing against this rush its worth proxying your factory as he has nothing at home to defend?


It is an interesting idea. but he will still be far behind, and as Dwf said before, it is gg when you get hellion or mine, so I believe it's preferable to be safer and get mine/hellion at home, crush his push, and then just go kill him, as he won't have any production or economy compared to you. I think you could also expand instead of going all in (still counterattack though), and then be miles ahead of him.
Commentator for Esports Heaven, covering mainly European and Chinese events. I do observing and writing on the side.
Douillos
Profile Joined May 2010
France3195 Posts
March 27 2013 09:30 GMT
#106
On March 25 2013 02:16 TheDwf wrote:
I don't understand all the fuss over this. Unless I missed something 8-8-8 is awful, whether he goes OC or not… It loses to any continuous production from the first Barracks as long as you take some appropriate measures.

Two days ago, BratOK did this build (using the OC and delayed 1X second rax variant) against me with like five seconds distance between his proxy Barracks and my mineral line, and I had no trouble defending despite being braindead and not even really recognizing it with my scouting SCV. The procedure is simple: retain your first Marine, build a Bunker as a shelter near the Barracks so Marines cannot be picked off by Reapers as they move out of the Barracks, all Marines together at one of the possible edges to have a chance to welcome Reapers as they make the jump, Factory as soon as possible (I went gas 15 so it was even late), one Mine or Hellions, gg.

If we examine the most all-in version i. e. 8-8-8-8 completely skipping OC, we have the first Reaper being complete at ~3'15 (next ones at 4'00, 4'45, 5'30, etc.) and the second Barracks ending at ~3'30 (with Reapers moving out at 4'15, 5'00, 5'45, etc.). Let us immediately remember that 8-8-8 has a grand total of 4 SCVs mining minerals, i. e. 180 minerals per minut assuming those SCVs are on close patches, which means you have as much economy even if you have only your MULE mining. You can thus pull SCVs liberally to protect your first Marines and/or Reapers and still be convincingly ahead…

At the beginning of the attack, the 8-8-8 has only a ~20 seconds window (give or take a few seconds depending on the distance of the proxy) in which he has the advantage, i. e. one Reaper vs one Marine. This means you simply have to hide/protect this first Marine until the second one joins the party (at 3'35), after which you have 2 Marines vs 1 Reaper. Then the second Reaper comes at 4'00, by which time your third Marine is out, which means you still prevail at 3:2 with basic micro (and just like in the 2:1 situation, you still have the option to use 2-3 SCVs as a buffer). If your opponent went OC and a delayed second rax, his rush is effectively stopped because the production of the extra Barracks will come too late (complete at like ~4'45) to do anything; when the third Reaper is there at 4'45, you're on the verge of having your fifth Marine, and fending him off with 5:3 or even 4:3 with some SCVs to shield is not difficult. At any rate, if you went gas 13 your Factory is complete at ~4'25, which means his rush is completely dead shortly after 5'05 because there might be a Mine anywhere on the field for a trap (Hellions are also a possibility).

Now for the 8-8-8-8… The Reaper count increases faster, but it's still not enough to break a well-executed defence. Instead of having one Reaper at 3'15, two at 4'00, three at 4'45 and five at 5'30, the 8-8-8-8 variant (which, let us not forget it, is completely all-in) has three at 4'15, four at 4'45 and five at 5'00. Thus a build having continuous Marine production will have 4 Marines vs 3 Reapers at 4'25. In the open Reapers can win this fight, but the defender still has up to 15 SCVs ready to give their life to shield those Marines and stall long enough to get a Mine or a Hellion. The windows of vulnerability can be seen as below:

[image loading]

In blue, the timing of the first 4 Reapers from his first rax.
In purple, I underlined the advantage 8-8-8-8 has over 8-8-8-1X in terms of Reaper count.
In yellow (8-8-8-1X) and red (8-8-8-8), the windows of vulnerability a continuous Marine defence has if Marines face Reapers alone in the open (which, as you understand, should therefore not happen, i. e. you have to use either SCVs or a Bunker to shield and retain those Marines). Just play cautiously with your Marines during those few moments and you'll be fine.

For Reapers openings (either rax 11 gas 11 or rax 12 gas 12), you should have no trouble whatsoever. Just watch Mvp vs YoDa, Akilon Wastes, IEM, without the wrong sortie from Mvp and you see how he can easily defend while remaining miles ahead. Against 8-8-8-8 you probably want a second rax as soon as possible while still heading for Factory. Your opponent will be ahead in the Reaper count, but you have SCVs anyway.

If you opened gasless, you probably get one Bunker near your Barracks and +1-2 rax as soon as possible depending on the variation he uses.

Blunders to avoid:
- Don't lose your first Marine to avoid the snowball effect.
- No production cut on your Barracks! Naturally you don't get any Reactor on it.

TLDR; Marine and/or Reaper retention using SCVs and a Bunker somewhere to avoid the pitfall of losing too much in the few windows of vulnerability (see picture), Factory as soon as possible for Hellions or a Mine and you're golden.



Thank you for this post! <3

I ve been Sim city-ing my base lately also: walling off one side of my CC with rax and depot (the same side as my gas), going 12 rax 13 gas); if there is a problem you just make a quick bunker. Do you think this is a good idea or does it create too good corridors for the reapers to kite? It makes it practically impossible to loose that first marine tbh.
Look a giraffe! Look a fist!!
Scheme
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United Kingdom210 Posts
March 28 2013 20:32 GMT
#107
On March 25 2013 02:16 TheDwf wrote:
I don't understand all the fuss over this. Unless I missed something 8-8-8 is awful, whether he goes OC or not… It loses to any continuous production from the first Barracks as long as you take some appropriate measures.

Two days ago, BratOK did this build (using the OC and delayed 1X second rax variant) against me with like five seconds distance between his proxy Barracks and my mineral line, and I had no trouble defending despite being braindead and not even really recognizing it with my scouting SCV. The procedure is simple: retain your first Marine, build a Bunker as a shelter near the Barracks so Marines cannot be picked off by Reapers as they move out of the Barracks, all Marines together at one of the possible edges to have a chance to welcome Reapers as they make the jump, Factory as soon as possible (I went gas 15 so it was even late), one Mine or Hellions, gg.

If we examine the most all-in version i. e. 8-8-8-8 completely skipping OC, we have the first Reaper being complete at ~3'15 (next ones at 4'00, 4'45, 5'30, etc.) and the second Barracks ending at ~3'30 (with Reapers moving out at 4'15, 5'00, 5'45, etc.). Let us immediately remember that 8-8-8 has a grand total of 4 SCVs mining minerals, i. e. 180 minerals per minut assuming those SCVs are on close patches, which means you have as much economy even if you have only your MULE mining. You can thus pull SCVs liberally to protect your first Marines and/or Reapers and still be convincingly ahead…

At the beginning of the attack, the 8-8-8 has only a ~20 seconds window (give or take a few seconds depending on the distance of the proxy) in which he has the advantage, i. e. one Reaper vs one Marine. This means you simply have to hide/protect this first Marine until the second one joins the party (at 3'35), after which you have 2 Marines vs 1 Reaper. Then the second Reaper comes at 4'00, by which time your third Marine is out, which means you still prevail at 3:2 with basic micro (and just like in the 2:1 situation, you still have the option to use 2-3 SCVs as a buffer). If your opponent went OC and a delayed second rax, his rush is effectively stopped because the production of the extra Barracks will come too late (complete at like ~4'45) to do anything; when the third Reaper is there at 4'45, you're on the verge of having your fifth Marine, and fending him off with 5:3 or even 4:3 with some SCVs to shield is not difficult. At any rate, if you went gas 13 your Factory is complete at ~4'25, which means his rush is completely dead shortly after 5'05 because there might be a Mine anywhere on the field for a trap (Hellions are also a possibility).

Now for the 8-8-8-8… The Reaper count increases faster, but it's still not enough to break a well-executed defence. Instead of having one Reaper at 3'15, two at 4'00, three at 4'45 and five at 5'30, the 8-8-8-8 variant (which, let us not forget it, is completely all-in) has three at 4'15, four at 4'45 and five at 5'00. Thus a build having continuous Marine production will have 4 Marines vs 3 Reapers at 4'25. In the open Reapers can win this fight, but the defender still has up to 15 SCVs ready to give their life to shield those Marines and stall long enough to get a Mine or a Hellion. The windows of vulnerability can be seen as below:

[image loading]

In blue, the timing of the first 4 Reapers from his first rax.
In purple, I underlined the advantage 8-8-8-8 has over 8-8-8-1X in terms of Reaper count.
In yellow (8-8-8-1X) and red (8-8-8-8), the windows of vulnerability a continuous Marine defence has if Marines face Reapers alone in the open (which, as you understand, should therefore not happen, i. e. you have to use either SCVs or a Bunker to shield and retain those Marines). Just play cautiously with your Marines during those few moments and you'll be fine.

For Reapers openings (either rax 11 gas 11 or rax 12 gas 12), you should have no trouble whatsoever. Just watch Mvp vs YoDa, Akilon Wastes, IEM, without the wrong sortie from Mvp and you see how he can easily defend while remaining miles ahead. Against 8-8-8-8 you probably want a second rax as soon as possible while still heading for Factory. Your opponent will be ahead in the Reaper count, but you have SCVs anyway.

If you opened gasless, you probably get one Bunker near your Barracks and +1-2 rax as soon as possible depending on the variation he uses.

Blunders to avoid:
- Don't lose your first Marine to avoid the snowball effect.
- No production cut on your Barracks! Naturally you don't get any Reactor on it.

TLDR; Marine and/or Reaper retention using SCVs and a Bunker somewhere to avoid the pitfall of losing too much in the few windows of vulnerability (see picture), Factory as soon as possible for Hellions or a Mine and you're golden.


Thank you so much for this. Could you link this to a reply just so that I see it in actions...reapers have been a pain for me lately.
MSN
Profile Joined June 2013
Czech Republic53 Posts
May 28 2015 11:58 GMT
#108
[B]
For Reapers openings (either rax 11 gas 11 or rax 12 gas 12), you should have no trouble whatsoever. Just watch Mvp vs YoDa, Akilon Wastes, IEM, without the wrong sortie from Mvp and you see how he can easily defend while remaining miles ahead.


Well this game is quite useless when discussing how to defend this. Yoda made orbital command and it's really not a big deal to defend this.

But if you go two rax no orbital command its totally different situation and its much more hard to defend. I still don't know whats the best way.
What, you run out of Marines ? ^^
Gwavajuice
Profile Joined June 2014
France1810 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-28 19:20:40
May 28 2015 19:19 GMT
#109
On May 28 2015 20:58 MSN wrote:
Show nested quote +

For Reapers openings (either rax 11 gas 11 or rax 12 gas 12), you should have no trouble whatsoever. Just watch Mvp vs YoDa, Akilon Wastes, IEM, without the wrong sortie from Mvp and you see how he can easily defend while remaining miles ahead.


Well this game is quite useless when discussing how to defend this. Yoda made orbital command and it's really not a big deal to defend this.

But if you go two rax no orbital command its totally different situation and its much more hard to defend. I still don't know whats the best way.


see the bolded part :

On March 25 2013 02:16 TheDwf wrote:


For Reapers openings (either rax 11 gas 11 or rax 12 gas 12), you should have no trouble whatsoever. Just watch Mvp vs YoDa, Akilon Wastes, IEM, without the wrong sortie from Mvp and you see how he can easily defend while remaining miles ahead. Against 8-8-8-8 you probably want a second rax as soon as possible while still heading for Factory. Your opponent will be ahead in the Reaper count, but you have SCVs anyway.
Dear INno and all the former STX boys.
Prev 1 4 5 6 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Korean Royale
12:00
Group Stage 1 - Group A
WardiTV640
LiquipediaDiscussion
Kung Fu Cup
12:00
2025 Monthly #3: Day 5
Cure vs herOLIVE!
Reynor vs TBD
RotterdaM617
TKL 352
IndyStarCraft 269
SteadfastSC113
IntoTheiNu 35
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 617
TKL 352
Tasteless 324
Reynor 276
IndyStarCraft 269
Rex 147
SteadfastSC 113
Railgan 25
MindelVK 21
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 36790
Rain 8932
Sea 4139
firebathero 4096
BeSt 1748
Horang2 1687
GuemChi 939
Soma 605
EffOrt 552
Stork 500
[ Show more ]
Mini 456
actioN 283
Rush 225
Killer 174
Last 146
Hyun 144
scan(afreeca) 136
hero 133
Bonyth 99
Mind 90
Barracks 61
Sharp 51
zelot 50
yabsab 49
Sea.KH 45
sorry 42
Snow 39
sas.Sziky 24
Shinee 18
Hm[arnc] 15
NaDa 8
Bale 6
Dota 2
singsing3070
qojqva1678
Dendi1083
Gorgc737
XcaliburYe301
Counter-Strike
byalli539
x6flipin531
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor238
Liquid`Hasu193
Other Games
FrodaN4939
B2W.Neo1844
Pyrionflax359
Fuzer 256
KnowMe216
DeMusliM40
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream14873
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream1808
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 8
• Dystopia_ 6
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV606
• Ler66
Upcoming Events
BSL 21
6h 7m
JDConan vs Semih
Dragon vs Dienmax
Tech vs NewOcean
TerrOr vs Artosis
IPSL
6h 7m
Dewalt vs WolFix
eOnzErG vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
9h 7m
Wardi Open
22h 7m
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 3h
Replay Cast
1d 9h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 22h
BSL: GosuLeague
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
BSL: GosuLeague
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
IPSL
6 days
Julia vs Artosis
JDConan vs DragOn
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-14
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.