| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
Dazed.
Canada3301 Posts
On May 21 2009 23:23 TwoToneTerran wrote: What? You object to his writing style or something equally ridiculous? lol...It was the manner in which it was done as opposed to that it was done, really. | ||
|
Avidkeystamper
United States8556 Posts
Also, you might want to tone down your insults. | ||
|
TwoToneTerran
United States8841 Posts
On May 22 2009 10:03 Dazed_Spy wrote: What? You object to his writing style or something equally ridiculous? lol... Talk about missing the point. | ||
|
fusionsdf
Canada15390 Posts
On May 20 2009 19:12 Jaeden wrote: FS's PR may some shaky placements, but he quickly forgets it the next month. He is way more objective than JWD. And FS doesn`t have a bias towards a specific team, and put as many players from that team in the PR. also twotoneterran's post is valid. He may be a little aggressive but he's got some pretty good arguments for his opinions. JWD has done one PR. Let's wait until next month to see if he tends to favor certain teams etc. | ||
|
Kuja900
United States3564 Posts
| ||
|
Avidkeystamper
United States8556 Posts
| ||
JWD
United States12607 Posts
On May 22 2009 11:07 Kuja900 wrote: This PR just seems like it was designed to encourage conflict amongst the audience more so than to actually rank players. If my objective was actually "to encourage conflict", don't you think I could have done a better job? Screw Jaedong at 4, let's kick his ass down to CBNC!! | ||
|
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
On May 22 2009 12:34 JWD wrote: If my objective was actually "to encourage conflict", don't you think I could have done a better job? Screw Jaedong at 4, let's kick his ass down to CBNC!! No, than ppl wouldnt even take it in serious, but this way everybody (including me) tried to prove the obvious fact that JD>>>Zero in every regards expect maybe the TLPD page outlook. This alone provided ~400 comments (ok let's not exclude the Kespa joke), a PR writer should be glad. The previous PR had ~200 comments by the time this one was supoused to come out, and it had bad and arguable placements. So be proud, ppl at least take you in serious and many of them (includng me) believe you can do an even better job with the next PR (i dont mean place JD on a stupid place again to have discussion topic, but to be more accurate or stabilize your way of rating beforhead as Mani did) PS: Also as it was said one million times, PR on the first 3 days of the month is the way to go, no need to wait one month after the previous one. | ||
|
Musoeun
United States4324 Posts
PS: Also as it was said one million times, PR on the first 3 days of the month is the way to go, no need to wait one month after the previous one. Interestingly enough, if the PR had come out on time, Zero over JD would have been a ton more valid, as JD was playing sloppy and Zero was on a tear... by the time it was actually published, things had evened out, Zero was dropping games again and JD wasn't. | ||
|
StylishVODs
Sweden5331 Posts
On May 22 2009 13:33 Musoeun wrote: Interestingly enough, if the PR had come out on time, Zero over JD would have been a ton more valid, as JD was playing sloppy and Zero was on a tear... by the time it was actually published, things had evened out, Zero was dropping games again and JD wasn't. Thats why you have to wait more games to determine if its just a little streak or if the new player is actually getting really good. I'd also like the PR to come out early in the month instead of in the middle and then keep it that way. There's really no reason to get it out the 15th etc. New KeSPA and PR rank at the same time would be awesome. | ||
Chill
Calgary25990 Posts
| ||
|
StylishVODs
Sweden5331 Posts
But I get the msg.. | ||
|
Polar_Bear
Germany55 Posts
1. Bisu 2/3 Jaedong/Fantasy 4.Zero 5. Effort 6. Skyhigh 7. Leta 8-10. Calm/Flash/Kespa the PR is very well done. JD should be 2 or 3 and I miss Horang2 (untested vs Z but good vT and brilliant vP) in the CNBC, but the rest is absolutely fine (it might be only my personal opinion, that skyhigh > Leta). Also the Kespa gag was nice and the reasoning is comprehensible. So grats and thanks to JWD for doing a very good job! | ||
|
Pooshlmer
United States1001 Posts
| ||
|
JWD
United States12607 Posts
On May 23 2009 06:56 Pooshlmer wrote: That would be an interesting feature. A short discussion at the end of the month seeing how predictive the old PR was. I don't see many places do that. I think this would be a good idea, if the point of the PR was to predict next month's big players. However, if I do write another PR I promise a) to include a little blurb on how last month's big risers fared (if they're not already covered in the rank or CBNC) and (a point that has been raised by many posters in this thread) b) to try to push the PR's publication date closer to the 1st of the month. | ||
|
TwoToneTerran
United States8841 Posts
| ||
|
JWD
United States12607 Posts
On May 23 2009 10:26 TwoToneTerran wrote: I don't like the idea of circumcising this month so it's instantly back on schedule. Maybe bring it back 5 days per PR -- treat every month like Februrary for the summer! I agree, this is the plan I suggested a few pages back. | ||
|
TwoToneTerran
United States8841 Posts
| ||
|
Husky
United States3362 Posts
| ||
|
StylishVODs
Sweden5331 Posts
On May 23 2009 10:27 JWD wrote: I agree, this is the plan I suggested a few pages back. Great JWD. I'd rather go cold turkey here, "circumcising" one powerrank doesn't really matter in the long run, but I'm fine with whatever. | ||
| ||
|
|
Big Brain Bouts
Elazer vs Nicoract
Reynor vs Scarlett
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Krystianer vs TBD
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs TBD
ByuN vs Nicoract
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
|
|
|
EPT
