|
On April 20 2016 03:19 justanothertownie wrote: The more you do this the more I think you are just trying to rile me up and to undermine my standing in this town. BTW since you were arguing about basic mafia play, if you were town and I was scum, I wouldn't go against the hardest player to go against for no reason. There is no point in doing that.
|
On April 20 2016 03:37 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2016 03:19 justanothertownie wrote: The more you do this the more I think you are just trying to rile me up and to undermine my standing in this town. BTW since you were arguing about basic mafia play, if you were town and I was scum, I wouldn't go against the hardest player to go against for no reason. There is no point in doing that. There are only 2 options:
1) You are doing exactly this. 2) You are misrepresenting me and calling me mafia for things that don't make anyone mafia as town. Forgive me for having my doubts about that.
|
On April 20 2016 03:26 Superbia wrote: About to head to movies. I'm town doc boys. =/
Lynch someone else (TW/maybe SL).
hmm, that sounds familiar.
Obi day 1:
He really doesn't, but what else can we do? The best I can suggest is a GB/ possibly SL wagon but those are shots in the dark.
How to make it look like your willing to lynch your scum mate (while not actually really threatening them) 101.
|
On April 20 2016 03:41 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2016 03:37 Rels wrote:On April 20 2016 03:19 justanothertownie wrote: The more you do this the more I think you are just trying to rile me up and to undermine my standing in this town. BTW since you were arguing about basic mafia play, if you were town and I was scum, I wouldn't go against the hardest player to go against for no reason. There is no point in doing that. There are only 2 options: 1) You are doing exactly this. 2) You are misrepresenting me and calling me mafia for things that don't make anyone mafia as town. Forgive me for having my doubts about that. 3) You are scum and you're angry I caught you over something so simple
|
On April 20 2016 03:44 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2016 03:41 justanothertownie wrote:On April 20 2016 03:37 Rels wrote:On April 20 2016 03:19 justanothertownie wrote: The more you do this the more I think you are just trying to rile me up and to undermine my standing in this town. BTW since you were arguing about basic mafia play, if you were town and I was scum, I wouldn't go against the hardest player to go against for no reason. There is no point in doing that. There are only 2 options: 1) You are doing exactly this. 2) You are misrepresenting me and calling me mafia for things that don't make anyone mafia as town. Forgive me for having my doubts about that. 3) You are scum and you're angry I caught you over something so simple Even if I was mafia 2) would still apply.
|
On April 20 2016 03:41 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2016 03:37 Rels wrote:On April 20 2016 03:19 justanothertownie wrote: The more you do this the more I think you are just trying to rile me up and to undermine my standing in this town. BTW since you were arguing about basic mafia play, if you were town and I was scum, I wouldn't go against the hardest player to go against for no reason. There is no point in doing that. There are only 2 options: 1) You are doing exactly this. 2) You are misrepresenting me and calling me mafia for things that don't make anyone mafia as town. Forgive me for having my doubts about that.
Dont make this into a dick measuring contest jat -_- sometimes townies go after townies for whatever reason. It happens, it's called days 1-3(assuming towns lucky enough for it to end there). If rels is scum here with super he has no reason to go after you, as his third scum buddy is unlikely to be more townie than him.
If rels is scum, and super is about to be lynched no matter what, right now he just has to settle in for the long haul and do whatever it takes not to get spotlighted.
Arguing with you is not the way to do that.
|
On April 20 2016 03:46 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2016 03:44 Rels wrote:On April 20 2016 03:41 justanothertownie wrote:On April 20 2016 03:37 Rels wrote:On April 20 2016 03:19 justanothertownie wrote: The more you do this the more I think you are just trying to rile me up and to undermine my standing in this town. BTW since you were arguing about basic mafia play, if you were town and I was scum, I wouldn't go against the hardest player to go against for no reason. There is no point in doing that. There are only 2 options: 1) You are doing exactly this. 2) You are misrepresenting me and calling me mafia for things that don't make anyone mafia as town. Forgive me for having my doubts about that. 3) You are scum and you're angry I caught you over something so simple Even if I was mafia 2) would still apply. Case in point ^^ Now let's shut it down unless I reread your interactions after Superbia's flip.
|
|
On April 20 2016 03:48 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2016 03:46 justanothertownie wrote:On April 20 2016 03:44 Rels wrote:On April 20 2016 03:41 justanothertownie wrote:On April 20 2016 03:37 Rels wrote:On April 20 2016 03:19 justanothertownie wrote: The more you do this the more I think you are just trying to rile me up and to undermine my standing in this town. BTW since you were arguing about basic mafia play, if you were town and I was scum, I wouldn't go against the hardest player to go against for no reason. There is no point in doing that. There are only 2 options: 1) You are doing exactly this. 2) You are misrepresenting me and calling me mafia for things that don't make anyone mafia as town. Forgive me for having my doubts about that. 3) You are scum and you're angry I caught you over something so simple Even if I was mafia 2) would still apply. Case in point ^^ Now let's shut it down unless I reread your interactions after Superbia's flip. Shutting it down would be better for you regardless of your alignment. Agreed.
|
On April 20 2016 03:44 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2016 03:41 justanothertownie wrote:On April 20 2016 03:37 Rels wrote:On April 20 2016 03:19 justanothertownie wrote: The more you do this the more I think you are just trying to rile me up and to undermine my standing in this town. BTW since you were arguing about basic mafia play, if you were town and I was scum, I wouldn't go against the hardest player to go against for no reason. There is no point in doing that. There are only 2 options: 1) You are doing exactly this. 2) You are misrepresenting me and calling me mafia for things that don't make anyone mafia as town. Forgive me for having my doubts about that. 3) You are scum and you're angry I caught you over something so simple
yous a derp rels, a big ol / : derp.
I'll ask you the same question I asked tumble (I will be assuming super is scum for this question, as this whole argument is predicated on that and you insist on having it before the flip so there ya go)
If jat is scum, then he must have okd the shot on palmer in order to give supers vig claim weight.
if so, why did he immediatly shoot that possibility down?
Ok, I assume the vig shot fazers. Everything else would make me quite mad. Superbia claims with his first post today.
better yet, why did he go through with it in the first place? If he was scum, wouldn't he realize that shooting the same guy that super claimed he would kill would make no sense and would hurt his position far more than just a flat doc claim at the start of the day? Did he not realize fazzers had a good shot of dying?
It's ether a terrible oversight, or a flat out terrible play. Something I dont think ether of you would let go through.
|
On April 20 2016 03:53 gumshoe wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2016 03:44 Rels wrote:On April 20 2016 03:41 justanothertownie wrote:On April 20 2016 03:37 Rels wrote:On April 20 2016 03:19 justanothertownie wrote: The more you do this the more I think you are just trying to rile me up and to undermine my standing in this town. BTW since you were arguing about basic mafia play, if you were town and I was scum, I wouldn't go against the hardest player to go against for no reason. There is no point in doing that. There are only 2 options: 1) You are doing exactly this. 2) You are misrepresenting me and calling me mafia for things that don't make anyone mafia as town. Forgive me for having my doubts about that. 3) You are scum and you're angry I caught you over something so simple yous a derp rels, a big ol / : derp. I'll ask you the same question I asked tumble (I will be assuming super is scum for this question, as this whole argument is predicated on that and you insist on having it before the flip so there ya go) If jat is scum, then he must have okd the shot on palmer in order to give supers vig claim weight. if so, why did he immediatly shoot that possibility down? Show nested quote +Ok, I assume the vig shot fazers. Everything else would make me quite mad. Superbia claims with his first post today. better yet, why did he go through with it in the first place? If he was scum, wouldn't he realize that shooting the same guy that super claimed he would kill would make no sense and would hurt his position far more than just a flat doc claim at the start of the day? Did he not realize fazzers had a good shot of dying? It's ether a terrible oversight, or a flat out terrible play. Something I dont think ether of you would let go through. There is also the possibility that mafia just accepted that superbia was going down today and killed Palmar because a) he is a good player and their attempt to mislynch him while he was away failed b) he was an unlikely medic save. Palmar dying is not a reason to read me anything.
|
Sry gumshoe but I don't think your "vig kill" theory is likely. Palmar is a strong player and he got shot, maybe it was because of your plan which would mean the scumteam are complete idiots, and maybe he was shot because he is a strong player and nothing can be assumed about the scum team.
|
See, even JAT is saying his team didn't kill Palmar because of a stupid plan. =D
|
On April 20 2016 03:57 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2016 03:53 gumshoe wrote:On April 20 2016 03:44 Rels wrote:On April 20 2016 03:41 justanothertownie wrote:On April 20 2016 03:37 Rels wrote:On April 20 2016 03:19 justanothertownie wrote: The more you do this the more I think you are just trying to rile me up and to undermine my standing in this town. BTW since you were arguing about basic mafia play, if you were town and I was scum, I wouldn't go against the hardest player to go against for no reason. There is no point in doing that. There are only 2 options: 1) You are doing exactly this. 2) You are misrepresenting me and calling me mafia for things that don't make anyone mafia as town. Forgive me for having my doubts about that. 3) You are scum and you're angry I caught you over something so simple yous a derp rels, a big ol / : derp. I'll ask you the same question I asked tumble (I will be assuming super is scum for this question, as this whole argument is predicated on that and you insist on having it before the flip so there ya go) If jat is scum, then he must have okd the shot on palmer in order to give supers vig claim weight. if so, why did he immediatly shoot that possibility down? Ok, I assume the vig shot fazers. Everything else would make me quite mad. Superbia claims with his first post today. better yet, why did he go through with it in the first place? If he was scum, wouldn't he realize that shooting the same guy that super claimed he would kill would make no sense and would hurt his position far more than just a flat doc claim at the start of the day? Did he not realize fazzers had a good shot of dying? It's ether a terrible oversight, or a flat out terrible play. Something I dont think ether of you would let go through. There is also the possibility that mafia just accepted that superbia was going down today and killed Palmar because a) he is a good player and their attempt to mislynch him while he was away failed b) he was an unlikely medic save. Palmar dying is not a reason to read me anything.
wrong, palmer dying throws suspicion onto super. as why would scum shoot the guy super claimed he was going to kill? unless they knew he was never going to kill him. Ie, scum knows supers not vig, how, cause supers scum. Hence why scum shot palmer without fear.
it outright makes no sense unless they were trying to pass it off as a vig shot. It was so very derp and I dont see a player like your rels letting that slip
|
On April 20 2016 04:00 gumshoe wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2016 03:57 justanothertownie wrote:On April 20 2016 03:53 gumshoe wrote:On April 20 2016 03:44 Rels wrote:On April 20 2016 03:41 justanothertownie wrote:On April 20 2016 03:37 Rels wrote:On April 20 2016 03:19 justanothertownie wrote: The more you do this the more I think you are just trying to rile me up and to undermine my standing in this town. BTW since you were arguing about basic mafia play, if you were town and I was scum, I wouldn't go against the hardest player to go against for no reason. There is no point in doing that. There are only 2 options: 1) You are doing exactly this. 2) You are misrepresenting me and calling me mafia for things that don't make anyone mafia as town. Forgive me for having my doubts about that. 3) You are scum and you're angry I caught you over something so simple yous a derp rels, a big ol / : derp. I'll ask you the same question I asked tumble (I will be assuming super is scum for this question, as this whole argument is predicated on that and you insist on having it before the flip so there ya go) If jat is scum, then he must have okd the shot on palmer in order to give supers vig claim weight. if so, why did he immediatly shoot that possibility down? Ok, I assume the vig shot fazers. Everything else would make me quite mad. Superbia claims with his first post today. better yet, why did he go through with it in the first place? If he was scum, wouldn't he realize that shooting the same guy that super claimed he would kill would make no sense and would hurt his position far more than just a flat doc claim at the start of the day? Did he not realize fazzers had a good shot of dying? It's ether a terrible oversight, or a flat out terrible play. Something I dont think ether of you would let go through. There is also the possibility that mafia just accepted that superbia was going down today and killed Palmar because a) he is a good player and their attempt to mislynch him while he was away failed b) he was an unlikely medic save. Palmar dying is not a reason to read me anything. wrong, palmer dying throws suspicion onto super. as why would scum shoot the guy super claimed he was going to kill? unless they knew he was never going to kill him. Ie, scum knows supers not vig, how, cause supers scum. Hence why scum shot palmer without fear. it outright makes no sense unless they were trying to pass it off as a vig shot. It was so very derp and I dont see a player like your rels letting that slip If super is mafia they know the vig won't shoot Palmar therefore I am not sure I am following your logic. If super is mafia they also knew that he will have to claim medic and not vig in almost every possible scenario anways. The only way he could survive another day fakeclaiming vig is if they rb the vig n1.
|
On April 20 2016 03:58 Rels wrote: Sry gumshoe but I don't think your "vig kill" theory is likely. Palmar is a strong player and he got shot, maybe it was because of your plan which would mean the scumteam are complete idiots, and maybe he was shot because he is a strong player and nothing can be assumed about the scum team.
I am asserting the scum team are complete idiots.
ok. follow along I am going to make this really fucking simple
super claims. Scum has no idea what he is if super is town.
Super says hes going to shoot palmer
if super is not scum, why would scum shoot plamer thereby risking 2 kp on one target considering palmer was going to possibly die anyway?
the only explanation is scum knew that super wouldnt vig shoot palmer. They only way they could know that is if super is scum.
therefore, shot onto palmer=completely outing super.
is that so very complicated?
|
so scum knew super wasnt going to shoot palmer for sure (hence revealing him as scum)
scum being idiots (at least for night 1) is not a matter of speculation, it is a fact
they did not have to make the palmer shot call if they wanted to kill palmer, but they did, and if super did that of his own accord, someone competent (jat/rels) would have switched the target to avoid outing super completely.
hence scum=derp.
|
Yeah I don't follow. Let's assume Superbia is scum. Why do you assume Superbia wanted to maybe claim vig ? JAT is right in that the only claim he can make is doc.
|
On April 20 2016 04:03 gumshoe wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2016 03:58 Rels wrote: Sry gumshoe but I don't think your "vig kill" theory is likely. Palmar is a strong player and he got shot, maybe it was because of your plan which would mean the scumteam are complete idiots, and maybe he was shot because he is a strong player and nothing can be assumed about the scum team. I am asserting the scum team are complete idiots. ok. follow along I am going to make this really fucking simple super claims. Scum has no idea what he is if super is town. Super says hes going to shoot palmer if super is not scum, why would scum shoot plamer thereby risking 2 kp on one target considering palmer was going to possibly die anyway?the only explanation is scum knew that super wouldnt vig shoot palmer. They only way they could know that is if super is scum. therefore, shot onto palmer=completely outing super. is that so very complicated? They could also just rb super which is what they probably did if he is town. So since noone else would make that shot they knew they weren't risking 2 KP. Alternatively like I said earlier it is entirely possible that mafia decided superbia was basically dead already and didn't think about anything like that when making their kill.
|
I am starting to understand your thought process though. I disagree with your conclusion but it makes sense.
|
|
|
|