TL Mafia LXIII: Time to Die - Page 136

On November 18 2013 09:43 Pandain wrote:
Does anyone have a good read on Mattchew? I think he's town because of the total lack of effort he's putting in to be honest. He does more as scum, I think he's literally not just giving a shit

On November 18 2013 09:41 StorrZerg wrote:
Start off with a light townie read on Lord CHUPAZI.
Vapam have issues with SS, takes Kaslizm a bit but duplakfish move past the issue. I don't really like how salazan brought it up, mafia is about fun, and its about trying to win as well. I think mangufish over reacted to SS, puzani pushed to move on from the issue and directing it to push other for questions.

Yet thuu continue with the pointless talk about having fun ><
Moving past that..

I like the direction magunti are pushing with questions, struggling to find Ronald Reagan's own personal opinions atm
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=434275&currentpage=52#1028
Here we go. I like this post from Harrison Ford, i get a townie feel from it. Mark Levinn made an early case on grack about his style of play being troll not meaning its scum.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=434275&currentpage=53#1054
IMO ji-ann-chu are clearly looking to connect the dots between what people are talking about, rather than string idle conversation.

While i like how mr. Svengali's playing the game so far, i'm finding it hard to read who yam ming thinks is scum. Jumanji are giving quit a bit of opinions with thought and reason.

Here we have a scum read
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=434275&currentpage=80#1583
Personally i found Mocsta at the time (with his case on me) looking for scum, just picked the wrong thing to focus on. The bit about Spaghetticus and mocsta i find interesting... And then the continued assult onto Mocsta
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=434275&currentpage=80#1589
Smurfs are slowly winning me over on mocsta.


So with the end of that, I can get behind Lilliputian reads on scum, and Brobdinagian reads on town. I'd be happy to call yahoos a strong town because of the way fish have been playing.

On November 18 2013 09:50 StorrZerg wrote:
Alakaslam
if you have an issue you can say something. should i go back to quotes and spoilers?

i don't see the point of making that kind of complaint when it is going to clutter the thread more rather than saying what you mean

On November 18 2013 09:41 StorrZerg wrote:

WITH REGARD TO ARTANIS?
Start off with a light townie read on you.
You have issues with SS, takes you a bit but you move past the issue. I don't really like how you brought it up, mafia is about fun, and its about trying to win as well. I think you over reacted to SS, you pushed to move on from the issue and directing it to push other for questions.

Yet you continue with the pointless talk about having fun ><
Moving past that..

I like the direction you are pushing with questions, struggling to find your own personal opinions atm
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=434275&currentpage=52#1028
Here we go. I like this post from you, i get a townie feel from it. You made an early case on grack about his style of play being troll not meaning its scum.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=434275&currentpage=53#1054
IMO you are clearly looking to connect the dots between what people are talking about, rather than string idle conversation.

While i like how your playing the game so far, i'm finding it hard to read who you think is scum. You are giving quit a bit of opinions with thought and reason.

Here we have a scum read
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=434275&currentpage=80#1583
Personally i found Mocsta at the time (with his case on me) looking for scum, just picked the wrong thing to focus on. The bit about Spaghetticus and mocsta i find interesting... And then the continued assult onto Mocsta
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=434275&currentpage=80#1589
You are slowly winning me over on mocsta.


So with the end of that, I can get behind your reads on scum, and your reads on town. I'd be happy to call you a strong town because of the way you have been playing.

On November 18 2013 09:51 supersoft wrote:



Second /piece/ of evidence:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=434275&user=Oatsmaster&view=all

one million questions, no follow-ups.
Only oneliners, no opinions on anything.
Questions are mostly pointless.
If he has no serious notes, he's scum

On November 18 2013 09:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Oh god Mocsta. That's a bad shot. Really bad.

On November 18 2013 09:53 Mocsta wrote:
Running behind schedule, works a bitch today and Im only up to p124.

Things I want to say before deadline.

---

(1) Artanis: You are tunneled.
Your issues with me are because I do not play the game the same way you choose to.
That is not an indicator of scum. Everyone that has played with me many times realises this is how I play town.
Further, all your reads on other players hinge upon their thought process on me. You should know association reads are terribad.
You are obsessed beyond reason.
Unfortunately, the way you walk people through your mindset makes me lean town.
You need to drop this; or if you can't, fine -- Accept there are other players in the game that *must* be scum and look there.

---

(2) Spag: You need to sleep more.
Your argument agianst me is that I played 3-4 games with you and should know you best, hence, should understand how you play as town/scum.

Yet, neither of us call recall the specific details of these games.
Fact: I have an opinion on my expectations for your play; however, I don't think for one second this is gospel. Its been 10-11months since we played together and this is your first game back.
If you want to know what I remember from the game we played together: Kush and his buddy got modkilled 1/2way through Day1 and I was left by myself in my first scum game ever. You came in as a replacement and hammed up your play style intentionally. Every decision was premeditated.

Thus, I questioned your actions with VE. My qualms were specifically as I had outlined. No more no less.

---

(3) Grack: Is still scum.
Im pretty disappointed my gracktease got shut down yesterday - however, I suppose it needs the support of the case to be more convincing to all.
I am not expecting to die, but on the off-chance something did happen.
Please read his filter this game, and compare to Hogwarts. I find the play worlds apart.
In Hogwarts Grack was useless and not confident in his assessments.
Here, Grack is still useless but his delurks are opportunistic and he is constantly jutting in with opinions but no justifications/evolutions.

---

(4) Storrzerg: I only had 1 bullet so may as well claim.

I vigg'd him. You can thank me Day2.

---

---

I'm under the pump already at work, so will prob unveil the Grack case tonight (say 12hrs from now)