[G] Mass Mutalisk ZvP for 2013 - Page 11
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy |
abefroman
70 Posts
| ||
Vulture174
United States74 Posts
| ||
SalvationII
Germany25 Posts
Could some Mutalisk-Abuser tell me how to win as Protoss against mass mutaslisk? @Vulture174, no armor doesnt help against storms. | ||
anatase
France532 Posts
On April 10 2013 00:17 SalvationII wrote: Mutalisks are so unfair against protoss, because at one point, you can't defend against it anymore. Even if you cannot scout the spire its often insta-GG. Could some Mutalisk-Abuser tell me how to win as Protoss against mass mutaslisk? If you can, have a look at DRG vs FLYING (code S group B, played today). DRG had a ton of mutas, probably more than 24 actually, both were struggling to secure their forth (only exp they could mine). DRG was flying everywhere and slowly destroying flying's bases. the only way for flying to secure his forth was a good number of cannon (something like 15) with 2 archons and a HT. All while his main army (few coloss, lots of stalkers, archons and ht) were denying DRG's 4th. DRG had SH and muta with many spinecrawlers, but ultimately DRG lost, despite he really abused Flying with the muta. (best way is still to watch the game, should soon be on youtube i believe as it is the WCS qualifier) | ||
abefroman
70 Posts
Basically you need to scout mutas fast and keep Phoenix count close to mutas. Avoid a situation where you have 30 Phoenix and Zerg has 40 mutas....they can just whip by and snipe a base or two. constantly trade.i | ||
LardMaster
United Kingdom123 Posts
On April 10 2013 00:05 Vulture174 wrote: Does muta armor reduce storm damage? No, armor doesn't affect spells. | ||
Expir3d
Spain17 Posts
I've been trying 2 base swarmhost with 0 success. | ||
Markwerf
Netherlands3728 Posts
Even then reactive phoenix with some cannons to buy time works just fine I think. You should basically have a stargate almost every game anyway now, so moment you see spire you can just throw down another stargate and fleet beacon. | ||
Moonrisesc
Netherlands38 Posts
On April 10 2013 00:17 SalvationII wrote: Mutalisks are so unfair against protoss, because at one point, you can't defend against it anymore. Even if you cannot scout the spire its often insta-GG. Could some Mutalisk-Abuser tell me how to win as Protoss against mass mutaslisk? @Vulture174, no armor doesnt help against storms. You can move-command pheonix on the minimap and you cannot possibly lose vs pure muta. | ||
Iksf
United Kingdom444 Posts
| ||
Randomaccount111
29 Posts
Thanks for the great write up. I needed something to get some wins vs P and this is doing it so far. | ||
TelecoM
United States10645 Posts
EDIT : I have been opening with an early +1 melee upgrade for the lings because muta ling / corrupter into baneling or swarmhosts is good, you have to be able to combat the ground army as well so I think that +1 is very good with the mutas, mutas without lings is just not as strong as muta ling ect. | ||
TheLunatic
309 Posts
| ||
Randomaccount111
29 Posts
On April 12 2013 02:26 TheLunatic wrote: I hate when players, especially pros use a mass unit type to win, leads to boring games, this is the only part I truly hate about sc, you should have to have multiple unit types with micro from all to win a game, mass muta, voids, marines, ect is lame as fuck and I boo the players that use these styles, and blizzard for making them viable. Yea I can see that. This does feel a bit cheesy. But for me at least, where Protoss is compared to where Zerg is, it's the only way to keep up. Hopefully this style, however cheesy you may find it, will evolve into a new metagame for the matchup. Going mass Muta as the only viable option may eventually evolve into something more complex once people figure out HOW to transition to a few less muta's and more other stuff (stuff that wont get ROFLSTOMPED by ff's, voids, collos, HT's).. The speedlings in the beginning of the game and the ability to abandon the muta plan based on what you scout and the number of drones/expansions up also cuts down on the cheesy feel for me. For now, since ZvP basically meant auto-loss for me before this build, I'll be experimenting with it quite a bit. | ||
| ||