II Titanic Mini Mafia - Page 6

On December 11 2013 13:24 Pandain wrote:

So you actually have scum reads and decide to ignore them for a policy lynch

Nice holy

On December 11 2013 13:36 Pandain wrote:

This is super fake reasoning to me.

If we're that confused, slam can explain.
And he's not that unintelligible

On December 11 2013 15:19 bumatlarge wrote:
I don't man, mafia don't single out people to send little messages. I've got this special power rangers post, and I think he was trying to tell me something.

On December 11 2013 15:33 bumatlarge wrote:


Nothing

On December 11 2013 19:46 Xatalos wrote:
Alakaslam would be a better Vigi shot, since (almost) everyone seems to agree that he's detrimental. The voting patterns wouldn't really tell that much of anyone's alignment, at least compared to players who have reasons not to be lynched (besides a statistical chance of flipping town). It's better to lynch players who have a higher chance of flipping scum and whose flip will give good insights into the voters. One mistake we made in GoT Mafia was to focus too much on lurkers/anti-town players, and it ended badly.



I like this post. Bum's main reason for voting Pandain was because he hadn't posted yet. Now Pandain has posted quite a bit, but bum just keeps going for him regardless of that. It doesn't really look like bum tries to figure out Pandain's alignment, he just chose a target and keeps going for it. That's not a town mindset. I want to hear from bum why Pandain is still a "good lynch" ASAP.

On December 11 2013 20:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Slam starts contributing in English or we lynch him.
purple starts contributing or we lynch him.

In case both of those do not happen one gets lynched other one vigged.
In case both of those happen we lynch the scummiest dude.

On December 11 2013 20:48 Xatalos wrote:
By the way, I see Spaghetticus mentioned as a lynch candidate every once in a while. I don't really agree. Just look at these posts:







They all just read to me as town. It's not impossible for this attitude to be a ploy, but the far more likely scenario is that Spag is just not afraid of suspicions at all. Which means town.

I also agree with this:



The only worrying part is that there isn't much scumhunting in his filter. The previous post is probably the post closest to scumhunting, although it didn't come to any conclusion.



Alakaslam isn't a terrible lynch, but it's definitely the easiest way out of D1. And it's a bit worrying that Spag's only committal to a lynch is someone like him.

Spag, if you're town, you need to step up your scumhunting. You mentioned that you had several slight scumreads, but you haven't shared any of them yet (except Corazon, I'd assume). Otherwise you're looking townish, but that's a worrying part about you.

On December 11 2013 20:45 kushm4sta wrote:
tbh im getting sick of your bitching more than im sick of shitposters

On December 11 2013 20:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Xatalos: Corazon is highly emotional player who contradicts himself as town, a lot. To me it seems like he's just pissed off for accusations against him because he finds them unreasonable. Stupid? Yes. Scummy? Not necessarily. He's far more reasonable and tries to control his emotions as scum. I don't see anything scummy in what he has said this game, mor likely it's just frustration. What you just quoted from Spaghetticus is attacking Cora for being emo. That's not scumhunting, that's an easy way to attack someone who says dumb stuff. The fact is Spag was here last night, he said he will catch up and share his thoughts. He ended up not catching up and and instead made 60 fluff posts about something irrelevant (defended himself against people who just wanted him to share his opinions). I find that highly suspicious.

On December 11 2013 22:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Plutarch what do you think of this?

sidesprang finds Xatalos' thoughts really good and has a town read on him. Xatalos mainly talks about Artanis yet sidesprang does not mention Artanis at all in his post. Shouldn't he have a scumread on him?

On December 11 2013 22:13 Xatalos wrote:
Hmm. Maybe I've focused too much on Spag's "towntells". It's certainly easier to fake stuff like that than scumhunting, and there isn't really scumhunting by Spag despite a large filter.

Plutarch, you agree with rayn that Cora's anger seems genuine? I don't really think so. He's just focused on countering those who have accused him and not much else.