Do you like the direction B.net 2.0 is taking?
Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
Ysorigin
United States82 Posts
| ||
Lucumo
6850 Posts
On May 29 2010 14:58 Ysorigin wrote: Calling it right now! The poll is going to be 90% no and 10% yes! Nope, it will be at least 95%. | ||
Shiragaku
Hong Kong4308 Posts
| ||
Wr3k
Canada2533 Posts
| ||
Raelcun
United States3747 Posts
Listen to your customers for once Blizzard. 90/10 is too generous probably going to be 97/3 or 96/4 edit: lol at troll yes vote | ||
Frah
Canada96 Posts
| ||
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
| ||
DanceCommander
United States1808 Posts
| ||
deL
Australia5540 Posts
| ||
Neverhood
United States5388 Posts
| ||
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + :D | ||
BloodDrunK
Bangladesh2767 Posts
| ||
S[-_-]iege
United States29 Posts
| ||
sLiMpoweR
United States430 Posts
| ||
Hyde
Australia14568 Posts
8 people saying yes... | ||
writer22816
United States5775 Posts
| ||
TacToSs
Australia330 Posts
| ||
Renaissance
Canada273 Posts
| ||
J1.au
Australia3596 Posts
On May 29 2010 15:46 Renaissance wrote: People voting no are trolls, or family or friends of Blizzard. I think you're the troll here. Assuming you have confused 'no' with 'yes' on purpose... | ||
Mastermind
Canada7096 Posts
| ||
Drowsy
United States4876 Posts
| ||
Boundz(DarKo)
5311 Posts
| ||
pshych0
274 Posts
| ||
Saturnize
United States2473 Posts
| ||
TheAuthor
Canada2 Posts
| ||
Puosu
6982 Posts
edit: lol i find it hilarious i call it skyrocketing when the percentages are 90%/10%. | ||
meegrean
Thailand7699 Posts
| ||
Spidinko
Slovakia1174 Posts
Anyway, chat rooms are not such a big deal. No cross realm play is scary. They probably don't want cross realm because if too many people wanted to play on, say, Asia, they would be lagging. That's not that bad really, because they chose to lag to play there unlike Asian players they would face in ladder. | ||
Solai
204 Posts
| ||
knyttym
United States5797 Posts
| ||
infecteddna
Slovenia243 Posts
| ||
Infernus
Norway222 Posts
| ||
MorroW
Sweden3522 Posts
| ||
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
On May 29 2010 19:00 MorroW wrote: i didnt know 13% on tl were trolls and blizzard employees Or people who want sc2 to fail. I voted no, bnet 0.2 is a shame. | ||
Lao Xuin
United States24 Posts
| ||
Subversive
Australia2229 Posts
On May 29 2010 19:03 Roggay wrote: Or people who want sc2 to fail. I voted no, bnet 0.2 is a shame. Some people might have really enjoyed the beta or are voting yes out of loyalty to Blizzard, who knows. Personally I voted a solid No. | ||
Tyrran
France777 Posts
On May 29 2010 19:12 Subversive wrote: Some people might have really enjoyed the beta or are voting yes out of loyalty to Blizzard, who knows. Personally I voted a solid No. I did enjoy the beta, and i love the game. But Bnet 2.0 sucks . | ||
SchOOl_VicTIm
Greece2394 Posts
| ||
Subversive
Australia2229 Posts
On May 29 2010 19:16 Tyrran wrote: I did enjoy the beta, and i love the game. But Bnet 2.0 sucks . Yeah agreed. | ||
fIamewheel
177 Posts
| ||
KinosJourney2
Sweden1811 Posts
Battle.net 2.0 is fine overall but what's really making it useless is the lack of any kinds of chatrooms or cross-realm play. | ||
Corrupt
Bulgaria1312 Posts
| ||
UbiNax
Denmark381 Posts
i think the 2 major problems i guess is Cross realm play and chat rooms... Chat channels: they already said they have something cooking for that, which is better than the wc3 and sc1 channels Crossrealm: they have said its a long term goal " which means they are aware of it "... and to be honest i really think their gonna fix it quite fast, since its crazy, and im sure they see it aswell. so thats 2 of the major problems which will be fixed over time. After all sc1 wasnt perfect either at release ^^ | ||
HydraRulz
Romania36 Posts
Ladder matches are not that bad. Overall ranking is useless considering there are a lot of people playing Starcraft 2. It's a lot more competitive if you don't really know if you are the best or not. I like the direction battlenet 2.0 is going. There are a lot of bugs right now, but they will eventually be fixed | ||
grobo
Japan6199 Posts
| ||
rotinegg
United States1719 Posts
| ||
endy
Switzerland8966 Posts
On May 29 2010 20:46 HydraRulz wrote: battlenet 2.0 is pretty good. and better than battlenet 1. Ladder matches are not that bad. Overall ranking is useless considering there are a lot of people playing Starcraft 2. It's a lot more competitive if you don't really know if you are the best or not. I like the direction battlenet 2.0 is going. There are a lot of bugs right now, but they will eventually be fixed Your statement doesn't make any sense. And regarding competition, how are we going to play world wide tournaments ? Buy one of each client, for each expension ? I love the post Kennigit made about Tamagochi TSL episode 10 haha. | ||
enzym
Germany1034 Posts
[x] no public chatrooms [x] no chance to choose for yourself whether or not you want to put up with "lag" in xrealm play [x] no for bnet 2.0 | ||
enzym
Germany1034 Posts
original poll: No (3439) 94% Yes (230) 6% 3669 total votes new poll, embedded on tl main page: No (1270) 87% Yes (188) 13% 1458 votes i cannot explain this huge discrepancy. what happened? two digits for yes seems like such a huge number... | ||
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
| ||
Spyfire242
United States715 Posts
| ||
SoL[9]
Portugal1370 Posts
So lets fix it! | ||
cartoon]x
United States606 Posts
| ||
Scheefe
Netherlands226 Posts
LAN is a great feature to have in any RTS game. I remember playing LAN with lots of friends during school time on w3 and sc1. Good times that apparently will not continue. And why remove cross-region as well? All the features that made blizzard games wonderful are being removed. | ||
ggrrg
Bulgaria2707 Posts
| ||
esla_sol
United States756 Posts
a resounding no. | ||
psion
106 Posts
| ||
revy
United States1524 Posts
| ||
chrisolo
Germany2604 Posts
| ||
Butigroove
Seychelles2061 Posts
Auto matchmaking and portraits were in b-net 1.0... (wc3) Other than that I can't think of anything I am remotely satisfied with. Correct me if I am wrong, but the only 'new' feature so far in beta seems to be unit decals... lol OH I know. SC2 doesn't kick me in the nutsack when I log in. +1 for blizzard | ||
EleanorRIgby
Canada3923 Posts
| ||
QueueQueue
Canada1000 Posts
Criticizing people for voting yes is pretty unfair. For a lot of people, chat channels are not an important thing (myself included), or the fact that it just doesn't seem polished (which is my issue) is not a concern for some. People assume everyone else has the same vision as to what is important to a good b.net experience, and that is just the wrong way to look at it. B.net does effectively get you into games pretty quickly, and the match ups are fairly decent. To a lot of people, B.net is a means to get them into games, and for them to say they like B.net for this reason is 100% justified. | ||
HaFnium
United Kingdom1068 Posts
They should explain their reasons here... | ||
sLiMpoweR
United States430 Posts
| ||
Butigroove
Seychelles2061 Posts
On May 29 2010 23:54 sLiMpoweR wrote: While i voted no i can see while some people voted yes. Its much easier to find games against similar skilled opponents. From the casual gamers perspective you dont lose much without chat channels because on bnet 1.0 they never left brood war usa-1 anyway. And instead of having to search through 3v3 bgh and and fastest games you can now quickly find a game and play. You mean like automatchmaking that existed in wc3? (Only broken because of lack of players, not functionality) | ||
LosingID8
CA10824 Posts
On May 29 2010 23:54 sLiMpoweR wrote: While i voted no i can see while some people voted yes. Its much easier to find games against similar skilled opponents. From the casual gamers perspective you dont lose much without chat channels because on bnet 1.0 they never left brood war usa-1 anyway. And instead of having to search through 3v3 bgh and and fastest games you can now quickly find a game and play. AMM was already present in bnet 1.0 (wc3) | ||
BadBinky
Finland649 Posts
[] no chat [] no overall ranking [x] facebook no thx | ||
Axonn
Croatia287 Posts
On May 29 2010 14:58 Ysorigin wrote: Calling it right now! The poll is going to be 90% no and 10% yes! Almost there NO definitely | ||
haterade
7 Posts
But anyway I voted no because they are using the same logic that Infinity Ward used to justify their lack of dedicated servers. "If we make IWnet good, people won't want dedicated servers". "If we make matchmaking good, people won't want chat channels". Don't tell me what I want. | ||
o3.power91
Bahrain5288 Posts
| ||
TLOBrian
United States453 Posts
Massive. Blizzard's Games and the Service may incorporate technology of Massive Incorporated ("Massive"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft"), that enables in-game advertising, and the display of other similar in-game objects, which are downloaded temporarily to your personal computer and replaced during online game play. As part of this process, Massive may collect some information about the game and the advertisements delivered to you, as well as standard information that is sent when your personal computer or game console connects to the Internet including your Internet protocol (IP) address. Massive will use this information to transmit and measure in-game advertising, as well as to improve the products and services of Massive and its affiliates. None of the information collected by Massive will be used to identify you. For additional details regarding Massive's in-game advertising practices, please see Massive's In-Game Advertising privacy statement at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=122085&clcid=0x409. The trademarks and copyrighted material contained in all in-game advertising are the property of the respective owners. Portions of the Service are © 2008 Massive Incorporated. All rights reserved. Goddammit Blizzard. | ||
Spinks
South Africa23 Posts
With all the votes, emails and opinons it can easily be seen that the majority of the community do not like the direction that sc2 was taken. Since blizzard is all for the players, why are we still having to deal with these stupid problems? Wc3 was and still is a great game, why cant they just have the lan and bnet settings the same? It worked for wc3 so why the **** change it? You guys agree? | ||
Night[7]
Sweden31 Posts
Now I don't think B.net is perfect, far from it. No chat channels and similar issues will inevitable bring down the "B.net experience". Lack of overall ranking This is UNNECESSARY. Let's look at the TSL ladder. That's basically an overall ranking of the participating players. Was it accurate? No. Neither was the iCCup ladder and an overall B.net ladder wouldn't be accurate either. The only reason to have 1 big ladder would be to satisfy your own astoundingly big egos. Tournaments decide who is better. Not ladders. No chat channels This I find one of the most serious issues. But you can indeed connect with anyone you want anyway so I don't consider it to be breaking B.net. No cross server play allowed This made me mad. Inability to change nicknames You actually put this as a problem? Obviously you are running out of issues and just want to hate on Blizzard. No LAN feature This has been done to death and while I personally would prefer a LAN feature I can live with it and overall it won't change that much. Inability to host games by name and password This again I find annoying. This should be available. Online replays Blizzard stated their reasons for these and I mostly agree. The only argument I see is that you can copy someone elses build. But people have proven quite capable of doing that just by watching VODS. So overall yes I like the way B.net is heading. Although some changes are needed. | ||
climax
United States1088 Posts
| ||
Froadac
United States6733 Posts
On May 29 2010 15:46 Renaissance wrote: People voting no are trolls, or family or friends of Blizzard. I'm family, and I voted no :D | ||
Deleted User 61629
1664 Posts
| ||
SichuanPanda
Canada1542 Posts
On May 29 2010 15:48 J1.au wrote: I think you're the troll here. Assuming you have confused 'no' with 'yes' on purpose... You both are, now stop talking about it. On a more serious note. BNET 2.0 is taking one step forward two steps back with every single iteration it produces, and every time we hear anyone at Blizzard talk about it one thing is quite clear to me. They have absolutely no idea whatsoever what features fans want, and are taking a completely stubborn approach to developing the Beta as whole. They ask us for feedback, and then disregard all of it in favor of 'we've got a whole lot of data to sift through'. Guess what? Data isn't going to be the saving grace of any video game, it may help fix overall balance in a race vs race situation however the fact of the matter is that without taking an actual look at the hands-on game play (by more than Blizzard handful of in-house Beta testers oh wait I'm talking about a BETA!). If SC2B was like any other Beta I've ever been in the company producing it would actually read and respect the opinions of players, but wait there is more. Rather than using simply a direct-submit form like was used with the WC3 and all Blizzard Betas prior to this they choose to use a 4 different section forum like the did with WoW Beta. And what happened? Threads get buried in second buy noobs and trolls spamming useless banter, a direct-submit system would the only way to make sure Blizzard sees the legitimate testers reports, but that won't happen because they've got their all precious data. The game as a whole is okay, but the presentation we are currently seeing is far and away from what I would have expected. | ||
Count9
China10928 Posts
| ||
KlaCkoN
Sweden1648 Posts
On May 30 2010 01:14 TLOBrian wrote: I voted No. Battlenet 0.2 is horrible. But on another note, I found THIS in the updated ULA. Massive. Blizzard's Games and the Service may incorporate technology of Massive Incorporated ("Massive"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft"), that enables in-game advertising, and the display of other similar in-game objects, which are downloaded temporarily to your personal computer and replaced during online game play. As part of this process, Massive may collect some information about the game and the advertisements delivered to you, as well as standard information that is sent when your personal computer or game console connects to the Internet including your Internet protocol (IP) address. Massive will use this information to transmit and measure in-game advertising, as well as to improve the products and services of Massive and its affiliates. None of the information collected by Massive will be used to identify you. For additional details regarding Massive's in-game advertising practices, please see Massive's In-Game Advertising privacy statement at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=122085&clcid=0x409. The trademarks and copyrighted material contained in all in-game advertising are the property of the respective owners. Portions of the Service are © 2008 Massive Incorporated. All rights reserved. Goddammit Blizzard. Lol what, you are joking right? You have to be? Now they want to reserve the right to install adaware on my computer as well? Seriously? Wtf. | ||
D10
Brazil3409 Posts
On May 30 2010 01:34 Night[7] wrote: I voted yes and wouldn't post except people seem to want to know why. Now I don't think B.net is perfect, far from it. No chat channels and similar issues will inevitable bring down the "B.net experience". Lack of overall ranking This is UNNECESSARY. Let's look at the TSL ladder. That's basically an overall ranking of the participating players. Was it accurate? No. Neither was the iCCup ladder and an overall B.net ladder wouldn't be accurate either. The only reason to have 1 big ladder would be to satisfy your own astoundingly big egos. Tournaments decide who is better. Not ladders. No chat channels This I find one of the most serious issues. But you can indeed connect with anyone you want anyway so I don't consider it to be breaking B.net. No cross server play allowed This made me mad. Inability to change nicknames You actually put this as a problem? Obviously you are running out of issues and just want to hate on Blizzard. No LAN feature This has been done to death and while I personally would prefer a LAN feature I can live with it and overall it won't change that much. Inability to host games by name and password This again I find annoying. This should be available. Online replays Blizzard stated their reasons for these and I mostly agree. The only argument I see is that you can copy someone elses build. But people have proven quite capable of doing that just by watching VODS. So overall yes I like the way B.net is heading. Although some changes are needed. Actually no, you didnt like it but you are too much of a wuss to lay a finger against mighty blizzard. youd rather be complacent with their faults since thats how they roll nowdays. | ||
ChewbroCColi
Denmark108 Posts
| ||
L6-636536
United States94 Posts
XBox Live - No Chat Rooms Fail Community Microsoft pwns you for money BNet 2.0 No Chat Rooms Gimmie your Acc Info Microsoft still pwns you for money (Massive) | ||
ESV TV
United States109 Posts
On May 30 2010 01:34 Night[7] wrote: I voted yes and wouldn't post except people seem to want to know why. Now I don't think B.net is perfect, far from it. No chat channels and similar issues will inevitable bring down the "B.net experience". Lack of overall ranking This is UNNECESSARY. Let's look at the TSL ladder. That's basically an overall ranking of the participating players. Was it accurate? No. Neither was the iCCup ladder and an overall B.net ladder wouldn't be accurate either. The only reason to have 1 big ladder would be to satisfy your own astoundingly big egos. Tournaments decide who is better. Not ladders. No chat channels This I find one of the most serious issues. But you can indeed connect with anyone you want anyway so I don't consider it to be breaking B.net. No cross server play allowed This made me mad. Inability to change nicknames You actually put this as a problem? Obviously you are running out of issues and just want to hate on Blizzard. No LAN feature This has been done to death and while I personally would prefer a LAN feature I can live with it and overall it won't change that much. Inability to host games by name and password This again I find annoying. This should be available. Online replays Blizzard stated their reasons for these and I mostly agree. The only argument I see is that you can copy someone elses build. But people have proven quite capable of doing that just by watching VODS. So overall yes I like the way B.net is heading. Although some changes are needed. Online replays refers to being able to do a multiplayer replay host watching it with friends without having to count down 5 4 3 2 1 start | ||
Raelcun
United States3747 Posts
| ||
sLiMpoweR
United States430 Posts
On May 30 2010 00:04 Butigroove wrote: You mean like automatchmaking that existed in wc3? (Only broken because of lack of players, not functionality) I was talking more about the sc1 since i never played war3, but i see what you mean and i think both chat channels and an auto matching system would be the most beneficial to all. | ||
FoBuLouS
United States570 Posts
| ||
BierKlauMeister
Germany42 Posts
Blizzard is retarded | ||
novat
Great Britain33 Posts
On May 30 2010 01:34 Night[7] wrote: I voted yes and wouldn't post except people seem to want to know why. . Why do you say this if you don't elaborate the reasons for you to vote yes?? I voted no too because i don't see that the benefits outweigh the disadvantages. | ||
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
| ||
petered
United States1817 Posts
As long as blizzard has a solution for people who are truly serious about the game and need to play against people on other servers, I like a lot of the things about BNet 2.0 | ||
rezoacken
Canada2719 Posts
| ||
Eatme
Switzerland3919 Posts
| ||
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
On May 30 2010 04:41 Two_DoWn wrote: All yes votes: BW fans. YESSSSSSS | ||
Zoler
Sweden6339 Posts
| ||
KnockOut
Germany22 Posts
On May 30 2010 04:41 Two_DoWn wrote: All yes votes: BW fans. yes! + Show Spoiler + Also im a mad german | ||
SKT_Shino
Peru2 Posts
| ||
Night[7]
Sweden31 Posts
On May 30 2010 03:41 iCCup.Raelcun wrote: Ergh wrong account anyways, see above for online replays, the LAN feature is important seeing as when I was in a dorm I couldnt play anything online even on Bnet had to use LAN to play any games and seeing as a lot of college networks are shit you're limiting your market. The nicknames feature really you don't think this is a big deal? Look how often the top players on iCCup change their names so that they don't get bothered constantly if they're unable to practice without getting pestered every 2 seconds they're going to get frustrated. I seem to have misunderstood the online replays part so disregard my statement on that. I have no idea how often people on iCCup change their name but if blizzard brings back the old names with identifiers (this email era was just to test out that facebook thingie) then you can't just start whispering someone cause you know their name. The subject of LAN has been discussed thoroughly and while I agree that no LAN will in fact hinder some people it won't effect most. (This is from my viewpoint in soutehrn sweden. I have decent connection and I don't know a single person who doesn't, even at lans my friends almost never use LAN unless the game is pirated. But it might very well be different from where you are so maybe that problem is broader then I would imagine.) | ||
Doctorasul
Romania1145 Posts
Those that voted yes are either completely ignorant of the state of bnet2, utterly unaware of what creates and sustains a competitive and professional gaming community or stupidly misguided into thinking they're actually helping BW by damaging SC2. It's disheartening to see the prestige of this site being tarnished. This poll needs to be a crushing statement against incompetence and greed. TL, please do not disappoint. | ||
SpiritAshura
United States1271 Posts
| ||
DiTH
Greece116 Posts
I voted No as Blizzard voted No to all the features i liked in their previous versions of battle.net And tbh im very dissapointed at blizzard.This being the First of their game i wont buy.And next Wow expansion being the 2nd.I hope they turn things around with D3 or their next games. | ||
Zurles
United Kingdom1659 Posts
| ||
Mastermind
Canada7096 Posts
On May 29 2010 21:23 enzym wrote: Do you like the direction BNET 2.0 is taking? original poll: No (3439) 94% Yes (230) 6% 3669 total votes new poll, embedded on tl main page: No (1270) 87% Yes (188) 13% 1458 votes i cannot explain this huge discrepancy. what happened? two digits for yes seems like such a huge number... You had to read that terrible article before voting in the first poll, whereas the TL poll can be voted in by people who know nothing about that article. | ||
JoeSchmoe
Canada2058 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
pokerface
507 Posts
On May 30 2010 08:23 JoeSchmoe wrote: people complaining about facebook integration and lack of chat channels are obviously hardcore nerds with no friends. facebook integration has proven to be quite fun and chat channels were just spam prone wastes of time. Why would I want to talk to random strangers when I can just make a party with actual friends? Oh wait I suppose if you have no friends then yeah you get off by talking to random strangers. Nice first post no | ||
novat
Great Britain33 Posts
On May 30 2010 07:00 Night[7] wrote: I seem to have misunderstood the online replays part so disregard my statement on that. I have no idea how often people on iCCup change their name but if blizzard brings back the old names with identifiers (this email era was just to test out that facebook thingie) then you can't just start whispering someone cause you know their name. The subject of LAN has been discussed thoroughly and while I agree that no LAN will in fact hinder some people it won't effect most. (This is from my viewpoint in soutehrn sweden. I have decent connection and I don't know a single person who doesn't, even at lans my friends almost never use LAN unless the game is pirated. But it might very well be different from where you are so maybe that problem is broader then I would imagine.) I ask you again don't just write what is not important to you write why you like it. Just because you don't need lan/offline makes you think that it is good that there is no lan/offline mode in sc2? Just because you don't want to chat with other players makes you think it is good that there is no possibility to do it?Would 1 little chat button annoy you that much? It's not about what you need or don't need these are things that have been in other games and no longer are in sc2 for no reason but profit. Please just name some things that are better now than they were in sc or wc3 because for me it just seems like some people did not vote for the new b.net but against some posts. | ||
Piste
6136 Posts
| ||
Trozz
Canada3439 Posts
because Starcraft 2 is fun. But b.net? yeahno | ||
Zurles
United Kingdom1659 Posts
On May 30 2010 08:23 JoeSchmoe wrote: people complaining about facebook integration and lack of chat channels are obviously hardcore nerds with no friends. facebook integration has proven to be quite fun and chat channels were just spam prone wastes of time. Why would I want to talk to random strangers when I can just make a party with actual friends? Oh wait I suppose if you have no friends then yeah you get off by talking to random strangers. User was warned for this post Why oh why does blizzard favour people like this over us! | ||
aimaimaim
Philippines2167 Posts
| ||
DemiSe
883 Posts
If there were a choice between Bnet 2.0 and the SCBW / Wc3 I'd go with scbw / wc3 bnet without blinking. | ||
Puremiss
United States232 Posts
| ||
zZygote
Canada898 Posts
| ||
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
On May 30 2010 11:00 Zurles wrote: Why oh why does blizzard favour people like this over us! theres more of them ;_; | ||
Wintermute
United States427 Posts
On May 30 2010 08:23 JoeSchmoe wrote: people complaining about facebook integration and lack of chat channels are obviously hardcore nerds with no friends. facebook integration has proven to be quite fun and chat channels were just spam prone wastes of time. Why would I want to talk to random strangers when I can just make a party with actual friends? Oh wait I suppose if you have no friends then yeah you get off by talking to random strangers. User was warned for this post Talking to random strangers who have a common interest (like, Star Craft) is one of the best ways to make friends. Once you get past 8th grade, this will start to become more apparent. You'll also start to realize that "you have no friends" isn't really an effective way to intimidate adults. Only middle schoolers and horribly insecure adults worry about how many friends they have. Most of us are more worried about finding time for the friends that we already have than whether our friends list is long enough. That's why it's so cool when you can get social interaction in a relaxed setting like a bar or a public chat room, because that can fit however much time you have. Nice first post though. I don't expect to see a third one from you, given your charming demeanor. That's probably why you're so obsessed with having a lot of friends. Grass is always greener, etc. | ||
Butigroove
Seychelles2061 Posts
On May 30 2010 12:54 Wintermute wrote: Talking to random strangers who have a common interest (like, Star Craft) is one of the best ways to make friends. Once you get past 8th grade, this will start to become more apparent. You'll also start to realize that "you have no friends" isn't really an effective way to intimidate adults. Only middle schoolers and horribly insecure adults worry about how many friends they have. Most of us are more worried about finding time for the friends that we already have than whether our friends list is long enough. That's why it's so cool when you can get social interaction in a relaxed setting like a bar or a public chat room, because that can fit however much time you have. Nice first post though. I don't expect to see a third one from you, given your charming demeanor. That's probably why you're so obsessed with having a lot of friends. Grass is always greener, etc. Hey the guy has a point... I want LAN so I can play with my friends in real.... wait.... | ||
Rkie
United States1278 Posts
On May 30 2010 07:54 DiTH wrote: No chat,No Tours,No Clans,No Ranks,No Cross-Realms,No Lan,No playing without Internet,No Online Replays,No Custom Games with names?,No lag indicators? etc etc I agree with all of these entirely. But my least favorite part is the loading of each map before the games. But this might be SC2-only as well. I don't know, but it is annoying. It should be a bit more like in Bnet 1 where everyone downloads the map, then the game begins. Blizzard better make the new and improved "Battle Net 2.0" effective with updates, maybe Battle Net 2.5 is the answer, noone knows. | ||
thezergk
United States492 Posts
| ||
HardBoy359
Portugal48 Posts
If you bump this, you better have a good reason." omg I'm so scared x.x anyway, I love when I see posts like this about how people hated the new b.net, and now even though that is has it's flaws, everyone likes it :b BuMP! | ||
| ||