Guilty Mini Mafia - Page 99

On August 25 2014 07:02 justanothertownie wrote:

That's fair but we aren't lynching Xatalos day2 so you guys should maybe try to analyse something different now. You are beating a dead horse anyways.

On August 25 2014 06:18 Xatalos wrote:
I'm not entirely sure I understand. I suppose your argument is that:

1) Hapa+jat wanted to save me and would have gotten yamato lynched instead of me if I didn't go for Robik too
2) That means I purposefully killed the Mafia Godfather (who wasn't under much of any suspicion before) when I had the option of still going for yamato to mislynch a townie instead
3) This was supposed to take some heat off me, but really it feels like the same people are still suspecting me and the same people are still townreading me

How does this make sense as scum Xatalos?

On August 25 2014 07:07 yamato77 wrote:
"Aren't lynching Xat day 2" seems like a bold statement. No one is safe just because they voted Robik.

On August 25 2014 06:53 justanothertownie wrote:

How could GB force him to vote rob if his survival wasn't in doubt. It makes no sense.

On August 25 2014 07:08 KelsierSC wrote:


I am responding to this fallacy from Xat



point 1 is wrong as Hap specifically said it was between Dam and Robik

Xat had every reason to switch to Robik as it stopped him being the lynch.

This isn't beating a dead horse it is pointing out incorrect reasoning from Xat.

As for analysing something else I already analysed Dam again and concluded he was town, see earlier.

On August 25 2014 06:29 Damdred wrote:
I can accept that it would be a dumb bus...bjt you dodged around the bit about the sk and your play this game lining up with it

On August 25 2014 07:07 yamato77 wrote:
"Aren't lynching Xat day 2" seems like a bold statement. No one is safe just because they voted Robik.

On August 25 2014 07:15 Damdred wrote:


Rob wasn't getting traction gb went vote xata....xata switched people went NOT XATA. You guys weren't going to let him die

On August 25 2014 07:36 justanothertownie wrote:

When did I say it is only because he voted Robik? Look at Hapas case for xatalos being town and argue against it. If you can't do that we are not lynching him.

On August 25 2014 07:39 KelsierSC wrote:


Hapas case was kinda shitty in my opinion. It was based on Xata posting lots in other games or something it just felt shit tier.

I already gave a lot of reasons from THIS GAME why Xata is scum so I would happily lynch him.

On August 25 2014 07:42 justanothertownie wrote:

He has fucking 21 PAGES of filter. Show me one example of a scumplayer on this site that had this ridiculous amount of posts at this point. And that's not even the main point. He posts more careful and structured as mafia.

On August 25 2014 07:44 KelsierSC wrote:


I already explained that it isn't hard for him to mimic his town play. If his town play is to post a giant amount of nonsense.

imagine the crazy scenario where a mafia player mimics his town play! OMG SO WILD

On August 25 2014 07:44 Damdred wrote:
If the only reason we take xata off the table is because of a town case hap did (hap even admits now that xata could be the sk or town) thats largely meta based at least how i read it, then i should 100% be off the table for lynch today. If someone can tell me why both situations are bad gets a cookie

On August 25 2014 07:46 justanothertownie wrote:

I think you have no idea how hard it is to be active as scum. And with active I mean having maybe one half of this filter.

On August 25 2014 07:50 KelsierSC wrote:


Well I am sure you and Hapa are town, If neither of you are lynching Xata d2 then I will look elsewhere.

For me VA and Onegu are still scummy and would be my lynches