• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 10:21
CET 16:21
KST 00:21
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies2ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !10Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Micro Lags When Playing SC2? When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win
Tourneys
$100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1 RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
Anyone remember me from 2000s Bnet EAST server? soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings How Rain Became ProGamer in Just 3 Months
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB QuarterFinals - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1465 users

[D] Contaminate "build" in ZvZ

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Normal
fazir
Profile Joined August 2010
Poland6 Posts
September 08 2010 14:44 GMT
#1
I've been practicing with something that can be called a contaminate build. After getting Zerling Speed and Queen all the gas goes to get 3 overseers. After I get them, I use them to cast Contaminate on the hatchery - with 3 overseers, you can do that all the time.

Contaminate blocks additional larva from being spawn and also pauses the Spawn Larva ability and all the research at the hatchery. There's more - if the enemy Queen uses Spawn Larva on a contaminated hatchry then the Spawn Larva resets.

By doing that, I can just produce anything I want (I preffer to early produce zerlings and tech to Muta after 3 overseers) and the enemy just can't keep up. It's a real production victory

The replay below is against medium AI, as it's rather a concept, then an actual build.

http://screplays.com/replays/mickotula/8116
AnodyneSea
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Jamaica757 Posts
September 08 2010 14:52 GMT
#2
I've actually been thinking about doing something like this to delay that lair tech and slowly come out ahead with spire tech, I may explore this more later.
Lost within the hope of freedom, not for control but in the light of our cause
scojac
Profile Joined June 2010
United States99 Posts
September 08 2010 15:04 GMT
#3
This is incredibly interesting...i'm wondering right now if it would still work against a 2-base build (FE, or just a second hatch, if you can get it up safely before the overseers come).

Regardless, it seems that the overseers would be up before you would expect mutas in ZvZ, so it's definitely an interesting move, at least as a surprise tactic. Gonna test this out, see how it goes.
Geo.Rion
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
7377 Posts
September 08 2010 15:07 GMT
#4
dont open a trash topic like this, if you have an idea, make it happen, analyze it, post replays and tell about details... The concept isnt that horrible but these kind of threads drive me crazy

User was warned for this post
"Protoss is a joke" Liquid`Jinro Okt.1. 2011
fazir
Profile Joined August 2010
Poland6 Posts
September 08 2010 15:13 GMT
#5
On September 09 2010 00:07 Geo.Rion wrote:
dont open a trash topic like this, if you have an idea, make it happen, analyze it, post replays and tell about details... The concept isnt that horrible but these kind of threads drive me crazy


Sorry, but not everybody have the time to do the research. And what if somebody already tried it? Then all the things I would do would just be a waste of time. Anyway, I will try to do some research and then I will just simply get back here... That's how things work, right?
Bond(i2)
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Canada926 Posts
September 08 2010 15:20 GMT
#6
On September 09 2010 00:07 Geo.Rion wrote:
dont open a trash topic like this, if you have an idea, make it happen, analyze it, post replays and tell about details... The concept isnt that horrible but these kind of threads drive me crazy

In no way do i feel this is a trash topic. The OP is simply suggesting a theory that he wants to discuss.

Anyways, I think this is a very interesting concept considering zvz mostly revolves around 1 hatchery for the majority of the game. IT seems like it would work very well if you can pop out a lair and get the 3 overseers before he can get mutas. Assuming you are correct about 3 overseers being able to constantly contaminate I think this might turn into a 100% victory strat.^^
roses are red violets are blue, Im schitzophrenic and so am i
drats
Profile Joined August 2010
5 Posts
September 08 2010 15:23 GMT
#7
Can't watch the replay because I'm at work, but how do you protect the overseers against the double queens? Flood the base with speedlings until the queen is dead?
fazir
Profile Joined August 2010
Poland6 Posts
September 08 2010 15:32 GMT
#8
On September 09 2010 00:23 drats wrote:
Can't watch the replay because I'm at work, but how do you protect the overseers against the double queens? Flood the base with speedlings until the queen is dead?


Well in my situation the enemy got 1 queen. Need to test it, but it's possible to stop the second queen with the first overseer. Overseers are faster then overlords, to they won't be takan down so easily. And you can always produce more Overseers and focus on zerlings.

The other thing I've noticed it's that you force your enemy to get Mutas... And you can early on plan on how to deal with that.
febreze
Profile Joined April 2010
167 Posts
September 08 2010 15:57 GMT
#9
One thing I miss is that contaminate doesn't work on photon cannons anymore. Anyone know if fortresses and bunkers still attack? I recall a game contaminating a bunker, but couldn't tell if it was still attacking.
Beauty in truth, deception with dogma, meaning through life.
nihoh
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Australia978 Posts
September 08 2010 16:02 GMT
#10
Fortresses attack as far as I know, so it would be safe to assume bunkers attack too, and simply cannot be laoded/unloaded/salvaged while under spell.

300 gas is it for 3 overseers? If you've both raced to Tier 2, I would assume he would put down a spire? Where would it go from there? As long as you can keep him permanently in lockdown.. But then again he can simply throw down spores after an evo cahmber?
Dont look at the finger or you will miss all that heavenly glory.
Ineluctable
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada68 Posts
September 08 2010 16:17 GMT
#11
On September 09 2010 00:57 febreze wrote:
One thing I miss is that contaminate doesn't work on photon cannons anymore. Anyone know if fortresses and bunkers still attack? I recall a game contaminating a bunker, but couldn't tell if it was still attacking.


Contaminate blocks production now, so it just makes the PF unable to produce SCVS but it can still attack. Contaminate on a bunker MAY block salvage but I'm not sure about that.
Zips
Profile Joined August 2010
United States146 Posts
September 08 2010 16:32 GMT
#12
Contaminate in zvz has the potential to be op, but I have yet to actually see someone use it in this way.

Regardless, it's probably worth using spare overseer energy to contaminate a hatch every so often, even if you're not trying to perma-block larva.
Geo.Rion
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
7377 Posts
September 09 2010 07:29 GMT
#13
On September 09 2010 00:13 fazir wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2010 00:07 Geo.Rion wrote:
dont open a trash topic like this, if you have an idea, make it happen, analyze it, post replays and tell about details... The concept isnt that horrible but these kind of threads drive me crazy


Sorry, but not everybody have the time to do the research. And what if somebody already tried it? Then all the things I would do would just be a waste of time. Anyway, I will try to do some research and then I will just simply get back here... That's how things work, right?

NO, definetly not, at least it should not, but who am i kidding... Threads like this remaining open, makes me want to quit posting. You dont have time? Absolutely no problem, dont open a topic then. You have an idea want to get out of yourself? Make a blog, as the content you put in it is no way worthy of a thread.

User was warned for this post
"Protoss is a joke" Liquid`Jinro Okt.1. 2011
-vVvTitan-
Profile Joined August 2010
United States473 Posts
September 09 2010 07:36 GMT
#14
I do this a lot vs protoss to delay the collosus death push. Buying just 2-3 more spits changes the entire game.
vVv.Titan @ vVv-Gaming.com
AFKarnn
Profile Joined August 2010
United States8 Posts
September 09 2010 07:36 GMT
#15
On September 09 2010 16:29 Geo.Rion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2010 00:13 fazir wrote:
On September 09 2010 00:07 Geo.Rion wrote:
dont open a trash topic like this, if you have an idea, make it happen, analyze it, post replays and tell about details... The concept isnt that horrible but these kind of threads drive me crazy


Sorry, but not everybody have the time to do the research. And what if somebody already tried it? Then all the things I would do would just be a waste of time. Anyway, I will try to do some research and then I will just simply get back here... That's how things work, right?

NO, definetly not, at least it should not, but who am i kidding... Threads like this remaining open, makes me want to quit posting. You dont have time? Absolutely no problem, dont open a topic then. You have an idea want to get out of yourself? Make a blog, as the content you put in it is no way worthy of a thread.


Did you have a bad day? Maybe your dad didn't hug you enough . Anyways, I'm happy this was posted, as a 700+ diamond I've hit a wall in zvz and now I have something new to try. Cheers OP, I probably wouldn't have though of this .

User was warned for this post
Xapti
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada2473 Posts
September 09 2010 07:37 GMT
#16
WTF, last I remember testing, contaminate didn't do anything for hatcheries I thought (except block queen or research of course).

So you're saying now for sure that it pauses both spawn larva timer (and lets the player cast another spawn larva even though there's already one that's frozen?) and normal hatchery larva production?

Nonetheless, while much more useful vs zerg than vs terran or protoss, I think this build is not really viable, because it requires quite a bit of gas investment quite early on, at which point the opponent could very well outpower the player. Queen fire will eventually make the overseer(s) unable to go in again without dying, too.
"Then he told me to tell you that he wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire" — "Well, you tell him that I said that I wouldn't piss on him if he was on Jeopardy!"
Phisk
Profile Joined June 2010
166 Posts
September 09 2010 07:42 GMT
#17
Most high level ZvZs start out with Baneling wars, then turning into mutalisk war. If you manage to survive the baneling war with this build he will have 3 more mutas than you due to not wasting 150/300 resources, and once his mutas are out he can go overseer hunting.

I've seen a lot of these overseer theorycrafting threads for all match ups, never seen a high level replay of someone making use of it. Its just not practical.
Neuuubeh
Profile Joined July 2010
138 Posts
September 09 2010 07:50 GMT
#18
On September 09 2010 00:32 fazir wrote:
The other thing I've noticed it's that you force your enemy to get Mutas... And you can early on plan on how to deal with that.


Err, its ZvZ, Mutas are always in the game... It is simply so much better to get mutas than be on the other end...
PhuxPro
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States294 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-09 07:54:06
September 09 2010 07:52 GMT
#19
On September 09 2010 16:29 Geo.Rion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2010 00:13 fazir wrote:
On September 09 2010 00:07 Geo.Rion wrote:
dont open a trash topic like this, if you have an idea, make it happen, analyze it, post replays and tell about details... The concept isnt that horrible but these kind of threads drive me crazy


Sorry, but not everybody have the time to do the research. And what if somebody already tried it? Then all the things I would do would just be a waste of time. Anyway, I will try to do some research and then I will just simply get back here... That's how things work, right?

NO, definetly not, at least it should not, but who am i kidding... Threads like this remaining open, makes me want to quit posting. You dont have time? Absolutely no problem, dont open a topic then. You have an idea want to get out of yourself? Make a blog, as the content you put in it is no way worthy of a thread.


Who assigned you mediator of threads?

+ Show Spoiler +
[D] Discussion threads

Be clear about the topic and the feedback your are hoping for

This is the most open form of thread. Use a Discussion thread if you are not certain about some game mechanic and you want to get the feedback from other players. This can be about strategy and tactics, the role and viability of certain units, rock paper scissor counters, etc. The building blocks of what becomes sound SC2 strategy.

While the thread is less formal, please be clear and concise on the topic you want to discuss about, and open with your own opinion. Don’t make the topic too broad.

This is the perfect way to post a strategy you came up with that is not quite ready to be turned into a guide (See below). Post your strategy and point out the areas where you are not sure about it’s validity and ask for feedback.


Get acquainted with the guidelines before you attempt to play god again, Mister Snob.

On topic, OP's idea is pretty good. I had no idea that Contaminate resets Spawn Larvae and also halts production of larvae as well. This would actually be really effective in ZvZ. Muta/ling/bling's gonna turn into Muta/Overseer, haha. Basically, whoever produces more will simply win.
Money was meant solely to be spent.
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
September 09 2010 07:56 GMT
#20
You really gotta kill the first queen for this to have a prayer of happening. Overseers don't last forever. If indeed contaminate blocks larva creation AND inject larva's mechanic, then I'd just expand to use the resources I can't use yet. My army on the ground actually has gas spent on units that are more powerful that your mostly-zergling army so you have no ability to deny my expansions.

I consider this theorycrafting better discussed with a practice partner as you try it against regular ZvZ builds like speedling/baneling and roach openings. Then you get it down to a phantom timing where you can stop his army cold and he can't' rebuild fast enough or whatever. Assuming this is accomplished, you upload a couple proof-of-concept replays showing the refinements you've put on there after losing to your partner many, many times. Then you get some recognition for making a thread with substance--good replays!!--instead of another thought experiment of what could be.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
AFKarnn
Profile Joined August 2010
United States8 Posts
September 09 2010 08:35 GMT
#21
Better yet, why not just use additional gas for blings or upgrades and overwhelm him, put mutas aside. If your good at this you could force him to go hydras or lings himself since he will most likely only have 1 queen. Just defend the blings well and start massing your ling army while larva blocking him. Sounds legit? Can't wait to try it out.
Neuuubeh
Profile Joined July 2010
138 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-09 08:38:13
September 09 2010 08:37 GMT
#22
I just had a zvz and tried contaminating the hatch, works pretty nice actually. I wouldnt consider getting 3 overseers tho :s. Still, makes for a nice trick to halt production. Too nice as a matter of fact...

PS. Blings arent all that hot you know...
AFKarnn
Profile Joined August 2010
United States8 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-09 08:46:46
September 09 2010 08:45 GMT
#23
On September 09 2010 17:37 Neuuubeh wrote:
I just had a zvz and tried contaminating the hatch, works pretty nice actually. I wouldnt consider getting 3 overseers tho :s. Still, makes for a nice trick to halt production. Too nice as a matter of fact...

PS. Blings arent all that hot you know...


Eh, at top 30 diamond thats all I get haha. Sorry. Maybe things change in the higher ranks.
Neuuubeh
Profile Joined July 2010
138 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-09 08:50:17
September 09 2010 08:49 GMT
#24
Well dunno, Im defo lower than that, hovering at around 650ish (had a huuuuuuge loss streak when I got into diamond lolol :D). I mean blings are nice and stuff, I like the unit myself. However if you see them coming, its so easy to make a wall with a few evos or something and drop 2-3 spines around the ramps/chokes. In fact, I started using pool and other buildings to wall off the mineral line a bit, which paired with some static defense seems to work wonders. Again, this is somewhat early game

Then again, as I said, im a lowbie naab :D. I kinda prefer blings for mass ling and especially hydra annihilation
DarKFoRcE
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Germany1215 Posts
September 09 2010 08:49 GMT
#25
The biggest problem i see with this is actually getting to T2 and having 300 gas spare for this kind of shenanigans. In a standard ling/bling fight game this is not exactly easy without being far behind due to alot of static defense (and then your opponent just expands). furthermore, i always thought that contaminate doesnt block spawn larvae timer, but maybe i was wrong on that.
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/PinDarKFoRcE
Neuuubeh
Profile Joined July 2010
138 Posts
September 09 2010 08:51 GMT
#26
On September 09 2010 17:49 DarKFoRcE wrote:
The biggest problem i see with this is actually getting to T2 and having 300 gas spare for this kind of shenanigans. In a standard ling/bling fight game this is not exactly easy without being far behind due to alot of static defense (and then your opponent just expands). furthermore, i always thought that contaminate doesnt block spawn larvae timer, but maybe i was wrong on that.



Just tried it, it blocks natural larva production from the hatchery, as well as spawn larva. Didnt know that myself
tackklee
Profile Joined September 2010
United States270 Posts
September 09 2010 08:53 GMT
#27
It's a good thought, but I just don't see this working in most games on ladder. Maybe in a game where both zergs decide to FE and macro up. 99% of my ZvZ ladder games, the enemy goes speedling/baneling. It's way too much early pressure.
RoL
Profile Joined April 2010
United States22 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-09 08:57:19
September 09 2010 08:56 GMT
#28
whoops double post plz delete
RoL
Profile Joined April 2010
United States22 Posts
September 09 2010 08:56 GMT
#29
On September 09 2010 16:29 Geo.Rion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2010 00:13 fazir wrote:
On September 09 2010 00:07 Geo.Rion wrote:
dont open a trash topic like this, if you have an idea, make it happen, analyze it, post replays and tell about details... The concept isnt that horrible but these kind of threads drive me crazy


Sorry, but not everybody have the time to do the research. And what if somebody already tried it? Then all the things I would do would just be a waste of time. Anyway, I will try to do some research and then I will just simply get back here... That's how things work, right?

NO, definetly not, at least it should not, but who am i kidding... Threads like this remaining open, makes me want to quit posting. You dont have time? Absolutely no problem, dont open a topic then. You have an idea want to get out of yourself? Make a blog, as the content you put in it is no way worthy of a thread.


I'm surprised someone thats been around as long as you have in the community will still post garbage bashing comments unrelated to the topic. If you think this thread is a waste a time, why be so hypocritical and spam on the thread? Id think maybe you'd figure out how teamliquid works by now. New builds and Ideas created never come out polished from its first iteration. Just look at the 5 RR build, it wasn't perfect when Fistdantilus first posted it up, but now it has more depth and transitions further optimizing the original build.

Anyways like someone said before, this thread comes as a discussion so heres my two cents on it:

This 3 overseer contaminate strategy was actually used by Argos Zenith in a zvz game to stop larvae production:



Although I'm not sure the viability in creating a build with the 3 overseer being the ultimate goal, I do see this strategy working in a zvz when the game is mirrored and progresses into lair tech. That is, zvz is very erratic as the balance of favor tips with 1 small mistake, and often goes back and forth that requires quick counters between banelings, spines and roaches so any planned build up to lair tech is pretty much useless.

Therefore, instead of this becoming a straight up build I see this tactic as an option in the case that your zvz game progress to lair tech and you guys continue to mirror each other, this might be the split tactic where he goes mutas and you go 3 overseer roach and/or zergling push
AFKarnn
Profile Joined August 2010
United States8 Posts
September 09 2010 08:58 GMT
#30
On September 09 2010 17:49 Neuuubeh wrote:
Well dunno, Im defo lower than that, hovering at around 650ish (had a huuuuuuge loss streak when I got into diamond lolol :D). I mean blings are nice and stuff, I like the unit myself. However if you see them coming, its so easy to make a wall with a few evos or something and drop 2-3 spines around the ramps/chokes. In fact, I started using pool and other buildings to wall off the mineral line a bit, which paired with some static defense seems to work wonders. Again, this is somewhat early game

Then again, as I said, im a lowbie naab :D. I kinda prefer blings for mass ling and especially hydra annihilation


I would say this strat is a win against a no bling build, due to massive amounts of lings then pumping drones/expanding when you start cycling the contaminates... pretty much a win if it does completely eliminate the ability to spawn ANY larva, although I find it hard to believe that they don't even produce a larva every 10 or so seconds.
Neuuubeh
Profile Joined July 2010
138 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-09 09:03:39
September 09 2010 09:02 GMT
#31
On September 09 2010 17:58 AFKarnn wrote:


I would say this strat is a win against a no bling build, due to massive amounts of lings then pumping drones/expanding when you start cycling the contaminates... pretty much a win if it does completely eliminate the ability to spawn ANY larva, although I find it hard to believe that they don't even produce a larva every 10 or so seconds.[/QUOTE]

Try it out, I first did it in the unit tester, then tried it on a ladder game. Again, I dont think this will be game breaking unless you invest in 3 overseers and catch him by surprise, but still, another harrassment trick up the sleeve . Which can't be a bad thing, but as I mentioned, I do think this might be toooooo good to be in the game currently. One unit halting any larva (essentially unit) production for 30 secs... cant be right
Alsn
Profile Joined February 2008
Sweden995 Posts
September 09 2010 09:45 GMT
#32
Just a question, does contaminate stop a lair from morphing?
Machina improba! Vel mihi ede potum vel mihi redde nummos meos!
BoZo
Profile Joined July 2010
Iraq10 Posts
September 09 2010 09:57 GMT
#33
On September 09 2010 18:45 Alsn wrote:
Just a question, does contaminate stop a lair from morphing?



No
SeaSmoke
Profile Joined July 2010
United States326 Posts
September 09 2010 09:58 GMT
#34
If my hatch got contaminated two times in a row, i'd put up spore crawlers immediately. I'd still be behind a bit, but three overseers aren't cheap either.
royal.cze
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada287 Posts
September 09 2010 10:17 GMT
#35
its such a large investment early game that I find it hard to comprehend its effectiveness.

You would need double gas, you wouldn't get banelings or roaches and no upgrades. If your opponent moves out with a roach push or a baneling opening would destroy this build also mid game into late game I cant see the investment being worth it since most mid games either have mutas or hydras.

in zvp and zvt however contaminate is AMAZING for delaying death pushes with collosus or thors and even early voids if you do a standard opening.
brocoli
Profile Joined February 2010
Brazil264 Posts
September 09 2010 14:30 GMT
#36
It's not a large investment when you stop All production with just 3 units.
Sixes
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada1123 Posts
September 09 2010 14:54 GMT
#37
On September 09 2010 16:29 Geo.Rion wrote:

NO, definetly not, at least it should not, but who am i kidding... Threads like this remaining open, makes me want to quit posting. You dont have time? Absolutely no problem, dont open a topic then. You have an idea want to get out of yourself? Make a blog, as the content you put in it is no way worthy of a thread.


Please do, your posts are the least usefu on this thread.

As for the topic, seems like a great idea and I remember seeing something like this on a replay Crota cast ... http://www.youtube.com/user/BlizShouter#p/u/13/HveAkF9Npnw Argos vs Carrain, Argos 6 pools and follows up with that I believe to get back in the game.

It is actually great. You stop opposing production meaning that even if he got his lair up, he can't get many mutas for a little longer, so you should be ahead.

Depending on the situation it can either lock his lair down (if it is late) or stop production from it. Overseers morph in pretty fast and can be right next to his base already (at least 1 or 2 overlords should be around there) so it doesn't take much to get in there before his lair is finished (and you will almost always make it before the spire finishes).
Tropical Bob
Profile Joined August 2010
United States127 Posts
September 09 2010 15:05 GMT
#38
I've had thoughts about using Overseers to perma-freeze a Hatchery for a while. The problem is that to really be effective, you need probably 3+, as well as Pneumatized Carapace. So that's 250/400 investment, and assumes you don't lose any Overseers. It also will tax your macro, because it adds in another timer of 30s, on top of your 40s Spawn Larva and 15s Creep Tumor timers.

That being said, maybe if you somehow adapt a 'quick' Lair into a ZvZ build without dying right off, you can start to shut down your opponent completely. Incredibly effective if you manage to incorporate a push.

I just don't see it happening, though. Perhaps if Overseers were 50/50, it'd be more viable.
tierax
Profile Joined August 2010
United States4 Posts
September 09 2010 15:09 GMT
#39
I like the concept too, I just don't think its practical.

You can't get overseers faster than player Z can bring Blings, Slings, Roaches. Most ZvZ from that point evolves into Muta war, as others have said. Essentially, you leave yourself open to normal ZvZ attacks if you try to quick tech T2. Essentially, you'd only pull this off at a normal T2 time, which is probably around the same time as your opponent. Then, you'd have to time the overseers to beat his spire and prevent Muta production, hope he doesn't have multiple queens, and is flustered enough to not just lay down another hatch.

To me, while it seems like an underused harass tool, to rely on it as a 'strategy' is weak since its countered pretty easily via normal Z production. I think your better served only making one overseer and stopping production occasionally (a harassment tool) vs. investing 300gas right when you both hit T2 on something that isn't mutas or hydras.
jiabung
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States720 Posts
September 11 2010 09:00 GMT
#40
I think this build could be effective. I already tried out contaminate in the unit testing map, and figured out it takes about 4 overseers to keep something permanently contaminated. The overseer gets close to 18 energy back throughout the life of the contaminate spell. 3 seems to work perfectly fine in a real game though if you have a bit of surplus energy before you contaminate.

I practiced 2 games with my ~1000k protoss buddy. He doesn't play zerg, but it was the only person to practice with since no one ever replies in #tlpickup. I suppose it works somewhat, but I can't really gauge how well since I won basically because I am better at ZvZ. He didn't exactly play an orthodox zerg build either since he is a protoss player. I do think it has potential though and would like to flesh it out more. If anyone would like to practice this strat send me a PM. I'm ~1000 random. Replays below.

http://www.mediafire.com/?fpt0mgnqm25la0j
http://www.mediafire.com/?gcl13csk113ap3v
archwaykitten
Profile Joined May 2010
90 Posts
September 11 2010 09:37 GMT
#41
You actually need at least 5 overseers to permanently shut down a hatchery. I think four can technically keep a building locked down forever, but you have to cast corruption the instant the previous corruption wears off. If you consistently cast slightly early with four, eventually the corruption cycle will time out before your overseers have regenerated enough mana to cast again. If you cast even a split second late, then the building you're trying to contaminate will obviously get a split second of production in. Normally a split second of production wouldn't matter very much, but if a hatchery sits uncontaminated for any time at all a larva will spawn. If that larva is morphed into either a mutalisk or a hydralisk, your overseers will not be able to survive much longer unless they retreat.
ZerG~LegenD
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
Sweden1179 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-13 13:23:17
September 13 2010 09:56 GMT
#42
I've been playing around with a Roach opening followed by a rush to 3 Overseers at the ladder, rating around 1200-1300.

The build is rather useless vs a 15 Hatch opening, and I think you're in a rather uncomfortable situation vs 1 Hatch Muta rush too - unless he opened Banelings first. However, vs everything else it's pretty sweet.

So far I'm 6-2 with the build, here are all the reps:
SieGe vs DalaiLameR (W)
SieGe vs Revolver (W)
SieGe vs mTwFallY (L)
SieGe vs FoRaWhiteGuy (L)
SieGe vs EnTi (W)
SieGe vs BuNNy (W)
SieGe vs Zergius (W)
SieGe vs Draakki (W)

After losing twice to the Muta rush I decided to change my follow up. The new one is undefeated so far, but it's rather gimmicky so it won't hold in the long run. You could probably transition straight into a common Hydra/Infestor 2 base build on some maps though.

Contamine opens up a rather huge timing window vs some builds, where you can simply kill them straight off. Other times it prevents Drone production in situations where both players would prefer to just sit still and macro up. It also provides perfect intellligence. The huge downside is that you have to give up map control vs Mutalisk builds and your own economy isn't the greatest either.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day
blackodd
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden451 Posts
September 13 2010 12:02 GMT
#43
You can heal overseer with queen if things gets dirty
For I am the Queen of Blades. And none shall ever dispute my rule, again...
Noxie
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2227 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-13 14:19:11
September 13 2010 14:18 GMT
#44
This is a pretty interesting topic..From the replays it def looks promising.. not sure if a build like this will actually catch on.

I think its plausible
CurLy[]
Profile Joined August 2010
United States759 Posts
September 13 2010 16:54 GMT
#45


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HveAkF9Npnw



That was a great game, very interesting early harass, sounds like the commentator got it wrong about contaminate?
Great pasta mom, very Korean. Even my crown leans to the side. Gangsta. --------->
Andre112
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada52 Posts
September 13 2010 21:18 GMT
#46
Does it stop building from morphing? Say a spire being build.
Lets say after some opening battles and you both get to lair at about the same time and plant down spire at about same time.
While spire is being built, get 2 overseers to contaminate the morphing spire and the lair.
The problem is that overseer doesn't have enough energy right way.
The timing might not be fast enough?
mcbrite
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany229 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-13 23:20:28
September 13 2010 22:54 GMT
#47
and how would this EVER work against anybody but the AI??? For more then say 1 or 2 cycles???

Having said this: The spell is definitely underused... I'd love to see it more often...
PrinceXizor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States17713 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-13 22:59:40
September 13 2010 22:58 GMT
#48
So there is a bug (or maybe intended) use with contaminate, i had my hatch contaminated today with spawn larva 50% done, and when the contaminate ended, my spawn larva was at 0% and had to start over, and another time he contaminated me just as the timer ended but in that window before the larva appear, and i got those larva stolen from me, they never spawned, even after it ended.
deusemx
Profile Joined August 2010
United States8 Posts
September 15 2010 06:05 GMT
#49
This is me using a triple overseer opening in a ZvZ Diamond 500 point ranked game.

http://www.gamereplays.org/starcraft2/replays.php?game=33&show=details&id=149091

He goes zergling baneling rush.
ZomgTossRush
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1041 Posts
September 15 2010 06:34 GMT
#50
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Contaminate

sad
Coaching for 1v1 and Team games at Gosucoaching.com
ZomgTossRush
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1041 Posts
September 15 2010 06:45 GMT
#51
This should be entitlted "Contaminate forces restart on spawning larvae." because thats all you have proven.

Maybe for a mid-late game tactic. But I am not sure how i can survive any god bling play having 0 roaches and 0 mutas untill Lair +300 gas.
Coaching for 1v1 and Team games at Gosucoaching.com
deusemx
Profile Joined August 2010
United States8 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-15 08:58:44
September 15 2010 08:53 GMT
#52
On September 15 2010 15:45 zomgtossrush wrote:
This should be entitlted "Contaminate forces restart on spawning larvae." because thats all you have proven.

Maybe for a mid-late game tactic. But I am not sure how i can survive any god bling play having 0 roaches and 0 mutas untill Lair +300 gas.


In my replay I got 2 gas early but once I had 300 gas for the overseers I put them all back on minerals and built some spine crawlers.
Acritter
Profile Joined August 2010
Syria7637 Posts
September 15 2010 10:20 GMT
#53
For this to be effective you're going to need to take the time that their production is screwed to gain some huge, huge advantage over them. The most obvious solution is Zergling spam, but that can be weak to a small number of Banelings. Roaches work in a similar vein, but are more expensive and tech-dependent. You don't have to try and end the game and instead expand once or even twice, but you'll still have to defend that against your opponent's superior army (since you've been focusing on those Overseers). Tech would work similarly, but that would again be tougher because of the 300 sunk in the Overseers. This looks like it has potential in a very precise timing push, but outside of that, not much..
dont let your memes be dreams - konydora, motivational speaker | not actually living in syria
ZomgTossRush
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1041 Posts
September 15 2010 10:26 GMT
#54
On September 15 2010 17:53 deusemx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2010 15:45 zomgtossrush wrote:
This should be entitlted "Contaminate forces restart on spawning larvae." because thats all you have proven.

Maybe for a mid-late game tactic. But I am not sure how i can survive any god bling play having 0 roaches and 0 mutas untill Lair +300 gas.


In my replay I got 2 gas early but once I had 300 gas for the overseers I put them all back on minerals and built some spine crawlers.



This is how I read your replay.

I get to 2 gas early, so i have hardly any lings to defend eary ling pressure, then after i got 300 gas, i waste more resources not getting lings or blings, then i put drones on minerals, since i dont have any blings or roaches, and then get spine crawlers, to defend the 2 drones i have left from the opponents lings, blings and roaches.

I am not trying to troll or anything, but you cant suggest a theory and have people take you seriously when you play a medium AI. Try this vs a few diamond level z's and see how easy it is to mine 300 gas without getting roflstomped, then post THOSE replays.
Coaching for 1v1 and Team games at Gosucoaching.com
risk.nuke
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden2825 Posts
September 15 2010 11:33 GMT
#55
On September 14 2010 07:54 mcbrite wrote:
and how would this EVER work against anybody but the AI??? For more then say 1 or 2 cycles???

Having said this: The spell is definitely underused... I'd love to see it more often...

read the thread before you post.
Neo.G Soulkey, Best, firebathero. // http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/index.php?show_part=31
Rudiment
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States174 Posts
September 15 2010 13:43 GMT
#56
Doesn't contaminate 'pause' a making building? Also if you contaminate a tech building (like a spire), doesn't that mean you can't produce units allowed by it(mutas)? That could also get a good edge in a ling/bling/muta mirror.
OreoBoi
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada1639 Posts
September 15 2010 14:00 GMT
#57
I really don't see how you can use up that 300 gas and not die.
So you spent gas on, zerglings speed, lair, and 3 overseers. You have 6 drones in gas, so unless you are pumping drones, you won't have enough minerals. How can you defend banelings with this build?
onmach
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States1241 Posts
September 15 2010 14:22 GMT
#58
The only major problem with this is nothing really prevents your opponent from doing it back to you. It is not like he's going to be able to use his resources for anything else.
Logo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States7542 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-15 14:43:56
September 15 2010 14:30 GMT
#59
For contaminate ZvZ questions, I've already done the research! http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=126855

My understand is that it does not reset spawn larva timer if you revomit on the hatchery. What happens is the larva 'spawns' but is stuck in the hatchery due to contaminate. This lets the queen revomit and create 4 more larva that are stuck in the hatchery. When contaminate ends all of the larva explode out of the hatchery, but maybe the OP has tested it more thoroughly than I have.

The time when I'd use this really is when your opponent goes roaches. You can go overseer+eco->roaches to abuse his lack of AA.
Logo
kcdc
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2311 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-15 15:17:28
September 15 2010 15:15 GMT
#60
The big problem I see here is that you're investing 300/300 for 3 overseers in hopes of shutting down a hatchery. Building a second hatchery costs 350/0. Even if you were able to perfectly shut down a hatchery (you won't be able to for long), your opponent can easily neutralize your tactic by making an extra hatchery. After AA comes online, the harass will be less effective, and your left with 3 expensive flying paperweights and he has an extra hatchery.

In the best case scenario, you're spending 300/300 to disrupt his production for a minute and make him spend 350 minerals, but his investment has greater utility throughout the game. Even in the best-case scenario, I think you're on the losing end of the trade unless you can figure out a way to parlay the minute of disrupted production into something more meaningful (like a quick win or a significant economy lead). With so much gas invested into the harassment, I doubt it will work out tho.
deusemx
Profile Joined August 2010
United States8 Posts
September 15 2010 17:09 GMT
#61
On September 15 2010 19:26 zomgtossrush wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2010 17:53 deusemx wrote:
On September 15 2010 15:45 zomgtossrush wrote:
This should be entitlted "Contaminate forces restart on spawning larvae." because thats all you have proven.

Maybe for a mid-late game tactic. But I am not sure how i can survive any god bling play having 0 roaches and 0 mutas untill Lair +300 gas.


In my replay I got 2 gas early but once I had 300 gas for the overseers I put them all back on minerals and built some spine crawlers.



This is how I read your replay.

I get to 2 gas early, so i have hardly any lings to defend eary ling pressure, then after i got 300 gas, i waste more resources not getting lings or blings, then i put drones on minerals, since i dont have any blings or roaches, and then get spine crawlers, to defend the 2 drones i have left from the opponents lings, blings and roaches.

I am not trying to troll or anything, but you cant suggest a theory and have people take you seriously when you play a medium AI. Try this vs a few diamond level z's and see how easy it is to mine 300 gas without getting roflstomped, then post THOSE replays.


I am not the original poster and you did not see my replay. See the replay submitted under my name.
Fatalll
Profile Joined September 2010
United States23 Posts
September 15 2010 18:08 GMT
#62
if you can keep your opponents queens down, this will work, but if you can keep your opponents queen down, this is pointless. very limited situational uses for this in a zvz imo.
Chocobo
Profile Joined November 2006
United States1108 Posts
September 16 2010 06:49 GMT
#63
On September 09 2010 16:50 Neuuubeh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2010 00:32 fazir wrote:
The other thing I've noticed it's that you force your enemy to get Mutas... And you can early on plan on how to deal with that.


Err, its ZvZ, Mutas are always in the game... It is simply so much better to get mutas than be on the other end...


This is what I thought until two infestors killed my 12 mutas.
Rozza
Profile Joined August 2010
United Kingdom45 Posts
September 16 2010 07:54 GMT
#64
i like this , i really do.

but i think my lurking ovis will just get butfucked by his mutas
; _ ;
EriktheGuy
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada132 Posts
September 16 2010 08:46 GMT
#65
the zergs dependence on a single building for all tech is a serious weakness. If the player does not already have either lair or a second hatch out when you start this, they are probably in serious trouble.
In mathematics you don't understand things, you just get used to them. -Neumann
TUski
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1258 Posts
September 16 2010 08:54 GMT
#66
I've had this done to me before. Spore crawlers work wonders.
"There is nothing more cool than being proud of the things that you love." - Day[9]
SpiciestZerg
Profile Joined August 2010
United States154 Posts
September 16 2010 08:56 GMT
#67
I tried this actually, the main problem is if theyve expanded 2 hatch/2 queen gives an excess of larvae usually since drone count is usually fairly low since the bling/ling war is so deadly. So they have slightly hindered production, but still enough.

However if theyre still on one base...you can completely stop production until they decide to make a new hatchery, and then win with basically any unit combo.

Unfortunately this requires: they have on hatch only
not much aa (2 queens is probably the most you could handle-any spores, hydras or mutas and it would be impossible)
the game lasted until tier 2, and you had 400 gas for overseers (500 if speed)
The answer to all life's questions is more zerglings.
Windwalker
Profile Joined August 2010
Turkey18 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-24 16:07:15
September 24 2010 15:59 GMT
#68
I just played a zvz with this, though my build order was a little bit different. I didnt get zergling speed because what I had mind in the beginning was to get some lings, but carry a general weight on roaches and go to spire and mutas. (I dislike banelings, and I knew my opponent was going to get them)

Anyway based on the scout information I noticed I had some little more time as my opponent was overdroning, thus I gave this idea a go.

Please note that I am not a good player, especially not a good zerg because I started out as terran and switched my race to zerg because of imbalance discussions and to see if there really was a problem with zerg (and I dislike the idea of my opponents having an idea like they lost because my race was bugged) so even though I could create a kind of three-overseer-hatchery-lockdown, I am not entirely sure this was the reason I won the game. I am trying to add the replay, so comments are welcome.

In my opinion, this is definately worth trying, at least for the fact that it was fun and a welcomed difference in ZvZ for me.

EDIT: replay added.

http://www.mediafire.com/?ywv79vo5vzc4ppv
Pfeff
Profile Joined August 2010
United States270 Posts
September 24 2010 17:15 GMT
#69
On September 09 2010 16:52 PhuxPro wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2010 16:29 Geo.Rion wrote:
On September 09 2010 00:13 fazir wrote:
On September 09 2010 00:07 Geo.Rion wrote:
dont open a trash topic like this, if you have an idea, make it happen, analyze it, post replays and tell about details... The concept isnt that horrible but these kind of threads drive me crazy


Sorry, but not everybody have the time to do the research. And what if somebody already tried it? Then all the things I would do would just be a waste of time. Anyway, I will try to do some research and then I will just simply get back here... That's how things work, right?

NO, definetly not, at least it should not, but who am i kidding... Threads like this remaining open, makes me want to quit posting. You dont have time? Absolutely no problem, dont open a topic then. You have an idea want to get out of yourself? Make a blog, as the content you put in it is no way worthy of a thread.


Who assigned you mediator of threads?

+ Show Spoiler +
[D] Discussion threads

Be clear about the topic and the feedback your are hoping for

This is the most open form of thread. Use a Discussion thread if you are not certain about some game mechanic and you want to get the feedback from other players. This can be about strategy and tactics, the role and viability of certain units, rock paper scissor counters, etc. The building blocks of what becomes sound SC2 strategy.

While the thread is less formal, please be clear and concise on the topic you want to discuss about, and open with your own opinion. Don’t make the topic too broad.

This is the perfect way to post a strategy you came up with that is not quite ready to be turned into a guide (See below). Post your strategy and point out the areas where you are not sure about it’s validity and ask for feedback.


Get acquainted with the guidelines before you attempt to play god again, Mister Snob.

On topic, OP's idea is pretty good. I had no idea that Contaminate resets Spawn Larvae and also halts production of larvae as well. This would actually be really effective in ZvZ. Muta/ling/bling's gonna turn into Muta/Overseer, haha. Basically, whoever produces more will simply win.


I'd rather just use 2 banelings and kill all of his larva in 1 shot
When your loading screen shows my name, just F10 -> N
fazir
Profile Joined August 2010
Poland6 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-28 14:55:33
October 28 2010 12:48 GMT
#70
spoilerz

User was warned for this post
Gentso
Profile Joined July 2010
United States2218 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-28 14:56:13
October 28 2010 13:28 GMT
#71
+ Show Spoiler [gsl spoilers] +
On October 28 2010 21:48 fazir wrote:
Just a fun fact - oGsZenio just used contaminate/roches build against Idra in GSL Ro16 and won, maybe there is a future for this build :D


Yeah, it's good on a map like DT because there's so much space of nothing behind hatcheries over there. Although I feel that idra should've went infestation pit instead of hydra den, and also throw down at least one spore crawler.
Jumbled
Profile Joined September 2010
1543 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-28 15:05:31
October 28 2010 14:03 GMT
#72
+ Show Spoiler [gsl spoilers] +
In addition to DQ being friendly to air attacks, I'd say the contaminate build suited it because it's hard for zerg to fast expand, meaning they are likely to be on one hatch. Idra was lucky in this case that he'd decided to go for the rear expansion quickly, as it actually made the contaminate into roach push less effective. Gave him a good chance against it, but he couldn't pull it off.
Titilisk
Profile Joined March 2010
96 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-28 14:11:34
October 28 2010 14:09 GMT
#73
I saw this topic a while ago, and thought : hmmm good idea. And then I read the comments, there were so much flaming about this, and treated the OP like shit. If I were the author of this thread, I'd be so happy right now, knowing my strat was used (GSL spoiler)+ Show Spoiler +
to kick Idra out of the GSL Ro16

Great concept, and definetely a great build. This game was really entertaining to watch. You, Sir, were a pionneer.
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
October 28 2010 14:16 GMT
#74
The concept originally stated now lives on to show how it can impact the macro abilities of a zerg unprepared for it.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
me_viet
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Australia1350 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-28 14:57:21
October 28 2010 14:18 GMT
#75
[You got my respect sir. After witnessing + Show Spoiler [gsl spoilers] +
Zenio use this against Idra in the GSL ro16.


User was warned for this post
Whiladan
Profile Joined September 2010
United States463 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-28 14:56:37
October 28 2010 14:20 GMT
#76
+ Show Spoiler [gsl spoilers] +
On October 28 2010 21:48 fazir wrote:
Just a fun fact - oGsZenio just used contaminate/roches build against Idra in GSL Ro16 and won, maybe there is a future for this build :D


Spoiler tag, please.
Garnet
Profile Blog Joined February 2006
Vietnam9033 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-28 15:04:02
October 28 2010 14:24 GMT
#77
+ Show Spoiler [gsl spoilers] +
Nice bump, so someone actually thought about this before Zenio.
Toast216
Profile Joined April 2010
34 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-28 15:03:52
October 28 2010 14:35 GMT
#78
+ Show Spoiler [gsl spoilers] +
Zenio is gonna make contaminate either a new standard in ZvZ or he gets it nerfed.
CowFu
Profile Joined June 2010
United States35 Posts
October 28 2010 14:50 GMT
#79
On September 16 2010 03:08 Fatalll wrote:
if you can keep your opponents queens down, this will work, but if you can keep your opponents queen down, this is pointless. very limited situational uses for this in a zvz imo.


It takes 25 shots (with 0 regen and no upgrades) for a queen to kill an overseer.

Thats 23.45 game seconds to kill the overseer, queens are less of an issue than you think. If you do hit and run sweeps, he'll probably get ~10 hits off if he has 2 queens.

Now if they have anything more than 2 queens, your boned, unless you make it a suicide run.
Logo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States7542 Posts
October 28 2010 14:56 GMT
#80
Yeah that's accurate Cow. When I used to do this way back when a single queen couldn't kill an overseer.

Still the weakness should be simply putting down a spore crawler, or maybe 2, and maybe some other stuff in there to be able to hold off if he pushes with roaches (on DQ my thought would be a spine crawler or 2. His investment in overseers isn't trivial. Not overreacting is also important. It'll be interesting to see the games.
Logo
awesomoecalypse
Profile Joined August 2010
United States2235 Posts
October 28 2010 15:15 GMT
#81
TBH, the GSL match today made it seem almost overpowered when used against Hatch/Lair/Hive. I mean, Contaminate is always useful, but Zerg is the only race that is so completely reliant on one building. If you contaminate any given Toss or Terran building you delay one upgrade or unit, which if its a worker can somewhat delay their economy...if you contaminate a hatch, you absolutely cripple your opponent.

I have to commend the OP for thinking of this, as I have a feeling it could really change the ZvZ matchup going forward.
He drone drone drone. Me win. - ogsMC
Sabin010
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1892 Posts
October 28 2010 15:15 GMT
#82
BronzeLeagueDude here I was searching to see if anybody had tried this before. Good to see it has been rejected by people who never even tried it, and it actually worked competitively. Thought I was on to something new, but nope.
Pyrthas
Profile Joined March 2007
United States3196 Posts
October 28 2010 15:17 GMT
#83
Ret also did this several days ago in some event or other, right? I'm not just making that up, am I? (Not saying Zenio got it from him or anything dumb like that.)
Nafaltar
Profile Joined May 2008
Germany302 Posts
October 28 2010 16:29 GMT
#84
On October 29 2010 00:15 awesomoecalypse wrote:
TBH, the GSL match today made it seem almost overpowered when used against Hatch/Lair/Hive.(...)


Got to disagree here, if Idra had had his roaches in proper position at the ramp he would have been in great position. Don't get me wrong, it definitely is viable but from that single game it certainly did not look overpowered to me.
Azzur
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia6260 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-28 18:43:08
October 28 2010 17:58 GMT
#85
+ Show Spoiler [GSL] +
Wow, that Zenio vs Idra game blew my mind. I didn't like seeing the ling/bling builds of the previous ZvZ games and I was so happy to see such innovative ZvZ play.

When I clicked on this thread, I thought it was an analysis of the build in the game. When I saw the date of the OP, I was stunned. Congrats to the OP of thinking of an innovative strat!
Braxxo
Profile Joined February 2011
United States1 Post
February 10 2011 09:13 GMT
#86
Figured I would post here rather than make a new thread.

I think this would work best on a map that u could block with 2 queens.

The idea is to get to lair faster than him, and have 3+ over lords ready to be changed right as lair finishes.

The early queens (the defender's advantage+queen's measly dps+rush time+transfuse)

If you can stop him getting lair you can one base to 4-6 mutas control the entire map(where he doesn't have a hatch already) and just out expand him. If you are rushing to lair, with decent scouting u can block a roach bust, but zerlings and banelings are already stopped by having 3 queens. Well if I saw 3 queens i'd just expand. Perhaps with more micro u'd only need 2 queens.

With some proper practice and thinking I bet we could figure out a way of making this work, just have to make this 'smooth'. Probably would only work on small ramp maps where u can turtle a bit.
You know when I knew I was god? It's when I sat down to pray one day and realized I was talking to myself.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 20h 39m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
LamboSC2 171
Liquid`VortiX 94
trigger 78
SC2Nice 27
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 10296
Horang2 1010
EffOrt 858
ZerO 681
Light 302
actioN 296
Rush 284
Hyun 266
ggaemo 242
Sharp 202
[ Show more ]
Snow 104
Pusan 80
Mind 73
Killer 57
Movie 54
Barracks 54
Sea.KH 51
sas.Sziky 48
soO 45
hero 43
Yoon 38
ToSsGirL 31
sorry 26
Oya187 23
910 21
HiyA 18
Terrorterran 12
Dota 2
BananaSlamJamma268
XcaliburYe199
syndereN1
Counter-Strike
zeus1170
edward149
Other Games
Lowko555
hiko469
rGuardiaN397
Fuzer 394
Pyrionflax274
XaKoH 104
QueenE97
Mew2King84
nookyyy 55
Trikslyr35
ZerO(Twitch)18
RushiSC15
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 11
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 67
• poizon28 3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV707
League of Legends
• Jankos3013
• Nemesis2301
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
20h 39m
Gerald vs YoungYakov
Spirit vs MaNa
SHIN vs Percival
Creator vs Scarlett
Replay Cast
1d 17h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 20h
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Krystianer vs TBD
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs TBD
ByuN vs Nicoract
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

YSL S2
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.