EPTDo you like the direction B.net 2.0 is taking? - Page 5
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
ChewbroCColi
Denmark108 Posts
| ||
|
L6-636536
United States94 Posts
XBox Live - No Chat Rooms Fail Community Microsoft pwns you for money BNet 2.0 No Chat Rooms Gimmie your Acc Info Microsoft still pwns you for money (Massive) | ||
|
ESV TV
United States109 Posts
On May 30 2010 01:34 Night[7] wrote: I voted yes and wouldn't post except people seem to want to know why. Now I don't think B.net is perfect, far from it. No chat channels and similar issues will inevitable bring down the "B.net experience". Lack of overall ranking This is UNNECESSARY. Let's look at the TSL ladder. That's basically an overall ranking of the participating players. Was it accurate? No. Neither was the iCCup ladder and an overall B.net ladder wouldn't be accurate either. The only reason to have 1 big ladder would be to satisfy your own astoundingly big egos. Tournaments decide who is better. Not ladders. No chat channels This I find one of the most serious issues. But you can indeed connect with anyone you want anyway so I don't consider it to be breaking B.net. No cross server play allowed This made me mad. Inability to change nicknames You actually put this as a problem? Obviously you are running out of issues and just want to hate on Blizzard. No LAN feature This has been done to death and while I personally would prefer a LAN feature I can live with it and overall it won't change that much. Inability to host games by name and password This again I find annoying. This should be available. Online replays Blizzard stated their reasons for these and I mostly agree. The only argument I see is that you can copy someone elses build. But people have proven quite capable of doing that just by watching VODS. So overall yes I like the way B.net is heading. Although some changes are needed. Online replays refers to being able to do a multiplayer replay host watching it with friends without having to count down 5 4 3 2 1 start | ||
|
Raelcun
United States3747 Posts
| ||
|
sLiMpoweR
United States430 Posts
On May 30 2010 00:04 Butigroove wrote: You mean like automatchmaking that existed in wc3? (Only broken because of lack of players, not functionality) I was talking more about the sc1 since i never played war3, but i see what you mean and i think both chat channels and an auto matching system would be the most beneficial to all. | ||
|
FoBuLouS
United States570 Posts
| ||
|
BierKlauMeister
Germany42 Posts
Blizzard is retarded | ||
|
novat
Great Britain33 Posts
On May 30 2010 01:34 Night[7] wrote: I voted yes and wouldn't post except people seem to want to know why. . Why do you say this if you don't elaborate the reasons for you to vote yes?? I voted no too because i don't see that the benefits outweigh the disadvantages. | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
| ||
|
petered
United States1817 Posts
As long as blizzard has a solution for people who are truly serious about the game and need to play against people on other servers, I like a lot of the things about BNet 2.0 | ||
|
rezoacken
Canada2719 Posts
| ||
|
Eatme
Switzerland3919 Posts
| ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
On May 30 2010 04:41 Two_DoWn wrote: All yes votes: BW fans. YESSSSSSS | ||
|
Zoler
Sweden6339 Posts
| ||
|
KnockOut
Germany22 Posts
On May 30 2010 04:41 Two_DoWn wrote: All yes votes: BW fans. yes! + Show Spoiler + Also im a mad german  | ||
|
SKT_Shino
Peru2 Posts
| ||
|
Night[7]
Sweden31 Posts
On May 30 2010 03:41 iCCup.Raelcun wrote: Ergh wrong account anyways, see above for online replays, the LAN feature is important seeing as when I was in a dorm I couldnt play anything online even on Bnet had to use LAN to play any games and seeing as a lot of college networks are shit you're limiting your market. The nicknames feature really you don't think this is a big deal? Look how often the top players on iCCup change their names so that they don't get bothered constantly if they're unable to practice without getting pestered every 2 seconds they're going to get frustrated. I seem to have misunderstood the online replays part so disregard my statement on that. I have no idea how often people on iCCup change their name but if blizzard brings back the old names with identifiers (this email era was just to test out that facebook thingie) then you can't just start whispering someone cause you know their name. The subject of LAN has been discussed thoroughly and while I agree that no LAN will in fact hinder some people it won't effect most. (This is from my viewpoint in soutehrn sweden. I have decent connection and I don't know a single person who doesn't, even at lans my friends almost never use LAN unless the game is pirated. But it might very well be different from where you are so maybe that problem is broader then I would imagine.) | ||
|
Doctorasul
Romania1145 Posts
Those that voted yes are either completely ignorant of the state of bnet2, utterly unaware of what creates and sustains a competitive and professional gaming community or stupidly misguided into thinking they're actually helping BW by damaging SC2. It's disheartening to see the prestige of this site being tarnished. This poll needs to be a crushing statement against incompetence and greed. TL, please do not disappoint. | ||
|
SpiritAshura
United States1271 Posts
| ||
|
DiTH
Greece116 Posts
I voted No as Blizzard voted No to all the features i liked in their previous versions of battle.net And tbh im very dissapointed at blizzard.This being the First of their game i wont buy.And next Wow expansion being the 2nd.I hope they turn things around with D3 or their next games. | ||
| ||
