• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:44
CEST 01:44
KST 08:44
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202534Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder9EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced50BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Serral wins EWC 2025 Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 Classic: "It's a thick wall to break through to become world champ" Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup Weeklies and Monthlies Info Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Scmdraft 2 - 0.9.0 Preview [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Which top zerg/toss will fail in qualifiers?
Tourneys
[ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 1 [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 474 users

Normal Mini Mafia: Episode I

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Normal
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 19 2014 05:35 GMT
#61
Hmmmmmmm. I'll guess I'll /in since it has been awhile.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 20 2014 00:07 GMT
#79
Hi guys. I've got a thought for you. What do you think of having all our Boxers claim right now? I think it limits scum's options. I mean we have a 50% chance of having more than 1 Boxer and we are almost guaranteed to have 1. It prevents shenannies by scum claiming later and scum would be put into a difficult position now by claiming. Thoughts?

P.S. Don't claim yet, Boxers. This only works if everybody agrees. No claim strategy should be done partway because that is always the worst option.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 20 2014 02:06 GMT
#127
On January 20 2014 10:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 10:01 VisceraEyes wrote:
On January 20 2014 09:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Nobody should claim at this point. Named VT's (boxers) do not help us in any way now because there is a possibility of 0-3 boxers and claiming does not clear anyone, it only gives mafia information about the setup unless we want all people to claim which we don't.

suki, kushmasta does not usually even read his own role PM properly (which is proven by last game for example) so unfortunately that plan does not make him non VT / non named VT and certainly not mafia.

Yeah I'm mostly indifferent to the matter. I can see the argument for it not being needed and it giving scum information, but I think it could help us in the future by 1) eliminating scum's ability to fake-claim it on the block and 2) forcing scum to decide now whether they want to fake-claim the role.

Here is the problem:
If the named VT's claim it gives mafia info about the setup.
  • If there are no named VT's -> mafia knows the setup and can WIFOM by fakeclaiming VT and it's impossible to prove if itäs true or not
  • If there is 1 naved VT -> If mafia has a GF they know the setup, if not, they know town has no more than 1 power role.
  • If there are 2 named VT's -> mafia knows there is only max 1 power role.
  • If there are 3 named VT's -> mafia knows there is no other power roles. they can WIFOM a roleblock on people and it "confirms" that's not the setup, so WIFOM.


Every single possible scenario only helps mafai and not town, so no, don't claim named VT's because they can't be confirmed and it only helps mafia if they know how many Named VT's there are.

Discussion closed.

I don't think it's quite that simple.

I don't care if there are no named VTs or 1 or 2 or 3. Yes scum will be learn things about the setup, but honestly that doesn't matter because scum already know that there are X to Y power roles from their configuration. What claiming now does is prevent scum from being able to fake claim a named VT later. It prevents stupid things happening at lynches. Additionally, if we have power roles it gives them info about where they should begin using their powers. Even if scum decide to fake claim now, it's not like we're giving the named VTs a free pass, we're just treating them like miller claims where the info helps us and prevents scum from claiming something like that (e.g. miller) in the future.

That's all. It all depends if you think it matters if scum knowing the setup is a bad thing or if the claims could even help our power roles. I'll let other people chime in on this.

Ok. Back to this crazy Niners-Seahawks game.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 20 2014 03:08 GMT
#139
On January 20 2014 11:09 thrawn2112 wrote:
When'd you start writing that Crossfire?

Idk. During some random 2 minute commercial break. I'll think about this issue more, but I gtg now, though. See you all tomorrow.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 04:00 GMT
#604
Sup I'm back. I think I agree with thrawn about kush. I remember hosting ## and reading the game and remembering how kush (as town) just bounced around all over the place saying this person was scum, that person was scum, no change all that they're town now, etc. I don't see any of that here.

town kush's filter in "##" Mafia as a smurf

Choice quotes from his filter that game (where he was town):

On October 30 2013 23:26 OOHCHILD wrote:
Reason why I nuked WoS:
It was a very impulsive move. I was just pissed that clarity had been lynched instead of him, since i had a pretty good townread on clarity. Should be pretty obvious by now but my scumread on WoS changes every second, from probs town to OMG SUCMMIEST PLAYER in the game as I weight the arguments in my head. Right now I could see him flipping either way. I tried to read through his filter last night but I didn't do it full and I wasn't fully present and I didn't make any good conclusions.

On October 30 2013 23:29 OOHCHILD wrote:
I was just really angry at him and I wanted to use my powers on someone so I figured eh why not him. Also my read of him changes a lot so I figured cant be that bad because he could be scum anyway.
Plus I dont know what it is about WoS but his attitude and everything about him pisses me off for some reason. NO offense WOS! It's me, not you.

On November 01 2013 16:18 OOHCHILD wrote:
you know im town when i start conspiracy theorizing





Hmmmm. After reading his filter more from here and ##, I don't know how sure I am of him being mafia, but I'll still post it because it's relevant. These posts by him from ## made me change my mind plus a gut town read I had on him based on the early game.

On October 31 2013 02:21 OOHCHILD wrote:
It's kind of lame that everyone wants to lynch me for shit I can't control.

And prome in my recent scum games I have not been bussing scum and defending townies. I really only ever did that in games with people who didn't know about it.

I remember there was this game where someone who knew about it came in as a replacement and I got fucked.

On October 31 2013 04:26 OOHCHILD wrote:
cant stay but wtf vayne
Show nested quote +
OOHCHILD - Now that I know it's kush this doesnt look like his recent townplay at all. He hasn't made any cases or deduced anything worth reading like has recently been the case, he has only been throwing suspicion on random people and then nuking completely different targets. His play is erratic and doesn't make sense. With that said, I don't think he would play this reckless as scum because in an experimental game it's just asking to get shot in the face in some way.

Why so wishy washy?
Also I have never played with even a shred of decency on d1 EVER.



TL;DR I'm conflicted on kush's play right now. thrawn brings up decent points about kush's meta, but also I trust what kush says about his own meta when playing as town. Time to go find someone else cause I'm not too sure about kush either way.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 04:10 GMT
#607
On January 21 2014 12:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am pretty sure zarepath is mafia. About half of his stuff in his case on VE has happened before he makes these posts:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 21:44 zarepath wrote:
I thought VE was talking about the two different plans, kush's "don't lynch anyone who claims blue" plan and the Boxer claim plan. I don't know what he was talking about with the "2 is pretty potent" quote, I have no idea what he's saying. But I didn't think he was inconsistent while reading him because he had two different opinions on two different plans.

Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 21:48 zarepath wrote:
@Thrawn, VE's vote seemed premature to me because I didn't really see a super early blue claim as scummy, but not wholly unreasonable considering Wile WAS directly contradicting everything he had said earlier.

If he really thinks that stuff in his case is scummy i doubt he would defend VE against other people for the same stuff earlier on..

##unvote
##Vote: zarepath


I'll look into kush tomorrow in more detail. something does not add up in his scumslip finding.

I don't know if I agree with you. He says he is scummy because of all these things, not just 1 of these things. He even specifically says that his first point isn't scummy in and of itself.

On January 21 2014 03:46 zarepath wrote:
I am thinking VE is scummy based off of a few things:

1. Lots of early discussion about the two plans
+ Show Spoiler +
He talked a lot about the two plans and asked others about them, and said so many things about them that people were mixing up which plan he was talking about. Not necessarily scummy in and of itself, but a very easy topic to talk about if you don't actually want to start making reads on people


Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 04:12 GMT
#608
On January 21 2014 13:06 thrawn2112 wrote:
maaaaan that is an unhelpful post

crossfire your kush read is nothing but meta. a bigass post with nothing but meta and no conclusion. why on earth did you post that?

cause I did a bunch of work and didn't feel like posting nothing after reading about kush for however long i did. I also figured it would be helpful in case people wanted to see my thoughts on kush since he seemed to be a hot topic (well at least you constantly pushed him)
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 04:30 GMT
#613
I don't know if this is town rayn right now. He is basically throwing accusations at everyone and just trying to see which one sticks. First there's the one against me.

On January 20 2014 11:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Could lynch for that post.
+ Show Spoiler +
On January 21 2014 10:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
##Vote: Crossfire99
I'll go back here until this guy says something.


He followed this with a vote on thrawn
On January 20 2014 10:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 10:22 thrawn2112 wrote:
yeah kush is right, pretty close to confirmed that one of kush or thrawn is scum

Well in that case:
##Vote: thrawn2112
There is nothing scummy in what kush has done so far.
+ Show Spoiler +
On January 21 2014 10:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Ugh.. Artanis is probably town after all. I kinda get his thought process but it's not good..
Artanis my vote on thrawn was not a joke. It was a serious vote, i do not joke vote.


Then the one against Wile (Slam)
On January 20 2014 12:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What the hell? How can scum hide? You just said a while ago you don't like kush's plan which means you don't take claims for granted. Who cares if someone claims named VT when most likely being lynched. It does not mean shit unless you can tell for sure their claim cannot be false which you can't.

If we have named VT's claim now we have 0-4 claims. In case we have 0 claims we learn the setup. If we have 1-3 claims we learn that there are 0-3 fakeclaims which in fact tells us absolutely nothing as you can't confirm anything. If we have 4 claims we learn that we have at least 1 scum in the claimed VT's, one fucking mafia in a group of four people, lol.

In every situation mafia learns how many power roles town has, possibly even the whole setup depending on the claim numbers and their roles.

Do i need to explain more why the claiming does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING GOOD TO THE TOWN AND ONLY HELPS MAFIA?!?!?!!?

VE - Crossfire - thesmurfdude / all those people look terrible.
VE + Crossfire for not realising something obvious while agreeing that we should not blindly trust claims
smurfdude for not reading the thread or if he has for making a useless post that does not contribute towards anything and asks an useless question that has been explained in thread already.

##unvote
##Vote: Wile E. Coyote

Next up is bum.
On January 20 2014 22:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 22:36 VisceraEyes wrote:
There isn't much to them. After reading through I can at least say that he weakly agrees that I look bad (though I don't know why) and he believes the boxer claim and he thinks other boxers should not claim.

I wouldn't mind some elaboration on his issue with me.


So here are bumatlarge's posts:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 17:32 bumatlarge wrote:
We'll, No one else should claim. One named VT doesn't actually tell us or the mafia anything. I have my doubts that Wile is lying unless he's being a very intentionally hard to understand smurf. "Chez" or no, it doesn't hurt that bad. Anyone voting for him for that reason is being awfully hasty.

green: believes claim
red: says claim is fake

which is it?

Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 18:23 bumatlarge wrote:
I'm assuming boxer means Named VT?

This is a question that has been answered twice in the thread already.
Useless "contribution" or not even reading the thread.

Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 18:29 bumatlarge wrote:
On January 20 2014 13:02 suki wrote:
On January 20 2014 09:27 VisceraEyes wrote:
It's dumb because of what rayn said - you're literally saying "Anyone who claims blue is immune to the lynch". Literally. What is stopping scum from just claiming blue whenever they're on the block?

On January 20 2014 10:01 VisceraEyes wrote:
Yeah I'm mostly indifferent to the matter. I can see the argument for it not being needed and it giving scum information, but I think it could help us in the future by 1) eliminating scum's ability to fake-claim it on the block and 2) forcing scum to decide now whether they want to fake-claim the role.

On January 20 2014 10:02 VisceraEyes wrote:
2 is pretty potent in my opinion. If you don't believe me, take a look at Kush's plan. He wants to make blues IMMUNE to the lynch.


So is kush's plan dumb? Or do you think it could help us in the future and there's a reason that's pretty potent? Or are you just indifferent to the whole matter?

On January 20 2014 11:26 VisceraEyes wrote:
It does NOT matter if scum figure out the setup before town does...in fact given the nature of this game that is pretty much a given. What DOES matter it's that we not tell them exactly what it is ON DAY ONE BEFORE WE GET ANY INFO OURSELVES, which is very possible if we have boxers claim.

Is it worth the risk? I'm starting to think not, but want other opinions.


Inconsistent views on kush's plan (he think's it's dumb / sees arguments for it / is mostly indifferent). Wishy-washy.

And I just hate the bolded red line in general.

##unvote
##vote VisceraEyes


The scum hunt is strong with this one. I'd like VE to explain his thought process on the first part, he seems to be changing his mind mid post, then it would make more sense as town.

Scum hunting is not strong with that one. The first part is entirely false and that's all he's talking about.

Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 18:33 bumatlarge wrote:
On January 20 2014 17:48 Wile E. Coyote wrote:
On January 20 2014 14:25 VisceraEyes wrote:
##Vote Wile E
His little act about not knowing what a boxer is does not really jive with the claim. Add to that the fact that he claimed 5 hours into the game after being very clear about how he feels about boxers claiming, and it all just looks bad.

This is a logical reaction.

I disagree, the only reason you think it's reasonable is because he is holding back because he probably wrong about you. I'm just working out what I can remember from VE if he posts like this as town.

Again implying the claim is true, and now he is not really suspicious of VE in the end.



TLDR;
Here's what bum's posts say this far
- Does believe the claim but does not believe the claim
- Says VE is scummy but VE is not necessarily scummy
- Asks a question that's been answered 2 times already.

##Vote: bumatlarge

Then kush
On January 21 2014 02:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
##unvote
##Vote: kushm4sta

stop it already bum, i have no idea what you are trying to do or why you get angry for no reason at all. If i have one invalid point in my case that does not make other points invalid as you try to tell here.

I have no read on VE. If i had to give something i'd say scum but i dunno yet.

artanis has the next honor
On January 21 2014 04:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I kinda wanna lynch Artanis for his stupid ass case and unwillingness to do anything.

And now zarepeth.
On January 21 2014 12:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am pretty sure zarepath is mafia. About half of his stuff in his case on VE has happened before he makes these posts:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 21:44 zarepath wrote:
I thought VE was talking about the two different plans, kush's "don't lynch anyone who claims blue" plan and the Boxer claim plan. I don't know what he was talking about with the "2 is pretty potent" quote, I have no idea what he's saying. But I didn't think he was inconsistent while reading him because he had two different opinions on two different plans.

Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 21:48 zarepath wrote:
@Thrawn, VE's vote seemed premature to me because I didn't really see a super early blue claim as scummy, but not wholly unreasonable considering Wile WAS directly contradicting everything he had said earlier.

If he really thinks that stuff in his case is scummy i doubt he would defend VE against other people for the same stuff earlier on..

##unvote
##Vote: zarepath


I'll look into kush tomorrow in more detail. something does not add up in his scumslip finding.

Remember this is only a little more than 24 hours into a game and he is already attacking and voting for this many people!? This screams just throwing out cases and hoping one sticks.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 21:31 GMT
#852
Hmmmm. I don't know what to make of zare's claim, but I'm thinking it doesn't matter. I defended him earlier about his case but after all the other things he's said and the other stuff people have pointed out about his case, I could still lynch him.

If the claim scares people off his lynch I'd be willing to vote Balla purely because of his "case" against me.
On January 21 2014 17:09 Balla24 wrote:
I don't like Crossfire at all.

His case on Rayn is super weird, where exactly does what rayn does make him scum? He's pressuring a lot of people with cases and votes. Crossfire is calling him scum for not committing to them and switching targets a lot but how does that make rayn scum?? It doesn't. It makes him town. From town perspective everybody starts as neutral and either gets a mafia read or a town read... its the opposite as scum.

Rayn builds cases on people he thinks are scum, and posts reasoning too, yet Crossfire just latches onto the action itself and NOT the reasoning of rayn's cases. Rayn is one of the most active people in this game, why does Crossfire feel the need to pressure rayn about something so weak?

Then there's this:

Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 11:06 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 20 2014 10:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On January 20 2014 10:01 VisceraEyes wrote:
On January 20 2014 09:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Nobody should claim at this point. Named VT's (boxers) do not help us in any way now because there is a possibility of 0-3 boxers and claiming does not clear anyone, it only gives mafia information about the setup unless we want all people to claim which we don't.

suki, kushmasta does not usually even read his own role PM properly (which is proven by last game for example) so unfortunately that plan does not make him non VT / non named VT and certainly not mafia.

Yeah I'm mostly indifferent to the matter. I can see the argument for it not being needed and it giving scum information, but I think it could help us in the future by 1) eliminating scum's ability to fake-claim it on the block and 2) forcing scum to decide now whether they want to fake-claim the role.

Here is the problem:
If the named VT's claim it gives mafia info about the setup.
  • If there are no named VT's -> mafia knows the setup and can WIFOM by fakeclaiming VT and it's impossible to prove if itäs true or not
  • If there is 1 naved VT -> If mafia has a GF they know the setup, if not, they know town has no more than 1 power role.
  • If there are 2 named VT's -> mafia knows there is only max 1 power role.
  • If there are 3 named VT's -> mafia knows there is no other power roles. they can WIFOM a roleblock on people and it "confirms" that's not the setup, so WIFOM.


Every single possible scenario only helps mafai and not town, so no, don't claim named VT's because they can't be confirmed and it only helps mafia if they know how many Named VT's there are.

Discussion closed.

I don't think it's quite that simple.

I don't care if there are no named VTs or 1 or 2 or 3. Yes scum will be learn things about the setup, but honestly that doesn't matter because scum already know that there are X to Y power roles from their configuration. What claiming now does is prevent scum from being able to fake claim a named VT later. It prevents stupid things happening at lynches. Additionally, if we have power roles it gives them info about where they should begin using their powers. Even if scum decide to fake claim now, it's not like we're giving the named VTs a free pass, we're just treating them like miller claims where the info helps us and prevents scum from claiming something like that (e.g. miller) in the future.

That's all. It all depends if you think it matters if scum knowing the setup is a bad thing or if the claims could even help our power roles. I'll let other people chime in on this.

Ok. Back to this crazy Niners-Seahawks game.


Where rayn points out why claiming Boxers is a bad thing for town and a good thing for mafia. He essentially brushes that off by saying "mafia already knows information about the setup" without really explaining what. Rayn gives him the courtesy to write out his expected outcomes from the plan but Crossfire does not reciprocate.

##vote Crossfire99

His bolded section is just wrong. It's like he just stopped reading my post after the green section or is trying to purposely misconstrue what I'm saying because there is no reason to stop reading in the middle of the sentence. Especially since the very next sentence explains what the advantage (expected outcome) of my plan was, preventing scum from fakeclaiming before a lynch (*cough* zarepeth *coug*).

On January 22 2014 02:31 Balla24 wrote:
Past 2 days have been busier than normal. Can't refresh and spam conversations with people like I normally do which is unfortunate. It's looking a lot better moving forward though.

As far as Crossfire: His case against rayn is bad and really construed, its very large but the only thing he is attacking is the fact that rayn has jumped around a lot. Like it doesn't make sense to put that much effort into that first off, and secondly why does he feel the need to pressure rayn of all people who is active as hell and will be more readable because of it. It just feels very wrong. The second bit about the Boxers claiming thing is obvious that there is scum motivation for discussing it and getting the town onboard. So him brushing off what was said is super suspicious.

Other people who look bad: Jonnylaw, Artanis. Artanis's game plan is really weird and underwhelming to me. He comes in trying to hard read rayn, accuses him of being scum and then leaves. Not only did he only accuse you of being scum because he thinks you have "something to hide" but you had done so much already and now that there was more.

This quote where he restates his scum read on me also doesn't work. He's saying I shouldn't pressure rayn just because he's active. That's dumb. If you think someone could be scum, you don't just not pressure them because they're active. He also just assumes that my plan is purely scum motivated and didn't have a legitimate point which was what I said about the whole prevents scum from fake claiming.

Basically, Balla seems to purposely miscontrue what I'm saying and paint it in a scummy light instead of just actually reading what I'm saying.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 21:34 GMT
#856
I don't understand what just happened. I don't think he broke the rules at all. I've given fake claims to scum in my games and they can copy paste it. I think that rule refers to timestamps or jazz like that.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 21:41 GMT
#870
On January 22 2014 06:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
No townie wants anyone modkilled especially when mafia has fakeclaims and it's easy to prove and i have asked the hosts about it already.

I assumed this as well about the fake claims. It's always been something that's been "standard" to me. You give mafia a role pm written by you to prevent that them from being caught on the specific phrasing of the pm. Apparently it's illegal to even post that though? I don't think that's right. I guess going strictly by the wording of the rule, what zare did was illegal, but I've seen other people do that in other games and not be modkilled for it because it was assumed people got fake claims. I don't know what to believe now.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 21:44 GMT
#877
What do people think about what I said about Balla?
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 21:49 GMT
#889
On January 22 2014 06:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Crossfire99 you're wrong. You never explained how you draw the "mafia already knows information about the setup" conclusion because it's incorrect.

Because they either have 2 goons or not. I figured it was obvious. They then can narrow things down based on that. 2 goons means 1 powerrole and 1-2 named VTs. If not, there's more spread for the options, but they still know things.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 21:54 GMT
#902
On January 22 2014 06:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Crossfire, I somewhat agree what you say about Balla but you look way worse because you just dropped your case on me for no reason. Your play all game has made no sense to me and i have no idea what are you going to achieve.

Eh, I don't know what I think about you, so I put you on the back burner because I feel stronger about others instead of you. No one seems to think you're scummy now, so I'll have to see what you look like later. Maybe I'm just too paranoid about how active you can be as scum because of ##, but I'm basically waiting to see what happens and reevaluating you then.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 21:56 GMT
#909
On January 22 2014 06:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 06:49 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Crossfire99 you're wrong. You never explained how you draw the "mafia already knows information about the setup" conclusion because it's incorrect.

Because they either have 2 goons or not. I figured it was obvious. They then can narrow things down based on that. 2 goons means 1 powerrole and 1-2 named VTs. If not, there's more spread for the options, but they still know things.

Yes that's true and i missed it in the first place. Why did you not just say that in the first place?

cause I thought is was obvious T_T and didn't realize it was an issue
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 21:58 GMT
#914
So interesting thought. If we believe all the named vt claims, we lynch kush. If not we lynch one of them because kush soft claimed a powerrole (or not a vt)
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 22:00 GMT
#920
On January 22 2014 06:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 06:56 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:49 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Crossfire99 you're wrong. You never explained how you draw the "mafia already knows information about the setup" conclusion because it's incorrect.

Because they either have 2 goons or not. I figured it was obvious. They then can narrow things down based on that. 2 goons means 1 powerrole and 1-2 named VTs. If not, there's more spread for the options, but they still know things.

Yes that's true and i missed it in the first place. Why did you not just say that in the first place?

cause I thought is was obvious T_T and didn't realize it was an issue

No i really looked it only from town role perspective, not from scum at all.

What do you think about kush?

gut feeling now is town, because of the accidental non vt claim and now I'm seeing the "wildness" and big swings in opinions on players I was seeing when he smurfed and was town in ## (which I though was really weird because i never played with him or observed a game with him in it).
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 22:02 GMT
#924
On January 22 2014 06:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 06:58 Crossfire99 wrote:
So interesting thought. If we believe all the named vt claims, we lynch kush. If not we lynch one of them because kush soft claimed a powerrole (or not a vt)

Where did he do that?

I read this quote as him doing this. I assumed scum got fake claims and therefore know the structure of at least named vts and regular vts, so this made him town in my eyes, but then he didn't act like I expected him too so I got confused.
On January 20 2014 09:19 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 09:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I found it ironic that my "name" is Z-Boson, the dude who outed my scumteam by posting our scum QT in thread in one game.

\so you are claiming named vt lol

Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 22:07 GMT
#930
On January 22 2014 07:06 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 07:02 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:58 Crossfire99 wrote:
So interesting thought. If we believe all the named vt claims, we lynch kush. If not we lynch one of them because kush soft claimed a powerrole (or not a vt)

Where did he do that?

I read this quote as him doing this. I assumed scum got fake claims and therefore know the structure of at least named vts and regular vts, so this made him town in my eyes, but then he didn't act like I expected him too so I got confused.
On January 20 2014 09:19 kushm4sta wrote:
On January 20 2014 09:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I found it ironic that my "name" is Z-Boson, the dude who outed my scumteam by posting our scum QT in thread in one game.

\so you are claiming named vt lol


So what is your current read on Kush?

On January 22 2014 07:00 Crossfire99 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 06:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:56 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:49 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Crossfire99 you're wrong. You never explained how you draw the "mafia already knows information about the setup" conclusion because it's incorrect.

Because they either have 2 goons or not. I figured it was obvious. They then can narrow things down based on that. 2 goons means 1 powerrole and 1-2 named VTs. If not, there's more spread for the options, but they still know things.

Yes that's true and i missed it in the first place. Why did you not just say that in the first place?

cause I thought is was obvious T_T and didn't realize it was an issue

No i really looked it only from town role perspective, not from scum at all.

What do you think about kush?

gut feeling now is town, because of the accidental non vt claim and now I'm seeing the "wildness" and big swings in opinions on players I was seeing when he smurfed and was town in ## (which I though was really weird because i never played with him or observed a game with him in it).

Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 22:14 GMT
#943
kush are you a non vt role? now would be the time to claim. Even if you're a power role it means someone of you, thrawn, zare, or wile (slam) is lying.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 22:16 GMT
#948
I'd lynch balla but not kush
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 22:24 GMT
#960
artanis, the first quote you had of mine was me explaining my read now in full which includes the accidental non vt claim which was my first thought about him and his "wildness." The second quote was what I though about him during the post where I came to no conclusion on him. The accidental non vt is in both, so I'm confused about what you're confused about lol.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 22:28 GMT
#965
yeah kush, i don't understand this post of yours if you're not a non vt role. Now I think you're scum.

On January 22 2014 07:02 Crossfire99 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 06:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:58 Crossfire99 wrote:
So interesting thought. If we believe all the named vt claims, we lynch kush. If not we lynch one of them because kush soft claimed a powerrole (or not a vt)

Where did he do that?

I read this quote as him doing this. I assumed scum got fake claims and therefore know the structure of at least named vts and regular vts, so this made him town in my eyes, but then he didn't act like I expected him too so I got confused.
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 09:19 kushm4sta wrote:
On January 20 2014 09:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I found it ironic that my "name" is Z-Boson, the dude who outed my scumteam by posting our scum QT in thread in one game.

\so you are claiming named vt lol


Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 22:35 GMT
#972
On January 22 2014 07:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 07:28 Crossfire99 wrote:
yeah kush, i don't understand this post of yours if you're not a non vt role. Now I think you're scum.

On January 22 2014 07:02 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:58 Crossfire99 wrote:
So interesting thought. If we believe all the named vt claims, we lynch kush. If not we lynch one of them because kush soft claimed a powerrole (or not a vt)

Where did he do that?

I read this quote as him doing this. I assumed scum got fake claims and therefore know the structure of at least named vts and regular vts, so this made him town in my eyes, but then he didn't act like I expected him too so I got confused.
On January 20 2014 09:19 kushm4sta wrote:
On January 20 2014 09:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I found it ironic that my "name" is Z-Boson, the dude who outed my scumteam by posting our scum QT in thread in one game.

\so you are claiming named vt lol



That's dimb, he thought i claimed named VT, there's nothing more to read into that.

no, he isn't claiming either named VT or VT there. if he was a VT, he would have known that your role name goes along with how VTs are named. If he is a named VT, he would know that that isn't a named VT role pm. And now since he says he is just a VT, I no longer believe this was a town slip and actually a scum slip.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 22:37 GMT
#975
EBWOP: I misread your post, so I changed my first sentence.

On January 22 2014 07:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 07:28 Crossfire99 wrote:
yeah kush, i don't understand this post of yours if you're not a non vt role. Now I think you're scum.

On January 22 2014 07:02 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:58 Crossfire99 wrote:
So interesting thought. If we believe all the named vt claims, we lynch kush. If not we lynch one of them because kush soft claimed a powerrole (or not a vt)

Where did he do that?

I read this quote as him doing this. I assumed scum got fake claims and therefore know the structure of at least named vts and regular vts, so this made him town in my eyes, but then he didn't act like I expected him too so I got confused.
On January 20 2014 09:19 kushm4sta wrote:
On January 20 2014 09:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I found it ironic that my "name" is Z-Boson, the dude who outed my scumteam by posting our scum QT in thread in one game.

\so you are claiming named vt lol



That's dimb, he thought i claimed named VT, there's nothing more to read into that.

no, he is accidentally revealing what info he has. if he was a VT, he would have known that your role name goes along with how VTs are named. If he is a named VT, he would know that that isn't a named VT role pm. And now since he says he is just a VT, I no longer believe this was a town slip and actually a scum slip.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 22:42 GMT
#985
On January 22 2014 07:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I didn't fucking claim anything and he thought i did.
Every single person has a different "name". If i am a cop and you are a cop you can be named "raynpelikoneet" and i can be named "Crossfire99" and it does not tell anything about our role.

kushmasta thought i was claiming named VT for some reason, probably because his "name" was not Z-Boson and he thought i have a different role than he does. If anything he is claiming vanilla town there, because i was talking about my "name" and he thought i climed something.

So yes, if he is not mafi he is vanilla town - based on that post alone, not power role.

Well let me put it this way. I didn't assume that power roles had names cause they're power roles, though I see now they probably do and if you asked about this it would be helpful to know. Actually now hearing kush's explanation and what you said, I don't want to lynch him lol.

Balla anyone?
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 22:45 GMT
#992
##Vote: Balla24

I'm down.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 22:59 GMT
#1029
On January 22 2014 07:58 VisceraEyes wrote:
Hi guys, dinner is keeping me away from the thread. wtf 10 pages in 2 hours?

I can't read it all in time. I'll read it all after the flip.

what else do you expect but last minute tl mafia shenanigans.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 23:01 GMT
#1033
On January 22 2014 07:59 suki wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 07:59 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 22 2014 07:58 VisceraEyes wrote:
Hi guys, dinner is keeping me away from the thread. wtf 10 pages in 2 hours?

I can't read it all in time. I'll read it all after the flip.

what else do you expect but last minute tl mafia shenanigans.


Is this really a thing cuz I hate it -_-;

it depends on the game, but especially games with *cough* BlazingHand *cough* are known to have lots of last minute shenannies
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 23:01 GMT
#1034
On January 22 2014 08:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Can't do anything else because people are stupid and start playing at the last hour every game.

Blame my schedule. I don't control it. I'm here when I can be here.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 23:08 GMT
#1042
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 23:08 GMT
#1045
Peace yo. Gone till tomorrow probably.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 22 2014 15:58 GMT
#1141
Calm down and stop the personal insults people. This is just a game. No need to make the attacks personal. I'll get to what I think on this stuff after I read what I missed but I noticed this just skimming and had to comment.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 22 2014 16:13 GMT
#1142
Haha. Would lynch for this. Great find. (You too suki for the original case which I'm not quoting, but read) In the spoiler below are the towniest of townie posts (sarcasm) that Balla posted in that window to make JLaw (lol, but if this offends you let me know and I won't call you it) do a 180.
On January 23 2014 00:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 03:59 JonnyLaw wrote:
I dunno maybe he's frustrated he got no support after putting a lot of effort into a case. Something you did not do.

Hell if it were up to me I'd lynch balla today but that doesn't seem likely. I've played 3 games with him in the last 2-3 months and this is not how town balla should be playing. So, when something's not working find another scummer to lynch. And I think Rayn did exactly that when he found Zarepath.

Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 06:47 JonnyLaw wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:45 suki wrote:
I think Balla's play fits my view of him as town so far.

Aside from the activity level I'd agree.

no no no.
This does not make any sense.

+ Show Spoiler +
On January 22 2014 04:06 Balla24 wrote:
yeah yeah jonny we get it and its true i havent been the same Balla, that's gonna change

Why are you so worried this game though? Usually you are all "well Balla is generally active enough that I can read him later".

I'm fine with lynching zarepath. You guys have both done all the work, which makes you more town definitely, but I still need to see what Crossfire and Artanis are doing before I settle 100%

##unvote
##vote zarepath

On January 22 2014 04:25 Balla24 wrote:
lol Aristotle? You mean artanis?

On January 22 2014 04:33 Balla24 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 04:26 kushm4sta wrote:
Balla why are you voting zare? There is nothing scummy therre. Yes rayn is town and probably jl too but that doesn't make them righT


I disagree, what JL and rayn are pointing out IS scummy to me. He's contradicting himself and playing exactly like how he says scum players play.

With that said though... with artanis jumping on him 2/3 of my current scum reads are voting on him. That doesn't sit well with me. Still want to see what crossfire does though but i'm already reconsidering.

Why don't you think what rayn and JL are saying about zarepath is scummy kush? It looks scummy to me and clearly them.

On January 22 2014 04:41 Balla24 wrote:
You tunneled Rayn for not playing along with your troll, which is fine. You can have a scum read on him for that if you want. But he's done so much more than just not play along with you, which you didn't really say anything about. Your re-entry is consistent though. I just feel like you can and should have been doing so much more. Which is why I'm underwhelmed by your play so far.

My read on crossfire is what I posted in my case, nothing has changed since he hasn't come back and posted anything. So still scum.

JL is the weaker of the 3 that I don't feel very confident about.

On January 22 2014 04:44 Balla24 wrote:
Also I'm still having trouble understanding why you chose to try to get rayn to counterclaim your scum claim. What happens if he plays along?

Rayn told me it was a joke and wrote it off so I didn't pay it any mind but it turns out you had some real motivation for it so I do want an explanation afterall.

On January 22 2014 04:45 Balla24 wrote:
EBWOP: Why you chose to claim SCUM as opposed to anything else.

On January 22 2014 05:03 Balla24 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 04:51 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On January 22 2014 04:44 Balla24 wrote:
Also I'm still having trouble understanding why you chose to try to get rayn to counterclaim your scum claim. What happens if he plays along?

Rayn told me it was a joke and wrote it off so I didn't pay it any mind but it turns out you had some real motivation for it so I do want an explanation afterall.

It's not about if he plays along. I was near certain he would. It's about how he would approach it that would allow me insight into the mindset with which he starts the game. It was also meant as kickstart for the game so we could go straight into scumhunting rather than talk about setup and policy and all that jazz.


Sure that's reasonable.

But why did you chose to call rayn scum based off of only that and barely mention other things that make him scum. Like you said:

Show nested quote +
On January 21 2014 04:04 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
No I'm not happy, because other than refusing to engage me in conversation you're now also attempting to destroy town atmosphere. I have found scum in you, and you are who I want to lynch.


But you didn't say how he was destroying the town atmosphere...

On January 22 2014 05:18 Balla24 wrote:
@thrawn: I don't really have any experience with Slam at all. So let me ask you this:

You seemed to not consider the fact that he is claimed BoxeR. Does that fact change anything with how he might play. To me he seemed to get much less serious after he claimed BoxeR. Similar to when people become confirmed town they start sucking and not caring as much. Do you see Slam doing that here?


Interesting tidbit is the soft bus of Jonny because he's the 3rd most scummy in Balla's eyes, but he's not really sure. Standard sorta scummy but maybe not spiel that scum do all the time especially this early.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 23 2014 23:53 GMT
#1425
##Vote JonnyLaw

Unless he comes back with some amazing stuff, this vote is staying here.

As for the last scum, that's more difficult. I would guess it would be either bum, artanis, or barristan. I've read through their filters and nothing has jumped out at me, so it looks like I'm gonna have to spend so more time on this later because I gotta peace now. Sorry, but I'm crazy busy.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 24 2014 16:45 GMT
#1545
Ok. I'm back. I'm willing to lay off Jonny for now because he's actually tried and done stuff. I can also see his defense as townie. If our lynches don't turn out, we have to look at him again, but for now I'm definitely down for an Artanis lynch. This bum claim clears some things up, and Artanis's activity around lynch is super suspicious plus this quote from him (I feel someone already said this but I can't find it so I apologize to that person)

On January 24 2014 06:58 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2014 13:49 suki wrote:
Artanis, do you have any ideas who the third scum is? I notice you asking a lot of questions but haven't posted any of your ideas recently.

I think it might be Barristan. I'm not sure though. The only point that really goes against him was the one I pointed out earlier, other than that nothing really stands out from his filter. If it's not Barristan, then I imagine it's one of the people that's town for the wrong reasons. It could be someone town just for a claim (Zarepath, Wile E, Thrawn). I haven't looked into them too much. Still plenty of time and I'm pretty sure on my other townreads.
-snipped-


Basically, he's attacking what he knows is a fake claim because mafia only have a rb which means 3 named vts is impossible. This is the same thing that bum knows to be false, but he knows it is because he's a parity cop. (I still can't believe you claimed now...you could have at least tried a little bit to move the lynch to artanis before claiming, but whatever lol).

##Unvote JonnyLaw
##Vote Artanis[Xp]
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 24 2014 18:12 GMT
#1583
After reading Artanis, I'm getting a random paranoia moment. I'm actually thinking the scum team could be Jonny and suki. They both had weird reads on Balla early game and acted oddly during the lynch. Honestly with the way suki has actually been throwing cases at everyone until one sticks (and then backing off Jonny once it did if he is actually scum), she could be scum. I don't want to vote her before either of Artanis or Jonny. I've got to think about this more. I'll be back in a few hours in time for the lynch.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 24 2014 22:48 GMT
#1689
Hmmmm. I'm here and I think I gotta keep my vote.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 24 2014 23:03 GMT
#1695
Yeah boi!
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 24 2014 23:04 GMT
#1697
qt still there!
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 24 2014 23:04 GMT
#1698
didn't click it though!
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 24 2014 23:04 GMT
#1699
hurry dp!
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 24 2014 23:05 GMT
#1703
well i'm leaving now. i pmed dp too. So everybody spam his inbox till he does it.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 24 2014 23:06 GMT
#1704
Don't click it!
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 25 2014 04:42 GMT
#1804
gg yo. Was fun. Now do people see why I wanted the named VTs to claim (This needs to be thought hard about for this setup in general because it might make it too hard for scum because it's a big risk to fake claim named VT for fear of a setup in which it is impossible to have X named VTs with the amount of power roles in the game.)

Day 1 lynch is even more hilarious knowing Zare was mafia. Props to him for claiming. You probably would have survived a few days, but I don't know if you would have been able to pull off the win. It would have been tough.

It's good to see you back Keirathi. Now that I know it's you, I can see it being you because you were always heavily into meta, but I had no clue who you were and honestly didn't care too much lol.

Don't be too hard on yourself, Darth. Everybody makes mistakes hosting. I've made a few while hosting as well and will make more in the future. Also no matter who is hosting, there will always be this potential because people screw up because that's real life and there's nothing you can do to 100% prevent it.

I also apologize if anyone was upset by my lurking. My schedule doesn't allow me to devote large chunks of time to the game for me to post a ton, but I still tried my best with what time I had.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 10h 16m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 279
StarCraft: Brood War
ggaemo 322
firebathero 66
Aegong 65
Sexy 46
Dota 2
syndereN614
monkeys_forever371
League of Legends
JimRising 523
febbydoto3
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox702
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor190
Other Games
tarik_tv22384
summit1g12297
gofns11153
Grubby3971
shahzam426
ViBE53
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1054
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH190
• davetesta47
• RyuSc2 47
• tFFMrPink 17
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21737
Other Games
• imaqtpie1263
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10h 16m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
14h 16m
Bonyth vs TBD
WardiTV European League
16h 16m
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
HeRoMaRinE vs MaxPax
Wardi Open
1d 11h
OSC
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
6 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
HCC Europe
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CAC 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.