• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:52
CEST 19:52
KST 02:52
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
WTL 2023 Summer - Week 7 Recap/Week 8 Preview4Team Liquid Map Contest #18: Results & Winners7WTL 2023 Summer - Week 6 Recap/Week 7 Preview2Team Liquid Map Contest #18: Voting4[Interview] iRk-AgGe10
Community News
2023 GSL Season 2 (Qualifiers)6ESL Summer Winners stage44ESL Open Week #177: herO, Clem, Astrea win2Matcherino starts SC2 team with Astrea, Future18ESL Open Week #176: Creator, Clem, Solar win7
StarCraft 2
General
WTL 2023 Summer - Week 7 Recap/Week 8 Preview 2023 GSL Season 2 (Qualifiers) Starcraft Late Night Podcast : Official Thread ESL Summer Winners stage Team Liquid Map Contest #18: Results & Winners
Tourneys
[WTL 2023] Summer - Week 8 Tenacious Turtle Tussle (Americas/OCE/Asia) 2023 NA Apprentice Season 2 KSL Week 14 Buying POE 3.21 Currency for new challenges
Strategy
Counting drones (zerg)
Custom Maps
TLMC#18 Judging Comments and Feedback Thread [M] (2) Magannatha [M] (2) Ultralove [M] (2) Vertigo
External Content
Mutation # 372 Medieval Times Mutation # 371 Never Say Die Mutation # 370 Astigmatism Mutation # 369 Undermined
Brood War
General
The StarCraft Race Stereotypes (FT. FlaSh) Stormgate. The new Starcraft 3? BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.com/ Mouse wheel scrolling speed BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 BSL 2v2 ProLeague S2 - Day 4 - Sunday 20:00 CEST Artosis vs the World
Strategy
Why mech style is rarely used in TvZ? Fighting Spirit mining rates [H] Yet even more questions about DT builds Carriers or arbiters
Other Games
General Games
Frost Giant announce Stormgate Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum Diablo IV The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion Berlin Major 2023
League of Legends
MSI is happening, the thread TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead Building the Future of Sport at Riot Games
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes International Nations Cup - Berlin 2023
Hearthstone
TL Mafia
TL Endures Mafia II TL Endures II Voting Thread TL Mafia Community Thread TL Endures Mafia TL Endures Voting Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Summer Games Done Quick 2023! NASA and the Private Sector Bitcoin discussion thread
Fan Clubs
The Guru Fan Club INnoVation Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion!
Sports
2022 - 2023 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022 Thread
Tech Support
StarCraft 2 Is Crashing on My PC
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
BRIEF MOMENT OF HAPPINESS…
XenOsky
Going for a kidney transp…
Jockmcplop
Atom-Mech (Chapter 4)
Terryberri
Berlin and Balloons!
FuDDx
Unexpected Wholesome SC Mome…
JieXian
Job interview
mantequilla
15 years
Shady Sands
The truth about Final Fan…
jameswatts
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 894 users

[G] Build order timing calculator - Page 5

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 14 15 16 Next All
Haploid
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands89 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-22 23:23:30
October 22 2010 23:23 GMT
#81
On October 22 2010 18:01 Existor wrote:
Epic work! Can you add column for zergs, how many larvae we have for a moment?

My works have never been called epic before. o.O Added larvae to the results.

On October 22 2010 22:47 Bitters wrote:
right but under your example of
15 Hatchery
14 Pool > Queen

That doesn't time the second queen starting off the expansion's finish (since the build I posted already was building a queen after the SP was done

I changed the way in which prerequisites are checked. They are now checked as it executes the build order, instead of trying to tie everything up beforehand. As a result, your first notation will now work as you'd expect:
15 Hatchery > Queen
14 Spawning Pool
It'll build the Queen right when the second Hatchery completes.

And the third and final change of the day: you can now specify a travel time for transferring probes. The notation for this is (any of these will work):
15 Hatchery > transfer 8 drones (10 seconds lost)
15 Hatchery > transfer 8 (10 seconds)
15 Hatchery > +8 (10s)

My next stop will be allowing you to specify a startup delay. I'm not sure what would be the most flexible way to write this. It depends on whether you send your probes first, or queue your probe. Personally, I start with the probes, and I assume most people do (mining outranks building). So for me, there is a maybe 2 second delay on startup mining and a 3 second delay on building the first probe. Any suggestions on how to write this down in a build order?
Thank you Carl, you saved me from having to kill them all myself.
Skrag
Profile Joined May 2010
United States643 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-23 02:02:56
October 23 2010 01:36 GMT
#82
On October 22 2010 14:01 kidcrash89 wrote:
15 Hatch 14 Pool gets a Pool quicker than 14 Hatch 14 Pool, interesting


See, this is the problem with not trying to add a bit of reality in.

I'd bet you money that if you actually tested it in-game, that would not be true.

**Edit**
Er, I misread something somehow. 15hatch 14pool will get the pool faster than 14hatch 14pool. Not by much, but slightly faster.

I did test it in-game, though, and came up with about the same time on both, with 15hatch being slightly faster, as expected.

However, the actual time is 10 or 11 seconds after the "theoretical" time, and my early game timings are pretty crisp, so it would be really tough to improve on that. I can manage everything just fine when there's not very much to do.
"Just go *@#$ing kill him!" -- Day[9] "Thanks for being a jackass though! Enjoy your time on the forums!" - Artosis
Skrag
Profile Joined May 2010
United States643 Posts
October 23 2010 01:39 GMT
#83
On October 22 2010 18:04 Haploid wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 22 2010 10:55 Bitters wrote:
9 Overlord
15 Hatchery>Queen
14 Spawning Pool
15 Overlord
18 Queen
20 Zergling

...
ya confirmed... using that hatchery>queen command has the code check current constraints instead of constraints after the hatch finishes
in the above example is says queen requires spawning pool, which would be complete by time hatch is done.

Yes, it picks up the jobs in the order in which they appear in the build. Even when you write 15 Hatchery>Queen, 14 Spawning Pool, it'll see the Queen first and throw an error. I've tried to make it so that "floating" jobs (jobs which don't depend on a specific supply count) such as ">Queen" can be moved to a later time to account for prerequisites. But it's not simple. It's actually an NP-complete problem, akin to the Travelling Salesman problem, which means that the computation becomes very expensive when a build has lots of floating jobs.


Seems like there's an easy solution here. Don't make it a "floating" job. Make it dependent on the thing that the > is after. So it doesn't do anything at all with the queen job until the hatchery is complete.
"Just go *@#$ing kill him!" -- Day[9] "Thanks for being a jackass though! Enjoy your time on the forums!" - Artosis
Skrag
Profile Joined May 2010
United States643 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-23 02:05:18
October 23 2010 01:44 GMT
#84
On October 23 2010 08:23 Haploid wrote:
My next stop will be allowing you to specify a startup delay. I'm not sure what would be the most flexible way to write this. It depends on whether you send your probes first, or queue your probe. Personally, I start with the probes, and I assume most people do (mining outranks building). So for me, there is a maybe 2 second delay on startup mining and a 3 second delay on building the first probe. Any suggestions on how to write this down in a build order?


Starting the worker first is typical and recommended by just about everybody, and I'm like 99% sure that's what all of the pros are doing, because a delay on the first worker isn't just a delay on the first worker.

I think you're severely underestimating your response time though. 3 seconds is a *long* time. You're probably quite a bit faster than that.

As for suggestions about how to write in delays, it could be as simple as

delay X > job

Especially if you change > jobs so they're dependent jobs, rather than floating ones.

Hmm. Except that would only work for things that you call out, and you don't call out workers mining.

Meh, I don't think the syntax matters that much though, as long as the instructions say what to do.
"Just go *@#$ing kill him!" -- Day[9] "Thanks for being a jackass though! Enjoy your time on the forums!" - Artosis
Sidus
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada6 Posts
October 23 2010 05:21 GMT
#85
On October 23 2010 10:44 Skrag wrote:

Starting the worker first is typical and recommended by just about everybody, and I'm like 99% sure that's what all of the pros are doing, because a delay on the first worker isn't just a delay on the first worker.


For zerg if you go 9 overlord then the the drones you build up to 12 supply are all mineral or supply limited (and if supply limited depend on the overlord timing which is in turn mineral limited) and in practice it's up to 13 supply even if the calculator claims it's larva limited at that point. So all those drones except the first are faster if you mine first, unless mining first delays the first drone 6 times more than it speeds up the mining.

Now, after that point, you will be ahead on larva if you built the worker first and might make up the mineral disadvantage, unless you hit 3 larva before making the 9 overlord. If you hit 3 larva before making the 9 overlord, the larva timer now depends on when that overlord was produced, and not when the first drone was produced. The calculator claims that the overlord will be produced with 4 seconds to spare, but this assumes perfect mining (each new drone going directly to an available patch and also without causing an existing worker returning to the patch from shifting to another, also the larva position relative to the minerals matters). In practice, looking at some replays of Idra (who builds the drone first) I see that he hits 3 larvae before making the overlord most of the time, although sometimes he does build the overlord before then. The delay is small enough that he would probably be making the overlord before the larvae count reached 3 if he mined first, so it's not 100% clearcut without actually doing math that he would be better off mining first, but for less good players like myself who can't direct each drone to the best mineral patch very well, and/or are less good at making that overlord immediately when 100 minerals is reached, the larva is probably going to reach 3 before the overlord anyway, so we should defininitely mine first.

tl;dr - if you are a pro zerg player making a drone first might or might not be a good idea (more research needed). If you are zerg and not pro then mine first (with a 9 overlord build).
Perscienter
Profile Joined June 2010
957 Posts
October 23 2010 05:27 GMT
#86
13 Assimilator > transfer 3
22 Nexus > transfer 8

Line 1 : transfer 3 is not a structure or unit.

Doesn't function, although it is stated this way in the 'How to use'. It only functions if you add the worker's name. It would be nice if you could update this.
Haploid
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands89 Posts
October 23 2010 08:44 GMT
#87
On October 23 2010 10:39 Skrag wrote:
Seems like there's an easy solution here. Don't make it a "floating" job. Make it dependent on the thing that the > is after. So it doesn't do anything at all with the queen job until the hatchery is complete.

Oh, it already is. When I say "floating" jobs, I mean that it is not pegged to some supply count or resource count. This means that the calculator can continue processing other jobs until this one becomes available. In some cases, this involves a choice.

Consider, for example, this snippet:
14 Drone > Spawning Pool
13 Hatchery
Clearly, the 14 Drone will finish very quickly, and the calculator will then have a choice:
a) Drone, Spawning Pool, then another Drone, then the Hatchery
b) Drone, Hatchery, then Spawning Pool
It'll always prefer to build the Hatchery first, because it has a given supply count that is already achieved. So in that sense, the Spawning Pool job is floated to a future time.

In the other example:
14 Spawning Pool > Queen
13 Hatchery
In this case, the choice will be:
a) Spawning Pool, then Queen, then Hatchery
b) Spawning Pool, then Hatchery, then Queen
Again, it will build the Hatchery first, because the given supply count for the Hatchery would be exceeded if it starts the Queen first. Again, the Queen job is "floated" until it can fit somewhere in the build order.

On October 23 2010 14:21 Sidus wrote:
tl;dr - if you are a pro zerg player making a drone first might or might not be a good idea (more research needed). If you are zerg and not pro then mine first (with a 9 overlord build).

Wow, very thorough analysis. I'm a Protoss player, and I know there's a gap right after I build my 9 Pylon where I have to wait a few seconds to start another Probe. So my thoughts are that if I start mining first, I can minimize that gap a bit.

On October 23 2010 14:27 Perscienter wrote:
Line 1 : transfer 3 is not a structure or unit.

Got it. Funny how two question marks in a regular expression can cancel each other out.
Thank you Carl, you saved me from having to kill them all myself.
Haploid
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands89 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-23 12:17:50
October 23 2010 11:02 GMT
#88
I've added some options to increase realism:

Worker can be sent early when building a structure, e.g. 12 Gateway (send @120 minerals)
Startup delay for mineral mining, e.g. #Startup mining delay = 3 seconds
Startup delay for worker production, e.g. #Startup build delay = 3 seconds

So a more realistic 10/10-gate would be something like:

#Startup mining delay = 2 seconds
#Startup build delay = 1 seconds
10 Pylon (send @80 minerals) > Gateway (send @120 minerals) [2]
12 Zealot* [3]
18 Pylon (send @80 minerals)
Which only delays the third Zealot by about 2 seconds, not too bad.

Note that if you switch the delays, you'll get that Zealot out one second sooner. Which would seem to indicate that it's better to send your workers first, then produce a new worker.
Thank you Carl, you saved me from having to kill them all myself.
XGDragon
Profile Joined September 2008
Netherlands61 Posts
October 23 2010 12:52 GMT
#89
Could you also implement the Extractor trick Zergs can do?
My current qq: TvT hellions are boring to watch :(
Sleight
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
2471 Posts
October 23 2010 13:45 GMT
#90
Halpoid has already instituted a 3 second delay on mining at the start and a 3 second loss of mining time every time you build a structure. That is very consistent with actual game timing. Now if you are a Terran or Toss walling, it might be 2-3 seconds more for the first few structures, but I think it is fine.

At least that is what I suggested and then he said, "Got it." or something to that effect.
One Love
kme
Profile Joined March 2010
Serbia176 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-23 14:40:52
October 23 2010 13:59 GMT
#91
This is very interesting. I'm curious would it be possible to give the option of setting a goal and then the program would determine the fastest way to do it. I can only hope .

If not, then it would be nice to add a command for constant worker or unit production. It would allow more abstract builds. Something like this:

10 supply depot
12 barracks & constant marine production; constant scv production
@100 mineral supply depot
@400 mineral Command center
@150 orbital command & stop scv production & stop marine production
@150 mineral barracks
@150 mineral barracks
@150 mineral barracks & constant scv production & constant marine production
@100 mineral supply depot
@75 mineral refinery > +2
@75 mineral refinery > +2

Edit: I am also curious about the supply triggers. I assume they trigger as soon as you hit the stated supply (if minerals are available). This would mean that if you want to state workers to be created at certain supply to emulate worker production, you would actually have one scv constantly queued as opposed to queuing it just before the previous worker finishes.

Edit2: OK it seems that constant production can be somewhat emulated by doing say barracks > marine [5] but it somehow messes with supply timings. It would be nice if it could show the result until the point where it requires more supply instead of showing only an error. Heh I suppose that it would be asking for too much if you could implement some sort of priority system for commands .
Perscienter
Profile Joined June 2010
957 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-23 15:22:11
October 23 2010 15:19 GMT
#92
Is something like this possible?

14 cybernetics core > warpgate AND stalker
Exstasy
Profile Joined August 2010
United Kingdom393 Posts
October 23 2010 15:35 GMT
#93
Ok right i want to work out a Terran CC first build.
I put in: '10 Supply Depot' '15 Command Center'
This wasn't on strict mode also, and i only have 70-ish busy percentage on my CC.
How do i find out the way to do a CC first with constant worker production?
Haploid
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands89 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-23 17:55:11
October 23 2010 17:52 GMT
#94
On October 23 2010 21:52 XGDragon wrote:
Could you also implement the Extractor trick Zergs can do?

In the next version.
On October 23 2010 22:45 Sleight wrote:
Halpoid has already instituted a 3 second delay on mining at the start and a 3 second loss of mining time every time you build a structure. That is very consistent with actual game timing. Now if you are a Terran or Toss walling, it might be 2-3 seconds more for the first few structures, but I think it is fine.

At least that is what I suggested and then he said, "Got it." or something to that effect.

Well, not 3 seconds hard-coded. You can manually set the startup delay with the #Startup Mining Delay=3 seconds command, and you can send a worker early when building a structure by writing 12 Barracks (send @120 minerals).

And in actuality, the travel time to a walloff is often much bigger than 3 seconds. More like 6 seconds on Lost Temple.
On October 23 2010 22:59 kme wrote:
This is very interesting. I'm curious would it be possible to give the option of setting a goal and then the program would determine the fastest way to do it. I can only hope .

It's an entirely different problem, and I'm not sure how I'd approach it in a way that allows for the whole myriad of units, morphs, upgrades and various dependencies.
On October 23 2010 22:59 kme wrote:
Edit: I am also curious about the supply triggers. I assume they trigger as soon as you hit the stated supply (if minerals are available). This would mean that if you want to state workers to be created at certain supply to emulate worker production, you would actually have one scv constantly queued as opposed to queuing it just before the previous worker finishes.

When a unit, structure, upgrade or morph can be produced depends on when:
a) enough minerals are available;
b) enough gas is available;
c) larvae are available (for zerg units);
d) supply capacity is sufficient (for units);
e) production queue is available (for non-zerg units, upgrades and structure morphs);
f) spellcaster energy is available (for abilities);
g) prerequisite structures are completed;
h) job dependencies are completed (such as 12 Gateway > Zealot. The Zealot job depends on the completion of the 12 Gateway job.).
That's part of why an optimizer would be... complex.

I'll think about an option to let you build something constantly (Marines, SCVs); it's not an easy addition, though. Maybe a priority system, like you mentioned. For the mean time, you'll have to add those units to the build order yourself and fiddle with when you can build them.
Thank you Carl, you saved me from having to kill them all myself.
icezar
Profile Joined June 2010
Germany240 Posts
October 23 2010 18:08 GMT
#95
How do you take drones off gas?
icezar
Profile Joined June 2010
Germany240 Posts
October 23 2010 21:08 GMT
#96
something is wrong with inject larva, it does not build drones right after that.

Ex:
10 Overlord
10 Spawning Pool
16 Queen > Spawn Larvae
18 Hatchery > transfer 3 drones
18 Extractor > transfer 3 drones (2 seconds lost)
18 Overlord
20 Queen
22 Overlord
22 Spawn Larvae
24 Spawn Larvae
28 Lair
32 Overlord
35 Overlord
38 Spawn Larvae
48 Zergling
Haploid
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands89 Posts
October 24 2010 00:03 GMT
#97
On October 24 2010 00:19 Perscienter wrote:
14 cybernetics core > warpgate AND stalker

Yes, just write: 14 Cybernetics Core > Warpgate & Stalker
It'll start the Warpgate research first, then the Stalker without waiting for the research to complete.

On October 24 2010 03:08 icezar wrote:
How do you take drones off gas?

It's in one of the examples: @100 gas take 3 workers off gas

On October 24 2010 06:08 icezar wrote:
something is wrong with inject larva, it does not build drones right after that.

Lol, actually, it injected the larvae on the second Hatchery, the one which hadn't finished yet. Should be fixed now.
Thank you Carl, you saved me from having to kill them all myself.
icezar
Profile Joined June 2010
Germany240 Posts
October 24 2010 06:32 GMT
#98
Thanks. Got another one now.
9 Overlord
14 Hatchery
13 Spawning Pool
16 Overlord
19 Queen > Spawn Larvae
21 Extractor > transfer 3 drones
20 Queen > Spawn Larvae
26 Overlord
29 Overlord
@100 gas take 3 workers off gas
30 Lair
34 Spawn Larvae
40 Spawn Larvae
41 Overlord
48 Zergling

No hatcheries are producing larvae. ???
It is ok until 41 Overlord....
Haploid
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands89 Posts
October 24 2010 09:57 GMT
#99
On October 24 2010 15:32 icezar wrote:
No hatcheries are producing larvae. ???
It is ok until 41 Overlord....

That, too, should be fixed now. Thanks again.
Thank you Carl, you saved me from having to kill them all myself.
icezar
Profile Joined June 2010
Germany240 Posts
October 24 2010 12:09 GMT
#100
Thanks for the fast updates but i keep getting errors :-((
9 Overlord
14 Hatchery
14 Spawning Pool
17 Overlord
18 Extractor > transfer 3 drones
18 Queen
20 Queen > Spawn Larvae
26 Overlord
29 Overlord
@100 gas take 3 workers off gas
30 Lair
40 Spawn Larvae
40 Spawn Larvae
41 Overlord
48 Zergling

here:
22 3:33 4:23 20 / 28 0, 1 Queen 25 7
23 4:15 4:32 22 / 28 3, 2 Drone 401 85

why does it wait so long to build that drone?
and larva count i think it is wrong

Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 14 15 16 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Big Brain Bouts
16:00
#30
RotterdaM1118
IndyStarCraft 244
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 1118
IndyStarCraft 244
SC2ShoWTimE 232
UpATreeSC 141
ProTech118
Nathanias 101
BRAT_OK 60
SC2Nice 57
Dragon 30
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 1410
Jaedong 974
Bale 741
Mini 496
ToSsGirL 411
EffOrt 410
ggaemo 394
Mong 316
Hyun 256
Killer 200
[ Show more ]
Dewaltoss 116
firebathero 93
scan(afreeca) 19
Britney 0
Dota 2
Gorgc13027
singsing4317
qojqva2972
XcaliburYe307
monkeys_forever153
Fuzer 152
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
fl0m2681
x6flipin262
Other Games
hiko3356
Lowko447
MaximusBlack394
ArmadaUGS365
Livibee265
Beastyqt229
Mew2King227
firebathero (twitch)136
ViBE97
nookyyy 89
Hui .68
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream17708
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
ESL CS:GO7699
Other Games
B2W.Neo790
StarCraft 2
Esl_sc2231
ESL.tv231
StarCraft: Brood War
StarcraftVOD5
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 43
• MindelVK 19
• Adnapsc2 18
• 80smullet 12
• IndyKCrew
• Poblha
• Migwel
• Laughngamez YouTube
• LaughNgamez Trovo
• Kozan
• Gussbus
• intothetv
• aXEnki
• Matcherino
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 4
• sscaitournament1
• BSLYoutube
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• STPLYoutube
League of Legends
• TFBlade2949
Other Games
• imaqtpie794
• Shiphtur450
Upcoming Events
Korean StarCraft League
9h 8m
OSC
16h 8m
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
1d 5h
OSC
1d 18h
ESL Open Cup
2 days
World Team League
2 days
Shopify Rebellion vs ABYDOS
Starlight Twinkle vs BASILISK
ESL Open Cup
2 days
ESL Open Cup
3 days
World Team League
3 days
Invictus Gaming vs Berserker eSports
Platinum Heroes vs SSLT
ESL Pro Tour
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

TT Offline Party
WardiTV TLMC #10
HOTS Unchained
ESL Impact League S3 Finals

Ongoing

FS Mania
KCM Ladies Race Survival 2023 Season 2
KCM Race Survival 2023 Season 2
GRS Season 6
Super Anchor Qualifying S1
Platinum StarCraft League S1
CSL 9: 2023 Summer
BSL 2v2 ProLeague #2
WTL 2023 Summer
Nexus Never Dies #3
BLAST Premier Spring Final
ESL Challenger Katowice 2023

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana Season 2
ESL Winter
2023 GSL S3: Code S
2023 GSL S2: Code S
HSC XXIII
ESL Summer
LTK Thunderball
Nations Cup 2023
ESL Pro League Season 18
IEM Cologne 2023
BLAST Premier Fall Groups
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2023 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.