EPT
Battle.net 2.0 is fine overall but what's really making it useless is the lack of any kinds of chatrooms or cross-realm play.
Do you like the direction B.net 2.0 is taking? - Page 3
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
KinosJourney2
Sweden1811 Posts
Battle.net 2.0 is fine overall but what's really making it useless is the lack of any kinds of chatrooms or cross-realm play. | ||
|
Corrupt
Bulgaria1312 Posts
| ||
|
UbiNax
Denmark381 Posts
i think the 2 major problems i guess is Cross realm play and chat rooms... Chat channels: they already said they have something cooking for that, which is better than the wc3 and sc1 channels Crossrealm: they have said its a long term goal " which means they are aware of it "... and to be honest i really think their gonna fix it quite fast, since its crazy, and im sure they see it aswell. so thats 2 of the major problems which will be fixed over time. After all sc1 wasnt perfect either at release ^^ | ||
|
HydraRulz
Romania36 Posts
Ladder matches are not that bad. Overall ranking is useless considering there are a lot of people playing Starcraft 2. It's a lot more competitive if you don't really know if you are the best or not. I like the direction battlenet 2.0 is going. There are a lot of bugs right now, but they will eventually be fixed | ||
|
grobo
Japan6199 Posts
| ||
rotinegg
United States1719 Posts
| ||
|
endy
Switzerland8971 Posts
On May 29 2010 20:46 HydraRulz wrote: battlenet 2.0 is pretty good. and better than battlenet 1. Ladder matches are not that bad. Overall ranking is useless considering there are a lot of people playing Starcraft 2. It's a lot more competitive if you don't really know if you are the best or not. I like the direction battlenet 2.0 is going. There are a lot of bugs right now, but they will eventually be fixed Your statement doesn't make any sense. And regarding competition, how are we going to play world wide tournaments ? Buy one of each client, for each expension ? I love the post Kennigit made about Tamagochi TSL episode 10 haha. | ||
|
enzym
Germany1034 Posts
[x] no public chatrooms [x] no chance to choose for yourself whether or not you want to put up with "lag" in xrealm play [x] no for bnet 2.0 | ||
|
enzym
Germany1034 Posts
original poll: No (3439) 94% Yes (230) 6% 3669 total votes new poll, embedded on tl main page: No (1270) 87% Yes (188) 13% 1458 votes i cannot explain this huge discrepancy. what happened? two digits for yes seems like such a huge number... | ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
| ||
|
Spyfire242
United States715 Posts
 | ||
|
SoL[9]
Portugal1370 Posts
So lets fix it! | ||
|
cartoon]x
United States606 Posts
| ||
|
Scheefe
Netherlands226 Posts
LAN is a great feature to have in any RTS game. I remember playing LAN with lots of friends during school time on w3 and sc1. Good times that apparently will not continue. And why remove cross-region as well? All the features that made blizzard games wonderful are being removed. | ||
|
ggrrg
Bulgaria2717 Posts
| ||
|
esla_sol
United States756 Posts
a resounding no. | ||
|
psion
106 Posts
| ||
|
revy
United States1524 Posts
| ||
|
chrisolo
Germany2614 Posts
| ||
|
Butigroove
Seychelles2061 Posts
Auto matchmaking and portraits were in b-net 1.0... (wc3) Other than that I can't think of anything I am remotely satisfied with. Correct me if I am wrong, but the only 'new' feature so far in beta seems to be unit decals... lol OH I know. SC2 doesn't kick me in the nutsack when I log in. +1 for blizzard | ||
| ||
