[N] Uninspired Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 01 2019 08:35 Grackaroni wrote: I'm voting Rels because he avoids early game a lot as mafia. And also as town. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 01 2019 08:46 Holyflare wrote: I think jock is mafia and bc is more mafia for defending(?? ? But also accusing???) him. Not much else to add really. Didn't even realise the game had even started. You can disregard this because I've reread it and it didn't go down like this. BC still gave jock a bit of an out which I don't like but he's pretty much said stuff I was thinking about Jock's posting. Minus points for grack not pointing this out. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 01 2019 09:04 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: So do you think Grack has the wrong idea with voting him? Not really the wrong idea just the wrong reasoning | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 01 2019 09:25 Grackaroni wrote: Scum has a pretty natural tendency towards appeasement when under pressure. I don't think scum's first reaction to being accused would be to shit on the entire player base of the website and boast about getting night killed in the last game. I feel pretty confident at reading butt-hurt and he reeks of butt-hurt townie to me. Zzzzz generic statements that never catch mafia/reliably find town or hold up to any kind of scrutiny when examined closely zzzz What he counters with doesn't even make any sense. He's boasting about not being able to be read as mafia, being shot by mafia as town? That's implying he's too good for the website.... But he's using that at a point when people are calling him mafia. So he's using a defence of him being better than everyone to prove absolutely nothing about why they are wrong other than some weak deterrent that only shifts people that read people in generic metrics (grack etc). | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 01 2019 10:29 Jockmcplop wrote: Out of character compared to when I was mafia? Compared to when you were carefree, joking and a bit lost as town. Unless you've become a giant ego after 2 games for absolutely no reason and you've decided to laud it over everyone else my conclusion is that you're not a dick and this is bravado to try and appeal to people's emotions and sensibilities. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
See first sentence. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 01 2019 10:48 wherebugsgo wrote: see your vote. If you want to convince people that Jack is acting out of character you're gonna have to try harder. There are a whopping two games to base this on, and comparing to the town game I just don't see how you can come to this conclusion. Jack clearly had at least a bit of an attitude and also self-awareness in the townie game: So this I think tells us nothing. There are other reasons I think which might be good to consider Jack scum but no one has really brought them up. Maybe I expect too much out of people too :p If you think those posts are anything like this one then I'm afraid your reading comprehension needs some brushing up on. It's a quite obvious thing. Maybe it's a nuance to mere mortals but from an experienced veteran of mafia such as myself, the evidence you've provided is of a guy that is butt hurt but not cocky and certainly not saying he's above the entire site because everyone is so much worse than him. Game 1 where he was mafia, read his QT. You can see it was all a facade and every time he got called out he was afraid it was the end of him. That's extremely understandable for someone new to mafia to feel when someone is pointing out your inconsistencies. See game 2 where he was more concerned with fairness more than anything and, you know, calmly giving reads even when called out. Your quotes literally show a guy defending himself with matter of fact points in a cocky way. See game 3. He gets called out. Everything people taught him in game 1 was to ignore the suspicion and fight back as if it meant nothing. Here he is trying but with the telltale way of fake bravado. No way he thinks he's above everyone on TL after 2 games where game 1 he thought he played badly but everyone complemented him and game 2 he got killed n1 and I don't think he picked out any of the mafia team at that point (could be wrong but don't think so). He's classically over compensating and he's played his hand too early. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 01 2019 09:17 wherebugsgo wrote: I'm 99% sure at this point if I do absolutely nothing to push a different lynch, Jock will continue to get suspicion and probably die. I'm giving him outs and the benefit of the doubt because I'm not confident he's scum. Honestly to me the weirdest thing he's done so far has been his last exit: Only for him to never come back. It's what, 1 am in the UK? So we can't really expect him to come back and defend himself any time soon. Anyway, my opinion has always been that having a single wagon on day 1 is rarely good. No need for me to contribute to that if I see something better, anyway. I honestly have no idea why you're voting for Jock and it looks really suspicious. You're essentially coaching him and all his responses are still just as clueless and you think the most suspicious thing is that he didn't return from afking? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 01 2019 20:52 wherebugsgo wrote: I wanted two things; one was to see whether Jock's tone and response style would be natural and the other would be whether he would actually tell me something believable. Given that Jock is very new I would expect some synthesis of Incognito's guide because he would have been bound to have read it recently. If he's town and someone in the game is asking him, I'd expect him to take the time to understand why (and reread if necessary) especially when I was indicating to him that if he didn't shape up he'd likely die. His response that followed afterward indicated that he probably lied, because even if you skim that guide literally the #1 takeaway for townies is to establish innocence. This is also why I phrased the question the way I did. Emphasis mine: by itself I don't think the lie is super alignment-indicative, but the fact that Jock actually answered that question about the guide but chose not to provide reads, in response to the same post where I specifically asked for them, is. He continued to attempt to stall for time afterward and has since disappeared. There was also no point for town Jock to ignore posts and ask HF if HF thought he's out of character compared to when he was mafia (what kind of question is that? it accomplishes nothing and doesn't even make sense, HF's post was clearly about Jock being out of character when compared to being town) and saying this: rather than just coming out with them. Why didn't you just say this in the first place? :p | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 01 2019 21:19 wherebugsgo wrote: because I found it unlikely that explaining it to you would change my read on you whereas now we have some evidence that Pandain cares about figuring out what's going on Have you read Incognito's mafia guide? Emphasis mine: + Show Spoiler + Priority #1: Establishing Your Innocence So, you know how to look for mafia and are ready to smoke them out. But unfortunately, just knowing how to find mafia is not good enough. The other part of the equation is convincing the town that you’ve found them. While you may be correct, it takes more than your own vote to properly seal the deal and kill off the mafia. As a townie, your number 1 priority is to establish your innocence. Why? Establishing your innocence does three things: It gives you a credible platform from which you can push your agenda It reduces the mafia’s options for pushing their agenda - they can’t attack you without some serious consequences It reduces the number of viable mafia candidates - if the town thinks you are innocent that’s one less person to worry about To elaborate: 1) It is hard to get people to listen to you if they are unsure of your motives. There are times where townies will ignore persuasive evidence based on an (irrational) fear that you might be pulling the wool over their eyes. Establishing your innocence allows you to focus on hunting the mafia instead of wasting energy defending yourself. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
![]() | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
You got me. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 02 2019 03:16 Pandain wrote: Mafia literally does it all the time. It's precisely inherently mafia to say good things and then not do them or follow them On May 02 2019 03:18 Pandain wrote: Also more importantly it's not a dumb silly contradiction that could be overlooked. It's a mindset contradiction On May 02 2019 03:18 Pandain wrote: I mean he could be town perhaps even likely. Im not even voting him. But it's day 1 so do what you do On May 02 2019 03:37 Pandain wrote: Why are you not against the lynch when you said there was only a five percent chance he's scum On May 02 2019 03:38 Pandain wrote: That makes no sense and is super scummy regardless of jocks alignment On May 02 2019 04:01 Pandain wrote: If you think there's almost no chance someone is scum why are you perfectly okay with his lynch This guy is suspect numero uno. Anybody that uses the phrase "that's scummy regardless of Jock's alignment" is a guy that has tmi and makes it want to look like he's weighing up his options. Let us also not forget that he agreed with all the points on Jock, fought against rayn that jock looked scummy, said rayn was scummy for not trying to save his town read and then dropped it all to try and shenanigan with rayn. Let us also not forget that Pandain wanted to lynch rels (based on incorrect meta that was highlighted several times already) despite a wagon building on Jock, his also scum read, to make rels active again. Then when that didn't take off, Pandain, master of misdirection, avoided joining the jock wagon (his scum read) again for terrible shenanigans. Then when Jock, his scum read, flipped town (after pandain said he's probably town for no discernable reason why arguing that he was still mafia) Pandain decides to call the entire wagon on Jock, his scum read, and also maybe town read, mafia. No thanks. You mafia mate. Lynch Pandain when I'm gone. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I did with that Pandain guy. He's mafia. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
He literally came from afking with his shitty formatted post saying he doesn't understand the jock change in mindset and that jock was contradictory. You say you have to be an idiot to do that as mafia. Pandain says mafia do that all the time but more importantly it's a mindset contradiction. Pandain then makes all his previous posts irrelevant saying "lol I'm not even voting him". Why even bring jock up in his return and argue with you about mafia mindsets if he doesn't agree he's mafia? Pandain questions your motive for not saving jock. Your motive is purely emotional bs that doesn't mean anything to do with your alignment and should never have swayed Pandain one way or another. Then Pandain tries to make you vote rels out of the blue for absolutely no reason other than he's afk. You say no, maybe only vivax. Pandain comes up with reasons to vote vivax that don't really apply because vivax has proportional activity to normal since this thread isn't very long imo. Maybe he's busy? Who the fuck knows? Where has his jock read even gone? Nothing he has said at any point since initially scum reading jock has given a reason to why he has NEVER placed a vote on his other scum read, Jock. Nothing. Not even a smidge. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 02 2019 07:23 raynpelikoneet wrote: Also why the fuck would you be gone? Youve done nothing but killed a townie. I'm the towniest person in this thread but also a medic dodge. Also it's realise unless you're some American heathen. They like to throw rogue Zs into things. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 02 2019 07:30 raynpelikoneet wrote: What is wrong with this post Holyflare? With Rels being mafia or Rels not being mafia? Dont care about Vivax votes because that was not going to happen anyways since you were academicly 15 mins late... What's wrong with this post? He has absolutely no reason to scum read people who thought the same exact fucking things he did. On May 02 2019 00:53 Pandain wrote: I think Wherebugsgo is solid town, not even learn town. He's most active person, is clearly actively reading and re-reading and using that to inform his view in a logical way (even if i disagree sometimes) Super strong town lean on Koshi as well for his carefree posting. They just seem townie. Bugs solid town. On May 02 2019 01:02 Pandain wrote: Dear Mr. BloodyC0bbler, I think Jock is a good lynch but I'm keeping my vote on Rels at the moment. This is exactly what he did in End of the World as mafia (as you and I both know), and I also don't like his only post that said "me too!". It just seemed fake to me. Furthermore, and maybe more importantly, it pressures him to come on in and talk. I would love if more people voted him if only for this reason. Sincerely, Pandain Agrees with BC about jock being a good lynch. On May 01 2019 20:33 Pandain wrote: I don't really have any mafia reads, but I think VE is town from his carefree and open posting, and Koshi for same reason. I think that's a pretty good start for day 1. I'm going to vote Rels because he's done absolutely nothing, and he did the same exact thing last time when I was mafia with him. Thinks VEs POSTING is town. Says nothing about me but I unequivocally pushed his scum read and nothing more. Vivax he tried to shenanigan to. Point is 3 of those people are essentially the only town reads he's made this game. Really strong looking ones too. Yet just because they were wrong on someone he also thought was mafia(!) he's gone straight to calling the whole wagon probably having 2 mafia. It doesn't make any sense. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 02 2019 07:34 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay. I will let himself say what he has to say about that. Why is Vivax not mafia? When did I say vivax wasn't mafia? I don't think he's done anything good or awful. Similarly to you. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 02 2019 07:45 raynpelikoneet wrote: comment on bugs? Sometimes they're okay but I can't say I'm a fan. Pretty gross really. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 02 2019 07:48 raynpelikoneet wrote: idk i think he screams all mafia, what is okay in your opinion? Sometimes they're just arround and it's an annoyance. I guess tolerable rather than okay. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I've tried calling bugs mafia but how do you call such a miniscule being mafia? I don't think anyone listens to inane midnight ramblings of a British man talking to bugs anyway. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
![]() | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 02 2019 10:28 wherebugsgo wrote: actually nah Pandain is not scum HF's case is pretty trash And why is that? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 02 2019 18:23 wherebugsgo wrote: I don't claim to be some sort of Pandain whisperer, but here's my top 3 clickbait list: 1. Pandain's behaviour is different enough between alignments to be noticeable, at least after reading 3-4 games. As town, Pandain seems to be trying to figure things out, and tends to use a lot of conditional language/hedging. Here are a couple examples, which ones are town and which are mafia? Example 1: + Show Spoiler + On October 28 2013 08:46 Pandain wrote: There's too much scum for me to ignore in Rayn. I'll clarify my case. I agree my case on Rayn isn't that convincg. It's based on a whole bunch of small tells. However, given the information we have now he is objectively the most scummy of everyone. WoS you think I might be scum because my reasons are crap, but okay then I guess I'm crap. Let me know why revealing a role to a person who's alignment isn't certain is town or comes from a blue role. I don't think my arguments are weak, they're non-conclusive at best but it's ultimately a matter of debate. I also think you don't like me for some reason, so I hope we can get that behind me. Or if you think I'm bad just address the arguments rather then the person. Sentinel, it's not set in stone but its at least semi-serious. Answer: + Show Spoiler + town Example 2: + Show Spoiler + On November 15 2013 09:52 Pandain wrote: Why do you think he's town so far? I don't think effort is the town indicator you think it is, unless you're looking at something else which of course I may have missed. I don't like this by the way. I totally agree that the best canidate, in yamato's terms but it makes sense anyway, is to vote someone who wants to lynch a scum who you believe is scum. That will make my best vote, but it's not indicative. So right now, if I wasn't voting kush, I would be voting someone who is a good anazlyer probably VE because I think he's alright in the long term and is also town. Even if your town, we're not just trying to vote someone who is town. We want to vote a good analyzer because they get two votes each day. Answer: + Show Spoiler + town Example 3: + Show Spoiler + On March 12 2019 04:59 Pandain wrote: Fuck busy again tonight. Can't do a last post but if I die slam and onegu need to be next lynches. Grack I saw your post but meta tells like that are shit compared to actual analyses. Any good player can change their meta, and honestly people can't read meta for shit. Slam has two huge scum tells. He voted for HF and then later pushed HF for lynching palmar(extremely hypocritical and makes sense from mafia perspective). And he also, despite being very active most times, was completely "gone" during the sentinel lynch, and "convienantly" just showed up five minutes after. Yeah right. Lynch this guy. Onegu has just been scummy this whole game, pushing me for absolutely no reason (like actually none. His reason was because of a misunderstanding of acros role later shown to he false. But onegu never backtracked. And he too convienantly afked during sentinel lynch. Also I can't do analysis because g2g but his whole filter is pretty bad. If ace ever lives past night 4 he's 100% scum. Acro is town I think. Don't agree with aces analysis at all. It's not anti town mechanic because he wasn't forced to shoot anyone. Answer: + Show Spoiler + mafia I tried seeing if there is any language Pandain uses differently based on alignment, and you can try searching "think" or "don't think" in filters; I think as scum P uses words like "think" and "don't think" less often than as town but it's certainly not conclusive. Here are some numbers: + Show Spoiler + Thug life: 23 pages mafia - 1.13 don't think per page 21 don't think total 169 think 7.34 per page noir 19 pages mafia 0.78 per page 15 don't think 181 think 9.5 per page end of the world 9 pages mafia 1 per page don't think 57 think 6.3 per page time to die 30 pages town 1.35 per page 40 don't think 280 think 9.33 per page ##mafia 15 pages town 1.7 per page 26 don't think 159 think 10.6 per page 2. P's reads tend to be more consistent as scum and this matches what I'd expect of scum in general being unwilling to change reads. I think townies try to figure out the game rather than just lining up people to kill. I wouldn't expect scum P to just immediately backtrack and put me in a list of potential scum after calling me the towniest person in the game on the same day: 3. P was trying to consolidate people to kill Vivax at EoD. This shows initiative and is quite a risk as scum I think-why not just sit back and watch Jock die/what purpose does it accomplish? I tend to believe that scum will look to see if there is support before trying something like that, and actually I've seen that in Pandain's past games as well: In that game Pandain voted MZ, but then got off MZ when there wasn't any traction and moved to Onegu (following a vote by MZ on Onegu as well, making it clearer that there was traction on Onegu). In general Pandain's vote movements were minimal even with townies getting lynched. Here Pandain was happy to move around the vote and try and get a different person lynched even last minute, regardless of support existing. Ok, you're almost definitely mafia then. Not only did you call my CASE trash, which you haven't talked about once in this entire wall of Pandain defence but you quite conveniently also highlight points I was making in it too. Point 1. Pointless meta defence based on language he may or may not use. Point 2. He's more consistent as mafia? That's literally the point I'm saying, he's not consistent, his accusations don't align with his posts and furthermore he was hesitant at every point to lynch his mafia read and even tried to vreate shenanigans away from it but then attack everyone on it afterwards. Point 3. I do not believe for one second you went back through all of his town games and found a specific moment where he did some kind of shenanigan or whatever it is you're trying to prove. This looks almost definitively like you have cherry picked something that fits your narrative because you either have insider information on Pandain's alignment or you're trying to cover for him. Something, I might add, that he absolutely does not need. None of this addresses the case, one of these proves the case has credibility, at least from your perspective and narrative and the other is inadmissible. You maf. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 02 2019 18:32 wherebugsgo wrote: HF do you think any of MZ, Vivax, or BC are scum? What a pointless trivial question which I've addressed already. Mz has posted shit all, could be anything. Vivax has done nothing to sway me one way or the other and didn't post anything I hated yet. BC has only made posts I've agreed with. Rayn I can't believe you fell for my posts last night. Reread them as if I'm talking about actual insects :D I will lynch bugs with you. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
My reads being awful is not going to convince anyone of anything to do with my alignment. If you would actually spend the time attacking your mafia reads as much as you did defending your town reads with narratives and figures maybe you'd figure that out. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Pointless already answered questions. Calling cases bad but then not addressing the case and instead writing walls of text on defending a town read Pandain instead. Even with Jock it was asking about reading the guide and then complaining about the Jock meta being wrong after the fact. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Based on bugs defence of pandain tempted to take pandain out but we'll see. Koshi hit or miss kinda like what he posted but I trained him as mafia well and he's a complete non entity. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Interestingly ff left pandain out of his read list. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 02 2019 03:18 Pandain wrote: I mean he could be town perhaps even likely. Im not even voting him. But it's day 1 so do what you do That looks like a town read to me, not even a hedge. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 02 2019 19:07 wherebugsgo wrote: are you serious I've avoided confronting you because I didn't want to pollute the thread, but if you're town, you need to be told this as honestly you're so arrogant, ESPECIALLY when you're wrong. I pointed out that I disagreed with your meta case on Jock right at the beginning and you chose to tell me I don't know how to read. I responded reasonably and instead of entertaining the thought that you could be wrong, you decided to make the environment completely hostile. Now you call me scum because I disagree with you and provide reasons for my town reads. Literally the only acceptable reason for you to play like this is if you are scum. I stand by the comment that you were unable to see the differences, it's laughable since you've spent more time defending pandain in the same way I attacked jock than even checking up on Jock. The meta was not wrong in the slightest, he played differently to both his previous games. I just attributed that to being mafia. It was wrong, big deal. Similarly, you've just done the EXACT same defending Pandain. I don't agree with it, in fact it looks like a scummy narrative. I think you're mafia for it because you've spent more time doing that than responding to the actual case in the first place. You then asked me a pointless question about 3 people I've largely already even talked about, which shows you just didn't care about reading me. You simultaneously say I'm going to ruin the game because if I die people will sheep me but also call me mafia. But then attack me in a way that only makes sense if you know I'm town. It's my literal job as mafia to shit up a thread and make it hostile and out talk people but at every step it's the old fake hedge from you. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 02 2019 19:37 wherebugsgo wrote: Rayn is this scum HF being fake aggressive or town HF who thinks he's posted something but actually hasn't? I ask him about MZ, Vivax, and BC. 1. Up until this post, MZ is not at all mentioned in HF's filter. Here, HF doesn't take a stance. 2. HF did say the same thing about Vivax earlier, so sure, fine. But again, no stance. 3. "BC only made posts I've agreed with" no direct interaction besides that first weird mistake post HF had, we can come to this conclusion I suppose based on the fact that BC and HF both voted Jock but why should vote alignment matter in reading BC? So why does HF say this is a pointless question when the only thing that HF actually said was #2? 1. What has mz done since that required me to take a stance on him? Like I said, he's done shit all. Also I quite categorically do mention him in my filter. I ask him when he's going to stop fannying around not voting Jock, which now Jock has flipped town makes him look more suspicious. Regardless, I don't have enough information because he just hasn't posted enough. If anyone says they can form an opinion on him they're either lying or wrong. 2. Yup. 3. What has BC posted since that would make me change my mind? If you think it's anything to do with voting alignment or whatever nonsense then ok but it's clearly not and I've highlighted that in my post. If someone says stuff I am thinking before I've posted it when reading the thread there's a strong chance we're on the same wavelength and are the samw alignment. That's a pretty basic tenet of mafia. Either way, you've only just now blatantly gone through my filter to check these things and then point it out after the fact. You've asked me the question before you even knew whether I had answered them. So this question WAS largely pointless because: A) you didn't know if I had already talked about them B) you didn't actually care about the response because you've gained nothing from it other than showing your true colours | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
![]() Yes, I do filter people before I ask them questions because otherwise it is pointless. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
With regards to the people I actually push, the ones that now actually matter (you and pandain) I have posted my thoughts quite well and elaborated. Pretty obvious. I don't go into your filter where you pick out the list of like 3-4 people you said contains mafia and say omg unexplained reads no way do I? Pretty petty if you ask me. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Literally in the next post On May 02 2019 18:58 Holyflare wrote: And all those shitty afkers and ff I guess but pointless trying to include those shitters yet. Interestingly ff left pandain out of his read list. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I'm extremely hopeful that other people will see how obviously mafia you are and sheep me after your petty attacks. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 02 2019 09:19 wherebugsgo wrote: BC town, I didn’t push my read on MZ because I doubted myself and I also wasn’t insistent enough on maintaining a counter wagon. Had Jock responded better to me I would have defended him very hard because I thought the meta case was really bad (also really HF, you should apologize for that reading comprehension insult LOL) I hope this is bugs calling BC town because if it is then it's extremely hypocritical the way he called out my BC read or even asked me about BC in that way if we shared the same read. He even spent some time criticising it! | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 02 2019 23:48 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am gonna make a more detailed post soon, i am in a bit of hurry rn. HF, bugs is right about Pandain (vs your case). I don't think he ever called jock even mafia so i dont understand why it's scummy for him to look at the people on jock wagon. I need a clarification; when you said this: who did you mean and why was this post so vaguely worded? Because the townread on jock was, to be completely honest, one of the easiest reads to make in this game. On May 02 2019 00:44 Pandain wrote: FIXED POST I am confused about why Jock suddenly became an asshole in this thread when the last two games he was super nice and if anything apologetic. Also his blogs are fun to read so I'm sort of shocked. I don't think he's a bad lynch and might switch to him if the votes are close. Also this is concerning: And then proceedes to be super lukewarm about scum reads and doesn't scumhunt at all. On May 02 2019 00:45 Pandain wrote: Fuck formatting is hard. Anyway originally I was lukewarm about him but now I think he's a good lynch especially for day 1. On May 02 2019 01:02 Pandain wrote: Dear Mr. BloodyC0bbler, I think Jock is a good lynch but I'm keeping my vote on Rels at the moment. This is exactly what he did in End of the World as mafia (as you and I both know), and I also don't like his only post that said "me too!". It just seemed fake to me. Furthermore, and maybe more importantly, it pressures him to come on in and talk. I would love if more people voted him if only for this reason. Sincerely, Pandain Looks like scum read to me. I made that post as a super off the cuff remark meaning he was a super easy vote to afk on if you were mafia and he looked way different to normal if you are town. I'm gonna have to disagree with you on how obvious a townie he was since you know, he got lynched. People that are hesitant to go in on a free lynch look suspicious to me, especially as I remember them (pandain, mz too) agreeing with his lynch but not actually voting him. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I mean there's other suspicions sure but all of the others seem largely activity based even though he town read them before. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 03 2019 02:57 raynpelikoneet wrote: Because of his opening. I know you disagree with this but i fail to see a world where MZ comes into the game as mafia claiming he would do the same mistakes he was lynched (and almost lynched) for last (two) games. I just don't believe it because that would require huge balls and i am not sure if MZ has that big of balls as mafia. Wait what mistake are you talking about? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 03 2019 03:21 raynpelikoneet wrote: Please don't shoot me mafia because i am a veteran and i'd like to play another day because this game actually got very interesting in my opinion. Dumb they have a rber they just gonna rb you | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 03 2019 04:33 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Mostly caught up at the moment. Pandain/Grack are both shady to me thus far from what i've read. Mainly as both of them have been fairly active overall but the content they have both posted is basically non existent. This is very very similar to how Pandain posted in end of the world mafia. Ie situationally active and talks about things but never seriously pushes them. Trying to hard imo to appear as town while providing no effort. The next big tell for me is he actively agreed with the Jock Lynch but opted to vote for someone who hadn't started posting yet then swapped his vote with 0 stated reasons. Grack literally had a filter of 0 content for how long it is so he is clearly around but not doing anything of value. Although at this point I feel that one of HF/Rayn/Bugs could be mafia. Unsure of who. Bugs as mafia (in the past) when I have played with him has been super aggressive similar to how aggressive I can be and hes not this game. However I disagree with basically all his reads and I think he should be better than that. I personally find reading HF and Rayn insanely hard and until I am 100% sure one of them is mafia I am not prepared for the potential shit storm that creates. How can you not have a read on me when the 2 main people I've made cases on are/were BOTH your scum reads (pandain/jock) and I'm pushing bugs for what you're saying - that he's underwhelming? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 03 2019 07:01 wherebugsgo wrote: Vivax literally only mentions FF and MZ in his filter. I think FF is 100% town Okay, I'll just make this quick and painless for you. wherebugsgo | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 03 2019 07:32 wherebugsgo wrote: HF I think you played your hand too hard here BC, MZ, HF, at least one of you is town unless this is a bastard 4 scum setup. Come help me figure out the game while I'm still alive. As long as we're lynching me just assume I'm town. You can discard everything I say never, because I won't flip scum. HF if I'm wrong about you and these are not massive scum tells of you defending Vivax for no reason but then putting him as scum for equally no reason, please do explain yourself. Why was Vivax so special, out of the "do nothingers" that he had such a great honour of being in your kill list? If it wasn't clear I've red checked you. Good day. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 03 2019 05:22 Holyflare wrote: this means bugs is definitely mafia :D | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 03 2019 07:53 wherebugsgo wrote: how the fuck can you not realise there is a miller if you're a cop You think i read op? Hahaha | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 03 2019 21:05 Koshi wrote: I dont believe HF but I do want to vote wbg. Annoying. Shouldn't believe me, nothing came out of it. I don't trust bugs though because: He just assumed I was town claiming and that he's "miller" when the gf already flipped He made me top town He seems hung up on asking koshi about blue actions still His pandain town read is so whack and is the most effort he's put into the entire game, to defend a guy before he's even spoken Everything in my mind screams pandain is mafia but literally the only thing stopping me lynching him is bugs defence of him | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [mafia don't read] + today | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 03 2019 22:14 VisceraEyes wrote: What about his defense gives you pause? Do you agree with it? No I just don't think mafia makes a shitty defence narrative on another mafia like that. Seems like a foregone conclusion of tmi into narrative rather than making stuff up to save a teammate narrative. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 03 2019 22:17 VisceraEyes wrote: Like are you shipping bugs as mafia? Is that what the hesitance is? That's my point. Independently I think both are mafia, together not so much at all. Bad thinking but it's whatever. He's done nothing to convince me otherwise and since being red checked has essentially just made a list post. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 03:57 VisceraEyes wrote: Higher probability scum. Bugs only looks like mafia because of how he's flailing here, now. His play before now looked pretty null to me, leaning townie. The exchange between he and HF is a tough call though - like I said before, he looks like mafia because of how "resigned" he is to his fate. He even didn't believe HF's claim all along and STILL felt "momentum to lynch" him, even after the claim was retracted. Further, he looks worse because he ultimately believed HF - though the progression looks relatively natural, it could just as easily be him realizing the miller angle slowly, as others were realizing it too. As a townie, MY gut reaction is "WELP LOOKS LIKE WE GETEM BOYS!!!" if someone fake-claims on me, I INSTANTLY assume they're mafia trying to fuck me. It never really looked like bugs had that reaction. HOWEVER In the spirit of transparency, I'm not confident in my ability to accurately read bugs or his intentions. He's always been something of a wild-card to me and that frustration has bubbled over several times in our history. That could be coloring my hesitation to call him scum - I've been wrong SO MUCH before about Bugs. But like I said before - his play lacks a sharp edge that his mafia game typically has, so I've been leaning town most of the game. First few bits is why I disliked him. Guess Pandain is the safer lynch but I really don't care tbh. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 07:54 Pandain wrote: Can you respond to my actual points? It makes no sense for me to have done what I did if I was mafia. It would be extremely counter productive ,my teammates could have gotten super super super pissed at me, and maybe I would even be banned or something crazy if I did something as stupid as that. The more you talk about how much of a towny move it was the less towny you look unfortunately for you. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
You asking for all the cred is bad. Your post after the day post basically screaming for cred didn't help, looked pretty fake. Your lack of night activity because it was oh so obvious you wouldn't die and you'd do it tomorrow into nothing looks bad. Your d1 avoiding jock looked bad. Your 0 real scum reads is bad. More content will eclipse those points potentially eventually but you have to start somewhere. VE is being an absolute gentleman trying to help. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 07:56 Pandain wrote: It's a good question. I can't help but think Doc actually saved someone or a vet got shot, because let's realize that only one person died. And I think it would be super weird for mafia to have 1kp. Anyway that doesn't answer your question. If I had to guess 2 more? Wtf kind of theory is this by the way? Where does it say anything about any kind of extra mafia kp role in op? Are you trying really badly to fake a dumb tell? I even had to read the op to make sure. I hooe you're impressed. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 08:49 Pandain wrote: No my point is that only one person died. So are we just assuming that mafia has one kp? Probably not, then town would be hugely advantaged. So the fact that only one person died suggests there was a medic save or a vet got shot. What games have you played in when mafia have more than 1kp in a normal sized game? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
A+ doc whoever you are | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 09:32 Pandain wrote: Ok I was just going off the top of my head, I'm not an expert on balance. 1KP just seemed low compared to the 2KP last game and 3KPin end of the world mafia. Honestly if you both want to lynch me because I miscaculated what KP should be off the top of my head go ahead. Going for these "gotcha" moments instead of actual scumhunting is one of the reasons why the town play on these forums tends to be pretty low. Way to trivialise it. This is just one of many points against. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
![]() | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 09:35 Pandain wrote: The only okay points are lack of activity night one and fake inconsistencies regarding Jock, which I addressed and you never responded to. It absolutely was not inconsistent at all. I didn't like your response and chose to ignore it in favour of my perceived chain of events which makes you look pretty scummy if I do say so myself. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 10:25 VisceraEyes wrote: It was in the OP, your dumbtell is not accepted. It absolutely wasn't, trust me ![]() | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 11:40 Pandain wrote: I thought BC thinking both me and grack are his top mafia reads as complete crazy considering we helped lead the vivax lynch. But apparently you guys have rampant bussing issues in the past so I guess it's null, but I do find it surprising he didn't at least mention it. I didn't read too much into their interaction. Could be anything. I'm 90% convinced one of HF or BC is mafia (No I'm not going to get into HF. I just think his play is lazy this game and not good. It's more a gut feeling than anything concrete. ) I agree that hf guy is really phoning it in. Definitely just a lazy guy though. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 12:14 wherebugsgo wrote: no one. If I had to pick one player, the closest would be HF. We're all doomed. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 12:36 wherebugsgo wrote: he's not aware of the thread though, he's been consistently wrong about how events have unfolded and this has been pointed out several times already. Look at some of my rebuttals to him, for example. It's basically like he's coming in periodically, catching up and not actually spending time trying to figure out alignments, just finding surface-level things to nitpick and blow out of proportion. I'm not gonna lie I'm really busy and that's almost eerily accurate to exactly how I'm playing this game though. It's a lie I'm not aware of the thread though, I just don't allude to everything I'm thinking. I'll break it down: I didn't and still don't like Pandain's day 1. I don't care if it's how you felt and if vivax was on Jock, Jock was a good vote that Pandain supported it but at every opportunity was wishy washy af about joining it ESPECIALLY as his reason for voting rels was pointed out as incorrect repeatedly. Yeah, you and he call it hedging and whatever but to me it doesn't look like hedging, it now looks quite like he may have seen a mafia partner on Jock and not wanted to join it. I didn't like all the credit he's trying to take for the vivax flip or how he talked about being banned for just bussing in one breath while then changing his tune to saying another thing about bussing in another breath. I think his post on BC isn't exactly wrong in any regard but it looks very much like just a deflection to someone equally afk rather than a constructive scum read. I'd probably vote a lurker over him at this point though like mz who just asks questions over and over again but doesn't really contribute anything himself. Maybe actually alakaslam who I forgot was even in the game. Bugs, I dunno about you. I genuinely thought you were mafia and still hedge over you repeatedly. I look for how people spend their little time in the game and you spent an inordinate amount of time defending Pandian n1 before Pandain had even commented on anything. Your narrative didn't gel with my own meta on Pandain in the slightest and certainly, after just playing with him, his 1 game meta feels wildly different from last game did. That's why I claimed a red check on you. Partly to see how you'd react, which was horribly, pretty much just accepting my check was real and assuming you were a miller and that I'd never do this as mafia while simultaneously trying to shit all over it and give situations where I'm mafia. I think your Pandain repeated defence this cycle isn't necessarily out of character based on your n1 but it seems like that was all you were doing. On May 04 2019 12:36 wherebugsgo wrote: he's not aware of the thread though, he's been consistently wrong about how events have unfolded and this has been pointed out several times already. Look at some of my rebuttals to him, for example. It's basically like he's coming in periodically, catching up and not actually spending time trying to figure out alignments, just finding surface-level things to nitpick and blow out of proportion. I'm not gonna lie I'm really busy and that's almost eerily accurate to exactly how I'm playing this game though. It's a lie I'm not aware of the thread though, I just don't allude to everything I'm thinking. I'll break it down: I didn't and still don't like Pandain's day 1. I don't care if it's how you felt and if vivax was on Jock, Jock was a good vote that Pandain supported it but at every opportunity was wishy washy af about joining it ESPECIALLY as his reason for voting rels was pointed out as incorrect repeatedly. Yeah, you and he call it hedging and whatever but to me it doesn't look like hedging, it now looks quite like he may have seen a mafia partner on Jock and not wanted to join it. I didn't like all the credit he's trying to take for the vivax flip or how he talked about being banned for just bussing in one breath while then changing his tune to saying another thing about bussing in another breath. I think his post on BC isn't exactly wrong in any regard but it looks very much like just a deflection to someone equally afk rather than a constructive scum read. I'd probably vote a lurker over him at this point though like mz who just asks questions over and over again but doesn't really contribute anything himself. Maybe actually alakaslam who I forgot was even in the game. Bugs, I dunno about you. I genuinely thought you were mafia and still hedge over you repeatedly. I look for how people spend their little time in the game and you spent an inordinate amount of time defending Pandian n1 before Pandain had even commented on anything. Your narrative didn't gel with my own meta on Pandain in the slightest and certainly, after just playing with him, his 1 game meta feels wildly different from last game did. That's why I claimed a red check on you. Partly to see how you'd react, which was horribly, pretty much just accepting my check was real and assuming you were a miller and that I'd never do this as mafia while simultaneously trying to shit all over it and give situations where I'm mafia. I think your Pandain repeated defence this cycle isn't necessarily out of character based on your n1 but it seems like that was all you were doing. This is pretty much just a ramble and mostly to just get my thoughts across. I realise it doesn't say really anything but I don't care. I dunno if I'm just not invested in mafia anymore or if I'm just busy but it feels unfun to play this game. I think it might be mainly the activity of other people and I just got tired of talking to mafia reads while everyone else afks. In fact that's most likely it. Tbh even my mafia read afkd so maybe it's just everyone afking I hate. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 12:48 wherebugsgo wrote: Ask yourself why town HF would dodge responding to this post: If dodging means skipping over it because it should be really obvious then yes. I didn't think what vivax had done was enough to read him anything, as stated in all of those posts. I still don't know why, for the fourth time, you quote my poe post as if it's some revelation. It's poe, process of elimination. The list is simply people I don't town read that I think are most likely to be mafia because it's within their range. That is why vivax is there because his activity is either afk or his staple mafia play. That is why koshi, who I actually town read slightly day 1 is there, because koshi is perfectly capable of appearing town for short spans of time day 1. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 13:29 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Highlighting these three primarily because he fake claims (whatever he does it a lot) however does it and didnt read the OP to realize the chance of a miller existed. The key part to this is the not reading the OP. Follow that into the 2nd quote. That is the statement pandain made that warranted HF to vote for him. Which given all the other content going around the thread was a pretty weak statement to jump on. Moreso because it was lack of reading the OP related that HF himself is guilty of. Now the third quote. Literally stating that he is ignoring what someone said in favour of his own views. If he truly believed Pandain is mafia, he would be able to use pandains words as a reasons for this and actions, not just ignore them and make up ones own version of the events. Pretty sure he also dodged MZ's questions when MZ wanted to know about the shit related to the fakeclaim. Don't really care and you'll shoot yourself in the foot when you know the extent of it. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 18:19 Holyflare wrote: Who was it that has given koshi a pass by the way? Was only recently but cba to check. If you have come around on Pandain somehow and have bugs as a town read then Koshi is literally just afking and pretending to sheep rayn as a do nothing clause on your two town reads. Unless it was bugs himself and then that's even worse. Was ve and ff. Interesting. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 20:27 Pandain wrote: @HF yes I was wishy washy on Jock. Of course I agreed with points that made him suspicious but it didn't mean I felt it meant anything very significant. It's day 1 dude what do you want. And I was very transparent the whole day that I was iffy on Jock, it's not like I was gungho about him and then trying to lynch people who voted him later Yes I know your point of view. I just have my own assumption about it. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 20:42 Pandain wrote: Like what does HF really believe outside of me and bugs? It's not obvious . Do you want me to pick and choose between mz on almost no posts/koshi on almost no posts and alakaslam the unreadable mess? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I asked artanis to clarify the kp, not bugs, because it didn't say it in the OP and if you actually read the thread I'm the one asking about it. I fake claimed cop because I was likely one of the only blues in the game and probably could. Just because I don't give a shit doesn't make me mafia. There's 100s of my town games where I just don't give a shit about the game and conveniently this just happens to be a weekend I'm busy purchasing a house. Why should I talk about anyone else when mz is a lurker in my point of view. He comes in to make one post or two every 24 hours. Koshi similarly. Alakaslam no idea whatsoever. I think it's pretty opportune to push me over any of these people when anyone knows the only alignment I actually care about winning is as mafia. Town I just want to be correct and do my own thing. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 21:55 wherebugsgo wrote: I mean, you have to choose someone even according to your own logic because you said myself and Pandain can't be scum together Thus my vote is only on one of you. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
What's my mafia explanation bugs and why are you trying to twist it to something when it's really quite straightforward? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 17:48 Holyflare wrote: If dodging means skipping over it because it should be really obvious then yes. I didn't think what vivax had done was enough to read him anything, as stated in all of those posts. I still don't know why, for the fourth time, you quote my poe post as if it's some revelation. It's poe, process of elimination. The list is simply people I don't town read that I think are most likely to be mafia because it's within their range. That is why vivax is there because his activity is either afk or his staple mafia play. That is why koshi, who I actually town read slightly day 1 is there, because koshi is perfectly capable of appearing town for short spans of time day 1. Please answer this bugs. Why do you incessantly push my poe list as something scummy? Do you understand what poe is? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 22:31 wherebugsgo wrote: cool story bro, it's literally unbelievable that if you're actually the veteran it took you 30+ minutes to vote him after he talked about there being multiple KP. If you're actually the veteran you'd have just called him scum in the exact same post immediately rather than going to read the OP, asking him if he's dumbtelling, asking him if he's played in a game of this size with more than 1 kp, etc. Not really unbelievable at all? I checked op after he said it and it said nothing. I asked him to clarify since just voting him would likely reveal my role and then I asked artanis for clarification twice. Once to see if I get notified which was actually in the op that I didn't read and a second to ask about whether mafia would have an extra factional kp would it be in the op since there wasn't an extra role with kp. All those things take time. Also just because I haven't read someone doesn't mean they can't be in my poe? They're in my poe exactly because I haven't read them and my gut from interaction wasn't a town read. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 02 2019 18:58 Holyflare wrote: And all those shitty afkers and ff I guess but pointless trying to include those shitters yet. Interestingly ff left pandain out of his read list. Literally the next post after my list. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
What has mz done since that required me to take a stance on him? Like I said, he's done shit all. Also I quite categorically do mention him in my filter. I ask him when he's going to stop fannying around not voting Jock, which now Jock has flipped town makes him look more suspicious. Regardless, I don't have enough information because he just hasn't posted enough. If anyone says they can form an opinion on him they're either lying or wrong. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 22:44 wherebugsgo wrote: keep digging yourself deeper, your explanations just keep surfacing more questions and make it clear you're just making this up on the spot. If you asked for clarification and were worried about revealing your role by just voting him why wouldn't you wait until after the question was answered to vote him? Also, if FF and slam were voting your supposed scumread of Pandain, why the fuck would they be completely null to you? Because artanis answered that I wouldn't be notified and then I voted him and then I asked the kp question as far as I remember. I'll double check in a bit. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 23:18 Holyflare wrote: Because artanis answered that I wouldn't be notified and then I voted him and then I asked the kp question as far as I remember. I'll double check in a bit. 19 minute difference. It's ok if you don't believe it. Literally no skin off my back I'd rather just by a house. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 23:23 VisceraEyes wrote: I'm not beyond convincing Holyflare, you just have to convince me that you ACTUALLY BELIEVE that there's only one power-role in this game and that YOU'RE IT, the Town Veteran. I never said I believe I'm the only power role. I just meant it's more unlikely I'd get someone to counterclaim because I know I'm literally one of them. Rescinded it anyway because I wasn't achieving enough info that I desired particularly. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
If you think this is the play of the best mafia player on the site in his mafia element haphazardly claiming, skimming the thread and commenting or whatever then ok? You'd be incredibly wrong but I'm sure you can search holyflare and apathetic or some variant in that search bar and correlate how many times I've been like and town. I thought bugs would have done that by now but I guess it doesn't fit his narrative that I'm mafia. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I think bugs tries to twist everything I say into some mafia narrative repeatedly. He's extremely likely mafia. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
![]() | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 04 2019 23:57 VisceraEyes wrote: But it was a joke that conceded to Pandain that he dunked on your chain of events with facts. You did the same shit earlier when bugs dunked on you about why he asked Jock about Incog's guide or whatever...he had a reason for doing it, a very obvious one that you did NOT catch (maybe because you're mafia?) and when he clued you in you just retreated and joked about it. Your whole game has felt manipulative and, frankly I have to agree with Bugs now, opportunistic. This whole situation right now feels opportunistic, yuo're not interested in talking to me but you'll do quote wars with Bugs, putting in all kinds of effort. It's like you KNOW that thread control has changed hands and you can't be arsed unless it's worth it to you. No not at all. He didn't present facts, just how he FELT at the time which I genuinely think my version is more apt. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Koshi even maybe. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Dude it was a fucking joke lol, it was obviously a rayn fake claim? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 02:58 Holyflare wrote: Dude it was a fucking joke lol, it was obviously a rayn fake claim? Not only that but on the off chance they were fucking morons and believed it then they might just have shot me and that would have been great. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 03:01 Grackaroni wrote: Is Koshi going to show up today? Let's assume pandain is town. Really really have to stretch our imaginations but let's just pretend. Now let's also do something crazy and pretend bugs is the opposite alignment to what he is. What has koshi achieved other than complete apathy and small posts and almost 0 activity after vivax was modkilled? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 03:06 Grackaroni wrote: You think Pandain and WBG are not together though don't you? From the bugs defence yeah. If I'd have to pick one current I'm leaning more towards bugs being mafia really. He feels very much like BC did in that game I lynched Palmar where he tries to twist everything to a narrative about me being mafia and there's no middle ground. He also keeps rehashing the same arguments over and over again. Like the poe thing I really cant wrap my head around how he thinks it's scummy and then it's like every time I just simply tell the truth it's another "aha and this is why you're mafia too!" which seems extremely flawed. I get the vibe he's a brute force kind of mafia player that doesn't quite understand thread sentiment and the nuances of when to back off pushing something to appear genuine. It reads very forced. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 03:07 Pandain wrote: If you're town you're completely tunneled on me. Unfortunately if I was around when you first started making arguments you probably would not still be talking about me, but because I was essentially afk for 48 hours means your biases had time to fester and control your perspective and disallow an actual fresh reasoned view. Nothing I did was weird or strange, and what I said regarding my mindset is supported by my posts (apathy on Jock, etc..) Sorry I feel the way I do? That's just mafia. You don't have to keep repeating yourself. I've heard your side and I have my side. It's not going to change my view with you voting me and not discussing other people though. I didn't dislike the bc thing but I need more of it. BC you have one accusation against me that was explained by me being vet (my vote on Pandain) and your quote about me saying the game was easy was from me saying I had a red check. What's your new reason for voting for me and how is what I did in this game different from what you pushed me for when you were mafia and I was town and lynched palmar. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I know my vote is on you Pandain but I'll unvote you just as a sign of good faith because I really don't think you should be lynched over slam/mz/koshi. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 03:18 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Did you not read the thread? I think I was pretty clear when the entire you becoming a lynch was appearing with where I was coming from. Did I outright accuse you? no. Instead I discussed the possibility with the other people in the thread and we came to a consensus. You claiming Vet tbh is more or less a non issue as any claim you make in thread I just dont believe. I can't given your track record. I did read the thread and that is why I'm questioning yoir motives because out of everyone your posts were the most cherry picked out of context ones. You accused me of having a weird vote on Pandain which wasn't weird because I was vet and there is simply no other explanation for that unless I was mafia and simply planning to claim vet all along which is what you must now claim I had to have been doing but haven't actually claimed that. You just haven't really used logic to put that part of the puzzle together. You cherry picked my easy game post which was out of context and to do with my fake cop check. You then said I should be able to show why Pandain is mafia through his own words and not my twisted turn of events but at no point have you EVER highlighted where my accusation of Pandain is incorrect AT ALL. In fact people keep saying my accusation of Pandain was wrong WHEN THE DUDE HIMSELF CAME AND SAID IT WAS RIGHT. How twisted do you have to be to twist that accusation. My case is simply pandain said he thought jock was scummy and never actually voted for him. Which is true. Cold hard facts my friend. If you think otherwise please point me in the direction to where I twisted this into the narrative you claim. Pandain's defence is that it's true he did that but it was day 1 and his scum read wasn't really that secure and he believed his meta on rels was better despite everyone telling him it was wrong. His defence is literally that he didn't believe other people knew rels afkd as town and then he wanted another lynch than Jock. That's fine. He is entitled to that view and I am not saying he can't be town with that view. I am simply saying his hesitance on voting jock is way more likely from mafia pandain than town. Coupled with what I also added, that Pandain was way too eager to claim credit for vivax flipping I think it's a solid case. Why have you never commented on it? I don't even know what you think of Pandain. All I see was a circle jerk of yoj, mafia bugs and VE cherry picking content and then throwing out useless and wrong accusations. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 03:20 VisceraEyes wrote: It's almost as if you were describing YOUR play in this game up to this moment. Can you point to one point in this game VE where I have cherry picked something and not critically evaluated it or had reasons for what I've done? One. Just fucking one. Prove this and I will bend over, let you fuck over town and lynch myself. I'll wait. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 03:30 VisceraEyes wrote: At this point both of MZ and Pandain would have to switch off HF to sway the lynch imo. I think it's probably safe. I'm still waiting for you. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 03:31 VisceraEyes wrote: Nah, because you're going to bend over and let me lynch you anyway. Rather, convince me to lynch someone else, someone like Pandain or MZ. I know you're down to lynch MZ. Fuck off. The whole premise as to why I'm mafia from bugs and bc is that I'm opportunistic and cherry pick and twist narratives. If you can't point to even one part of this game where I have done that then fuck you. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 03:33 Holyflare wrote: Fuck off. The whole premise as to why I'm mafia from bugs and bc is that I'm opportunistic and cherry pick and twist narratives. If you can't point to even one part of this game where I have done that then fuck you. You're one of the people that have even perpetuated this and literally just posted about it. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 03:34 VisceraEyes wrote: I don't have to, bugs already did, I looked myself and agreed and moved my vote. You can get angry and indignant all you want, but you had an opportunity to say all this before now. Link me to this proof. Right now. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 03:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote: So HF, He said he thought Jock was a good lynch, but thought Rels was a better lynch, then chose Vivax for basically the same reason. Fuck, like, He stated his reasons for voting and you are damning him for it. Based on that logic, the fact you fake claimed to kill bugs but are now pushing pandain means we should lynch you because you thought bugs was worth the fake claim. On May 03 2019 04:33 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Mostly caught up at the moment. Pandain/Grack are both shady to me thus far from what i've read. Mainly as both of them have been fairly active overall but the content they have both posted is basically non existent. This is very very similar to how Pandain posted in end of the world mafia. Ie situationally active and talks about things but never seriously pushes them. Trying to hard imo to appear as town while providing no effort. The next big tell for me is he actively agreed with the Jock Lynch but opted to vote for someone who hadn't started posting yet then swapped his vote with 0 stated reasons. Grack literally had a filter of 0 content for how long it is so he is clearly around but not doing anything of value. Although at this point I feel that one of HF/Rayn/Bugs could be mafia. Unsure of who. Bugs as mafia (in the past) when I have played with him has been super aggressive similar to how aggressive I can be and hes not this game. However I disagree with basically all his reads and I think he should be better than that. I personally find reading HF and Rayn insanely hard and until I am 100% sure one of them is mafia I am not prepared for the potential shit storm that creates. Should we fucking lynch you or what? What a hypocritical fuck. This is literally what you YOU have said about Pandain. He was the top of your mafia list. NOW IT'S ME WITH THE TWISTING NARRATIVE LOL. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Extremely convenient. I can only assume you're mafia. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 02 2019 07:14 Holyflare wrote: This guy is suspect numero uno. Anybody that uses the phrase "that's scummy regardless of Jock's alignment" is a guy that has tmi and makes it want to look like he's weighing up his options. Let us also not forget that he agreed with all the points on Jock, fought against rayn that jock looked scummy, said rayn was scummy for not trying to save his town read and then dropped it all to try and shenanigan with rayn. Let us also not forget that Pandain wanted to lynch rels (based on incorrect meta that was highlighted several times already) despite a wagon building on Jock, his also scum read, to make rels active again. Then when that didn't take off, Pandain, master of misdirection, avoided joining the jock wagon (his scum read) again for terrible shenanigans. Then when Jock, his scum read, flipped town (after pandain said he's probably town for no discernable reason why arguing that he was still mafia) Pandain decides to call the entire wagon on Jock, his scum read, and also maybe town read, mafia. No thanks. You mafia mate. Lynch Pandain when I'm gone. This is my Pandain case which literally only bugs has EVER talked about. It mentions everything you called out Pandain for BC, literally everything. Yet now you use your same post as an accusation for me. No way. What is cherry picked in this case? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 03:41 BloodyC0bbler wrote: and then I made this post here HF. I have a 3 page filter. Cherry pick me more? THAT'S NOT WHAT CHERRY PICKING IS LOL. YOU you you, have said that I have CHERRY PICKED my case on pandain. That means I've extrapolated information incorrectly and used it to formulate a push in a bad way. This is extremely false because it's the same thing you posted. Either you have also cherry picked a pandain case or I have not. If you say I have then you also have. Just because things after the fact you say exonerate Pandain doesn't mean that I have to agree or disagree with them. If I disagree with your premise and say that people fake dumb tells like that all the time that is then a divergent path in our reads, not a cherry picked case being pushed. You are the one now saying that our disagreement is in fact cherry picking and a twisted narrative. Where does that twisted narrative ever occur BC? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Jock, played extremely differently to any of his games. My meta was correct, it just didn't make him mafia. Pandain: On May 03 2019 04:42 Pandain wrote: Decent argument but unfortunately it fails to keep in mind one key thing. It's day 1, and any of my reads are weak. So yes, I agreed with Jock playing weird and even suspiciously. I stated as such and even stated that I don't think he was a bad lynch. But that doesn't mean I was completely or even [b] mostly [b] convinced he was mafia. And when you're saying that I was trying to get Rels lynched despite being suspicious of jock, you totally fail to fucking realize I was more suspicious of rels than jock, so your whole argument is moot because I wanted to lynch someone who I thought was more suspicious. So when I switched to someone rayn pointed out was actually a good chance of being mafia , vivax, of course I finally switched and stayed. Also yes I read that rels sucks as day 1 even as town, but honestly I personally don't know that and I never really just "trust" people on what they say about other's people's metas. All I know is Rels played like how he did exactly when he was mafia with me. But especially as he didn't post at all by the end of the day, which is very different than just lurking for mosting of it, I didn't really feel confident with him either and that would just be a chance lynch. And I grew more convinced Jock was town near the end because of the complete lack of activity (there was only me and grack and rayn for the last hour), which doesn't seem like it would be likely if jock was mafia. That's his rebuttal to my case. He essentially agrees to the premise of it, doesn't say I've cherry picked anything or created a narrative and then just explains his thought process. If the guy I accuse doesn't say it's cherry picked why do other people? Sure, I don't necessarily see eye to eye with Pandain at this point but it's not cherry picked or opportunistic or any of those words. It's a simple accusation. Push on bugs opportunistic? Dude is scummy af looking tbh. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 03:51 BloodyC0bbler wrote: I have literally used the word cherry picking once and it was when you cherry picked 1 of my posts while ignoring another. Would would create a false narrative. However. If you really need to know. For all your "case" you have on pandain you didnt fucking vote for him because you still werent sure he was mafia UNTIL HE MENTIONED A POSSIBILITY OF MULTIPLE MAFIA KP. YOU THEN USED THAT AS THE MAIN REASON YOU VOTED FOR HIM. For fucks sake dude. that is literally what you did. Because of the whole bugs and pandain interaction yes. That is why I fake claimed to get a reaction from bugs and see if it would solidify that relationship even more. There's a method behind the madness... Somewhere. I had literally 0 reasons not to vote pandain other than bugs and UNTIL pandain did something that went against my ROLE which I would have had to have done so many things to plan for as mafia : Plan to fake cop on bugs while also planning to really have an endgame strat of claiming veteran afterwards and basing my whole play around that claim so that any kind of slip like that I would have instantly outed myself to trade 1 single town player (if I was mafia) for myself and then also have to fucking deal with people asking why I'm not dead the following thousand cycles and arguing about it pointlessly forever. Or I could just do the much simpler mafia strategy of doing none of that and not creating an intricate dichotomy between bugs and pandain and just simply lynch pandain for free be because almost everyone is onboard. No way do I ever do the first. Never. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
If I do then just let me know and I'll correct myself. I did it d1 straight away when I caught myself accusing you in regards to jock and I'd do it again wherever necessary. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 03:51 VisceraEyes wrote: I kinda felt like you twisted the narrative with all the "that was obviously a joke" and "I'm a cop with a redcheck" and "I'm buying a house I won't be around" Like, it just seems to me like you're playing dishonestly. Rayn tried to talk to you about bugs on N1 and you trolled all over him. I'm actually a little relieved mafia killed rayn because he was going to go ape shit on D2 and we were ALL going to have to deal with that, I'm surprised mafia even bothered. But they did, and your VERY FIRST WORDS were ....like sure, you were "reaction testing" or whatever with a fake-claim - I get it - but it just seems REEEEEEEALY convenient that Rayn dies with bugs name on his lips and the VERY FIRST thing you do, and REALLY THE ONLY THING YOU DO THIS DAY is try to get bugs lynched through one means or another. Have you read my n1 posts....? It's literally accusing bugs all night. I can't help if you feel I'm playing dishonestly. It's really not the case: + Show Spoiler + ![]() ![]() ![]() If there's one thing I just like doing in my mafia games above all it's having fun, trolling people sometimes (sometimes a lot). It gets into these spots sure but at least I have fun doing it in an environment that often gets heated. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 04:03 VisceraEyes wrote: Holyflare where's your partner? You got fucking fucked guy, is it Grack? He's the ONLY ONE trying to save you. Ergo.... Nobody is saving me Thus my alignment must be.... | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 04:04 wherebugsgo wrote: I mean, this would ordinarily be an amazing fucking argument. Like, I actually was on board with "nah HF would never fake claim here as scum" and 100% believed the claim when you made it because I was like he has to be a cop here. But of course, you have a history of fake claiming. and you know that. Which makes all of these completely alignment non-indicative because you and I both know, as some of the better scum players on these forums, that in order not get lynched for a deviation between your town and scum plays you have to do exactly what you would do as town. Or at least, you need to try to do exactly what you think others would expect you to do as town. And in your case, that's fake claim. Can people stop saying this like they know my meta. I can't think of a single game (maybe one but I'm not even sure if it's exactly one or not) in 100+ games where I have actually fake claimed a role as mafia but I can think of almost every game that I have as town. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 04:10 wherebugsgo wrote: grack I hope you're just a clueless townie here because if HF flips scum you're going to have a lot of explaining to do Do you understand how this mafia game works. When have you ever seen a mafia hard defend their teammate like this? I can't even think of any instance. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 04:12 Grackaroni wrote: lol the last time you said this you linked me to a filter of your scum QT to prove it and in the QT you were like "I'm going to claim cop lolololol." But DID I claim cop grack DID I? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
And if I did well then at least I'm consistent in my arguments when I'm town. Even if they're wrong. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 04:14 wherebugsgo wrote: hello? The last game we played together, I did exactly that?? rofl I literally don't remember. It's certainly not the norm for people to do. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 04:15 Holyflare wrote: I literally don't remember. It's certainly not the norm for people to do. Maybe it's worth it if the votes are close but they aren't really that close and who exactly is grack trying to convince? Likely mafia and some afkers. Hardly worth it if at all. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 04:16 Holyflare wrote: Maybe it's worth it if the votes are close but they aren't really that close and who exactly is grack trying to convince? Likely mafia and some afkers. Hardly worth it if at all. This doesn't even make sense but you get what I mean. It's not worth it if we're both mafia at least. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 03:17 Holyflare wrote: I think at this point even though I haven't and most likely still won't read MZ's filter I am pretty sure he has to be mafia. Of all the people that have voted me or fabricated reasons on me or cherry picked he's the only one that's simply hopped on with no critical evaluation or hesitance. He just exists in this game coming out of the woodwork to ask a few questions and back away into blending again. I know my vote is on you Pandain but I'll unvote you just as a sign of good faith because I really don't think you should be lynched over slam/mz/koshi. Can anyone counter this mz is mafia case? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 04:30 wherebugsgo wrote: even in the 0.001% chance that HF is town, we are still ahead and we have the opportunity to lynch into MZ and whoever else could possibly be scum afterward. Today, HF is the lynch. End of story. What negative is there to keeping myself, someone who types a lot and can give a lot of information if I were mafia or town over killing someone you think is mafia mz and getting rid of a lurker. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 04:39 VisceraEyes wrote: Ya I'm having fun regardless of the outcome of this game, I WOULD like a bit more activity from lurkers, but overall it's been fun. HF I won't lie, I could see you being town here too, and if you're town I'm sorry. It just feels like an HF mafia game and I have a chance to do something about it. COME ON YOU HAVE TO ADMIT, I wouldn't usually be able to lynch you REGARDLESS of your alignment, so this is actually like...a new experience for me. AND I DO COME TO BAT FOR YOU PRETTY OFTEN. Like, even in this game IT TOOK CONVINCING to get me on this train. So don't get mad if you're town. You took very little convincing and you couldn't even come up with any situation where the thing that convinced you was true and then made up something else which I just showed you screenshots and pictures of not being a lie. If you're too chicken to be independent and make a good decision and just want to defer to mafia or people that are incorrect because really you're just fear lynching me that's ok too. I won't hold it against you. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 04:43 VisceraEyes wrote: I DID WARN YOU I WAS VERY EXPLICIT ABOUT FEAR LYNCHING YOU VERY It's ok ve I forgive you. My shiny blue name will forever be a tarnish to your name. Mz is right here doing nothing though. The option is always available. Do you scum read mz? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I was just stressed and busy and distracted and demotivated. Now It's all ok, I'd like to play properly if you'll let me. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 04:48 VisceraEyes wrote: No I don't really deserve it it's fine. I just was under an illusion that I had it. That illusion doesn't exist anymore. It's actually a little freeing. No, you do. You're the only one here that tried to talk to me instead of burying me under wrong incessant accusations. I may have fobbed you off and I'm sorry but it was annoyingly just as I was putting in an offer and going to lunch with my parents so I really couldn't have cared less but that's no reflection on you. You have appeared universally towny. If you are mafia that's a great trait and if you're town that's even better. I commend you as a player and a nice dude. This is all appealing to emotion but I don't want you to feel down. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 04:50 VisceraEyes wrote: Small blocs are so useless though because mafia get to kill people. More people need to be active and trying to figure shit out so this shit can actually solve the game. I used to actively try and build that shit. It literally never worked once. I am here for that and can be here for that if you give me ONE more cycle. I promise to do my best. You can sit at the sidelines and watch me and just lynch me or interact and we can try to solve. I can't save you at night and nobody will because I'm the vet but it's the best I can offer. Lynch a lurker and we improve town and maybe even lynch actual mafia. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 04:53 wherebugsgo wrote: uh hello I tried to talk to you and you told me I don't know how to read that's okay though. I said some things that I guess you didn't like You don't know how to read as evidenced by your push on me. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I did most of my cases and talking at night? No other way to play vet than playing towny. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Nobody has countered the mz points. I'm one or the people that can spam the shit out of the thread with info and you're voting me off. There is no case. Lynch mz lynch bugs | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 04:59 Grackaroni wrote: Save yourself Holyflare! No. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 05 2019 05:00 wherebugsgo wrote: also I think the bs about calling rayn dumb about mafia having RBer was a scumtell it's a 14p setup, this site uses 13p often. Unless it's 4 mafia vs a fuck ton of blues, on town side this is probably as close to all-vanilla as can be Die mafia fuck | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
These are my dying words. | ||
| ||