EPT[M][T] Foundation Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Grack what was your vote on Alak for? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Also does it count that I saw exactly what the other dude saw? Do I get a weak town read too? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
 Hey i was gonna point out the GGtemp shit. Wtf palmar. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 04 2014 18:08 Palmar wrote: I'm just faster than you. Who are your top 2 town reads and why. If you don't have town reads, then please just force the answers and give whatever little reasoning you can. Slam and Robik. Slam because he is really really active and he isnt posting unreadable stuff either. I quite like the relaxing posts he posted with the many many faces. also this post is a fair assesment of boon's first post. On March 04 2014 14:49 Alakaslam wrote: That's not why she is scummy "Sorry for X, I see town is doing something and I made the observation, look I contribute. I'm not going to act on it, caveat caveat IF THAT IS OK WITH TOWN DO NOT LYNCH ME DO NOT LYNCH ME" That is why she is scummy. Its mostly an activity/attitude read though. For Robik, he is cocky and aggressive. I think that makes him town. Also that bit about boon's first post. On March 04 2014 12:54 IAmRobik wrote: Boone's entrance was scummy because of the way she said that she respected RNGesus but wasn't willing to vote VE yet cause she wanted to play more with him and Joey was scummy cause he trolls when he's mafia. In general, I come in and clear a bunch of people for being super town off of small things, but this game all I see are really fucking scummy players. On March 04 2014 12:34 IAmRobik wrote: That's fine cause based off of your recent history, your reads are pretty trash. On March 04 2014 13:43 IAmRobik wrote: When is this actually going to happen from you? You're all talk and no action this game. Do something or die. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 04 2014 13:33 austinmcc wrote: kk, that's more clear. Do you weigh boone not wanting to vote VE, in and of itself, as pointing towards her alignment? (her, yes?). Even if it's outweighed by the contradiction with liking RNG, does the no vote itself do anything for you? Also. Are you robik? Its odd for me that Austin is talking about boone as the only substantial part of his filter but never gives a read on her. Or anyone at all. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 04 2014 22:13 justanothertownie wrote: Well austin mentions boone once in a question to another player because that player talked about her. How is talking about boone the only substantial thing austin says then and why should he have/post a read on her especially? Don't get me wrong I won't claim that austin contributed much but that statement from oats is just wrong. Like this post. I have no idea what or why JAT defended austin when he has no idea whether austin is town. Weird defense = scummy defense. and his first post after being back feels really contributing for the sake of contributing. On March 04 2014 21:03 justanothertownie wrote: Well, considering you started the trolling this is a little hypocritical, isn't it? Anyways you are right people like grack/killing should start playing seriously now. Like you do now. Policy lynching and random lynching are not the same. Random lynching is a good discussion starter but a terrible play itself while policy lynching has it's merits. I think the only game we played together was Hogwarts. We lynched you day1 (so it is not surprising that you don't remember that much) I took over your vigilante role and shot scum. Literally nothing about who is town or scum at all even though there has been like 8-9 pages by then. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 01:58 justanothertownie wrote: He hasn't done enough for me to read him. Who has done enough for you to read? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 04 2014 22:33 justanothertownie wrote: I will do so when I have them. For now I don't like rayns read on austin if that oats post really is all he has against him. Seems to me like rayn didn't even check if what oats said is true. Apart from that I would like to hear an answer to the question I asked boone. She might be scummy. I don't have more than that yet. Can you elaborate or say anything thats changed or been added to your super sparse reads? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 02:32 Dandel Ion wrote: Interesting that none of you question boone's foundation QT claim should we? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
At the start of each Day, 3 randomly selected players will be invited to the Foundation quicktopic mason group. Hey yeah wtf is this shit. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 02:36 justanothertownie wrote: How come you are so sure that she is the one fakeclaiming? because at least VE has some proof. She doesnt. Hah. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 02:39 VisceraEyes wrote: Well she might - just because people haven't confirmed it yet doesn't mean they won't. If they don't then yeah, be suspicious, but for now why can't you just take the most likely explanation, that the host created at least two foundation chats instead of one, and look for scum normally? What do you think about GGTemplar Oats? I think that his really weird alak vote and thereafter boone vote really needs to be explained. Boone's stance on robik is really wishy washy and I dont like it at all. The only reason she has for thinking robik is scummy is that he chose 'easy' targets? And in the same sentence says that he is likely town? Throwing dirt for no reason. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 02:41 Killing wrote: Question isn't for me but answering anyways. Everyone is playing very differently except for Robik. He usually just goes super aggro on his reads and is always too certain of them. I wouldn't say how he has acted has been alignment indicative so far as he does it as both town and mafia. I get a better read on him as the first day goes on. He shows himself at the end of day 1 imo. Templar is probably atm the scummiest of all the DM players for me. He rarely gives out his reads with providing extensive reasoning. So what do you think of Boon calling Robik's play different from video and using that to read him when everyone is playing different anyway unless she thinks all the DM people are scum. Who else is scum? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 03:01 IAmRobik wrote: No thats not a good reason, try again.Catching up now...This guy is town for the bolded statement | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 03:05 justanothertownie wrote: I see where he is coming from - GGTemplar posted something really weird in there. I am way less sure if it really makes him mafia though. Can you clarify as GG has a very high chance of getting lynched. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 03:06 austinmcc wrote: There is/are an/some extra QTs. Boone/rayn/myself are in one. Alignments unknown. I don't know why Boone revealed this, and I'm very interested to see more of her reasoning. There MIGHT be scum and scum MIGHT manipulate me is, imo, a particularly bad reason for revealing this information 1/4way through D1. While there MIGHT be downsides, there also MIGHT be upsides to a QT that townies are in Whats the benefit for scum revealing it to the thread when she can try and fake a town circle? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 03:08 austinmcc wrote: I dislike Palmar. I think the way he deals with GGTemplar's unexplained reads, Robik's unexplained semi-reads into explanation, and my questioning of Robik is...inconsistent. GGTemplar needs to explain himself, sayeth the Palmar. Robik gives reads but doesn't explain himself. austinmcc asks Robik to explain a read or two, and give them specifically. Robik gives an explanation. Robik's explanation is townie, sayeth the Palmar (agree). But the Palmar forgetteth that Robik initially posts nothing specific, and that I'm the one to question him about it. While he may not like my followup, i would PRESUME that asking people to explain their reads, is, at the very least, a somewhat green thing to do (see Palmar, who would like to look green as either alignment, asking GGTemplar to explain himself). I do not understand how Palmar reaches his reads on the three of us given Robik's initial post and my question. robik explains himself somewhat in his first posts. GGtemp just posts votes. And you have done nothing, no walls of text and 0 reads. I dont agree with this read at all. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 03:17 Palmar wrote: I can be in-thread friends wtf this game. everyone has qt friends except me.  Hmm yeah ok Austin, I thought he did mention some stuff before that. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Its like totally different. He makes a general statement which he then backs up. GGTemp just makes really specific reads and does nothing to progress them or explain them. Different. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 03:19 austinmcc wrote: No. He mentions no specific REASONS, nor does he even mention specific PEOPLE. Thus why town might be interested in having him clarify himself. Do you understand my thoughts on Palmar now? Do you share them? Do you 80% disagree with them? I really dont understand why you are comparing yourself to palmar and saying, hey he cant call me scum, Im doing the same stuff. Except thats not why hes calling you scum. Its something really easy for scum to pick out to, a townie not explaining stuff looks bad. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 03:24 austinmcc wrote: Do you think it's townie to ask people to explain themselves? That question sounds ridiculously stupid. Yes, Robik backs up his statement. Only after being asked. I'm asking why, if you're town and Palmar is town, and you're asking GGTemplar to explain himself because you, as townies, want him to give specific information, me wanting someone to clarify their reads and give specific information is not, at the very least, a townie thing. Even if everything else I do is scummy. In particular, I'm asking whether you think Palmar just skates over that entirely. I had what...like 6 and a 1/2 posts. He read Robik's answer and liked it. But there's no thought put into me making the question. That smells to me. nah its not townie. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
y goal is the same as yours, to find the mafia and lynch them. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 03:39 IAmRobik wrote: Dandelion trying to push on something that's not scummy and really stupid and a mistake that no mafia would make. WE'VE FOUND SCUM BOYS! I did it too. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Night boyos. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Also you gave this Palmar read earlier. On March 05 2014 02:11 boonetown wrote: Palmar - created the whole random lynch, then drew actual reads from the conversation it started. The only world in which he would be scum is where him and robik are scum together (calling him town and pushing on an easy lynch target, myself) which seems unlikely. Where did Palmar draw reads from the whole random lynch debacle? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 14:57 GGTeMpLaR wrote: Oats did you find my post useless or hard to read or was I concisely (aside from fat pictures) answering what half the town asked of me. Slam do you honestly still think both that Boone is mafia and that I am mafia with her, or do you just scumread me alone now? I don't even follow your vote anymore. it was completely useless | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Even your VE read is incorrect, he brought up a great point but its fluff to you? And your dandel read. Why is him bitchfighting with Robik and JAT scummy as opposed to what Robik is doing? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 15:23 GGTeMpLaR wrote: end of day1 last game I played with you http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=440856¤tpage=58#1144 vs http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=440856¤tpage=58#1147 top 2/4 on my list were scum idgaf and? What exactly are you justifying? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 15:29 GGTeMpLaR wrote: I never said fluff=scum But posting a lot of fluff under the guise of it being pro-town is scummy. I don't know if you're talking about VE's accusation against me or the post from him I found suspicious. Robik seems genuinely/stubbornly invested in figuring out the game but is oblivious to how useless his responses are to Dandel b/c he's emotionally invested, whereas Dandel seems a lot more level-headed and rational so you would think he'd be the bigger man and let it go but he eggs it on and encourages it. You seem to think Palmar is scum because of fluff posts 1-20 and that VE is scum because of this fluff post. I was talking about the post you linked. Why is Dandel more level headed than Robik? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 15:32 GGTeMpLaR wrote: I'm discrediting your judgment of me by showing it having a poor track record. So wrong once = wrong all the time? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Where has Palmar promoted his 'fluff' posts as being pro town? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Thats what you said man, not me. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 15:50 GGTeMpLaR wrote: He never explicitly promoted it as fluff. It was implicit the way he was directing discussion - telling X people they need to do Y, asking people all sort of questions then he himself even admitted he wasn't really giving many reads. But you said its scummy when people say that their fluff posts are pro town. Which you so far havent shown is true for Palmar. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 15:51 GGTeMpLaR wrote: I'm not going to link the entire fight between Dandel/Robik, it's there for you to read. If you didn't get the same impression from it that I did then you're free to disagree. ok cool you cant back up your assumption. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 15:56 GGTeMpLaR wrote: So you disagree and think that they both lost their temper and that Dandel wasn't jerking Robik around or that he didn't have the upper hand in that shitfest. Yes | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 23:04 justanothertownie wrote: I never said she was town oats - I guess you will never learn to read. This is just unsettling. fuck man, then dont say shit you dont mean. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 23:18 justanothertownie wrote: Please quote where I said she is town. lynch too easy = someone is town. Seriously, is this hard to understand? Do you have to spell things out before I can comment on it? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 05 2014 23:31 justanothertownie wrote: Hey oats. See, Palmar thinks boone is town! Better attack him! hey JAT, he actually explains?!? Now tell me again, what did you mean by that earlier statement. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
So you think Rayn is town because he can solve the game? WHY?/ | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 06 2014 00:36 justanothertownie wrote: ah ok, another case where you say what you dont mean. Are you really that slow? I don't want to lynch him because of that. I never said I had a townread on him. I can totes solve the game. Im insulted. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
All you do is mostly call people terrible, tell them their reads are terrible or just plain disagree with others without giving much of your own thoughts Yeah how in the world is this scummy rather than his playstyle? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Palmer sat back and let the trolling happen, then when it did he commented on a lot of people based on what they responded with. He Talked about how he felt Roberts point was valid, that there was too much trolling, than Oats (and others) needed to step it up. He questioned the voting stuff templar did. This is stuff after the trolling phase though. Palmar analysed 0 content from that part of the game, only after that. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
I am not, nor have I ever acted scummy in this thread, I am town and therefor everything I say has been from a towns perspective. I might be nervous and I might have no idea what I'm doing (because, HI.. this is my first forum game) but I think I did an okay job. I find this particularly funny. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 06 2014 02:29 boonetown wrote: I didn't say I'd be good at this game, and from what I can tell, i'm the exact opposite. Do you have any more insults you'd like to hurl my way before I peace out? uhhhh why are you calling people scum for thinking you are scum? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 06 2014 02:39 Dandel Ion wrote: Seriously just ingore oats we all know he's an idiot already. man not everyone in the game is an idiot dandel, have some kinda respect. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 06 2014 03:27 justanothertownie wrote: Burst of activity? I think that's quite the exaggeration. he had 2 pages in 2-3 hours. Thats pretty bursty. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
I don't really know what was the deal with the QT stuff in regards to the game but outting it probably pushed her to more scummy in my eyes. So here he is talking about Boone. and then here On March 06 2014 01:48 Killing wrote: Boonetown I really really hated the QT play, more so than anything else. I think it was overall ok for town since we now know there's some seconday QT mechanic in play but the revealing part seemed very awkward to me. I read it as someone that was in a deephole and wanted to either A) Reveal something to town to try and show transparency(?) and by extent seem more town B) Create some diversion as in that post she begins to offload her blames onto at least 1 in her QT group (not really sure how she came to that conclusion but I think she has rescinded that) He manages to concoct a whole story about how claiming the QT made her the scummy person in the game apparently. Why didnt he do this before? dunno. He does this in order to supplement his content and make it look like he is useful. And his other reads. On March 06 2014 01:48 Killing wrote: Rayn You've honestly been just a shit poster for me this entire game. All you do is mostly call people terrible, tell them their reads are terrible or just plain disagree with others without giving much of your own thoughts. Although I'm usually the one to call people terrible, it's quite tiring to read through and I think it's overall bad for town. People that do not have town's best interests in mind are usually my top scum. Alakazam He also has posted very little content and hasn't tried to push town foward that much (I guess something I'm guilty of as well). I don't know what it is but everytime, my mind is just screaming scum. I guess it's just one of those gut things more than anything else. It seems most of town is reading town so if someone can give me a good detailed explanation why his nothingness constitues town that would be cool. I assume it's something to do with previous games and how he plays alignments differently. Totally wrong view of Rayn this game and misrepresenting his play super wrongly in order to twist it into something that looks bad. Same kinda thing with Alak who has actually posted some useful stuff. He is also very unsure about these reads. Wishy washy. And also scumslip. It seems most of town is reading town so if someone can give me a good detailed explanation why his nothingness constitues town that would be cool. [/b] | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
##vote Killing | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 06 2014 03:59 austinmcc wrote: oats, what useful stuff has alak posted? Like can you grab 2-3 posts of his that were useful? I want to peer into your soul here, because I've found him to not be useless, but ... I don't think slam has particularly pushed town forward or anything. On March 04 2014 14:49 Alakaslam wrote: That's not why she is scummy "Sorry for X, I see town is doing something and I made the observation, look I contribute. I'm not going to act on it, caveat caveat IF THAT IS OK WITH TOWN DO NOT LYNCH ME DO NOT LYNCH ME" That is why she is scummy. On March 05 2014 13:33 Alakaslam wrote: K rayn when you are back Why GGTEMPLAR vs BOONETOWN? What has boonetown done that she is not scummy to you or ggtemp that he is more scummy? I miss my custom autocorrects for ppl's names. See there is this thing, I must not vote ggtemplar unless I am convinced he is scum he put the flattering portrait that failed He called me monocle scum On March 05 2014 18:20 Alakaslam wrote: Well here is where the hypocrisy speech of motivation comes in. Boone, if you are town, best thing to do is either defend, or, if your position is indefensible, start forming scum reads and put them out there. Because if you are town, your flip will confirm everything you said- which has a huge impact if you had suspicions. There is even slang associated with this phenomena; "the dead hate Alakaslam" etc. I think these are all pretty ok posts, although there is somewhat less than I expected and all focusing around boone. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 06 2014 04:11 justanothertownie wrote: I disagree. Why are you defending him that hard? Why do you think he is town in your own words, oats? i just said earlier. dude. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Your turn JAT, why is ggtemp scum? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 06 2014 04:33 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay now a serious question, is anyone entertaining the possibility of boone fakeclaiming here? Not without a counterclaim. Jat, why the fuck are you so reticent about giving reasons for ggtemp to be scum? Stop stalling and give reasons. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Killing! Palmar, why is grack even somewhat town? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 08 2014 02:57 IAmRobik wrote: For all the people voting me: What happens once I flip town? Cause I guaran-fuckin-tee that's what's going to happen. game continues without the distraction of your fight with dandel. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 08 2014 03:20 IAmRobik wrote: Like, how can you read the beginning of the day and think "man, Rob is out for dandelion," when the first post I made was about Joey and how I think he should 100% be the lynch today. The only reason today became about me and Dandelion is because he's a fucking punk that is going hard on me for bullshit reasons, which I've already shat all over because they were 100% inaccurate. no, the reason today became about you and Dandel is because _you_ decided that you had to fight head on with him. Why does it matter that he sucks at reading you? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
I want to lynch you because your reaction is totally overblown today. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Is Palmar scum? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 08 2014 04:10 boonetown wrote: i'm still not sure Palmar is town, but he's being much more helpful and useful today. well yeah that kinda makes him scummier cause he wants to win more as scum than as town. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 08 2014 04:15 boonetown wrote: cause i'm an idiot? i protected someone i read as town. that's all. Why would you noob claim again???? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 08 2014 04:19 IAmRobik wrote: You've never played with me...I _HATE_ playing as mafia. In fact, when I was mafia with Joey in an immortals game the other night, I played Hearthstone and didn't give a fuck and didn't say anything and didn't give any reads and ended up talking my way into getting checked on d1. It's a downfall in my game. I don't care. I love being town. I love solving the game. That's what I'm trying to do this game...I'm actively trying to solve it. That was, up until I have to defend myself against accusations from a person that has given 0 reads on anything in the game besides myself. He's done nothing but tunnel on me incorrectly, absolutely unwilling to think anything other than that I'm scum. TOO BAD. I'M FUCKING TOWN, DANDELION. I've expressed my opinion on several occasions now. If anyone wants any clarification on anything that I've said, that's fine. A lot of people read me as town on day 1. One of whom is dead. im not even talking about you in that quote. What. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Grack is highly suspicious for trying to lynch Alak, a well known player who plays vastly different town and scum games. Hes town this game. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
wat | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 08 2014 21:41 raynpelikoneet wrote: A couple of things. I just went through Grackaroni's filter because of the comment Oats made about him going after Slam. Oats do you know something i don't? You need to explain the comment. Also where the fuck does Grackaroni "agree with templar's case on VE" like he suggests? Explain. Slam town means Grack should think hes town, he isnt some dm scrub so Grack trying to lynch Alak is Grack being scum because if hes town he knows slam is town and therefore wouldnt be pushing him but as scum Grack knows already. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
I still think Grack is scum though but now its cause he pushed VE for being disinterested and then pushing a lynch on someone which is contradicatory. You cant be both man wtf. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Grack said that VE was disinterested(somewhat townie) and pushing an agenda(scummy) and pushed him based on the above reason. But you cant do both man. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
And its bad. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 08 2014 23:52 justanothertownie wrote: In hindsight it was because VE flipped town. When it happened I didn't think his push was bad. If Grack is scum then that's because he didn't do shit apart from that and nothing so far on day2 as far as I am concerned. Yeah grack has so far just popped in and out asking some questions that didnt seem to go anywhere and giving some really easy reads to give. Boone town, oats town and all that shizzle. In his town games, he is able to be a tonwn leader and all that shizzle. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:08 raynpelikoneet wrote: Oats do you think Grack is more likely to lead the town than for example Palmar is? Also do you think Palmar has lead the town more than Grack has this game? I think that both have not played the best game ever if they were town but Grack played the worse game. Why are you being so sketchy with your questions? why not go and straight out ask me whether I think Palmar is scummy for the same thing that I called out Grack for. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:08 Grackaroni wrote: eh I'll do what I can. Bad week plus a lack of sleep from midterms and I haven't felt like playing mafia. Definitely was not going to bother arguing with Oatmaster. yeah that was bad. Can you just play the game man, it would make it so much easier if we were town buddies. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:13 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am not defending Grack, i am trying to get a better read on you and Oats because your thought process clearly does not line up with mine and i want to know where this sudden "Grack is mafia" is coming from. Because i don't see it, Oats' reasoning for Grack being scum was bullshit in the first place and when he was called out for it he went "oh yeah you are right but Grack still scum for this other reason i didn't bring up in the first place" which is also bullshit. bullshit and totally false are different things. Why are you comparing both reasons when 1 is just completely wrong? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
I have no idea what kinda cases he makes as scum, but he is playing scummily different from his town meta. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
I dont see how it weakens the second argument to have been brought up later. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: I don't see him pushing any agenda which he usually does as mafia. He seems just disinterested for whatever reason. Do you have any examples? Is his town play disinterested? Wasnt his push on VE pushing an agenda? I feel like he isnt going towards anything, like he is fine with the current game state. Which is now good for scum and bad for town. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:27 raynpelikoneet wrote: There is no counter-case so i expect people to vote for Robik unless they make a case on someone. Thats so dumb rayn. Are you dumb rayn? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
You dont seem interested in getting us to vote for Robik. So hypocrisy at its best. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:30 raynpelikoneet wrote: Tell me what i am supposed to do? Make a counter-case to a case that's on my top scumread and argue with myself that my #2 scumread is more likely to be mafia than my #1 scumread? really Oats? no, you are supposed to read the game and come to your own conclusions then talk with people and convince them that your choice is mafia with or without a case. A case isnt really anything but a bunch of stuff together in one post. You seem really set on Grack town and you arent giving any reasons that me or JAT could talk with you. super closed off. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
And he is useless, VE got lynched and all that shizz. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 08 2014 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote: Why don't you want to policy lynch the shit out of this Palmar? You know that's not going to stop. If you think robik is scum? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 06 2014 03:24 Oatsmaster wrote: I would lynch VE and I wouldnt lynch GGtemp, the burst of activity he had felt like he was trying to make up for his earlier ploys and it didnt really feel like he was making up stuff about his reaction tests. I dont remember your post about that reason I called bad as the reason I said I would lynch VE. I think I was thinking about the so little impact that VE had on the game. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:38 raynpelikoneet wrote: Because that was before he made some posts that were not only "RAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGE". wtf, read the thread. The case you are talking about above is Dandel's case right? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:44 Grackaroni wrote: yes. When you ask me for a reason I assume that you have some reason for doing so. If you thought that reason was shit I would expect you as town to go out and say that it is shit. I really dont remember that post. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Also contradictory. On March 05 2014 13:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: I don't knowwhat do you mean? Elaborate please. Top 2 vote leaders are bad votes and i don't even know why there are votes on them. Also: ##Vote: GGTeMpLaR He doesnt try and convince anyone to vote for GGTemp here but just a while ago, he asked us to make a case/convince people on Grack if we wanted to move votes. Actions dont match his words. and On March 06 2014 04:38 raynpelikoneet wrote: I kinda wanna lycnh VE for his bad post about boone's claim. Also ggtemplar so vote stands. he totally drops this read in favor of lynching GGtemp, never really talks to Grack about lynch VE, the top propnent towards his lynch. Basically it doesnt look like he wants to find scum, just push people who look bad. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:50 Grackaroni wrote: By ignore you mean never see then ok.I try to keep myself as unbiased as possible but I don't see how I can ever think of you as townie then. You ask me for reasoning to lynch VE, ignore my answer, and then come back the next day and argue that I'm scum for pushing faulty reasoning. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:59 raynpelikoneet wrote: trololol oats yay i have support! | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Who else is scum Robik? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
And it looks like GGtemp is town. Why didnt you talk to Grack about VE? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
You clearly dont get my lynchbait point, Im saying that you are finding shit that looks bad at first glance rather than finding shit that makes someone scum rather than bad town. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 09 2014 02:08 raynpelikoneet wrote: Green part: Based on one post, yes. ggtemplar made an equally bad post regarding the situation. VE gave an explanation to the post. templar didn't. templar was scummier than VE before that. wtf? No, there was no "VE or templar" moment, as i clearly said when i wrote "VOTE STANDS" in the post you quoted. I made it bold and all caps so you can't misrepresent it any more. Red part: That's not true. Show me where i have done so, because i have not. Well sorry for assuming "I could lynch VE" means "I dont want to lynch VE". You just said that you lynch people that look bad, how is that not true? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
1) im more confident in Joey 2) I think I can get a concrete answer on Rayn in later days while Joey has to die today for reasons. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 09 2014 02:38 Palmar wrote: I made it happen. And because he shouldn't be an easy lynch on day 1 as town, his lack of standing up for himself in the thread or even trying to get the lynch off him made me think he could be mafia. I think this is like the 3rd or 4th time ive seen ve mislynched day1 so its not like an uncommon thing as you seem to be saying | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
| ||
