i really look up to DJ and JP for having to sit there for hours and talk, really shows how good they are at what they do, even tastless and artosis run out with shit to say if shit goes wrong, you guys need to stop being day9 fanboys and just respect what they are doing, its not their fault, its MLG, plz stop trash talking them, love to see you do what they do.

grandkai

Canada71 Posts

April 02 2011 21:00 GMT

#390

Agreed with Shoggoth, It's MLG's fault that they can't fix the problems in a manner time.

xeDisMaD

10 Posts

April 02 2011 21:01 GMT

#391

On April 03 2011 05:59 Shoggoth wrote:
i really look up to DJ and JP for having to sit there for hours and talk, really shows how good they are at what they do, even tastless and artosis run out with shit to say if shit goes wrong, you guys need to stop being day9 fanboys and just respect what they are doing, its not their fault, its MLG, plz stop trash talking them, love to see you do what they do.

DJWheat i saw u writing that on stream BUSTED

Shoggoth

England75 Posts

April 02 2011 21:03 GMT

#392

On April 03 2011 06:01 xeDisMaD wrote:

Show nested quote +

DJWheat i saw u writing that on stream BUSTED

lololololol

Stil

United Kingdom206 Posts

April 02 2011 21:03 GMT

#393

I'm not happy with the compensation for the HD customers either. It's like 'We're sorry you have an inferior product, please have some more!!'

GusTreta

Canada5 Posts

April 02 2011 21:04 GMT

#394

The stream issues on day one were bascially just MLG screwing up, but ya, these issues today are all Blizzard.

They really need some sort of system for LAN play, they can't be doing this at all, at any time. Even in Korea, they had that disconnect in the GSL world vs Korea series, and their internet is amazing. North America's internet isn't even close to that level, so NA tournaments will always have problems.

I was thinking about this, and was wondering if this would be a solution: portable servers. Instead of creating a separate SC2 version without B.net, buy some smaller servers, put B.net on them, and actually bring them to the separate major events.

I'm sure their main servers are millions of dollars, but how much would it be for a server that only needs to handle less than 300 people? How much would it cost to bring it to these events and set them up, and have the computers connect to the server directly? I'm no server management guru, so I'm honestly interested in knowing if that would even be feasible.

Drock

United States305 Posts

April 02 2011 21:04 GMT

#395

This reminds me of the last MLG Dallas...

I'm really wondering if they'll be able to finish the tournament. It's already hours behind schedule.

DrunkenTemplar

Australia647 Posts

April 02 2011 21:04 GMT

#396

arghhhh should've checked this thread before buying the HQ stream :S oh well, there's always gsl and tsl3

Nevy

Canada169 Posts

April 02 2011 21:09 GMT

#397

On April 03 2011 06:04 Drock wrote:
This reminds me of the last MLG Dallas...

I'm really wondering if they'll be able to finish the tournament. It's already hours behind schedule.

I'm worried about this. I mean most of the players have to leave on sunday and have planes to catch.

BigSick

United States9 Posts

April 02 2011 21:09 GMT

#398

stream down for anyone else?

Psyqo

United States401 Posts

April 02 2011 21:11 GMT

#399

What a waste of a Saturday afternoon. I've seen 0 Starcraft 2 played at MLG.

Zooper31

United States5713 Posts

April 02 2011 21:14 GMT

#400

On April 03 2011 06:09 BigSick wrote:
stream down for anyone else?

They decided to just take it down instead of having it crash 24/7.

So no SC2 until they magically fix the problem. Wonder if they can even finish the tournament at this rate before players have to leave town.