Ban List 2.0 Breakout Discussion - Page 2

On January 06 2014 16:16 DarthPunk wrote:


OK i just flat out disagree with those being similar things. But that is ok. I still love you.

On January 06 2014 16:56 DarthPunk wrote:
Getting replaced out before the game starts should never be ban worthy and Wave did not have to replace in when he knew he would be survivor.

On January 06 2014 17:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:

It does not matter at all what you think but i happen to know WoS wasn't happy at all because of it. I actually requested to be a Serial Killer in Titanic II for reasons, if you can't handle playing some alignment you should request town/mafia then. When you sign up to a game you imo choose to play your role/alignment to their win condition, whatever that is. Replacing out because you didn't like what you got is not doing that.

On January 06 2014 17:04 DarthPunk wrote:


He didn't have to replace in. And if there was no replacement I would have played the game. Getting replaced out before the game even starts literally has zero effect on the game

If Wave wasn't happy about it he should not have replaced in.

On January 06 2014 17:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:

How can you say that? Someone might have joined that game just because they wanted to play with you. You can't possibly know how it affects people because everyone reacts differently.

On January 06 2014 16:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Well that's your opinion, and everyone has different opinions. That's the reason why it needs to be clear what you are allowed to do and what is against the rules. Lemme give you a couple of scenarios:

In GoT game my mafia team has succesfully framed Mocsta and we are pushing a lynch on him. That is my game plan. My game plan does not include Mocsta quitting the game in the middle of the day phase we are supposed to lynch him because that costs my team a night of actions, which means 1.5 KP + 0.5 house KP (which will be rethought in addition to the lynch). I have to find a new town lynch, if i do not my game might fall apart if town gets their shit together, just because someone decided to quit the game. Let's say Mocsta asked an immediate replacement. Does that make things more fair/less fair for me. Impossible to say, because i was playing against Mocsta and not against whoever replaced him. His replacement might be able to convince the town they were framed, hell they might even convince the town i am scum if they are good enough interacting with other people.

In Noir you asked to be replaced. I was mafia. Did i like it? Fuck no, because i was playing against DarthPunk and not against strongandbig. Did it matter? Not really, in the end. Could it have mattered? Yes, a lot. The town was in a fucking chaos because of ego battles and hotheads replacing out helped marv & yamato to get towns shit together and nearly won the game (most likely had without D2 lynch shenanigans). Did it hurt my team you replaced out? Yes it did. Did it hurt my team VE ragequitted? Yes it did, because he was a possible mislynch as we had correctly framed him. Did it hurt my team geript ragequit? Yes because he was promoting bad town atmosphere and was apossible mislynch/policy lynch/policy vigi shot. Was any of those any better/worse than others for my team, no.

In Golden Sun you replaced out because you did not like being survivor. Did i like it? I didn't really give a shit because it didn't matter to me at all. But go ask WaveofShadow, did he like it? He wouldn't prolly give a shit about Noir & GoT but would like you to have a ban because he had to play survivor because someone didn't like their role.

In LXI marv got modkilled for breaking the rules but his hydra partner geript was not removed from the game. Mafia did not think that affected the game at all. Town did, because by dick move analysis people considered geript confirmed town and that was literally the only reason town lost that game.

---

The bottom line is, you can't tell which is worse than others because every situation affects differently to different people. And yes, in each scenario the rules were broken, someone quit a game because they could not handle an in game situation / follow basidc rules given by their host, whatever that was.

That's why they should be equally punished.

DrParnassus Afghanistan. August 28 2013 03:20. Posts 308 Gift TL+ PM Profile Quote #
filter
I pm'd the G-Man about Mocsta but I haven't heard back. I'm going to go ahead and request a 1 game ban for Mocsta as I'm satisfied that he won't commit the same offense again.

Nothing else for GoT. The Ace modkill sucked but more and more people were blatantly disregarding the silent night and it was starting to get out of hand. By the way, thanks again to everyone who followed the rules. I'm not talking about simple mistakes such as accidentally posting, but the instances where people were knowingly breaking the rules.

On September 26 2013 07:11 ShiaoPi wrote:
Bans and Warnings for Golden Sun Mafia:

Requesting a Warning for DarthPunk.
He was replaced out after seeing his role PM as he thought that it was impossible for him to win as a 3rd Party survivor

On January 06 2014 17:27 Mocsta wrote:
Rules r da rules.

Being a mayor doesn't mean u can smoke da crack n booze it up with the ladies and receive no dmg to dat town cred.

80/20 rule in full effekt..respekt and represent. When the minority outvoice the majority and the sheep's follow thy shepherd.

On January 06 2014 17:28 DarthPunk wrote:


How did you get into mocsta's account slam?

On January 06 2014 17:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Well at least i tried.
Maybe people would step out of their tunnelvision if for example strongandbig had solved the Noir on N1.