Mafia VIII [GG] - Page 49
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 20 2009 08:24 L wrote: I think you're angry that we figured out you + hardware. quoted for /facepalmage later | ||
Showtime!
Canada2938 Posts
Keep em' posts coming so I can add them to my behavior analysis. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
Ace and Ver were both suspects based on bg's being killed, and both have been linked to the same clue. As town wants them to be red they are being forcefully linked to the clues to help prove a hunch. Regardless of the fact neither is dumb enough to kill two bgs day 1, as it gets them killed too fast. but hey, you guys have it all figured out, they obviously would be this bad. | ||
L
Canada4732 Posts
My vote is actually currently on plexa for inactivity/clue linkage to day 1. I changed it earlier, as for double lynch, Give me a viable second target for it and you will get your vote, neither ace nor ver get a vote to die from me. let the mafia off the one whos legit, and kill the other later if one is red and other green. Wait for mafia to confirm some mafia? No. I'll clear the way for double lynches right away. Double lynch does not happen today. It happens tomorrow. You prepare in advance. Do YOU think we'll have 2 good targets tomorrow? If so, vote for it. More importantly, why are you saying "give me a viable second target" when you already said double lynching tomorrow was a good idea? Doesn't add up, does it? | ||
0cz3c
United States564 Posts
On May 20 2009 08:09 BloodyC0bbler wrote: double Y Ace N Vig hit Ace N Qatol thinks very very very similarly to how I do. Which means he is most likely taking clues to a similar level to what I would (not the same but similar levels of obvious if you know how hes getting clues, till then insanely hard). Dreamflower would almost be impossible to catch unless a theme of oscar wilde himself was used (note he was believed to be bisexual). Hey that would go with rape. Hey! No need to insult Qatol. | ||
L
Canada4732 Posts
Oh wow. | ||
0cz3c
United States564 Posts
On May 20 2009 08:16 BloodyC0bbler wrote: You do realize last game the only person to successfully clue link ANYONE in my game was the guy who googled right? because its how i got my clues? half the time profiles are so vague you can't do a clue without being so obvious it hurts, google makes it less obvious I tend to think that Qatol and LTT are far more sophisticated than that. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
So sorry for me wanting decent thought into this. Ive seen MTF post analysis, ive also seen a shiteload of people just jump on ver and ace, finger pointing and screaming. Guess what, sit back start thinking seriously rather than finding everyway to pin 2 people and seriously analyze. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On May 20 2009 08:47 0cz3c wrote: I tend to think that Qatol and LTT are far more sophisticated than that. To just use google, yes they are, just as I was. ITs still a tool to use on people with shitty profiles, that would be way to obvious otherwise. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 20 2009 08:46 L wrote: So BC, you're saying that both people in office must be innocent because both bodyguards have died? Oh wow. I don't think he said that. Or at least I'd hope not. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On May 20 2009 08:46 L wrote: So BC, you're saying that both people in office must be innocent because both bodyguards have died? Oh wow. Oh wow, i wonder, If i was red, with two bgs, someone town almost was believing was dt, and then apparently a med, i wonder, i think id kill a bg, med and dt. Killing both bgs would get me put into the spotlight insanely quickly. So sorry if i give credit to people who are intelligent. Both ver and ace are smarter than that when they (if red) have tools to discredit eachother without killing bgs. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On May 20 2009 08:49 Ace wrote: I don't think he said that. Or at least I'd hope not. The chances are significantly less likely your both that obviously red to kill your bgs, you could still have one red, but less likely, more likely someone else had names, killed both and now can kill both mayor elects. | ||
0cz3c
United States564 Posts
On May 20 2009 08:51 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Oh wow, i wonder, If i was red, with two bgs, someone town almost was believing was dt, and then apparently a med, i wonder, i think id kill a bg, med and dt. Killing both bgs would get me put into the spotlight insanely quickly. So sorry if i give credit to people who are intelligent. Both ver and ace are smarter than that when they (if red) have tools to discredit eachother without killing bgs. Unless, of course, the killings were random. Not mere oversights! | ||
Showtime!
Canada2938 Posts
Killing 2 BGs is a ballsy play. This is strategy man. You can call it dumb all you want. But, who wants predictability? I'm telling you something doesn't add up. Who said vet's aren't capable of stupid plays? Look at what nemY did for christ sake. 3 blues down is major bait, no matter how you slice it. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
0cz3c
United States564 Posts
I also propose that I be the sole party running. Votes? Agreements? Dissent? | ||
Incognito
United States2071 Posts
| ||
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 20 2009 08:58 Incognito wrote: To everyone who is saying: They're smarter than that: Look. Smart people can often make stupid mistakes. Stupid people, on the other hand, usually make less smart mistakes. But really, if you are going to play this game assuming that everyone is "smart enough to not do X", well guess what? They'll do it. Being smart means you take risks and you sometimes play unpredictably. Or else they'll catch you with your pants down when you point and say, "Hey they're too smart to do that". ^_^ which is exactly what I said about Role Claiming DT on Day 1. oh dear this town hurts my soul. | ||
| ||