|
On June 14 2015 05:56 geript wrote: I've really been trying to be much nicer when I play, but there's a serious lack a brain cells if that argument catches on. Wow, what a compelling argument. Guys, I guess geript is town after all.
|
On June 14 2015 06:02 MoosyDoosy wrote: I think the better thing to discuss in terms of roles now that we're all voting for geript is finding who the doctors should save for night time. We should definitely not talk about this.
Let the blue roles decide how to use their abilities. Talking about it openly only gives scum more information, which can be extremely valuable.
|
|
I need to head off now, I'll do my best to be back before the deadline, but can't guarantee it. Family comes first.
I think I've only lynched scum on Day 1 once before. And never in a newbie game.
|
Wow.... I don't even.
I'll take a look at geript's filter tonight, and re-evaluate. I'm just frustrated that after all that, we ended up lynching town. I really thought we were looking good.
Batsnacks is still probably town.
|
Sulfurus, you need to say why you are scumreading me. You can't throw around suspicions with nothing behind them.
WaveofShadow, I don't understand how a player of your caliber can just vanish before the lynch and come back after it. You even came back after the later deadline. Can you please explain this?
|
On June 14 2015 10:40 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2015 10:20 Trfel wrote: Sulfurus, you need to say why you are scumreading me. You can't throw around suspicions with nothing behind them.
WaveofShadow, I don't understand how a player of your caliber can just vanish before the lynch and come back after it. You even came back after the later deadline. Can you please explain this? What the fuck does 'a player of my calibre' have to do with being present in thread, even IF 'a player of my calibre' even meant anything? You know enough to be around at the deadline. If you can't be around at the deadline, I expect you to say so in advance, or have a really good reason.
While I wish that even the newest players would be around for the deadline, I have different standards for newbies and for veterans.
|
Sorry I was busy, and couldn't do more.
I still feel like Rels is pretty scummy. Sulfurus is starting to look a bit worse as well. I'm having some trouble with scott31337, and Kickstart's absence is starting to be a little concerning. Damdred might also be scum.
n00bKing, WaveofShadow, both are almost certainly town. MoosyDoosy is probably town.
Argh, EON too fast.
|
Hm, not really sure what to make of that shot. He was obviously town, though.
The best part is that n00bKing left a very detailed legacy post. I'll make sure to read through his filter when I get a chance.
|
I wish I had more time, but our church had a special event after the worship today.
I should be able to fully catch up by tonight at the latest.
|
On June 14 2015 21:52 ruXxar wrote: So first off.
I'm very disappointed that the night actually started 1 hour earlier than expected. It didn't give me enough time to analyze batsnacks accusation even though it made sense when he posted it. I can't tell you his reasons for doing so, but it felt like such an improvised and irregular post that I don't know what to make of it. All game I had him as scum, and suddenly he makes this one move which totally breaks with his character so far. I can't help but feel like i've been fooled. I want to say that I should've stuck to my gut feeling and not be swayed so easily.
If I disregard that one action of his, then batsnacks is still my top scumread. This makes no sense to me given this post here.On June 14 2015 06:10 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2015 05:38 batsnacks wrote:On June 14 2015 05:33 MoosyDoosy wrote:On June 14 2015 05:32 batsnacks wrote: Bat Traps™ mafia traps. The highest quality traps for your scum hunting needs. We'll see how right we are after Sulfurus, Rels, and getrip. You don't understand. geript just claimed mafia. Here is geript saying he will sheep Trfel's amazing case on Rels: + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 04:54 geript wrote: Actually, I think I'm going to sheep too. Here is sulfurus's bold post defending Rels: + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 05:00 Sulfurus wrote:I didn't want to say anything about trfel before because his vote on Bats was protecting me but he is just straight up wrong on Rels. He makes a post here where he says rels made a bad town read on ruXxar even though (IMO) ruXx is one of the towniest players in the game. He also keeps saying that Rels is tunneled on Plant's only post and he basically dismisses the rest of his filter when in fact it's really good and shows a town who is focused on trying to solve the game. Here is me saying sulfurus's post is bold, I ask why mafia would post such a thing: + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 05:04 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2015 05:00 Sulfurus wrote:I didn't want to say anything about trfel before because his vote on Bats was protecting me but he is just straight up wrong on Rels. He makes a post here where he says rels made a bad town read on ruXxar even though (IMO) ruXx is one of the towniest players in the game. He also keeps saying that Rels is tunneled on Plant's only post and he basically dismisses the rest of his filter when in fact it's really good and shows a town who is focused on trying to solve the game. This is bold. Why does mafia post this? Here geript explains that sometimes mafia like to defend town poorly. geript knows that Rels is town, yet he would sheep Trfel's case on Rels: + Show Spoiler +On June 14 2015 05:08 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2015 05:04 batsnacks wrote:On June 14 2015 05:00 Sulfurus wrote:I didn't want to say anything about trfel before because his vote on Bats was protecting me but he is just straight up wrong on Rels. He makes a post here where he says rels made a bad town read on ruXxar even though (IMO) ruXx is one of the towniest players in the game. He also keeps saying that Rels is tunneled on Plant's only post and he basically dismisses the rest of his filter when in fact it's really good and shows a town who is focused on trying to solve the game. This is bold. Why does mafia post this? It's not uncommon for mafia to defend town badly. Especially newer mafia. Wow bats... I'm speechless. I had you and geript as my top two scum. I refuse to believe that you would bus your own scum teammate this hard. You really redeemed yourself here in my eyes. I'll have to change my alignment of you to town and change my vote to geript. ##Unvote batsnacks ##Vote geript Please explain. I'm more interested in this than the case on MoosyDoosy that follows.
MoosyDoosy, I know you've explained this a few times already, but I'm not sure I understand.On June 14 2015 07:57 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2015 07:37 Damdred wrote: Also day post is at 18:06 for,me and it's 18:36 now Sooo it's right just sucks.
Anyway, who do you think is town/scum Lol, I don't think anything is certain after this. getrip was fine with suspecting both Sulfurus and Rels when necessary and he even voted for both at some point. Not only that, but both Sulfurus AND Rels were two of our top suspects as Mafia. I can't shake off the feeling that getrip just really screwed up by accident and we were jumping on it for no reason. Either way, I think that everyone should look over everything again. You made this post without knowing that geript flipped his alignment. My impression is that you are less convinced that geript is scum, and your worry for him actually being town caused you to be less convinced that Sulfurus and Rels were scum? Is this correct?
On June 15 2015 01:29 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On June 15 2015 01:27 ruXxar wrote:On June 15 2015 01:18 MoosyDoosy wrote:On June 15 2015 01:08 ruXxar wrote:On June 15 2015 01:00 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 15 2015 00:56 ruXxar wrote:On June 15 2015 00:55 ruXxar wrote:On June 15 2015 00:53 ruXxar wrote:On June 15 2015 00:03 MoosyDoosy wrote:On June 14 2015 21:52 ruXxar wrote: So first off.
I'm very disappointed that the night actually started 1 hour earlier than expected. It didn't give me enough time to analyze batsnacks accusation even though it made sense when he posted it. I can't tell you his reasons for doing so, but it felt like such an improvised and irregular post that I don't know what to make of it. All game I had him as scum, and suddenly he makes this one move which totally breaks with his character so far. I can't help but feel like i've been fooled. I want to say that I should've stuck to my gut feeling and not be swayed so easily.
If I disregard that one action of his, then batsnacks is still my top scumread.
After reading all the filters again I also get a bad vibe off moosy. I had you as a town read early on since you so accurately read me with the IRL mafia association and came from the point of view as a newbie, but somehow I feel like that has blinded me from looking at the overarching lines of your play.
-Pulls the noob card a lot, too much imo. I can't excuse that you thought there were only 2 mafia in the game, nor that you missed that geript flipped. Missing that geript flipped as town has nothing to do with being a newb, but seems to me that you're trying to ride that excuse for a lot of things.
-Indecisive, passive play, says he wants to be careful with his vote. A lot of his comments are just very superficial questions which he backs off very easily. Almost like he's trying to pretend like he's helping but not really. He makes it seem like he's contributing by asking players their opinions, but makes no hard accusations of his own. The only time he follows an accusation is when other people already started a wagon. Wants other people to make a case for him:
[quote]
[quote]
Trying to misrepresent what geript actually said(he said that the post about his slip was dumb, not the post he himself made was dumb).
[quote]
Then he posts this gem:
[quote]
I'm trying to imagine a world where moosy and bat are mafia together. It seems possible.
There's more points to be made about moosy which some people have already made, including n00bking and rels. For now Moosy is climbing up as my #2 scum after bat.
Alright ruXxar, let's dance this dance of death. 1. Pulling the noob card I mean, what can I say? This is completely my fault for not reading things correctly and I realize it more than anyone else. However, if you look at the posts I make cluelessly, you can see that I'm still genuinely attempting to help. - When I bring up the possibility of 2 Mafia, I'm trying to expand our thought process in case there is more than 1 Mafia. After all, it's a terrible idea to have a confined mindset. Also, a nitpick with this point of yours. If you say that me suggesting there's 2 Mafia is "inexcusable" that's more of an accusation of bad play and not scum-oriented behavior. - geript flipped as town. Okay, try and follow me here. IF we didn't know that geript was flipped, then my thought process was clear here. IF geript was a Mafia, then his two suspects in Sulfurus and Rels can't be Mafia as well unless he was busing them. Which was unfortunate because Sulfurus and Rels were also our top suspects for Mafia. IF geript was a townie which seems more likely due to the above scenario, we screwed up big time. That's what my thought process was but it turns out geript flipped which means we screwed up. - Also, I do try and read stuff but some of it just doesn't end up in my brain. If you recall ruXxar, I did point out that we can ask questions in green text which at least displays some reading comprehension. You might want to point that out to show that I haven't completely been pulling out the noob card in every sentence I use. 2. Indecisive, passive play - Your example where I'm suggesting either Sulfurus or geript to batsnacks is a terrible one. I believe I said it somewhere else before, but it was an attempt for me to set bait. If batsnacks does try to defend himself with either of my suggestions or just makes a good case in general, that means he's town. If he doesn't try, he's scum. In the end, I'd still say I think he's town because he's genuinely been trying to defend himself and used geript as a way out. - Also, expand more on this if you're going to make it a point. You can't just nitpick things like you did with point #1 too. If we're talking about indecisiveness, cover how I don't really want to place a vote, I come into the thread passive, and I'm generally terrible at pressuring people. If you count all these things in, I'm pretty sure anyone can see that I have a passive playstyle. If you hate my playstyle, sure go for it and make a case off of my passivity, but don't nitpick stuff just to support your own argument. - Also, I won't answer your other quotes because those are totally irrelevant when looked at in context. 3. Asking about pr roles - Hm...I can see why you think a Mafia would post that. But don't worry, there was a reason behind that post. If you still want to pressure me on this, feel free to do so as I can't adequately defend myself on this one unless I wish to ruin the game.
Overall? Stop nitpicking stuff bro. Your argument was decent, but your evidence was weak. If you're going to try and kill a townie, you should work harder. The bold part makes me think you have a power role... Actually, I don't just think so, it seems like very strong evidence for a power role. I'm curious if you actually are the medic. (PS : Don't tell us if you are) Then why in blue fuck would you actually discuss this? Just terrible. Fuck.. that was a terrible play by me. I'm retracting my scumread on mossy based on this new information. ruXxar I put that post for a reason. I might be a town role. I might be a townie using it as leverage to keep me alive. I might be Mafia using it to keep myself alive. I might be trying to deceive you. That's not the main issue here, don't let that point blind you. Look at the rest of my actions and judge based on those. It was very enlightening for me to see you defend yourself so hard. I really liked the way you defended yourself with ferocity. I also believe in occams razor. I think that usually the scenario with the least amount of crazy assumptions is most likely to be correct. If you baited me with that piece of information, then good job, but I really liked your spirit in defending yourself, and seen in light of a newbie then it makes sense that you made some ramblings while under pressure. Keeping my townread on you for now. ^.^ I was hoping that someone would pick up on it and to get a solid read based on their reaction. Glad to see you're a townie with us ruXxar. How can you conclude that ruXxar is town based on this? If he's town, it's a bad play to bring it up because it draws attention to it. If he's scum, it's a bad play to bring it up because he would want to keep it secret and just shoot you. And I don't see anything in his tone that gives me a good read.
On June 15 2015 01:39 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On June 15 2015 01:35 ruXxar wrote:On June 15 2015 01:29 MoosyDoosy wrote:On June 15 2015 01:27 ruXxar wrote:On June 15 2015 01:18 MoosyDoosy wrote:On June 15 2015 01:08 ruXxar wrote:On June 15 2015 01:00 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 15 2015 00:56 ruXxar wrote:On June 15 2015 00:55 ruXxar wrote:On June 15 2015 00:53 ruXxar wrote: [quote]
The bold part makes me think you have a power role...
Actually, I don't just think so, it seems like very strong evidence for a power role. I'm curious if you actually are the medic. (PS : Don't tell us if you are) Then why in blue fuck would you actually discuss this? Just terrible. Fuck.. that was a terrible play by me. I'm retracting my scumread on mossy based on this new information. ruXxar I put that post for a reason. I might be a town role. I might be a townie using it as leverage to keep me alive. I might be Mafia using it to keep myself alive. I might be trying to deceive you. That's not the main issue here, don't let that point blind you. Look at the rest of my actions and judge based on those. It was very enlightening for me to see you defend yourself so hard. I really liked the way you defended yourself with ferocity. I also believe in occams razor. I think that usually the scenario with the least amount of crazy assumptions is most likely to be correct. If you baited me with that piece of information, then good job, but I really liked your spirit in defending yourself, and seen in light of a newbie then it makes sense that you made some ramblings while under pressure. Keeping my townread on you for now. ^.^ I was hoping that someone would pick up on it and to get a solid read based on their reaction. Glad to see you're a townie with us ruXxar. I want to hear your opinion on the whole batsnacks trap thing. It seemed like a very big jump from his normal demeanor. Like out of the blue he suddenly makes an irrational action like that. I know you said you didn't have any scumreads right now, but if you wanted to go with a gut feeling, who would you possibly want to know more about? Actually, I think there should be more discussion in general around the batsnacks trap case. Was I the only one that found it a strange change in behavior from him? It was a strange change in behavior. However, using Bat Traps is an indicator of batsnacks being town. Batsnacks looks significantly better after that geript push, despite the result.
Also, wow. Those points that batsnacks raised about Rels are really strong. Rels certainly has a lot to say for himself. ##vote Rels
On June 15 2015 05:50 ruXxar wrote: Here's some food for thought.
So far we have scum reads on 2 mafia, Rels and Sulfu. Both are newbies.
How likely do you think that all 3 mafia are in the newbie group? Would it not make sense that at least 1 mafia is part of the veteran group?
People who have played previous newbie games, what is usually the distribution of mafia on newbie/veteran side? Teams are randomized. Plus, it's best to go one lynch at a time.
On June 15 2015 06:59 n00bKing wrote:I don't particularly expect to be killed tonight. But just in case that happens, here's where my thoughts are at. Briefly, let's consider what it means if I do get killed. There was one post I made that I backreferenced twice, and is probably the post that would be most strongly associated with me. It was this one: Show nested quote +n00bKing wrote: Situation: 11 players have votes in place, and 2 players are not voting. All 11 of the votes are on either batsnacks or Sulfurus. No one has a vote on anyone else.
At this stage of a Day 1, I'm more used to seeing a smattering of votes on some other miscellaneous players too. Maybe partially because the scum team doesn't want to have all their votes in one place, so they fan out some (and maybe a random Townie or two gets tunneled on their respective targets, and won't budge, even though no one else has any interest in following along).
Theory: This situation makes it pretty likely that one of the two players receiving votes is actually scum, and that we don't have a Town vs. Town situation for our two vote leaders. The scum team has not been able to fan out their votes, because they've needed "all hands on deck" to make sure that the scum player doesn't take a runaway lead in the voting.
Conclusion: Even though there's a lot of time left in the Phase, we may not want to introduce a third lynch target, and should instead stick to trying to pick between these two (since, if the Theory is correct, one of them would flip Red). I didn't have any luck whatsoever trying to get geript out of the noose, and some players (like damdred and batsnacks) have been saying that a lot of my posts can just be safely ignored. Based on all that, I don't think the scum players would kill me, to make it look like they were trying to silence me, to FRAME one of Sulfurus/batsnacks, if they were both actually town. Rather, the scum team would only kill me if my Theory was indeed correct, and one of Sulfurus/batsnacks IS scum. So remember, if the scum team kills me, the Theory is correct. We already know that I still think the Theory is correct, and I've mentioned some possible teammates for batsnacks (damdred, Moosy) if he is the bad guy in this scenario. And I said that I also had some ideas in mind about who could be possible teammates for Sulfurus, if he is the bad guy in this scenario. So here goes. This part of n00bKing's post is rather ironic. But I need to disagree here. N00bKing's lynch theory was hardly the most important contribution he's made to the thread, and I see no reason to believe it. There are several reasons for lynching him, one of them being that he's townread by most everyone in the game and is rather active. This is shown by people being suspicious of him during the night, and that suspicion went nowhere fast. N00bKing was almost certainly not going to be lynched this game.
The association case that n00bKing presents is very interesting, but I generally don't like association cases. I have various levels of suspicions about the people that he suspected, though.
On June 14 2015 13:08 Sulfurus wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2015 10:20 Trfel wrote: Sulfurus, you need to say why you are scumreading me. You can't throw around suspicions with nothing behind them.
WaveofShadow, I don't understand how a player of your caliber can just vanish before the lynch and come back after it. You even came back after the later deadline. Can you please explain this? You basically said Rels his scum for changing his position a lot which isn't even alignment indicative. Like if you like at way rels changes his vote he actually does it in a very townie way giving good logic every time he's done. You on the other hand changed your vote to Geript sporadically (without even giving a read on him at any previous point in the thread) simply because Bats found a 'slip'. This read makes no sense. I didn't scumread Rels for changing his position a lot. I created a list of Rels' reads and used that as a basis for the arguments presented below, leaving the initial work there for people to check the evidence themselves. Please read more carefully.
On June 15 2015 08:45 Sulfurus wrote: Can someone besides trfel explain to me why he is being so universally town read? I admit looking back his tunnel on rels is better then I thought but that's it. He has spent all his time on this one player and doesn't have good reads on anyone else yet multiple players have put him at the top of their townlists. Catching ONE scum is enough of a challenge for me, much less catching multiple. If I can find someone who looks really scummy to lynch, that's about as much as I can hope for. I've been asking questions and pushing my suspicions, so I don't really understand how you can say that I've only been pushing one person.
On June 15 2015 09:18 Kickstart wrote: Cop check on me is only useful in confirming im town. I am not mafia nor is anyone really suspicious of me of being mafia from what I can tell, aside from being somewhat concerned over my afkness, cop should check someone that they think will turn up red. You are awfully concerned with what blue roles we have and what they do and you are quite wrong in what actions they should be taking. Let the blue roles play their roles and stop trying to direct them into bad plays or outing themselves. Posts like this are useless, and give me the feeling that Kickstart isn't invested in this game. He got townread, and then left for a long time. This isn't alignment indicative, but now that he's back, he isn't pushing the thread, or asking questions (which I really would expect, given how much he missed), but he's lurking and only responding when someone called for a cop check on him (right at the start of the day). Why doesn't he simply prove himself through his actions, or find scum?
This is a huge contrast to the Kickstart at the start of the game, and the Kickstart I have seen before. And I don't like it one bit.
On June 15 2015 11:18 Kickstart wrote: Of course me coming back after being afk looks bad, good job pointing out the obvious. Would you prefer I stayed afk? I don't need to make excuses cause it comes down to real life stuff which isn't anyone's business. Deal with it or don't. Me apologizing is because I don't think it is fair to everyone that I was afk when I am normally much more active. I should just ignore people commenting on me coming back but it annoyed me.
Wait, MORE of this? I don't understand why town!Kickstart would make these posts that don't provide any content and don't help town at all. Pure excuses, no scumhunting whatsoever.
On June 15 2015 11:38 WaveofShadow wrote:Trfel - First to jump on the wake of Bat's 'discovery.' Eh. On looking through I thought he was on Rels all day and then dropped his amazing case instantly in favor of even after this post: Show nested quote +On June 14 2015 04:14 Trfel wrote: Ugh, I just don't quite feel right about lynching geript or Damdred. They're both incredible players, and it's the weekend, so it's unfair to expect normal activity levels from them.
##vote Rels But he was onto batsnacks as well at one point. It does kinda look as though he almost doesn't believe his own case at times because of his initial dropoff from Rels onto bats, then as bats lost ground back onto rels again and onto Geript. He does put a LOT of effort into his rels push when he is on him though so at the same time it seems doubtful that this is a half-assed push where he was just looking for an out. Not sold either on this one. Also liked his activity around the lynch and his first post after flip. What is the mafia incentive for pushing Rels hard at times, and at other times going with other wagons? That's a lousy way to go about a bus, and if I'm scum and Rels is town, why would I keep jumping around between flipped town geript, likely town batsnacks, and assumed town Rels?
Given the lackluster way geript was playing, I was suspicious of him. I didn't want to lynch him for that alone, though, because of the weekend and because of the potential risk. However, when batsnacks caught what I thought was a scumslip, this new information convinced me to lynch geript. If I didn't re-evaluate based on new information, that would be more telling.
WaveofShadow, with your geript wagon analysis in mind, what do you think about ruXxar, given that you were townreading him earlier? + Show Spoiler [Quote] +On June 15 2015 11:03 WaveofShadow wrote: Lol also this moosy vs ruxxar business. I gotta say moosy you're scaring me a little because if I'm going to get burned by one of you it looks like you'd be the one. I can visibly see you improving in the middle of this game and part of me wonders if it's because you were sandbagging all along.
Rels is looking pretty bad, the evidence presented by batsnacks pushes it over the top. Rels hasn't seemed at all interested in defending himself. I'm more than happy to lynch him.
Kickstart is also looking quite bad. I just don't understand how a townie can be gone for many important events, then come back and only post saying that "being afk isn't alignment indicative". No scumhunting, no questions, no analysis, just excuses.
I just don't know about Sulfurus any more. For scumreading me, he seems uninterested in pushing it, but he's so inactive that I'm not sure if this even applies. I just really hope that power roles or associations sort this out. Would like to see a response from Sulfurus about the flaws I've pointed out in his scumread of me.
Damdred still feels off. I can't quite put my finger on it, though, beyond a few tells that are best kept to myself for now. I need to take a careful look at his filter in the near future. Also need to look more closely at MoosyDoosy, ruXxar, and Oatsmaster.
|
On June 16 2015 00:46 ruXxar wrote: Moosy and kick then both HARD agree that I have to bus rels and sulfur as the only chance to clear my name. Wait.... what???
The amount of content that Rels put out is just insane.... and while I don't like all of his points, he does raise some good points (particularly some of the ones against scott31337). I don't really like his response to batsnacks' case, but if he is scum, it's really impressive that he would go through all that work when he seemed to be completely doomed.
##unvote
|
On June 16 2015 03:35 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 03:32 Trfel wrote:On June 16 2015 00:46 ruXxar wrote: Moosy and kick then both HARD agree that I have to bus rels and sulfur as the only chance to clear my name. Wait.... what??? The amount of content that Rels put out is just insane.... and while I don't like all of his points, he does raise some good points (particularly some of the ones against scott31337). I don't really like his response to batsnacks' case, but if he is scum, it's really impressive that he would go through all that work when he seemed to be completely doomed. ##unvote You should read that thing I said about ruxxar being mafia because he voted me for 99% of d1 only to sheep me hard at the last second on a town wagon for reasons that he considers bad and a mistake. Then you should vote ruxxar because he's probably the best lynch. I need to look into that some more.
And I'm also thinking about lynching Kickstart or scott31337. But I have some work to do now, so I can't filter dive for at least another hour or two.
And I don't really like Rels' case on MoosyDoosy at all. I'm reasonably confident that MoosyDoosy is town, and Rels' reasons weren't terribly compelling.
|
On June 16 2015 08:03 Damdred wrote: Sure got busy at work.
Super large bulky posts with little activity besides that. Has good posts on rel, has the lynch ready to be pushed through. Instead of pushing counterwagon jumps off instantly on bats slip case on Geript. Someone who trfel had previously scum read. Start of today immediately was like bats case good sheep. Keeps mentioning worried about me without actually doing anything. Ie basically is soft pushing. Lack of scum hunting reliance on huge posts most won't read. Looks like trfel is doing lots when,isn't.~
Have you bothered to look at the order in which these events happened.
Batsnacks' play was getting more towny before he caught geript in the supposed scumslip. Furthermore, the fact that he pointed this out was a pretty big indicator that he was town, also showing that he used Bat Traps (was talking with scott31337 about this in hidden text that this is an indicator of him being town that was previously missing.
As for long posts, give me a break. If people don't want to read my posts, then they don't deserve to hear what I have to say... I've taken care to make them readable, and there's no reason why spreading my thoughts over several posts is any better than using a single post. Admittedly my play is more sporadic than normal, and this is because I'm home from college now. Family takes precedence over mafia games. This is the second mafia game I've played in the month and a half since I came home, and the first one was on a smurf (I smurfed in an attempt to not play to the same activity and standard that I normally do). While back at school, I had the freedom to play whenever I wanted.
If you want to lynch me, come up with some actual reasons, please.
|
Despite how Kickstart has been playing lately, the ease at which his wagon is gathering steam is somewhat concerning to me...
|
scott31337
On June 13 2015 02:08 scott31337 wrote: Geript has four posts and very little content. I know he's good as mafia - but on the scum side of null for now. So, geript is good as scum, but is playing worse than his mafia capabilities (and also therefore worse than his town capabilities, assuming he helps town at least a little more when he's town than when he's mafia). It's simply not alignment indicative, but scott31337 uses this as an excuse to not do anything about his geript read.
On June 13 2015 07:29 scott31337 wrote: Who I'm liking so far -
Wave Trfel n00bKing Damdred Oats
Probably wouldn't lynch today - Rels Kickstart
Could Lynch - Batsnacks Geript MoosyDoosy Sulfurus RuXxar In addition to the (at the time) easy target (MoosyDoosy), he said he could lynch everyone who could be a lynch target for the day, everyone that everyone else had been suspecting. He could be credited with leaving Rels out of the "could lynch" category, but then:On June 14 2015 05:13 scott31337 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 14 2015 04:56 Trfel wrote:Rels' Read Progression- Suspicious of ruXxar early
- Suspicious of MoosyDoosy's first post
- Early suspicions of n00bKing (across multiple posts, vague wording)
- Scumreads Fake)Plants for opening post
- Changes read on ruXxar to town
- Unexplained town reads on WaveofShadow, Kickstart, ruXxar, Oatsmaster, Trfel, sort of town lean ish? on Sulfurus, scum leans on MoosyDoosy, geript, and batsnacks
- Says that scott31337 isn't scummy
- Jumps on my suspicion on MoosyDoosy
- List post
- Unvotes batsnacks
- Wants to vote geript, might vote Damdred, could also vote Sulfurus
- Jumps on geript's suspicion of scott31337
Rels is generally throwing around suspicions on everything. His townread on ruXxar changed after it was clear that the push on ruXxar wasn't going anywhere. He's scumreading people already being scumread by others, and multiple times he uses other people's posts to justify increasing his own suspicions of other people. + Show Spoiler [Examples] +Criticizing MoosyDoosy's opening post (geript already did this) Suspicious of batsnacks (common suspicion), geript (WaveofShadow already said this), and MoosyDoosy (geript) Agrees with the suspicion I voiced on MoosyDoosy Immediately asked geript for his reason for being suspicious of scott31337, suddenly is more suspicious of him himself (see my previous post) It seems like Rels is like a leaf in the wind, following thread sentiment, jumping on whatever works. He townreads people who are being townread already, he scumreads people who are being scumread, and only changes when the thread sentiment shifts. The one major departure from this trend is when he townreads batsnacks. He did this before Damdred jumped in. This is a pretty big change in his read, and against the thread sentiment. However, I think that the way that Rels jumps on whatever suspicion is available every other time in the thread is quite telling. I can get aboard this and feeling better then a Sulf lynch - you pulled a lot of work Trfel. You the man! So, nope.
Reading through his filter, he only twice provided analysis on a player that is longer than one sentence. Combine that with how unoriginal he's been and how he's been willing to lynch everyone who might possibly be lynched, and he looks pretty scummy. I'm used to scott31337 being much more willing to go his own way and explain why.
I feel like I kind of got pocketed when he pointed out the Bat Traps thing to me in url code earlier. It was a good point, but he never acted on it. I wish I had noticed sooner.
|
Why does no one want to talk to me about scott31337?
|
On June 16 2015 09:24 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 09:22 Trfel wrote: Why does no one want to talk to me about scott31337? I'll talk to you trfel. Based on my post a few posts up, what do you think about scott31337?
|
Because MoosyDoosy asked. I think everyone else already knows why Kickstart is suspicious.
+ Show Spoiler +Kickstart1. Early posts don't attempt to provide reads + Show Spoiler +(first post in thread excluded as it obviously couldn't contain a read) On June 12 2015 08:14 Kickstart wrote: Liers means if you say you are going to do something but don't when it comes to forum mafia. Also good job breaking one of my rules, you answered a question directed at me! On June 12 2015 08:15 Kickstart wrote: But I might give you points for answering it correctly. Maybe. Probably not. On June 12 2015 08:16 Kickstart wrote: Also lol@ruxxar not finding the jokey first posts 'genuine enough'. You so silly. or scum. Ill let you decide which it is. On June 12 2015 08:17 Kickstart wrote: Oh also, dont forget that you have to 'actually' vote in the other thread. Generally you still say it here as well though so that people are sure to read it. On June 12 2015 08:19 Kickstart wrote: Day1 just at game start association cases are bad. Especially when I'm not scum. On June 12 2015 08:21 Kickstart wrote: And there are 3 mafia, 10 town. There are probably blue roles and possibly mafia roles but this we do not know, only the possibility that there is. On June 12 2015 08:29 Kickstart wrote: I'm joking with him it means nothing. His statement was silly and scummy, I said I would let him decide which one he wants us to classify it as. (hint: I think it is mildly scummy). On June 12 2015 10:08 Kickstart wrote: I've explained the no lying thing, read please. If you say you will do something do it - that is what is generally meant in forum mafia about lying. If you say " I will give my reads at such and such time", then you better do it, etc etc. On June 12 2015 10:09 Kickstart wrote: And town shouldn't really lie anyways. I don't know how ruxxar got in his mind that this game is about lying all over the place. Towns job is to not lie and be open and honest, only people that need to be thinking about lying this early are scum, save for some rare situations. On June 12 2015 10:17 Kickstart wrote: What case. The only case is that ruxxar misunderstood everything I said.
Just an fyi, I will tunnel people to hell and back who willfully misrepresent what I say. Ask Oats. Whenever he decides to show up that is. On June 12 2015 10:18 Kickstart wrote: Ruxxar is looking most scummy and sulfurus needlessly hoping on me as well is suspicious. Especially when he cites a non existent case as the reason. Look at how long it takes him to really start providing reads. For a very long time he's commenting but not going the next step of taking a stance on someone's alignment. So while he is posting, he actually isn't doing anything to move the game forward. It's best to make reads to at least get the game started It's possible that he is simply holding some reads back, but simply scumreading ruXxar and Sulfurus suggests the opposite to me. He doesn't seem all that interested in scumreading, especially for his large volume of posts. 2. Terrible behavior since his return + Show Spoiler +Excuses, complaining, responding whenever someone scumreads him with "inactivity isn't alignment indicative".
But no scumhunting, no questions, no content. He's willing to read the thread and say "this scumread of me is stupid" but not scumhunt.
On June 16 2015 09:25 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 09:22 Trfel wrote: Why does no one want to talk to me about scott31337? I feel it's similar to behavior from Sulfurus and Kickstart. All three promise to post more and provide more content on some level but always give little content, end up on wagons, and disappear for some lengths of time unless directly referred to. I have expectations for scott31337, and expectations for Kickstart. And neither of them are meeting these expectations.
|
On June 16 2015 09:28 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2015 09:24 Trfel wrote:On June 16 2015 09:24 batsnacks wrote:On June 16 2015 09:22 Trfel wrote: Why does no one want to talk to me about scott31337? I'll talk to you trfel. Based on my post a few posts up, what do you think about scott31337? I cba to go looking through scott's filter for URL code could you maybe just paste all his secrets in the thread? I feel like that's an important part of what I'm trying to understand. He just asked me what I thought about the fact that you hadn't used Bat Traps in this game. I responded saying that you generally only use Bat Traps as town, and that this was a good find.
|
|
|
|